Talking with (future Piston?) Terrence Williams
Terrence Williams, a four-year star out of Louisville, was in town yesterday to work out with the Pistons. Teams work out dozens of players before the draft, and in the past, hearing an update from any one player might merit only a line or two at the bottom of a newspaper article published days later.
But these days? You can hear from the man himself simply by checking his latest updates on Twitter, where you can also find his latest iPhone pics, such as this shot of him posing with Joe Dumars at the Pistons practice facility.
Williams, who's probably spent more time in airport terminals the last couple of months than many of us will in years, wasn't in town for very long, but he made time for a brief phone interview on his way out (and I mean "on his way out" quite literally -- he was speaking from outside his airport gate, and our conversation was occasionally interrupted by airport announcements). Familiar bias aside, he's exactly the type of player I think the Pistons should target -- a strong, physical wing capable of getting in the paint, making a few plays for teammates and himself and doing the dirty work on the glass and on defense.
If you want a scouting report, check out DraftExpress, NBADraft.net, ESPN or Rivals. If you want to hear his candid thoughts on the travel grind, whether NBA teams should listen to Malcolm Gladwell and press more often and why athletes on Twitter isn't a fad, keep reading.
Matt Watson: How did the work out go? What did they make you do?
Terrence Williams: You do a lot of shooting – do a couple of shooting drills and then you’re ready to play. It’s not really long – just a short, quick, good workout, do a couple of shooting drills and play against the players, 3-on-3, 2-on-2, 1-on-1.
Matt Watson: I know you’ve been going all over the country so far – how has the travel been? Has it been non-stop?
Terrence Williams: I mean, after awhile you get tired of it, but it’s the work that you have to put in to get your name called on June 25th. It’s cool, you’ve got to get used to it, but it gets tough getting off the plane and go out to dinner and then you’ve got to wake up at nine in the morning to workout for the team. This is my third one, so I’m kind of used to it, but I know some guys who it's their sixth one or their seventh one. I mean, it’s cool.
Matt Watson: That has to be pretty nerve-wracking. Are you going to be watching the lottery at all? I know you’re about to get on a plane now, are you going to be able to see it?
Terrence Williams: I won’t be able to see it.
Matt Watson: Being in the Big East and everything, you’ve obviously faced a lot of really tough competition. Who would you say would be the toughest player that you faced last year?
Terrence Williams: I don’t have a toughest player that I faced – Connecticut was probably the toughest team, but as far as players, I did my share well in the Big East, so I don’t really feel like there was a tougher opponent in the Big East. I had tough teams that I played against, but not opponents.
Matt Watson: Okay, that’s a nice, competitive answer. Growing up, was there any players that you tried to model yourself after? Any NBA players that you looked up to?
Terrence Williams: Magic Johnson.
Matt Watson: Completely changing subjects here – I noticed you’ve got the Facebook going, you have the Twitter going, I think a lot of younger athletes, they’re coming through college and they’ve already been exposed to a lot of this stuff. A lot of older athletes already in the NBA, it’s something that they’re really new to. Do you see that as the wave of the future? Is that something that you plan on doing as you go throughout your career, having that real close connection with your fans?
Terrence Williams: I probably will have Twitter. I mean, the main thing is to show people that me and everybody else that’s playing basketball in the NBA -- or trying to get in the NBA – that we are human, you know? I know, for me, I speak for myself, I know that I’m not untouchable, so I’ve had conversations with fans that’s related to basketball so many times. … When a fan can reach you, I think that makes them stay a fan. When they can get on Twitter and write a question that they really want to know about basketball and you answer it, that will make the guy’s day.
I know that if there was some resource where you can write LeBron James – or write Magic Johnson or Michael Jordan back in the day – and they answer it? That’ll make you feel so much more better about your day. And I’m not saying guys – there are some kids that may look up to me like that and some kids that might look up to Dwight Howard like that, or Nate Robinson, so trying to reach that person on Twitter, it just shows that we are human. So I think that people like us have Twitter and I think that we will continue to have Twitter.
Matt Watson: You’re obviously no stranger to YouTube, either. Do you have a favorite YouTube clip of yourself?
Terrence Williams: Nah. It makes a clip because it’s a highlight, so I believe that any clip that’s up there is a good clip because it was a highlight. … I think every clip that’s up there is a good one. I don’t really sit down and watch it, to be honest with you. There is one I’ll watch, with plays from my freshman year to my fourth year, it plays like a sad song. That’s probably my favorite one because it shows my memories throughout the four years.
Matt Watson: There's been some talk recently among NBA fans, there was a writer who was asking why coaches don’t use the full-court press more often, and he used Rick Pitino as an example of someone who’s had a lot of success with that. Do you think an NBA team could have success in the NBA doing that non-stop energy press?
Terrence Williams: Nah. You only see non-stop energy only in the playoffs. You’re not going to see that in the regular season. Not when you have game 14 and game 26 when they’ve got to play 82 and then the playoffs? Nah. Too many guys in the league are older; too many guys would get hurt trying to play that pressing defense. Pressing defense is for kids. Kids in high school do a lot of things different than kids in college; kids in college as you see do a lot of things different than in the NBA. You can’t try to change the NBA’s style. There’s no problem like it is, that’s what makes it the NBA.
Matt Watson: Alright, fair enough. I think you’re probably right, especially about the length of the season. There’s always been talk about whether the NBA should shorten the season. Where are you headed to next?
Terrence Williams: I’m going to Vegas.
Matt Watson: You’re going to Vegas?
Terrence Williams: Yeah.
Matt Watson: Good stuff. Well, thanks a lot for your time, and good luck. Who knows, maybe we’ll see you in Detroit next year.
Terrence Williams: Alright, I appreciate it.
0 recs |
94 comments
Comments
I would love to see Williams in a Pistons uniform. He can’t shoot, but he can do basically everything else you’d want.
by Birdman on May 20, 2009 7:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Shooting isn’t his strength, but he did shot 38% from three-point land (albeit the college version) last year, attempting four a game.
by Matt Watson on May 20, 2009 8:36 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really like his game as well. I think he could step in right away and be a rotation player.
by Jim on May 20, 2009 9:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I watched T-Will for four years as a die hard UofL fan. He wouldmake a great player for any team. The NBA needs more players who care about the game and have fun playing the game. If every team had a T-Will the NBA fan base would triple. He will fit in well with Detroit (if they pick him), because they have very passionate fans that love hustle. You will never see less than 110% from T-Will.
by Dean Boeh on May 20, 2009 10:47 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m from Seattle and have seen T-Will and Stuck play MANY times with my own eyes. Some people question T-wills shooting?? Trust me T-will is going to be a MAJOR stud..think Brandon Roy coming out of college. And his game translate to the NBA because of how good of a athlete he is..Stuck/Twill backcourt could be very, very scary….YOu could put T-will at the #1 and Stuckey at the #2
by babyyao on May 20, 2009 1:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That between-the-legs rebound was just gratuitous. I mean, anyone can dunk. But how many have snagged a ’bound like that?
by Rob G on May 20, 2009 1:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
T-Will would be great on the pistons. They need a guard with some skills and grit, and he offers that.
by Kevin O on May 20, 2009 4:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
T-Will will make a great NBA player for any team that needs a point forward type of player. He shooting wasn’t the greatest from his freshman to the 1st part of his senior year but after the new year with Rick helping him with his shot he became a much more all around player.
If the Pistons get him, he will be a great asset.
by Vi T on May 20, 2009 6:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice work Matt.
I dont think the Pistons will be able to pass up who is left over between Flynn, Lawson, Maynor or Tyreke Evans.
All those guys are NBA Starters in my book.
I do like the fact T Williams is embracing Social Media.
You know what, We are all probably wrong because who saw Joe D making Walter Sharpe his top newcomer last year?
by John W. Davis on May 20, 2009 6:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Walter Sharpe = Earl Clark + Narcolepsy
by Quick Darshan on May 20, 2009 6:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I’d love T-Will, but we can never tell what Joe Dumars is thinking. Last year we were all deciding whether we wanted CDR or Bill Walker. Instead we got a gun shot victim who involuntarily falls asleep. Regardless, I’m still excited about the draft!
by Big Mike on May 20, 2009 6:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have watched TWill for 4 years as a UL fan. He is absolutely, positively sensational. Whoever gets him will have a triple double threat every night. I hope i’m a new piston fan.
by Jonathan Tindle on May 20, 2009 6:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just how much social media is this kid embracing, really?
by b23 on May 20, 2009 8:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, what an end to the Cavs-Magic game!
by Toledo Joe on May 20, 2009 10:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Best final quarter I have seen since yesterdays game!
by Laughton on May 20, 2009 10:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m impressed with Orlando’s mental toughness, hanging on to win in Boston and coming from behind to win in Cleveland.
by Toledo Joe on May 20, 2009 10:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
2 great days of basketball in a row! Lakers will win it all :)
by mannie32 on May 20, 2009 11:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have a quick beef with the Cavs-Magic game. The 6th foul on Dwight Howard is what is wrong with the NBA. A big guy goes straight up, and a superstar goes into his chest and gets a call. The TNT postgame crew was going off on what a bad call it was. The league is so desirous of creating superstar guards/wings, that they have completely altered the spirit of the game. Fouls are when you don’t have position and nail a guy with the body. Or when you hit his arm. They aren’t for everytime a superstar puts his head down and goes to the rack.
Other than that gripe, wow are these two playoff series off to an exciting start.
by Forty on May 20, 2009 11:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Two of Howard’s three fouls in the first half were BS.
by Toledo Joe on May 20, 2009 11:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Barkley made a great point on how Cleveland might be screwed. If the LeBaby is cramping and exhausted after game 1, how on earth is he going hold up for a series that looks like it could go the distance? If he can’t, the Cavs are done.
by SadPanda on May 20, 2009 11:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
dear lord it was sweet to see the cavs lose and lebron cramping up after the game. thank you orlando magic, i can sleep easy tonite.
by dandresden on May 21, 2009 12:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t care who wins it all as long as it’s not the Lakers. I have nothing against them, but living in LA is insufferable when Laker fans start puffing out their chests.
by Quick Darshan on May 21, 2009 12:30 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Lebron Can’t win a title this year. Iggy gets old making it tough next year. Does Lebron get fed up and take off… maybe northward ;~). Or do they win one and we get stuck playing Lebron in Cleveland for the next decade?
Go Magic! F pansy bs fouls!
by Allens Ego on May 21, 2009 1:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
QD: You said that right. I’m already tired of all the old faded Laker flags pulled out of mothballs from last year. Which of course where they had been sine 2004!!
by MarkButter in SoCal on May 21, 2009 7:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
what to lbj is a block is a suspension for ron-ron
by jay_uno on May 21, 2009 8:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m still really bitter from our ass-kicking in round 1. Even though Cleveland was by far the superior team, it still grinds my gears to see LeBron get all the calls. He’s REALLY good — he doesn’t need help from the refs.
by Garrett on May 21, 2009 8:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And while I’m thinking about it, I also thought LeBron murdered Dwight on that “block” in the first half that everyone was gushing about.
by Garrett on May 21, 2009 8:37 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Q.D. about “anybody but the Lakers” winning. Heck, I get tired of arrogant LA fans and I live in frickin’ Ohio. Also, I like Denver because of Chauncey, Orlando is a fun team to watch, and the Cavs have put together a monstrous and obviously deserving team.
My only quibble with the Cavs is, as Garrett and others have said, LeBron gets way too many calls. It’s like Wade with the Heat. These are great players, they can still win in a fair game.
It will be interesting to see how the Cavs react after their first taste of adversity in the playoffs. I’m not counting them out, even if LeBron had some cramps.
by Toledo Joe on May 21, 2009 8:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i predict a 20 point cleveland win in game 2
by jay_uno on May 21, 2009 9:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I read today that Derrick Coleman wants to assistant coach for the Pistons and specialize in the paint.
by Skylar on May 21, 2009 10:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks for making me laugh jay_uno…I needed that…
by HB on May 21, 2009 10:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps Lebron wasnt actually drinking the Vitamin Water after all? I get that the guy plays hard… but he logged 42 minutes and was cramping as early as the 3rd. I bet Ray Allen was laughing somewhere.
by Lucas on May 21, 2009 11:28 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
From Basketbawful, re Cavs-Magic Game 1.
There was a time that the presence of Ben Wallace would have meant holy terror for Dwight Howard. Sadly, that time was around 2004. Last night, the 15 Million Dollar Man logged just under 10 minutes and finished with 2 boards, 1 foul and a plus-minus score of -14…easily the worst of the night. (Joe Beast was second-worst at -8).
by Toledo Joe on May 21, 2009 1:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think the cramping is a big deal. LeBron’s a machine and just had a small glitch for whatever reason. Maybe he only ate one ham sandwich for lunch instead of two or something. I don’t think his conditioning is going to be a problem going forward.
by Garrett on May 21, 2009 1:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
http://www.detnews.com/article/20090521/OPINION03/905210423/Will-Blackhawks-fans—chants-go-too-far
Derrick Coleman wants to return to the Pistons as a coach.
Coleman, who played in the NBA from 1990-2005, would like to teach big men how to play inside, and hopes president Joe Dumars gives him a call.
“It is like a lost art,” he said.
“There are a lot of bigs, but nobody posts anybody up. Everybody wants to stand still and hit jumpers.
“Tell Joe I am here. I am local. I love the game of basketball and want to get involved.”
by Skylar on May 21, 2009 2:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
@Motherfuckin’MikePayne:
Scroll past the hockey.
by Skylar on May 21, 2009 2:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Off topic and way too rehashed? yes. But I just can’t help myself because it’s always nice to see the pile get higher.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/chris_ballard/05/19/allen.iverson/index.html
by LeeROYbrown on May 21, 2009 4:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Cleveland’s bench scored FIVE points last night. Can we all agree that Cleveland is still just a marginal, average team with one amazing superstar that makes it super easy for the rest of them? If they make it past Orlando there’s absolutely no way they beat LA.
Oh, and also…man isn’t the Q a such a ghetto venue? If it isn’t chunks in the roof falling down, its Dwight busting down the damn shot clock..
by Mark B. on May 21, 2009 4:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
@ Skylar: maybe I’m wrong here, but wasn’t Coleman’s problem the same as Sheed’?
At basically 6’11" didn’t like the paint and instead shot 3’s? Am I remembering the right Derrick Coleman here?
by MarkButter in SoCal on May 21, 2009 5:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Totally random, but just looking over the Clippers roster for guys we might be able to get on the (relative) cheap because of the eventual Blake Griffin appearance:
Do you think we’d be able to swindle them out of Kaman AND DeAndre Jordan? Kaman’s a solid, known commodity at C, and DeAndre actually put up some decent numbers for a rookie. Check out his per-36 numbers:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/j/jordade01.html
Basically 11pts, 11reb, and 3blks per. Not bad at all. A lot of us (myself included) wanted Joe to pick this guy anyway, since he didn’t go until the 37th pick I think. Plus, he’s 6’11" and 250 lbs. Definitely has the tools to be a good big man.
Maybe some type of salary dump scenario? They’re on the hook for $35 million (!!!) between Camby, Kaman, and Randolph. Waaaaay too much money for 3 guys when Griffin is immediately going to eat up a third of their minutes at the same(ish) position(s). Maybe Amir + some 2nd rounders for Kaman + Jordan? I don’t think either is really in their long-term plans.
by Joel on May 21, 2009 6:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Joel, my guess is that they’d keep Jordan as part of the young core (Eric Gordon, Al Thornton, Blake Griffin, DeAndre Jordan, PG to be named later). Hopefully, they are high enough on him to part with the Caveman.
I would love to have Kaman as I’ve said before. I’m a big believer in having someone that can post up near the basket (not like Sheed who posts up twelve feet away). I would be so much more comfortable with any PF coming the Pistons’ way (Boozer, Odom, Varejao, David Lee, Dajuan Blair) with Kaman next to them.
Plus, I think he’ll be rejuvenated coming back to Michigan and having a legitimate chance to make the playoffs.
by Quick Darshan on May 21, 2009 6:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i am as nervous about the nuggets game as if it was detroit.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 6:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
According to espn ford washington is the team most likely to trade their pick no 5 i think , is there anyone we could get at the 5 thru 10 spots that would help us, what about jordan hill anyone seen him much this yr?
by Defor on May 21, 2009 6:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ALLEN IVERSON IS DA BEST YO!!!!! and so is eminem.. go get that Relapse. Detroit WHAT!
by david stern on May 21, 2009 6:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i guess no one on the lakers read that chauncey billups’ article. insult to injury to bounce it off kobe’s back of all people for the layup. go nuggets.
by JackDutch on May 21, 2009 9:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
chauncey bounces the in bound pass off kobe’s back to himself and gets the layup to cut laker lead to one at the half. sweet!
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 9:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
…….aaaaaand Ariza loses the ball on a crucial possession. I am a curse.
by Garrett on May 21, 2009 10:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What’s up with Chauncey missing his free throws? It’s in his head now.
by Garrett on May 21, 2009 10:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if denver and orlando reach the finals, will david stern be all right?
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 11:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
which team swept it’s series with both denver and orlando this past season?
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 11:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
qd, i know you are a big kmart fan. he has looked really good this series.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 11:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
it is just another exclamation point to joe d’s miserable season that carmelo anthony has picked this year to go for it. how many titles would the pistons have won with carmelo, chauncey, rip, sheed and prince?
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 11:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
watching espn nba ads with young portland sheed in the paint. man he was skinny. and quick. even while getting beat.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 21, 2009 11:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
watching sportcenter tonight. carmelo anthony, the sucker punch thug, getting the patronizing love from the sports nanny pundits. " he has really grown up, blah, blah, blah. and then some hockey game with all these white guys beating the shit out of each other and it is a big chuckle and totally cool. one of the hockey players is even named satan. it makes ron artest look demure and appropriate.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 22, 2009 12:01 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
“qd, i know you are a big kmart fan. he has looked really good this series.”
If your point is that Kenyon Martin can finish when he gets the chance, then you are totally right. But, that should be a given. He’s getting paid 31 million for the next two years. 30 million should go to Jason Kidd, becuase he made KMart.
I’d be willing to bet that KMart is one of the league leaders in terms of the percentage of his baskets that come off assists. And then he has to audacity to call out his teammates after getting whooped twice in the NBA Finals when his own Finals’ performance made Karl Malone look like Michael Jordan.
Except for that weird flip shot, he can’t create his own offense. I want to puke every time I see Carmelo/JR Smith/Chauncey break down the defense and give Kenyon a wide open dunk and then have to watch him flex and strut around like he actually did something.
Every dollar he’s paid over the MLE is a waste of money. I guarantee you the Nuggets would be happy to trade him for a bag of potato chips if they could find someone to take him.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 1:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
“if denver and orlando reach the finals, will david stern be all right?”
He definitely wants Kobe v. Lebron. But, I’m sure Dwight Howard is in his “Fave Five.” Wade would be on there too. I wonder who would be fifth? Nash? Garnett?
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 1:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
qd, my point is that in pistonville this season, points in the paint and around the rim were few and far between and when they came it was because of a little guy named bynum. amir was on the bench. kwame was bobbling and chucking the ball generally directed towards the backboard and rim. dyess was not getting it to fall. sheed occasionally tried a layup and looked like chris webber on bad knees. so kmart looks pretty damn good to me in that context whatever his price tag. in game one he hit that flip shot at steady intervals. yesterday he got the lay up to take the lead on a broken play that if chauncey had made last year or the year before is game over for the pistons. kmart also had three steals.
so kmart may be expensive but he is not “useless”. and will bynum would sure like to have some of those “potato chips.”
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 22, 2009 6:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i must have heard sheed quoted “ball don’t lie” three times last night. are the pundits sensing that sheed is history and oh my god we will miss him and he was sure fun to watch.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 22, 2009 6:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s three straight entertaining conference finals games. I just LOVED the Chauncey-bouncing-the-ball-off-Kobe’s-back play. And then JVG telling us what an intelligent player Kobe is (which is probably generally true, but seemed a tad defensive at the time). On the other hand, I appreciated JVG’s love for ’Sheed’s “ball don’t lie.”
by Toledo Joe on May 22, 2009 7:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Mark Butter: You’re right, I remember him being good in the low post but as you said, comparable to ’Sheed, plus he was a wildass, he pissed all over the rug at an Italian joint here in the (313) Anytime I find news that people want to come to the Pistons, I find it noteworthy, but the case against him coming here is solid.
Sorry for the lag but I was away for awhile yesterday.
Chauncey certainly knows how to answer Kobe, something Iverson could never attempt in this part of the millenium.
On K-Mart, I don’t want him for what he’s charging, and this is the best he’s looked in awhile. To me anyways. But I like his uncanny resemblance to Clifford Smith.
by Skylar on May 22, 2009 9:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like K-Mart, but I like him for maybe $6-7 million. I’ve always lumped him and Marion together— super long and athletic, owe their entire careers to good PGs, most horrific jump shot form I’ve ever seen, etc. etc. That being said, when his current contract is up I wouldn’t mind bringing K-Mart off the bench for around the MLE. He plays great post D and in spite of all his posturing he does bring a level of legitimate toughness.
by Joel on May 22, 2009 10:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Derrick Coleman/Sheed. Coleman was definitely a waste of amazing talent. But, for some reason, Larry Brown loved the guy. And Larry Brown only loves players that either play with passion or have high basketball IQ. I’m pretty sure Coleman doesn’t fit in the former category.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 12:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
afb, I think finishers like Kenyon Martin are easy to find (and cheaper). All the shots I remember him making last night came from a pass from someone else. Even the last one to win it was off a pass from Nene off the broken play.
I think the Pistons problem is that they never had guys that could get to the hoop and drop it off to the big man until Stuckey and Bynum. Maxiell and Amir are good finishers. Unfortuntely for Amir, he and Maxiell have the pretty much the same strengths and weaknesses and Maxiell had more experience.
But, yes, I would love for the Pistons to get another guy that could just catch the ball, rise up, and dunk in someone’s face. I would love Tyrus Thomas (who the Bulls want to trade) if he didn’t seem like a head case. Birdman fits the bill too.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 12:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
@QD:
But, yes, I would love for the Pistons to get another guy that could just catch the ball, rise up, and dunk in someone’s face.
Blair FTW!
by Mike Payne on May 22, 2009 1:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Foreman says that Gordon is a top priority:
http://www.nba.com/2009/news/05/21/bulls.gm.forman.ap/index.html?cid=playoff1
by James on May 22, 2009 1:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I’d much rather have Jamal Crawford than Ben Gordon. Crawford is one of three players in history to score 50 points in a game for three different teams. And since Golden State wants to dump him, maybe the Pistons can pry away someone else too.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 1:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Does Crawford play defense. I assume no, but honestly I haven’t seen him play much.
by Colin on May 22, 2009 3:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Crawford’s ever even been asked to play defense. He’s definitely athletic enough to be a good defender though. More problematic is his horrific shooting percentage— 40% on his career. Poor man’s Stackhouse basically. The very definition of a “volume shooter.” And at close to $9 mil/per, he’d be a completely useless piece for us.
Thank god Chicago’s new GM is apparently just as stupid as their old one— Joe D’s chub for Ben Gordon had me reeeeeally nervous for a bit there.
by Joel on May 22, 2009 3:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Crawford’s got mad skills and I think if he was in a better system (or A system) he’d be a more efficient scorer. The Knicks, the Warriors, and the Baby Bulls were grab bag offenses.
I read an interview once with Phil Jackson where he talked about how Crawford was always a player that he wanted because he thought he’d thrive in the triangle offense. I don’t think anyone has harnessed his talents.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 5:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
qd i am not making an argument for acquiring kmart. i just think you underrate him. from the nugg doctor…
Another player who has raised the level of his game has been Kenyon Martin. Defensively, we know K-Mart is going to supply the grit of Denver’s interior but offensively is where Martin is surprising L.A.. So far, Martin has been the Nuggets most efficient player against the Lakers. K-Mart is shooting 58% from the field (14-24 combined over the first two games) and is averaging 15.5 ppg against L.A.. And for those of you keeping track… That’s half a point more than Pau is averaging in this series and a major component as to how the Nuggets are looking so strong against the Lakers. With Carmelo scoring at a dizzying pace, and Chauncey micro-managing nearly every possession, Kenyon’s added offense has been a Godsend with J.R. Smith and the bench struggling to make their impact felt.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 22, 2009 5:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
it would be nice to have an offensive big. who was going to score in the paint. and kwame brown is not that guy.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 22, 2009 5:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
more from the nugg doctor…
And despite his unusual struggles at the free-throw line, Chauncey Billups has put his stamp on the first two games of this series too. Mr. Big Shot may just earn himself another nickname with how safe and efficiently he is distributing the ball right now. Perhaps adding “Steady” to “Smooth” as one of Billups’ monikers would be fitting seeing how he is sporting a 6:1 assist to turnover ratio against the Lakers and a true shooting percentage of over 46% with a 22.5 per game average. Furthermore, Chauncey’s is giving the Nuggets the best possible outcome scenarios in clutch situations. For instance, with the Nuggets tied last night at 99 Billups made the extremely cerebral decision to create contact with the hedging Pau Gasol to draw two critical free-throws. Other point guards with a lesser pedigree than Chauncey would have probably strayed from that contact, but Billups’ knew the time and situation and used Gasol’s aggression against him. Those two free-throws truly gave the Nuggets the upper hand down the stretch as both teams traded baskets in the final two minutes of game two. And who can forget Chauncey tying up Gasol on the other end after Nene sprung the ball free from Kobe’s control off the dribble? Without hesitation, Billups swarmed Gasol, who already had sturdy possession of the ball on the floor, to force that jump which Denver was able to control. In summation, Chauncey not only scored five of Denver’s final seven points at the free-throw line, but did so not with superior athletic plays but rather with his mind. He used a deeper understanding of the game within the game, and the officials, to mastermind a winning game plan that was more tactical then any coach could have drawn up.
by andyfrombrooklyn on May 22, 2009 5:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Andy, are you from Brooklyn Michigan, or Crooklyn NY? Just curious, I never thought of it until now.
by Skylar on May 22, 2009 5:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
“it would be nice to have an offensive big. who was going to score in the paint. and kwame brown is not that guy.”
My hope (and I know most people will think this is a little stupid) is to trade Amir for Kaman (a salary dump for the Clippers). And sign Odom at 9-10mil/year.
I know Odom isn’t having a killer series and is inconsistent in general. But, he’s playing with a back injury and got 10pts, 9reb, 5off reb, 2ass, 2blks, 0TOs in 30min. Not amazing numbers but he can do a lot of different things and can fit into the team concept.
Roster Game:
PG
Stuckey
Bynum
First Round Pick (Maynor? Lawson? Flynn? Holiday?)
SG
Rip
Afflalo
2nd Second Round Pick (Dionte Christmas?)
SF
Tay
1st Second Round Pick (Summers? Danny Green?) Sharpe
PF
Odom
Maxiell
Plaisted
C
Kaman
Kwame
Plaisted
That roster may not be ready to win a title, but there’s depth and still room to add another piece with the MLE while still being financially responsible.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 6:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
AFB, I think you’re exactly right about getting some athletic bigs that can block shots and dunk on someone and put their nuggets in someone’s mouth.
But, without the Chauncey trade (as painful as it was). The Pistons would have only 6mil (the MLE) to spend on getting someone like that.
Now they have 17mil (at least).
I’m curious to know, who would you go after? Birdman? Gortat? Boozer? Odom? Chandler? Okur? Milsap? Kaman? Stoudamire? Shaq? Marion? Bosh?
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 6:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
QD,
I usually agree with you but even 9 million is too much for Odom. Please God, no. The back injury isn’t really an excuse since he was getting manhandled by LUIS SCOLA before he even got injured. Uggh.
by Colin on May 22, 2009 6:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
“And MCIAFI is that man?”
Maybe not, but I’d love to see all those Rip plays run for Crawford.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 7:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
“The back injury isn’t really an excuse since he was getting manhandled by LUIS SCOLA before he even got injured. Uggh.”
Definitely, talent-wise that’s the one weakness in his game for a Power Forward: Low post defense.
by Quick Darshan on May 22, 2009 8:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ahh, QD, you’re so civil, it’s no fun disagreeing with you.
I guess I should temper my Odom hate. Given all the options, you’re scenario isn’t terrible. It just depresses me that this is one of the “better options” available.
by Colin on May 22, 2009 9:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Also, I am warming to Gortat. Definitely liked his D toward the end of the 2nd Q.
by Colin on May 22, 2009 9:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
There are several teams who would do almost anything to trade a certain guy off there team like the clippers Randolph ,golden state maggette ,new oleans has acouple of guys like that i’m sure there are others including boozer and utah , since were not going any where this year anyway I’m wondering if any of these teams would make it worth our while to take on one of these guys.
by Defor on May 22, 2009 9:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I will be ecstatic if we draft T-will, let’s make it happen, Joe.
by shh on Jun 11, 2009 10:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I read that there are a number of “red flags” concerning T-Will. Of course they don’t say what those flags are.
by MarkButter in SoCal on Jun 12, 2009 12:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really like Danny Green with one of our second-rounders. He’s a senior, an experienced guy, can shoot the 3, gets a ton of steals (1.8 per last season) and a ton of blocks for a guy his size (6’6", 1.3 bpg). In all honesty, he matches up favorably and almost superior to T-Will, a potential lottery guy.
Check the 2009 stats:
Green: 27 mpg, 13.1 ppg, 2.7 apg, 4.7 rpg, 1.3 bpg, 1.8 spg, 47% fg, 42% 3pt/fg
Williams: 34 mpg, 12.7, 5apg, 8.6 rpg, .8 bpg, 2.3 spg, 43% fg, 39% 3pt/fg
Obviously Williams’ assists and rebounds are much better than Green’s, but take this into account: Williams played 7 minutes per game more than Green, didn’t have a point guard (he played point forward a ton) and didn’t have a dominant big man (Earl Clark is a taller clone of T-Will). He HAD to put up those type of numbers. Green, on the other hand, played with one of the top distributing PG’s in the nation (Lawson) and one of the best post guys in college history (Hansbrough), and still managed to average 3 assists and 5 boards per game, in only 27 minutes. Give him another 7 minutes a game and I bet he has at least as many steals, OVER 2 blocks a game (ridiculous at 6’6"), closer to like 7 boards and maybe ~4 assists to go along with closer to 16+ points.
If there’s one thing the last few drafts have burned into my consciousness, it’s that people absolutely undervalue upperclassmen coming out of the draft. You think the Bulls are a little pissed about taking Tyrus Thomas over Brandon Roy nowadays? If we can get a polished, mature all-around guy like Danny Green in the second round, I say we have to go for it. Not to mention it gives us a more focused outlook for the #15 since we can eliminate “athletic swingman” from the proceedings, and can focus in on bigs (Blair, Hansbrough, Mullens, Clark) or a lights out pass-first PG (Flynn, Teague, Jennings, Maynor [love this kid; another senior], Lawson).
Now, maybe we can get some action going on this dead ass DBB afternoon…
by Joel on Jun 12, 2009 3:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













