Leetastic: Pistons Drop Another One
ed. note: I should preface this by noting that I am just getting accustomed to the robust functionality here at SBNation, so my apologies if I accidentally embed a video of Surprised Kitty or something.
What Happened
The Pistons lost their seventh eighth straight game, during which no Piston player registered a positive +/- rating. The frontcourt minutes were curiously distributed, with an ailing Charlie V. getting only 12 minutes off the bench, less than even Chris Wilcox. Meanwhile, David Lee torched Detroit for 30 and 12. Did I mention this was a home game? Great.
The Good
Ben Gordon had a nice game off the bench, registering 17 points off of just nine shots. Also, while the Pistons weren't quite at full strength, the more games the team gets under its belt with its full compliment of players, the quicker Coach Kuester can divvy minutes appropriately.
The Bad
Everything else. Charlie V. was held scoreless, and expressed confusion about his lack of minutes. Rip Hamilton is still (hopefully) shaking off cobwebs. The team continued its recent trend of being unable to find scoring. All of this against a starting lineup featuring (in addition to Lee) Wilson Chandler, Jared Jeffries, Danilo Gallinari, and Chris Duhon.
The MVP
Gordon by a country mile. On a night when Rip and Stuckey combined for 31 points on 24 shots, BG was a model of efficiency.
The John Long Unsung Hero
The Takeaway
Unless you believe that Rip, Tay and BG make this team worse, you have to allow for the fact that this team hasn't played together very much. That said, the losses are piling up, and even though 38 wins might land a playoff spot, Detroit is going to have to play at an above .500 clip to get there.
Elsewhere in the NBA
- The Cavs dominated the Hawks, in Atlanta, despite only getting 14 points from LeBron James. Of course, LeBron also added 10 assists, eight rebounds and five steals, but the Cavs are starting to look scary again.
- David West suddenly remembered he's kind of a big deal. He netted a career high 44 points in a losing effort against Team MIT, while Chris Paul added a triple-double.
- Kobe Bryant also scored 44, but it's not as cool when he does it.
- I'm not sure I knew Theo Ratliff played for the Spurs, but it doesn't surprise me. That team is some kind of grizzled.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That cat is cute...
and really that’s all I have to say because frankly, I’m a little scared to see box scores at this point.
My Music: Now on last.fm!!
My Blog: Inside A Head
Identity
The team needs an identity at this point. They need to pick SOMETHING and get really good at it. I’d prefer it be defense, but heck, I’d settle for some way to get some points as well.
I THOUGHT this team was already pretty good at defense, but after the last 8 games, it’s apparent that they only play in spurts and seem to only knuckle down when they are about 15 points behind.
The offense has been pretty brutal as well. For all the shooters that the Pistons have at this point (Hamilton, Gordon, and CV31), NONE of them are able to hit the broad sign of a barn door right now. The team is shooting so many bricks, they have an entire NEIGHBORHOOD built at this point.
The Knicks are not a good defensive team, but they simply packed the paint and made the Pistons shoot from the outside. It worked like a charm. The Pistons MUST make some outside shots to open up the middle.
Oh, and get Wilcox out of the rotation, Q-star. Give us more Maxiell or even Kwame. Wontcox is awful.
One last thing: why didn’t the Pistons want David Lee in the offseason. Someone please remind me why that was, because I know we talked about it and most of us seemed ok with it, but after last night I can no longer recall. Someone please tell me it wasn’t because we needed the money to sign Chris Wilcox.
by Big Z in Orlando on Dec 30, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions
Run a play maybe?
Our offensive ails can be boiled down to one thing, IMO: our propensity to play one-on-one basketball.
Last night, everyone was guilty. Stuckey, Tay, Rip, Ben Wallace (yes, he attacked off the dribble. Weird), and on the list goes.
Coach Q, please call a play. Call a timeout if you have to. Drill it into Rodney’s head that even though everyone thinks he’s a combo guard, he’s still responsible for initiating offensive sets when he’s on the floor at PG.
Get Rip moving off screens. Get players moving off the ball. And for pete’s sake, move the ball so the defense is forced to move and adjust.
We are entirely one-dimensional right now, and that’s just too easy to defend given our personnel.
agreed
when the team was winning, it was largely based on 1-on-1 ball, but the successful 1-on-1ers were relatively unknown (Will Bynum? Rodney Stuckey). I think they caught people off guard, but now the Pistons have been figured out.
just EPINION
here here
Just move the ball! It makes me sick to watch them when they play like that. I do think it is kinda a function of not playing together. Even the plays they did run (all two) the timing was way off. The screens were lazy and rip and BG were not coming off clean.
Why no Brown?
Why, with david lee torching us, did we not send in Kwame? I mean Lee just needed to get roughed up a little. Give him some hard fouls.. throw a big body at him. I’m not sure what Q was thinking playing wilcox instead. Clearly that didn’t work out.. Wilcox 1pt 16pf 0reb
I Was Saying, "David Lee..."
I was pro David Lee last summer, but I was also saying Boo-urns.
If I remember correctly, a lot of the anti-David Lee folks (MFMP was in that camp, I think) were saying his offensive game was too limited and that we needed a big with shooting range to stretch the floor. I think it’s pretty clear now that we need ANYONE with talent and hustle down low. We’re so weak up front that David Lee (or the other guy who polarized the threads, David West) would be a huge, huge, HUGE improvement over anything we have right now.
MFMP was in that camp
Yeah, I didn’t want a David Lee signing, for two reasons: 1) his cost would likely go too high as he was an RFA and 2) he plays like a C in a PF’s body, with a close range game that would clog the lane for our slashing guards. On top of that, he doesn’t block shots and isn’t a good defender in the post, something you need out of your C especially on this team. Add the D’Antoni effect, and his numbers become harder to evaluate.
One thing Lee has done this year which was difficult to predict was that he has begun to stretch his game closer to the perimeter. Sure, this accounts for very few of his attempts, but he’s shooting much more efficiently outside of the post and is converting well on jumpers. He didn’t do this well in 2008-09, and it was on this and past performance that I shyed away from him. There wasn’t any evidence, yet, to suggest that Lee could stretch defenders and keep them honest with a good 18 footer, enough to provide room for our guards to drive to the hole. At the time, Gordon wasn’t even rumored to sign with the stones (we were talking about this in May), so our guard situation looked like MFWB, Stuck and Hamilton.
Now, Lee is playing unreal, he’s scoring well from every point of the floor inside the perimeter. He’s rebounding like he did last year, he’s stripping balls every game and he’s been dishing like mad lately. I’d love to have dude on our team, especially with how much our team’s success revolves around CV right now.
Can’t say I’d disagree with myself from my perspective last May though. We needed a player who could score in the post AND from outside. We needed a PF who could block shots and hit threes. At the time, Lee was certainly not that player. He may not have 3s and blocks on his stat sheet, but he’s improved in areas this year that make him a lot more pertinent than he was last season.
I still don’t understand why it’s a requirement for your team’s bigs to have the ability to score from the perimeter.
I mean, sure, it helps; that’s obvious. If you can get a guy who rebounds, defends, scores inside AND score from outside, you’ve got a potential HoFamer. But IMO, the first three on that list are much, much more important from your PF and C than the fourth.
Also, IMO, David Lee > CV in all three respects.
Lee is not a great defender, and the Knicks are 28th in rebounding rate, which tells me that Lee is picking up the cheapies. Also, New York demonstrated every intention of signing Lee, especially at 7M per. We could probably have gotten him for 10-11M, but I think we got much better value from CV.
by Kevin Sawyer on Dec 31, 2009 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
To the tune of "Oh, Christmas Tree"
Chorus
Oh, post presence
oh, post presence
Whomever will be our big man?
Kwame’s hands are mighty small
Maxiell does not have range at all
repeat chorus
Charlie V loves Twitter much
He’d rather tweet than be clutch
repeat chorus
Big Ben can grab boards
but his jumper is absurd
repeat chorus
Wilcox’s mind tends to wander
leading to so many post blunders
just EPINION
Q-Star
It seems to me that Q-Start’s hype as a great offensive coach came about to large extent because Lebron plays for the Cavs.
Hell, even I could be a good offensive coach if I had Lebron running the offense.
Now that Q-Star is coaching more earth like basketball players his offense doesn’t seem to effective.
Kuester offensive prowess seems like a great misconception
I remember reading that he was a defense oriented coach his whole career and that the only reason he was named the offensive coach for Cleveland was because he was the only one in the staff who had some offensive knowledge and the team did not want to hire another assistant coach. I think the Cavs offensive improvement had more to do with Lebron’s growth coupled with the addition of better offensive players.
Like I said in the game thread, I don’t think he runs any plays. We don’t have Steve Nash on our roster, we need plays. Hell, the last good Pistons team was so good partly because they already had a number of set plays directed at each player’s strength that they ran to perfection.
Does Anyone Else Wish That Dumars Hadn't Traded Chauncy?
Yes the Pistons would have fallen off in wins if they had kept Billups but no where near what has happened and would in my opinion still be a solid playoff team..
The best thing that can come out of this year is getting a very good lottery pick next June. Cheeze, that sounds like what the Cippers fans have been saying almost every year since the beginning of the millenium.
I may be in the minority (hell, I'm sure I am)
But no, for me Chauncey was the major culprit in the whole lackadaisical attitude. It was time to break the core and he was the only movable piece. Not to mention that with his salary we would be too tied up (though that’s what Rip’s extension does).
For me Joe’s mistake was extending Rip, not trading Chauncey.
I've Always Wondered About Running Plays...
With so many trades and coaching turnover, haven’t most players had the chance to run a million different plays? So why can’t a guy like Rip, who has been in a number of winning systems, just say, “Hey guys, let’s do this and this and this…”?
By the time a player gets to college...
…. he should be able to see a play in the huddle and execute the play on the floor.
And yes, players should be able to get together during a FT and say, “hey, let’s run two downscreens, followed by a cross screen. If that doesn’t work, then let’s get CV and Stuck in a pick and roll with Rip and Tay stretching the floor.”
It’s that easy.
David Lee was restricted
Which is why he had to settle for a the Knicks’ lowball offer.
About Lee as RFA
NY is trying desperately to keep cap space for next summer. I have a hard time believing NY would have matched a five year, 7-8 million per (ascending) deal.
I think Lee’s worth that, and frankly, I think he would have thought long and hard about taking a deal like that.
Maybe I’m wrong about that, and my entire point is moot. Either way, I think Lee is worth at least that amount (relative to other NBA salaries) and would make a great PF for almost any quality NBA team.
We Need A "Worthiness Hierarchy"...
One of the arguments I always saw on DBB was that so-and-so wasn’t worth X amount of money. There should be be a hierarchy of salary ranges so we can see who is worth what — especially when people are always saying other guys are overpaid. Are CV and BG considered overpaid? Rip? I think David Lee is putting up solid numbers (and has for his entire career) and is probably worth a good chunk of change. It’s getting harder and harder to find efficient, active big guys who can give you a double-double (and more) every night.

by 
















