Clippers @ Pistons Game Thread
Game tips at 8:00 pm ET
Los Angeles: 6-10 (2-5 road)
Margin -3.8
Pistons: 5-10 (3-3 home)
Margin:-2.7
Oppo research
It's a battle of the season's two most star-crossed teams. The new-look Clippers look quite a bit like the old-look Clippers after an injury has sidelined first overall pick Blake Griffin. Wednesday saw the return of up-and-comer Eric Gordon, who was producing before going down with a groin injury.
As usual, Chris Kaman has made a feast of other's famine. He is putting up career numbers in Griffin's absence, and Marcus Camby has performed competently, if unremarkably.
Like the Cavaliers, however, the Clippers are relying on an absurdly low opposing three-point percentage, which partly offsets turnovers and poor rebounding. As strange as it sounds for a team featuring perennial rebounding leaders Chris Kaman and Marcus Camby, the Clippers are 25th in rebounding rate. Too bad, considering Baron Davis seems to play as though his contract pays him by the brick.
The Drama:
Ummm. Didn't Chris Wilcox play for the Clippers? Maybe all the injured players can get together for a pre-game round of NBA 2k10.
Keys for Detroit
Manage something from the three point range: I have the feeling I can cut and paste this one for the rest of the year.
Get the ball in the hands of Baron Davis: This can be achieved by putting pressure on Eric Gordon, who is a much more efficient scorer, and not really a play-maker.
Sound the gong: Big Ben should have a field day in general, and the Pistons will need a strong rebounding and defensive effort to offset their injuries.
Question of the Game
Daye at the 2? It's like Nellie-ball in reverse. How about Kwame at the 1?
193 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
To my knowledge the Clippers are the only team to have their announcer suspended this season.
I thought it was a real shame because Lawler and Smith are the best thing about the Clippers.
Remember: First to 100 wins, its the law
Assuming that either team gets to 100 tonight
I see where the Pistons actually let Maxiell shoot some in their last game.
This guy’s game has definitely devolved since Flip got the the old heave ho.
I would suggest the Pistons trade him now, but I think that he is a Stone for life, at least his NBA life. Kind of a poor man’s Jeff Foster.
by Mike on Nov 27, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions
@Mike:
I would suggest the Pistons trade him now, but I think that he is a Stone for life, at least his NBA life. Kind of a poor man’s Jeff Foster.
So in short, basically you’re suggesting that we TRADE MAXIELL NOW?
by Mike Payne on Nov 27, 2009 2:04 PM EST reply actions
Man I’m so happy, Gordon’s ankle doesn’t look serious and Daye is getting the start!
http://twitter.com/detpistons
As I pointed out before, starting Bynum really makes no sense to me. You have zero bench presence, and you lose a lot of size and shooting ability from your backcourt and most importantly you lose a lot of ball movement. With a good zone (which shouldn’t be too tough against the Clippers, they’ve got as little outside shooting as we do with their injuries) this lineup can be as good or better than our more conventional lineup.
by bmr007 on Nov 27, 2009 6:50 PM EST reply actions
The semi-silver lining to all these injuries is the rooks getting some PT. But jeez, arguably the Pistons best three players are out.
by Toledo Joe on Nov 27, 2009 7:09 PM EST reply actions
I find it strange that nobody comments on Rip’s ankle sprain. Isn’t it the worst sprain ever? Did he break his ankle???? We could use a shooting guard right now…
by Brazil on Nov 27, 2009 8:14 PM EST reply actions
I can’t say that I’m anxious or happy to see all the rooks playing, because the circumstances are nasty.
But, it ought to be interesting to see what the young guys are made of.
I sincerely hope that we milk CV tonight. We gotta get some inside scoring.
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 8:14 PM EST reply actions
shit, can anyone remember the last time the Pistons started two rookies??? if anyone has the details, i’d love to know.
by Mike Payne on Nov 27, 2009 8:14 PM EST reply actions
despite being pissed that we lost gordon (yet another injury) im actually looking fwd to seeing how stuckey and CV respond… hopefully they show that they can carry the load
oh and anti-nellie ball should be fun haha, daye starting at the 2
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 8:17 PM EST reply actions
I think I just saw LawyerBoy in the stands in a Clippers uniform right behind Dunleavy.
by Mike Payne on Nov 27, 2009 8:20 PM EST reply actions
that Baron Davis call is one that Stuckey never gets going to the hoop.
by rban on Nov 27, 2009 8:26 PM EST reply actions
we’re getting out of stuckey what i’d hope we’d get, and bynum looks like he could have a bounce back game
we need to use CV though
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 8:32 PM EST reply actions
Blaha said a few minutes ago that Kander claims Rip’s ankle is at 90-95%, so it sounds like he’s almost there but they’re playing it pretty cautiously.
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 8:34 PM EST reply actions
The last time the Pistons started two rookies: Lindsey Hunter and Allan Houston on April 24th, 1994. Thanks, George!
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 8:34 PM EST reply actions
Man, when a guy like Steve Novak checks into the game, how do you not just take it right at him every single time? Look at the guy!
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 8:36 PM EST reply actions
for those not watching the game, Blaha just answered my question from above. The last time the Pistons started two rookies together? April of 1994.
by Mike Payne on Nov 27, 2009 8:36 PM EST reply actions
@ Garrett … he was talking aout bynum’s ankles, not rip’s
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 8:39 PM EST reply actions
@mannie32: Ah, that sucks. I thought for sure they were talking about Rip. I’m worse than TMZ!
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 8:43 PM EST reply actions
The Clips shot 62% in the first and only managed to tie us. With any luck, they’ll regress to the mean.
However, one thing I notice about the Pistons is they don’t pass with purpose. All passing is done in hopes that something works, not because someone spots a mismatch. When a pass is made for a reason, either it’s for a jump shot (which have been going in this game,) or it goes off a fingertip and out of bounds.
by Zachatollah on Nov 27, 2009 8:50 PM EST reply actions
http://www.atdhe.net/5549/watch-los-angeles-clippers-vs-detroit-pistons
If it disappears, just refresh it in a few minutes because it’ll come back.
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 9:04 PM EST reply actions
Will is having a bad shooting night again, but he has done a very good job distributing the ball.
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 9:04 PM EST reply actions
@ Mike… agreed, they need to show up at more games if jerebko is gonna continue playing like this
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 9:05 PM EST reply actions
Man, CV sure looks like Sheed when he shoots his 3’s.
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 9:07 PM EST reply actions
Daye at the 2? Let the Longball era begin! When Tay is healthy again put him back in starting at point guard. The team doesn’t run anyway so why not?
by joejoejoe on Nov 27, 2009 9:08 PM EST reply actions
Bynum looks to be back up to speed tonight, he’s flashing all over the place. Zach I agree, I noticed especially with Stuckey, he never really seems to spot mismatches or pass into the paint. It always seems just hand it off to the guy next to you. So while the ball is moving and everyone touches it, it doesn’t really open anyone up. The Cavs in the first quarter spanked us and showed what real ball movement is.
On a side note, does anyone else find it funny that FSN points out Bynum and CV for their scoring, and yet they are a combined 7 of 20 for 19. I would have definitely pointed out Stuckey and Jerebko, they’re shooting 11 of 17 for 24.
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 9:19 PM EST reply actions
The Clippers should trade Steve Novak. He’s a good offensive player and he’s just eating pine on a team with Kaman, Camby, and Blake Griffin. The guy has a career 60TS% and he barely gets any run. Trade him to Detroit for a plate of leftover turkey.
by joejoejoe on Nov 27, 2009 9:20 PM EST reply actions
what the fuck? Why do the refs hate Jonas? He can’t even stand around without being called for a foul
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 9:33 PM EST reply actions
Can we bring back the replacement refs? At least they were consistently calling bullshit calls on both sides.
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 9:34 PM EST reply actions
Man Stuck has caught fire.
But can you imagine, how bad would we be without Ben Wallace?
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 9:37 PM EST reply actions
As much as I hate Stuckey’s head-down drives, he really does get smashed almost every time he goes to the rim.
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 9:38 PM EST reply actions
Are you fucking kidding me? How do we have 6 free throws to their 20?
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 9:38 PM EST reply actions
Does Austin Daye remind anyone else of those Kamino cloners from the second star wars prequel? His arms are impossibly long.
Also, I’m pretty sure Baron Davis is the bastard child of an Egyptian Pharaoh and Abraham Lincoln.
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 9:47 PM EST reply actions
Hustle hustle hustle, no one can shoot a damn but, lots of hard work.
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 9:54 PM EST reply actions
this wouldn´t be a goal tend with lebron blocking the shot
by jay_uno on Nov 27, 2009 9:56 PM EST reply actions
Our players should’nt have to sign hundreds of autographs b4 a game.
by scntfc on Nov 27, 2009 9:56 PM EST reply actions
@ scntfc hahahaha i swear i was thinking the same damn thing
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:02 PM EST reply actions
seems like fox sports detroit is having dicknicle tefficulties. anybody watching a stream still getting the game?
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:05 PM EST reply actions
Dayum! Gerald Wallace just had a conniption fit against the clippers. 31,14.
by scntfc on Nov 27, 2009 10:07 PM EST reply actions
hey go to nba.com and you can get the audio feed, its free but you have to sign up (no credit card required)
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:07 PM EST reply actions
pistons now down by 5, according to Rick Mahorn refs are still making bad calls
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:09 PM EST reply actions
If a basketball game is being played, but nobody can see it, does it really happen?
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:10 PM EST reply actions
im pissed… i pay for league pass and i cant see shit, why fuck up the 4th quarter too… complete bullshit
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:11 PM EST reply actions
pistons now down by 5, according to Rick Mahorn refs are still making bad calls
In other news, the sky is still blue.
:)
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:12 PM EST reply actions
Two great plays from Stuckey to Jerebko, 86-84, JJ has a free throw coming up
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:12 PM EST reply actions
It’s ok, I just watch the game for the commercials anyways. And that shot of the automotion dancers’ asses earlier.
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:13 PM EST reply actions
according to yahoo sports’ boxscore i missed a stuckey to jerebko alley-oop dunk? fuck this!
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:14 PM EST reply actions
did anyone see Bosh curl up into the fetal position when pierce dunked on him?
by scntfc on Nov 27, 2009 10:15 PM EST reply actions
Bosh was just trying to go to his happy place.
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions
league pass is brutal…. how can they just not show the 4th
by rban on Nov 27, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions
jerebko hits a 3!!!! (but again i didnt get to see any of this)
really pissed, have i said that already? i stayed home on a friday night to watch 3 quarters of basketball??
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions
It must be a problem with the camera’s at the palace, because neither fox or nba has a working feed (unless if league pass just takes the fsn feed?)
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:17 PM EST reply actions
league pas takes from the fsn feed… but still
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:18 PM EST reply actions
Im pretty angry that I can’t see the arrival of Jonas Jerebko.
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 10:18 PM EST reply actions
I’m angry that we’re down because of a big free throw disparity
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:19 PM EST reply actions
And of course the only fouls Stuck seems to get from these refs is the offensive kind.
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 10:19 PM EST reply actions
so what exactly is the fox showing?? on league pass they just sent it to this boxscore screen that they put on during halftime
curious as to what the fuck fsn is showing on their feed?
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:19 PM EST reply actions
footage of sheed shooting two 3 balls at once, now they’re on a chuck daly pistons in focus rerun
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:21 PM EST reply actions
FSD is showing random Pistons clips, interviews, etc.
Mickey was on a second ago saying they had lost their signal from the Palace.
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:21 PM EST reply actions
assholes… im probably equally pissed that according to the boxscore we’re losing now, and could potentially lose to the clippers… oh how this friday night has turned sour
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:22 PM EST reply actions
At least Jerebko is finally getting some decent calls from the refs. It seems that even if he just stands around, he’s called for a foul
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:22 PM EST reply actions
WTF??? FSN is linked to the Palace screen? What’s going on???
by Yahtzee on Nov 27, 2009 10:23 PM EST reply actions
my 95 yr old great aunt is prolly banging her cane on the side of the tv wondering what the hell is going on
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:23 PM EST reply actions
Finally, feed is back up!
About time we start seeing decent passes from Stuckey too.
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:23 PM EST reply actions
Hahaha I think they may have hooked it up to the Palace screen… crafty bastards
by Yahtzee on Nov 27, 2009 10:24 PM EST reply actions
DAMMIT THEY CUT TO COMMERCIAL JUST AS THE AUTOMOTION DANCERS WERE GONNA SHOW US THE GOODS
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:25 PM EST reply actions
league pass still hasnt caught the feed for some reason…
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:25 PM EST reply actions
just got back over heree on my league pass too… sweet
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:27 PM EST reply actions
Gosh, I can’t even see the scoreboard on this lousy FSD coverage.
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:29 PM EST reply actions
YYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!
Finally, legit ball movement!
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:29 PM EST reply actions
Jonas with the nice bounce pass to big ben
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:29 PM EST reply actions
JJ is doing everything I thought he was capable of.
I think he’s going to prove to be an enormous steal as a 2nd rounder.
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:30 PM EST reply actions
MAKE NOISE NOW!!
And of course, they missed an entire Clips possession. Good God, I’m actually paying for this lousy coverage.
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:31 PM EST reply actions
hahahahaha make some noise baby!
i hope we pull this one out, or i may be suicidal tonight between a loss to the clippers and missing out on much of the 4th quarter including alley-oop pass by stuckey
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:32 PM EST reply actions
Whoa, fire in the truck! Love to see Kaman playing well as a fellow Chippewa, but not against my Pistons. When this team is healthy, look out.
by Yahtzee on Nov 27, 2009 10:34 PM EST reply actions
I bet that when we trade for Kaman he will go ahead and suck ass.
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 10:34 PM EST reply actions
Man, all I can say is…
TRADE REFS NOW!
I tell you, at least the replacement refs gave both sides a lot of free throws. The free throw disparity was 21-6 at one point, if you even that out, Detroit would have had a solid 10 point lead and cruised through the fourth.
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:36 PM EST reply actions
Hey all, just got home and checked out the box score (and turned on the game…ugh). I see JJ got 22 points. wow. Has he been really good? 8-11 and 4-4 from beyond the arc says he did extremely well. Also 16 boards from Ben is nice, but I see that Bynum had another horrible shooting night. Did Bynum look slow again?
by Cody on Nov 27, 2009 10:36 PM EST reply actions
Man, Stuck only managed 2 FTAs tonight … with as much as he attacks the rim, it’s amazing he doesn’t shoot more FTs.
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:36 PM EST reply actions
might be too late (for this season anyway) by the time everyone gets healthy… they havent even given a timetable for the return of rip and tay, and who knows about gordon… this is as low as it gets, unless ur the nets
fuck
but i agree, at least for next season we know we have some nice pieces if we stay healthy
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:36 PM EST reply actions
dunno how the fans at the palace could be all smiles… im definitely not in the best of moods right now
by mannie32 on Nov 27, 2009 10:38 PM EST reply actions
“dunno how the fans at the palace could be all smiles… im definitely not in the best of moods right now”
They got to see the fourth quarteR?
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:38 PM EST reply actions
Anybody else think will has been attempting way to many cuts to the basket?
by Brandeaux on Nov 27, 2009 10:38 PM EST reply actions
Cody,
Bynum didn’t appear slow to me. But he sure didn’t shoot well. I suspect it’s linked to not having 100% springs
by brgulker on Nov 27, 2009 10:39 PM EST reply actions
JJ was unbelieveable. CV on the other hand, was meh at best. He needed to step up and instead dissappeared. Ohh and lets not forget how Stuckey basically camped out in Camby’s forearms and yet got just one foul call.
Bynum was actually very quick tonight. His problem is that teams have figured him out. I said this earlier, I don’t think he can be a franchise player because he’s just a slightly quicker version of Stuckey that is new to most teams and is a much better finisher as a result. As it is, I think Rodney has a better midrange jumpshot and he will continue to get better. Will on the other hand is in his prime.
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:41 PM EST reply actions
Is it good or is it bad that I still feel good about this team after 7 straight losses?
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 10:43 PM EST reply actions
I still feel great about this team. They at least try, which is better than some of the mail-it-in half-hearted performances we saw from the old crew.
by Vinny Chase on Nov 27, 2009 10:49 PM EST reply actions
From what I’ve heard, Gordon should be back in 2-3 games.
If that’s the case, I think I’d rather have Daye start in his place. Gordon will be much more effective against other team’s bench players, not to mention no one will be able to shoot over Daye. He did a pretty damn good job on defense if you ask me, so really, unless if he’s going up against someone of Wade’s strength or Ray Allan’s mobility, he should be fine.
The spacing was great tonight, anyone with a decent post game could have dominated. Bynum and Rodney even had a very surprising 16 assists despite how little offense they had to work with.
by bmr on Nov 27, 2009 10:50 PM EST reply actions
It’s tough going right now. Ask a team to lose 3 of their top 3-4 players and see what happens. My fear is this: that we’ll bury ourselves early, make a late push and either barely scrape in or end up with the 13th or 14th pick in the draft. We’re getting pretty close to a crossroads to which way our season is going to head. Is it already a lost season, where rookies will play heavy minutes and veterans will be either reduced or traded? Or do we wait and see what this team can do healthy and make moves accordingly?
It’s going to be a tough call for Dumars, because at 5-11, this team is only ahead of 3-4 teams in the league. We’re just as close to the bottom of the league as we are the 8th seed, and it might not be worth it. On the flip side, does Dumars want to tell his team it’s OK to tank and that their hard work isn’t going to be rewarded? It’s potentially demoralizing to a team, especially one that works hard like this one does.
Decisions, decisions. I do not envy Dumars here, because he’s already taken heat for some of his more recent deals.
by Terrence Lynch on Nov 27, 2009 10:57 PM EST reply actions
I don’t think Daye does a good job defensively, but he looks like a very capable offensive player.
What I hope they can take from this game is that if they (our pgs) show some confidence in our rooks (by passing them the ball from time to time) and the rooks can find some confidence in themselves (by taking the open shot) good things can happen.
by Kriz on Nov 27, 2009 10:58 PM EST reply actions
Kriz: I feel pretty good about them too. The effort is refreshing, and the record would be a lot better if it weren’t for some bad breaks/calls/luck.
by Michael on Nov 27, 2009 10:59 PM EST reply actions
Amazing that we got such high ast. #s from our pgs when JJ was the only one who could fill it up. take away him and Ben, and our team shot 25-3% for the night. And yeah I like the thought of Daye starting over BG… at least on an experimental basis.
by scntfc on Nov 27, 2009 11:03 PM EST reply actions
We got screwed by the refs tonight. In other news I managed to yell at some dickheads in front of me :)
by Laughton on Nov 27, 2009 11:32 PM EST reply actions
It also feels like defenses are finally adjusting and planning for Will Bynum, which is partially why he’s struggling right now. The injury obviously doesn’t help.
by Terrence Lynch on Nov 27, 2009 11:32 PM EST reply actions
I don’t like the thought of Daye starting over BG at all. Why would anyone do this? Daye is an unproven rookie with decent looking offensive skills, but Ben Gordon has been a monster for us, dominating games all by himself. Sure, he could score against the other team’s bench, but I’d rather have him score against the other team’s starters while Daye cheers from the sidelines for now. Daye would get lit up by a lot of savvy SG vets, even though his arms are 17 feet long.
by Garrett on Nov 27, 2009 11:53 PM EST reply actions
BG often gets lit up by other shooting gaurds as well. other than Bynum, our second unit is kinda lackluster offensively. this would at least alleviate some of the pressure that he’s been getting lately.
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 12:16 AM EST reply actions
And yeah I like the thought of Daye starting over BG… at least on an experimental basis.
facepalm
by Mike Payne on Nov 28, 2009 12:29 AM EST reply actions
Asking BG to come off the bench is like asking Iverson come off the bench! I mean, look at his resume! We talkin’ bout starting, man. Starting.
by Garrett on Nov 28, 2009 12:35 AM EST reply actions
i think that once rips back bg should come off the bench, but behind daye, well that just seems kinda silly. daye doesnt provide an upgrade on offense or defense. if we had a defensive minded sg to start, like afflalo or dahntay jones then i would agree but daye wont be setting any sort of tone on o or d and will get burned by any sg that is stronger or quicker and there is quite a few of those.
by dandresden on Nov 28, 2009 1:47 AM EST reply actions
@scntf:
facepalm
good logic.
super cool comeback bro. daye over bg187911bbq is not a smart idea, hence the facepalm.
by Mike Payne on Nov 28, 2009 2:13 AM EST reply actions
Uh, starting Austin Daye? Starting Summers?
What is DBB coming to?
Our starting five as is has limited offense. When Gordon gets back, it will get better. To bring BG off the bench when he’s healthy and start Daye gives us only 2 legitimate scorers in the starting lineup.
It will not work.
by brgulker on Nov 28, 2009 9:43 AM EST reply actions
I agree with the idea that watching this year’s team lose 6 in a row is much more enjoyable than watching last year’s team win 4 in a row. All the hustle and heart is awesome, even if we are losing. Last year, somehow even the wins were depressing. I haven’t had this much fun watching basketball since we won in ’04.
by Bugman on Nov 28, 2009 10:13 AM EST reply actions
Being that Daye started this game, and that Jerebko did exceptionally well offensively. Makes it that much more logical for BG to come off of the bench.
Bynum’s game suffers tremendously when he is the only scoring option off of the bench. BG has started how many games? and we have won how many games during that stretch?
It appears to me that “some” of our fellow DBB posters have subscribed to the adage that repeating the same mistakes will produce different results. How many games do we have to lose before someone says this is getting old?
We’ve been losing games. Bynum needs another “vet” on the second unit. time to try something new. We may even get a few breakout games from some of our rooks. just ask JJ.
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 12:15 PM EST reply actions
I am all for bringing BG off the bench…when Rip gets back. Before then, we will start him (if he can play). No question
by Cody on Nov 28, 2009 12:37 PM EST reply actions
Whether the pistons have BG starting or coming off the bench may not make much difference the way he plays,as long as the rookies are showing progress I say play them .Were rapidly approaching the point where we need to focus on next year ,we need to keep Daye in the starting 2 spot until Rip’s back ,bringing BG off the bench ,where he belongs unless Rip’s traded,will get us started on building the bench we’re eventually gonna roll with .Were not going anywhere this year we might as well look to the future.
by Defor on Nov 28, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions
When the luck runs out … it really runs out for Detroit.
Whoever says this basketball is more exciting than the years prior to last year … needs therapy.
Rodney Stuckey still hasn’t developed an outside shot, and teams know he’s going to the hoop. It’s year 3, 16 games notched, and I’m wondering if Rodney will ever be more than a 25-30 mpg bench star … a 2nd Microwave.
by Sauce1977 on Nov 28, 2009 1:20 PM EST reply actions
Qualification: Losing this year feels better than treading water with AI last year because that guy is only surpassed by players like LeBron and Jordan for the Douchebag Kingdom. AI was a Prince of Douches.
by Sauce1977 on Nov 28, 2009 1:42 PM EST reply actions
Sauce +1…remember when we won seven in a row, John Hollinger called it the “worst seven game winning streak of all time” ?
The present really sucks right now, but the future is looking pretty good.
by V on Nov 28, 2009 2:17 PM EST reply actions
On the bright side, at least when Gordon says he’s willing to come off the bench, he’s not lying through his teeth.
by Skylar on Nov 28, 2009 3:30 PM EST reply actions
“We’re not going anywhere this year we might as well look to the future.”
Especially since we can’t buy a game by sticking to protocol. at this point any experiment is a good experiment. In JJ’s post game the key thing he said was he built up some confidence.22 and 5 in 34 minutes? 4-4 from outside 8-11 overall. confidence works wonders for rookies.
13 and 5 from Daye? better #s than what Butler put up.
Untill we are healthy as a team, Our best bet is to continue to put our rooks in situations that build confidence as opposed to playing lineups that “some” think will win games.WE HAVE NOT WON WITH BG STARTING. Come playoff time/next season it is all for naught if we cant depend on our bench due to them being timid, or issues with confidence.
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 4:02 PM EST reply actions
I was looking at draft express’s mock draft, and I think this guy could be a second round steal
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Artsiom-Parakhouski-5690/
He’s averaging 25 and 15 so far and it looks like he’s played professional ball in europe before. He’s in a small conference, hence the low pick, but he’s got pretty good numbers against good competition – nothing jaw dropping, but hey, if we could snag him in the second round…
by bmr007 on Nov 28, 2009 4:51 PM EST reply actions
*my mistake, he’s from europe, but actually has very basketball experience. That changes things quite a bit, but he must have a good level of natural talent to put up these numbers.
by bmr007 on Nov 28, 2009 4:52 PM EST reply actions
@scntfc:
Bynum’s game suffers tremendously when he is the only scoring option off of the bench.
Simply not true. Bynum has his most productive stretches when he’s paired with the rooks, maxiell and kwame (see game flows: http://popcornmachine.net/?team=DET). His 1-on-1 game is his best skill set, and the other players on the court only effect spacing— ironically, MFWB finds holes no matter how tight the lane is.
BG has started how many games? and we have won how many games during that stretch?
This phrase always bugged me, but I can’t think of a better one: Correlation does not equal causation. BG has started one less game than CV, Stuckey and Ben Wallace. The one game he didn’t start is the only game this season that we’ve been 100% healthy.
Pinning these losses on Ben Gordon starting is like blaming a wheel when your engine dies.
On starting Daye over BG:
Unless injuries demand this, it is a terrible idea. I can’t believe I’d actually have to explain why— you’d have to look hard and deep to find any logic that supports starting Daye over our team’s absolute best player.
And if your concerns are about scoring options in our second unit, our problems are absolutely not in the backcourt.
by Mike Payne on Nov 28, 2009 5:00 PM EST reply actions
how many games have we won with daye in the starting line up?
by dandresden on Nov 28, 2009 5:40 PM EST reply actions
Just read that Gordon might be back tomorrow. Rip, on the other hand, looks to be out for a while.
by Toledo Joe on Nov 28, 2009 7:59 PM EST reply actions
@Mike Payne, good points. But again Bynum’s game has been suffering lately. What would you attribute that to? minutes? defenses being able to focus “solely” on him? Fatigue from feeling the necessity to carry?
Our losses don’t fall squarely on BG’s shoulders, it’s more of a team thing. Almost all of our games have been decided in the 3rd qtr. logisticly Ben coming off of the bench helps that cause in some way.
Bynum’s productivity may be good when paired with the rooks. but, usually he is the only one that is productive. Max has been spotty and Kwame has regressed for lack of a better term. Being short handed as we are the only way we will get some Ws is if we get production from the rookies. They have been most productive as starters.
dandresden,
yeah, un hunh, ok. Daye has started how many games? what kind of #s did he put up against the clippers? click on the box score for that game, look at the league avg for shooting gaurds. then present your case.
In your previous post you were talking about Rip. Now if Rip was back we wouldn’t even be in this quandry, now would we? what’s your point?
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 8:12 PM EST reply actions
@scntfc:
But again Bynum’s game has been suffering lately. What would you attribute that to?
He’s had two bad games. Two bad games is too small a sample size analyze. There are way too many variables to account for and not enough data to show a meaningful trend— in five, six games, we might have something more to look at. If we worry about every two game stretch in which a player performs poorly, we’d need to start a new blog just to account for all that meaningless analysis.
by Mike Payne on Nov 28, 2009 8:26 PM EST reply actions
I don’t think Rip will be back for a least another 2 weeks Tay probably a month.We can go back to starting BG and our back court will go back to carring us .On nights when 3 of the 4 of the group Stuckey,CV,BG and WB are on, we’ll win a few .If Qster can keep us playing solid defense we’ll be in every game ,but by the time we have everyone healthy we’ll be 8 to 12 games under 500 imop.Does putting BG back in the starting line up ,over Daye or whoever,give us the best chance to win,this year yes,but given the choice of hanging with teams stealing one now and then or moving BG to the bench rolling with Daye at the 2 and excepting the growing pains,I’ll take the latter.The fastest way is often the bumpiest path.
by Defor on Nov 28, 2009 8:38 PM EST reply actions
Maybe ben Gordon starting isn’t the reason we lost those games. Maybe its because we played 5 pretty good teams in a row. You think if we started daye and brought gordon off the bench that would have totally disrupted the other teams gameplans and got us the win? as for what I said about rip I believe i said that bg coming off the bench behind rip makes sense but starting date over him just doesnt make sense to me.
by dandresden on Nov 28, 2009 8:43 PM EST reply actions
My point about starting Daye is , the #s he put up against the Clips are slightly above avg for shooting gaurds. It makes perfect sense that Daye would be more productive as a starter then he would a reserve because he is anchored by better players.
BG? It doesn’t matter where you put him. he is going to do what he does. He is an established player that knows his role and his #s will always be consistent.Too bad we don’t have a measuring stick at this juncture, but Daye seems like a better defender than BG. If Rip was healthy we wouldn’t be having this discussion. He has always been the obvious choice for SG.
“Maybe its because we played 5 pretty good teams in a row.”
and we will get beat by 5 more teams until we
1. get healthy
2. get production from our rookies. We have gotten that production when they have been able to start and build confidence. BG has shown that he can/will put up the same #s regardless of when he comes into the game.
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 9:11 PM EST reply actions
The little Piston that never was…
"I never understand why people are still talking about me as the second pick," Milicic said. "But I never got a chance to play. Why take me as the second pick if you’re not going to play me for three years? They never let me get a chance. I still don’t get it … I never asked to be the second pick. I just wanted to play basketball."
http://www.interbasket.net/news/2009/11/28/darko-milicic-is-ready-to-return-to-europe/
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 9:51 PM EST reply actions
Kind of off topic, but FSN lost the game feed last night when there was a fire in the production truck. Sometimes bad luck just hits…maybe this is on topic.
by mountaineermac on Nov 28, 2009 9:59 PM EST reply actions
I actually have a Larry Brown autographed Darko jersey, how ironic is that.
by rban on Nov 28, 2009 10:00 PM EST reply actions
dandresden
I think a big reason why we lost those 5 games is because of fatigue. I brought up playing Daye at the 2 back then as a way to take some stress off our guards minutes. I think we’d get the most production from Gordon going against the other team’s bench, however at this point our starting lineup has very little firepower. CV really needs to step it up, I’d like to see him averaging at least 20 points in this stretch.
Regardless of where you play Gordon, I think Daye should get at least 15 minutes a game at the 2. We simply can’t use the 3 guard lineup with only 3 guards; playing them 40 minutes on back to backs is why we were miserable in Portland and Phoenix. Phoenix we had no chance, but Utah looked winnable until the 4th. I believe Bynum and Gordon had a total of 6 turnovers in that quarter alone, that comes from pure exhaustion. And quite frankly Portland is above average this year, that should have been a much closer game. But once again, exhaustion was a big factor.
My main point is that we can’t play Gordon, Bynum and Stuckey 40+ every night. 37 or so should be the upper limit of average playing time, and Daye can help with that. Or we have to scrap small ball until Rip comes back, which might be a realistic idea. Our defense stinks and offense isn’t good enough to compensate. Perhaps with a higher tempo it would play to our strengths, but we just don’t get enough outside shooting to have 2 slashers.
by bmr on Nov 28, 2009 10:06 PM EST reply actions
@MP:
You probably shouldn’t engage people who write stuff like this:
Our losses don’t fall squarely on BG’s shoulders, it’s more of a team thing. Almost all of our games have been decided in the 3rd qtr. logisticly Ben coming off of the bench helps that cause in some way.I have no idea what that means.
by Colin on Nov 28, 2009 10:12 PM EST reply actions
Colin, maybe its your level of comprehension. being that you have brought nothing of merit to the conversation at hand. So let me break it down for you, because I stand by what I said.
someone insinuated that I cant blame BGs performance for our losses.
Almost all of our games have been decided in the 3rd qtr."
If BG doesn’t start and comes off of the bench, that means his/and the teams play will be that much more potent during the third. As several posters have mentioned the fatigue of him and other gaurds.
Logistics: the planning, implementation, and coordination of the details of a business or other operation.
BG being who he is, and his level of play within an alotted amount of minutes regardless of where he starts means that he would make our 2nd unit better as opposed to depending on Daye to do so.
by scntfc on Nov 28, 2009 10:32 PM EST reply actions
Dude, nobody likes the grammar police, but proper punctuation and sentence structure makes it easier for your audience to understand your argument.
Also, I’m not really understanding how bringing BG off the bench would make us more potent in the third. Wouldn’t the starting SG play more minutes in the third? Or is your point that our guards would simply be more rested by having a 4th guard? That really has nothing to do with who starts, though, so I’m still confused.
BG being who he is, and his level of play within an alotted amount of minutes regardless of where he starts means that he would make our 2nd unit better as opposed to depending on Daye to do so.This is the kind of unintelligible bullshit I’m talking about. Seriously, I think your 9th grade English teacher is crying in shame somewhere. And I realize that I’m being a dick, but I’m getting tired of reading this stream of consciousness nonsense. Put a little thought into your comments and most people will respond thoughtfully.
by Colin on Nov 28, 2009 11:01 PM EST reply actions
two words that work for this team: Tall Ball.
The opposite of small ball. I haven’t run the numbers but I’d be interested to see what the collective +/- is when you have stuckey or bynum matched up with daye, jerebko, CV, and Ben Wallace. I feel like going with tall ball has given us a really strong 2-3 zone since we have the length to cover the 3 while packing in the middle to prevent slashers, etc.
enjoyable though. The two swedish dudes in the stands were great. I wish I could have seen Jerebko’s dominance. Looking forward to tomorrow’s game.
by James B. on Nov 28, 2009 11:18 PM EST reply actions
@Colin:
You probably shouldn’t engage people who write stuff like this
Very, very good point.
“BG being who he is, and his level of play within an alotted amount of minutes regardless of where he starts means that he would make our 2nd unit better as opposed to depending on Daye to do so.”
—This is the kind of unintelligible bullshit I’m talking about. Seriously, I think your 9th grade English teacher is crying in shame somewhere. And I realize that I’m being a dick, but I’m getting tired of reading this stream of consciousness nonsense. Put a little thought into your comments and most people will respond thoughtfully.
Win, win, win. + 1,000. Beyond the incomprehensible language, it’s the “say dumb shit then skirt around the issue when someone calls you on it” that bugs me. DBB has always had a “no layups” rule when it comes to comments. If someone says shit like “you people secretly want dujuan summers to fail” or “it’s gordon’s fault, we should start daye instead”, someone better speak the hell up. If that shit goes unchecked, we might as well be a youtube comment thread.
by Mike Payne on Nov 29, 2009 12:22 AM EST reply actions
And the news keeps getting better my DBB friends. Three important players are out, the Hawks are in town to give us a good whupping, and small ball might be about to make it’s return.
http://www.freep.com/article/20091129/SPORTS03/911290465/1051/rss16
I don’t care what the logic is. Much like violence against women, there is no excuse for small ball. If we wanted to see that shit we could have left Curry in charge.
by SadPanda on Nov 29, 2009 10:27 AM EST reply actions
SadPanda:
Thanks for the link. While I thought Gordon might be back today, the “small ball” issue is more important. I don’t like small ball at all, and small ball with Tay at the 4 is THE WORST type of small ball. Worse, say, than Rip or Stuckey at the 3 for brief periods with two legit bigs — and I don’t even like that.
I guess you could say that having two many decent SFs is not the worst problem to have, but I would have thought we would have learned last year that a player — say, Tayshaun — can be very effective at the 3 but a liability at the 4.
Just more evidence of what everyone already knows: while Detroit has some very good players and some young’uns showing potential, the roster is seriously unbalanced and we need a trade.
by Toledo Joe on Nov 29, 2009 11:28 AM EST reply actions
P.S. Bonus points to SadPanda for the violence against women analogy.
by Toledo Joe on Nov 29, 2009 11:28 AM EST reply actions
From the quotes, it doesn’t seem Kuester is that into having Tay at the four spot. He basically says “Yeah, I guess, but we have to get him healthy first.” It sounds like speculation on behalf of the writer. The fact that Tay was just injured should play into it to. Thats a rough spot for him to play, especially if he got out of shape at all. I would rather put JJ out there as a big, since thats apparently what they want him to be eventually anyway.
by Drew on Nov 29, 2009 11:47 AM EST reply actions
Re: new Fanhouse post on ’What’s the matter with Portland?’
I definitely see Portland making a move after Dec. 15th when they can trade newly signed free agents. There are a ton of mix-and-match possibilities between Detroit and Portland that I think would help both teams. I don’t want to speculate on personnel mid-season but most of the trades would probably involve getting a true PG from Portland. Portland has too much depth on their team and Detroit has too little so I can see a 3-for-2 deal or 2-for-1 deal happening, with Portland getting slightly better ‘win now’ talent and Detroit getting either better potential and/or some cap flexibility in the near term.
by joejoejoe on Nov 29, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions
I want a big man with a legit post offense game (and hopefully, some defense) way before I want a true point guard.
by Toledo Joe on Nov 29, 2009 12:13 PM EST reply actions
Small ball makes me cry, I have hated it when it is 3 guards and two bigs, I will hate it more if it is 3 guards, Tay and a big. I know this team is unbalanced but that is putting yourself in a position to lose. Terrible, just terrible.
The ideas being thrown around are kind of funny, some people suggest Bynum should start over Stuckey, others that Daye should start over Gordon and I just read a reporter suggest that Maxiell may start over Charlie. I think all of the above are bad ideas, but if you put it all together you got:
Wallace/Maxiell/Jerebko/Daye and Bynum…you hear that? That is the sound of our opponents shaking in fear.
by Kriz on Nov 29, 2009 12:23 PM EST reply actions
@Toledo Joe:
I want a big man with a legit post offense game (and hopefully, some defense) way before I want a true point guard.
Aaaaaaagreed. Good thing we didn’t… make a trade for… boozer. walks away, hangs head in shame
by Mike Payne on Nov 29, 2009 12:38 PM EST reply actions
Mike payne, I never said it was BGs fault. and I never skirted an issue. thats exactly why half of the posts in any given thread are between us going back and forth. At one point you said you would ignore me. a few threads back I asked you to do so.
Why pay any attention to something so diametrically opposed to what you think.
It’s not my fault that any opinion outside of your own is deemed incomprehensible. If I make 5 different posts, saying that we know what BG brings to the table, He’s gonna bring that where ever we put him, How is that blaming him? If I say that any unrealistic expectation on a player is a desire for said player to fail then what did I say wrong there?
I’m not here to hurl insults. it’s kinda childish.
we can go back and forth about intelligence all day, But in reality maturity is the issue at hand.
by scntfc on Nov 29, 2009 12:39 PM EST reply actions
And wow, Boozer has 3.4 assists per game on the season— better than our starting Point Guard. In the last five, dude has put up 5 apg.
@scntf:
yet another facepalm — Colin was right, I give up.
by Mike Payne on Nov 29, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions

by 












