Rip Hamilton won’t be suspended … yet
Not that I ever thought there was a chance he would be, but the NBA ruled that Rip Hamilton would not be suspended for his actions on Wednesday. From Chris McCosky in the Detroit News:
Pistons guard Richard Hamilton will not be suspended for his actions Wednesday night against the Bulls.
NBA spokesman Tim Frank said in an e-mail Thursday that the ejection would be the only action taken. Hamilton continued to stalk and have words with Bulls forward Tyrus Thomas after being ejected by referee Joey Crawford.
Hamilton has 15 technical fouls, one shy of a mandatory one-game suspension.
Between McCosky and the clowns in Blog-A-Bull's comment section, that's the third or fourth time I heard the word "stalked." Do we have to make it seem to predatory? Is this really the first time we've seen players get mad and instigate something?
I hate the fact Rip is so close to having the league activate the Sheed Rule on him (and I don't doubt it'll happen before the end of the year), but if he's going to get techs, I'd rather they come with altercations with the opposing team. I've never really bought in to the talk about the Pistons getting "fired up" after getting a tech for complaining too much ("Oh, you think I whine too much? I'll show you by hitting this three!"), but there's no doubt that the intensity picks up when players need to be separated.
(Disclaimer: this doesn't make Wednesday's techs any less stupid -- getting tossed in the fourth quarter when you're already down 23 is pointless, especially when it puts you one away from 16 on the season.)
Rivalry = entertaining.
Whining = boring.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I bet my girlfriend that there would be at least 3 technicals before the game started, she bet me that Rasheed would not get a technical. We both won, since there were double-technicals, and Rasheed did not get one. I watch Chicago all the time and any time they fall behind badly and Kirk doesn’t get calls his way, he gets too emotional and gets a technical. The Pistons are better at their mind game, they play a physical game, and Hamilton takes it a step further by messing with his opponent’s head.
As for the Bulls winning, there is one explanation for it: Ben Gordon did not play. Gordon is a terrible passer, he can’t make plays for anyone else, and he is their weakest defender. Without Gordon’s turnovers, The Pistons got less opportunities at the basket. The other factor is that Chicago played good defense and that lead to them being able to contain the Pistons.
by Player on Apr 5, 2007 2:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Is ‘stalked’ that bad a word? I thought it was descriptive, and more effective than ‘followed’. Sorry if it’s a bad connotation for Rip’s clean image.
by Matt, your friendly Bulls Blogger on Apr 5, 2007 3:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I didn’t understand what Rip was doing. Either punch the guy or get back to basketball. He was just following him around running his mouth. If you can’t separate competition and ill will, you don’t belong in the game.
by Pat Hunt on Apr 5, 2007 3:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
RIP definitely turned into “guy who needs an ass beating” for a few moments last night. I don’t mind his aggressiveness and will-to-win, but down 20-something, you’ve got 3 points, “mike, he’s been a legitimate non-factor in this ballgame, ok, alright”- stop f’ing talking and let it go… everyone in that building knows if tyrus thomas weren’t a rookie, and actually stood his ground or came back at RIP, the Ripster would have used that fame speed of his to run in the other direction faster than you can say Dr. Rahmani.
by wolf blitzer on Apr 5, 2007 4:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
At least last year proved regular season wins mean absolutely nothing. 3-1 records against Cleveland and Miami didn’t mean a whole lot when we fell behind 2-3 against the Cavs and were eliminated by the Heat. Hopefully Chicago’s blowing us out (twice) does give them a false sense of security. Those are about the only positives to take from last night. Definitely a game to forget! By the way, does anyone else think the Bulls are in a way tougher to play without Ben? Younger, quicker, more athletic, with everyone being a threat offensively and still good defensively?
Also, I do wish Rip would just PLAY. He’s my favorite guy, and it’s hard to see him get so frustrated. I used to say, “You never have to worry about Rip. He just loves the game so much and just has fun.” That’s not the case right now, but maybe Joe will have a talk with him and get him right.
by Trader Jac on Apr 5, 2007 5:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would be curious to know what Tyrus did to get himself ejected. What little I saw on TV didn’t reveal it. Anybody at the game have a take?
by Dr. Nick on Apr 6, 2007 10:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nick: It must have been for jawing with Hamilton — he didn’t look like he did too much trash talking, but it’s possible the little he did was heard by the ref and crossed the line.
Or, the ref may have just decided the hell with it and tossed them both even without just reason to end the whole situation. I’d buy either scenario.
by Matt Watson on Apr 6, 2007 11:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
“if tyrus thomas weren’t a rookie, and actually stood his ground or came back at RIP, the Ripster would have used that fame speed of his to run in the other direction faster than you can say Dr. Rahmani.”
Dr. Rahmani…holy smokes and WOW!!! LOL, ha ha ha!
by Q Dog on Apr 6, 2007 1:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












