Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Amir and Delfino swap places

It doesn't seem all that long ago that if I heard about a trade orchestrated by John Hammond involving Amir Johnson and Carlos Delfino that I'd be curious who the Pistons received in return. Instead, this doesn't involve the Pistons at all. From the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel:

So long, Amir Johnson.

The power forward's days in Milwaukee were numbered - at 55, to be precise.

In a sign-and-trade deal worked out between the Milwaukee Bucks and Toronto Raptors, Johnson and guard Sonny Weems will head to Toronto, while Milwaukee will receive small forward Carlos Delfino and guard Roko Ukic, a team source confirmed Monday.

The 6-foot-6-inch Delfino is the key man in the trade for the Bucks, a player who can provide depth at small forward, still a major concern after the departure of veteran Richard Jefferson in a June 23 trade. That was the same deal that netted Johnson from the Detroit Pistons.

But the 6-9 Johnson became more expendable in the Bucks' thinking after they signed free agent Hakim Warrick to a one-year, $3 million deal earlier this month. Warrick will have a chance to gain a starting spot at power forward.

*****

Hat-tip to, well, everyone in the comments already discussing this deal. It's an odd one for me to digest -- as long-time readers will recall, Delfino and Amir have successively taken turns serving as DBB mascots of sorts -- I've been a long-time believer in both and spent more pixels than I care to admit stumping for each to receive more playing time. Hopefully this trade works out for each of them.

As you may have noticed, things slowed down to a grinding halt this week -- I've been busy working on my sunburn and punishing my liver in Key West. Expect regularly-scheduled musings (including some related to current Pistons!) to resume shortly.

Comment 158 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Detroit Bad Boys

Amir Johnson answers questions

Oct 2009 by Matt Watson - 0 comments

It’s contagious!

Aug 2009 by Matt Watson - 649 comments

Comments

Display:

I love this trade. 1. Delfino is back in the league! And 2. I can now watch Amir play all year since I’m canadian. Which also means I might have to buy that Amir shirt after all.

by Matt Gibson on Aug 18, 2009 12:49 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Amir’s days in Detroit had run out … he was never going to be a player here.

But I think he still has a legitimate chance to be an impact player somewhere; perhaps being paired with Bosh in Toronto is his chance to become that.

by brgulker on Aug 18, 2009 7:55 AM EDT reply actions  

i like amir. i will be rooting for him wherever he ends up.

by andyfrombrooklyn on Aug 18, 2009 8:13 AM EDT reply actions  

hmmm i may actually watch raptors games now (im from toronto)

i’ll be getting league pass this year so i can watch the pistons game legit without illegally streamning. less hassle, etc.

by mannie32 on Aug 18, 2009 8:24 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Amir will get too much playing time in Toronto, sadly to say. They traded for Reggie Evans so he can be a tough guy out there for probably 10-15 minutes a game. Bosh plays the rest at PF. Unless they use Amir at backup C (or alongside Bosh, and Bosh plays C), i don’t think Amir’s going to get anymore than 10 minutes a game. Hopefully it will be a consistent 10 a game, though.

by Cody on Aug 18, 2009 8:25 AM EDT reply actions  

I really, really wanted Delfino to be better than he is.

by Toledo Joe on Aug 18, 2009 9:54 AM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Amir will get too much playing time in Toronto, sadly to say. They traded for Reggie Evans so he can be a tough guy out there for probably 10-15 minutes a game. Bosh plays the rest at PF. Unless they use Amir at backup C (or alongside Bosh, and Bosh plays C), i don’t think Amir’s going to get anymore than 10 minutes a game. Hopefully it will be a consistent 10 a game, though.

I agree. They also brought in Rasho for backup C. Looks to me like Amir will once again find minutes hard to come by.

by Shinons on Aug 18, 2009 10:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Langlois-ism of the day:

“Anyone who saw Stuckey dominate Rose in their December matchup… would scoff at any suggestion Stuckey doesn’t have the same considerable upside as the reigning Rookie of the Year.”

Stuckey has “THE SAME” upside as Derrick Rose? The same Rose who had a better year as a 20 year old rookie than Stuckey’s second season when he was 22? Okay there, Keith.

Seriously, what the hell is with this phrasing: “ANYONE would SCOFF at ANY suggestion…” that Rose has a higher upside than Stuckey?

First of all, that’s a ridiculous way to phrase such a statement. If Langlois said, “I think Stuckey could end up being as good as Rose…” then he’d be making an optimistic projection from his own insider opinion, and it would be clearly marked as such.

Pretending that “anyone” who watched that ONE game would “scoff” at “any” “suggestion” that Stuckey’s upside is lower than Rose’s, is dumb. Even by Langlois’s standards.

by Gabe on Aug 18, 2009 10:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed. Amir gets less time in Toronto than he did in Det. Plus, it’s an expiring contract for Toronto so it frees up money for bosh.

I don’t think Stuck can be as good as Rose right now. Rose has been coached and grown up being a PG whereas Stuck has been groomed to be a SG. It will take time for Stuck to get acllimated but he appears to take the job seriously. I also think this is just the makeup of teams. Stuck came when CB, Rip, etc., were here. Rose went to Chi who had BG, Hinrich (hurt for parts of last season) and not much else last year and had come off a very disappointing season before. It was virtually a no lose proposition.

On the flip side, I can foresee a good matchup each game and I think in a year or two these two guys will be featured as the “matchup” when these two teams play, with a side angle of BG being formerly of Chi.

Fianlly, I think you would see some of the same struggle in Rose had he been placed in the SG role for Chi. A talented player playing somewhat lost at times in a system. You’e not going to change 15 years of position mentality in 2 years at the NBA level, particularly the clusterscrew season we had last year and being drafted to play behind CB in 07.

by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 18, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

The same Rose who had a better year as a 20 year old rookie than Stuckey’s second season when he was 22? Okay there,

I resent that comment simply because Stuck didn’t have tyhe ability to juump out of the gate like Rose did. And then when he was finally given the keys. he didn’t have half of the coaching or team chemistry that Rose did. last year we knew that this still wasnt Stucks team. I bet he Knew it too. I say that 40 point beating has merit. and was no fluke. who cares to weigh in.

by scntfc on Aug 18, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Rose is better than Stuckey. The end.

(I certainly hope Stuckey is as good as well think he can be, though)

by Garrett on Aug 18, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Rose is better than Stuckey as a PG.

Stuck is better than Rose as a SG.

Problem solved and comparisons can stop. Regardless of what Langlois thinks, says or types.

by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 18, 2009 11:59 AM EDT reply actions  

I hope that this Stuckey/Rose match-up will live up to it’s hype for the years to come.

(Meaning, Stuckey will have to step up his game)

by Diablo on Aug 18, 2009 12:07 PM EDT reply actions  

To be honest, I don’t think either player are that good at the PG position.

Rose is definitely better than Stuckey at the SG though.

by Diablo on Aug 18, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t know how much stock I’d put into Rose’s coaching and chemistry.

Bulls got it together and gave the Celtics hell last playoffs, but chemistry-wise, they’re still a bunch of goddamn goofballs. Goofbulls, as it were.

Coaching-wise, they shitcanned Skiles, put Boylan in there, didn’t like Boylan, and now seem to be looking for some stability with Vinny Del Negro.

I admire Rose’s game anyways, but when you consider the team he’s on and the management (I don’t think many would disagree) I admire him even more.

I’m in no way dumping on Stuckey though. Kid needs more time and some real coaching. Rip is pivotal, getting productivity from him this season will not be a problem, and I hope getting positivity from him won’t either. Maybe adding Ben will do the trick.

by Skylar on Aug 18, 2009 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

If anybody here thinks Stuckey is even close to Rose, you need to take off the homer glasses. As it was pointed out already, Rose was better (BY FAR) as a 19 year-old rookie than Stuck was this past season. Yeah, we had a fucked up situation with a retarded coach, but Del Negro is almost as bad as Curry was. I don’t know one Bulls fan who has even an iota of faith in their current coaching staff. Not to mention the complete mess of a roster that the Bulls are/were working with, I’d say Rose had probably the best rookie season we’ve seen since Lebron’s. Not to mention Rose took his team to the playoffs, a .500 record, and even game a 7-game scare to the defending champs (and was a HUGE part of said scare).

If Stuckey puts up 17/6 on 48% shooting and leads the Pistons to some type of playoff success any time soon, we’ll all trumpet it as some type of breakthrough season. That was Rose’s rookie year. Rose already passes better, handles better, finishes better, is more clutch, etc., and is an absolute athletic FREAK. He’s as fast as Chris Paul but stronger and 4 inches taller. He’s the Lebron of point guards. Just wait— 25/10 is going to happen SOON for D-Rose. He’s going to make CP3, D-Will, and every other point guard in the league look positively archaic within the next five years, the same thing Lebron is doing to the SF position.

by Joel on Aug 18, 2009 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I totally agree with MBinSC: Rose has always been a point guard; therefore, he is going to be a better point guard in the nba at first. Stuckey has been a drive-first SG. He now needs to learn to be a point guard on the fly. Give Stuckey 2 more years, then compare. Chauncey wasn’t a great point guard his first few years- nothing close to it. Remember the year Chauncey all of a sudden had like 8.6 or something assists per game? I’m waiting for that from Stuckey in the next 2 years.

by Cody on Aug 18, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

any coach on the bulls staff last year>>>> michael curry. I believe they are 1 and 1 in matchups last year. I think I like Mark butter’s take on it the most

Rose is better than Stuckey as a PG.

Stuck is better than Rose as a SG.

when Stuck went for 40 he only had 2 ast. during that game. the game where the bulls won Rose hit BG with an ast from under the basket and BG hit the 3 pointer to win a very tight game.

all of this being a “microcosm” of how these guys may matchup in the future.

by scntfc on Aug 18, 2009 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Also agree with Joel: D Rose is something special, and was taken as the number 1 pick. Stuckey is and will be a solid, possibly all-star potential point guard, and was taken at the 15th pick. Rose is and will be worth his #1 status, and Stuckey is and will be worth his #15 status. In contrast, it would be like comparing Bargnani (#1 in 2006) to Cedric Simmons (#15 in ‘06) or Ronnie Brewer (#14 in ’06). Or like comparing Andrew Bogut (#1 in 2005) to Rashad McCants (#14 in ’05) or Antoine Wright (#15 in ’05). It’s not fair to compare them. They are on different levels. They are both well worth their pick, however. Rose has superstar potential, and Stuckey has all-star potential- exactly what each team would have hoped for at their draft position.

by Cody on Aug 18, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree with Joel and Cody.

And maybe I’ll go to a few Raptors games this year and cheer for Amir!

by Garrett on Aug 18, 2009 1:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m too lazy to look up the numbers, but didn’t Stuck get dominated as well in the game he had 40? I thought Rose had 30something himself. I’m a fan of Stuckey and the Pistons, but I think too much gets made of that one game. For crying out loud Clifford Robinson, Cedric Ceballos, and Dana Barros have all scored 50 in a game, and they never became amazing all stars. Just give the kid time and he’ll figure it out.

by Glenn on Aug 18, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Tony Delk too!

by Glenn on Aug 18, 2009 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

“I’m too lazy to look up the numbers, but didn’t Stuck get dominated as well in the game he had 40?”

No, Stuck thoroughly dominated him. Got him into foul trouble. Stayed in front of him and forced him into a lot of bad shots (that was maybe more impressive than the 40).

That being said, Rose is really goddamn fast and once he develops an outside shot, he’ll be in the Chris Paul/Deron Williams class.

by Quick Darshan on Aug 18, 2009 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Lmao. Cliff Scoring 50? Would love to watch that game. Did he shoot like 25 3-pointers? lol

by Cody on Aug 18, 2009 1:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Joel, let’s not go overboard here. Rose had a fantastic rookie year, but it wasn’t as good as Paul’s. Rose has a chance to be as good as Paul is now, but it is unlikely that Rose will surpass Paul.

by Birdman on Aug 18, 2009 2:02 PM EDT reply actions  

The day Rose stepped onto the court with the Bulls he was there franchise, he got like almost 40mpg from game 1 on, he knew he was going to get all his touches every game, hes the cornerstone and his teamates knew it too, he had a great year and and he’s a great player. He had stability from game 1.

Stuckey not so much, he delt with aging atittudes, mutiny’s against coaches, played with Iverson and Chauncey Billups. He’s not going to be what Rose is, but he can be a great player, this season is really a great chance for him.

by rban on Aug 18, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

You cant put that boston series on D. rose’s shoulders. If You ask me BG kept them alive in most of those games. all of those overtimes were pretty much keyed by Gordon. and Rose probably is the better point gaurd. but I am willing to say that Stuck clearly has his number.

by scntfc on Aug 18, 2009 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I think doug west and voshon leonard also had 50 point games long, long ago.

by Scott on Aug 18, 2009 2:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Can’t disagree with any of the posts. If the draft were held right now, there is no doubt Rose would be taken ahead of Stuck, obviously.

I do think coaching has alot to do with it. VDG was a point guard and can impart that knowledge on Rose. I think it also has alot to do with dynamics. The bulls rolled the ball onto the court and said “Rose, go pick it up and everyone else listen to Rose.” That was never going to happen in Det. And that’s what makes point guards from all-stars into superstars. It’s how they control the game. I don’t think Stuck will be in Rose’s level in 3 years. However, there are other things that factor into that level. How you get players involved, picking the right moment to “insert” yourself, off-season prep, etc. Stuck has played at EWU to where he was the man. Stop Stuck, stop EWU. Flip side, Rose, almost by default was stop Rose and he’ll dish to someone, because that was his job.

But it is unfair to compare the two as noted above. Rose probably dribbled the ball until his hand was sore and had the ball in his hands when playing and setting up teammates. Stuck probably drove/shot until his legs gave out. It was different “upbringing” in both physical and mental skills that I think this is an unfair comparison.

The bottom line is we’d trade Stuck straight up for Rose but wouldn’t for a number of point guards (Chalmers, Udrich, Duhon) who are PG’s full time and were raised with that mentality.

by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 18, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Rose is better than Stuckey right now. Period. But why the hell are we even comparing the two? I hate the freakin’ Bulls and I loved every second of Stuck’s dominance over Derrick Blows. Now if there was a trade in the works where we were maybe trading Stuck to get Rose then I could see why we are even talking about it, but otherwise, why don’t we just root for our own guys and be happy that we were even able to acquire such a talent at 15? Rose has super-star potential but I definitely do NOT see 25 & 10 in his future, maybe 20 & 8. Stuck has all the physical tools Chauncey had and now he just needs to learn the position like Chauncey did and he will be just fine. I could easily see Stuck averaging 17 & 8, which I would be perfectly fine with. I just want him to run the offense efficiently and make smart decisions with the ball. I don’t need a super-star. Rose may be faster but Stuck has decent speed too to go along with a massive body for a PG. He can post up Rose all day long. I look forward to watching them play each other for many years to come.

by KRONIKjose on Aug 18, 2009 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh, and fuck Keith Langlois for even bringing up this stupid debate!

by KRONIKjose on Aug 18, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Rookie seasons:

Chris Paul
43%fg, 16.1, 7.8apg, 5.1rpg, 2.2spg – 38-44 record, no playoffs; was the only scoring threat from the guard position

Derek Rose
48%fg, 16.3, 6.3apg, 4rpg, .8spg – 41-41 record, 7-game series with defending champs, best rookie playoff game debut since Kareem; other guards scored 21, 18, and 10 a game respectively, so Rose got his in the system and at a much higher percentage than Paul.

If anything, it’s a wash, but to me taking the team to the playoffs and actually playing extremely well in said playoffs gives D-Rose the upper hand. He’s clearly on par as a scorer and almost there as an assist and rebound guy (steals, not so much, but steals can be misleading — AI anyone?), but he’s athletically leaps and bounds beyond CP3, which leads me to believe he’ll eclipse him in every single way. Plus, the kid was just stone cold nasty in his first playoffs against a championship(ish) squad.

by Joel on Aug 18, 2009 3:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh, and Rose’ playoff numbers?

20/6/6 on 49% shooting.

And he doesn’t even have a jumpshot. The kid’s going to be ELITE. As in, “Thanks, Basketball Gods, for putting both the SF AND PG from mankind’s future physical evolution in the Pistons’ division” type of elite.

by Joel on Aug 18, 2009 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Joel:

I’m a big Rose fan, but his rookie numbers aren’t all that close to Paul’s:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/tiny.cgi?id=seF8x

Paul scored more efficiently, and rebounded, assisted and stole the ball at higher rates. Rose had a great rookie year for a PG, Paul had one of the NBA’s all time great rookie year’s for any player, regardless of position.

That quibble aside, I agree with everything else you’ve said in this thread.

KRONIC:

Yeah, it’s not really worth the time debating Rose vs. Stuckey’s. I just couldn’t get over the fact that Langlois said “anyone” who saw that game would “scoff” at even the “suggestion” that Stuckey’s upside is lower than Rose’s. That statement just seemed particularly outlandish.

by Gabe on Aug 18, 2009 4:17 PM EDT reply actions  

TRADE LEBRON AND ROSE NOW!

by Big Mike on Aug 18, 2009 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Trade. Amir. Now.

by Quick Darshan on Aug 18, 2009 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Trade. Langlois. Now.

by Gabe on Aug 18, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions  

If by “score more efficiently” you mean shoot much worse from the floor but get to the line more often then I guess you’d be right. But that’s bound to happen when literally the only way your team gets points is if you personally take it to the hole and score or you take it to the whole and dish to David West, who then scores. And other than the steals, the stats are quite close— 1.5 fewer assists and 1 fewer rebound does not a giant chasm make.

Like I said before, put a 22ppg SG and an 18ppg SG/SF next to Chris Paul his rookie year (or ANY year for that matter— guy has no help) and his scoring numbers drop dramatically. Rose scored more at a much higher percentage while still facilitating and allowing two other wing players to average close to 20ppg.

This little debate might stem more from the fact that I think CP3 is wildly overrated than it does from the fact that Rose was a better rookie (and I’m convinced he was). CP3’s usage rate and the fact that he hasn’t had a teammate of any worth other than David West his entire career skews his offense #‘s tremendously. Until he actually does some real postseason damage, I just can’t put him above Tony Parker, D-Will (who has been to the WCF and OWNS CP3 head to head), Billups, Steve Nash, Jason Kidd, or Rondo (my love for Rondo is well-chronicled— best defensive PG in the game, averages a triple-double for the postseason, mean/nasty/dirty/clutch, what’s not to love?).

by Joel on Aug 18, 2009 4:37 PM EDT reply actions  

+1 KronJ. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 18, 2009 4:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Joel, Paul in his rookie year was a much better passer than Rose (38.2% assist rate to 28.8%). He was a better rebounder as well. They had similar usage and turnover rates.

However, as you made clear, the biggest difference is in FG%. Unfortunately, you forgot to include anything about free throws or three pointers. Because Paul got to the line twice as often as Rose did, plus shot more and better from downtown, Paul’s TS% is higher than Rose’s (54.6% versus 51.6%).

All of these differences add up to Paul having a PER of 22.1 (all-star level) his rookie year and Rose having a PER of 16.0 (slightly above average).

by Birdman on Aug 18, 2009 4:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Joel:

It kinda feels like nit-picking trying to choose one of Paul or Rose, but Paul’s rookie year was better, and while I wouldn’t call the difference between them a “chasm,” it wasn’t super close either:

Paul— PER: 22, Winshares: 10, ORtg: 114, DRtg: 104
Rose— PER: 16, Winshare: 5.0, ORtg: 108, DRtg: 113

Also, on the scoring efficiency question: Paul averaged 12 shots per game, and scored about 16 points on those shots. Rose took about 15 shots per game, and averaged about 17 points on those shots. Rose shot the ball more often from the field and at a higher overall percentage, but Paul shot way more free throws and shot them at a higher percentage (and Paul shot the 3 better, though not very well compared to most 3 point shooters), which is why Paul’s TS% was .546%, while Rose’s was at .516%

For the record, I’m mainly sticking up for Paul because he’s one of my favorite players in the NBA (non-Pistons division).

by Gabe on Aug 18, 2009 4:53 PM EDT reply actions  

For the record, I’m mainly sticking up for Paul because he deserves to be mentioned as a top 3 player in the league.

by Birdman on Aug 18, 2009 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

I like the debate about stuck and rose, because stuck being dominate against rose and us having BG should place us hire than CHI as far as playoff seeding.

by scntfc on Aug 18, 2009 5:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Stuckey was the third point guard drafted in that class behind Conley and Law. The only other point guards drafted in the first round were Jarvis Crittenton, Aaron Brooks, and Petteri Koponen. We’re damn lucky to even be able to have this conversation.

Anyways, who cares about the Bulls. Stuckey > Rondo.

by Shinons on Aug 18, 2009 6:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Sorry, that came out wrong. It means that we should never have to worry about being man handled by the bulls like the days of old, when we were dominated for yrs on end. at this point they as well as we are going to be fighting for ECF dominance. If one or the other is to get there, at some point we will have to go through each other.and I like Stuck’s upside when playing Rose.

by scntfc on Aug 18, 2009 6:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Deron > All

by Quick Darshan on Aug 18, 2009 6:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Did you guys see that article link on the side about Lindsey Hunter being the oldest current player in the NBA? Really? Daaaaaaaamn. Now I feel old.

by Garrett on Aug 18, 2009 8:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Dude is still a good defender. Dumars must’ve gotten pretty spooked about the Criminal Investigation. I thought for awhile Hunter would retire a piston.

by Skylar on Aug 18, 2009 8:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Not that this has any bering on anything , but how do you guys think Chris Paul or Rose for that matter stacks up to Isaih Thomas , if you compared all three of there rookie yrs.

by Defor on Aug 18, 2009 9:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Thomas, Rose = from Chicago
Paul = not from Chicago

Thomas, Paul = short, two first names
Rose = tall, has proper last name

Paul, Rose = still in the NBA, could turn out to be good coach/GM
Thomas = out of the NBA, (former) crappy coach/GM

by PS on Aug 18, 2009 10:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Rose = tall, has proper last name

(last name could be a woman’s first name)

by PS on Aug 18, 2009 10:23 PM EDT reply actions  

PS wins this thread, this internet, this beer I’m drinking.

by Mike Payne on Aug 18, 2009 11:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Sidenote, PS, Joel, etc:

“Wed, Dec 02 Detroit at Chicago 8:00 PM ET”

You guys in?

by Mike Payne on Aug 18, 2009 11:08 PM EDT reply actions  

"Wed, Dec 02 Detroit at Chicago 8:00 PM ET"

All-encompassingly.

by PS on Aug 18, 2009 11:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I like the debate about stuck and rose, because stuck being dominate against rose and us having BG should place us hire than CHI as far as playoff seeding.

Dominant. Higher. Jesus.

by TDP on Aug 19, 2009 12:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Dude, who cares.

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 12:56 AM EDT reply actions  

OT, here is my best keyboard-based impression of boobs:

(o)(o)

by Mike Payne on Aug 19, 2009 2:11 AM EDT reply actions  

All of Mike’s “Trade Amir Now” posts have accumalated and sent Amir into a Quentin Richardson like trade spiral.

I wonder if he even got a chance to post on brewhoop.com before it happened.

by Quick Darshan on Aug 19, 2009 2:27 AM EDT reply actions  

8

/sideways mismatchin boobs

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 2:50 AM EDT reply actions  

@MFSKZ:
8008IES

by Mike Payne on Aug 19, 2009 2:51 AM EDT reply actions  

I heard Esran was coming back to the Bucks anyway, so that would have ment even less minutes for Amir in Milwaukee(Esran and warrick).

by Spills on Aug 19, 2009 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Sidenote, PS, Joel, etc:

"Wed, Dec 02 Detroit at Chicago 8:00 PM ET"

You guys in?

Speaking of such an outing, any DBB’ers in the Toronto area interested in hitting up the Air Canada Centre for this?

Wed, Nov 04 Detroit at Toronto 7:00 PM ET

P.S. Other than Garrett are there any other DBB’ers up this way?

by Sean W. on Aug 19, 2009 9:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Why is Toronto referred to as T-Dot? What’s the derivation?

by Quick Darshan on Aug 19, 2009 10:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Why is Toronto referred to as T-Dot? What’s the derivation?

It comes from the T.0. nickname (as in Toronto, Ontario) which is sometimes shortened to read T. or T-dot.

by Sean W. on Aug 19, 2009 10:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Sean W: I’d be in. We could make a big DBB sign and I could shave my eyebrows in support of Charlie V.

by Garrett on Aug 19, 2009 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Guys,

I’m sorry to say it… but with the signing of Calbert Cheaney to the Warriors’ staff, there’s no reason to play the upcoming season. Just hand them the trophy.

/LawyerBoy’d
/tell me what college you went to so I can tell you how much your basketball team sucks in comparison to IU
/you obviously didn’t go to college because you had to ask me who a randomass guy was that I mentioned on a basketball blog that doesn’t even play basketball
/Life fail.

by Boney on Aug 19, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Trade Villa for Jared Jeffries now?

by Shinons on Aug 19, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Joe D should’ve been fired for even thinking about trading DJ White

by Boney on Aug 19, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate Brett Favre.

by Birdman on Aug 19, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Yep Onions. I didn’t watch the press conference so the quotes and stuff are pretty amusing.

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions  

look in the right column, under “shutdown corner recent readers”. hurry.

you’ll shit bricks.

by Mike Payne on Aug 19, 2009 2:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Must’ve missed it, MP. What’s so funny?

@ Shinons. I had seen those. I figured Big Daddy Drew (a fellow Vikings fan) would have a quality rant on KSK. I hope Favre gets injured in preseason. I don’t want him breaking Jim Marshall’s record for consecutive games (non-kicker) in a Vikings uniform.

by Birdman on Aug 19, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions  

@Birdman:
It’s still there for me— a tiny profile pic under the “shutdown corner recent readers”. Let’s just say something got past Yahoo’s decency filter.

by Mike Payne on Aug 19, 2009 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I saw it. Gross brah!

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions  

@Birdman – I hope he has wonderful health this season. No better way to ensure that the Vikings go 8-8 than having Farve behind center.

by Shinons on Aug 19, 2009 3:42 PM EDT reply actions  

@QD re: T Dot. I blame this guy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liuj1WjgqCo

Ugh.

by Garrett on Aug 19, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Ok I looked it up.

Rose: 10 pts, 5 ast, 4 reb, 1 st, 2 to, 6 pf
Stuckey: 40pts, 4 ast, 2 reb, 4 st, 3 to, 2 pf

Stuckey dominated, I was wrong.

by Glenn on Aug 19, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Good ole’ balloon knot. Nice find, MP.

by Joel on Aug 19, 2009 3:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Last two meetings between Rose and Stuckey:

4/13/2009 – Loss
Rose: 24/8/5
Stuck: 16/9/7

2/10/2009 – Loss
Rose: 23/4/2
Stuck: 16/5/4

Neither loss was Stuck’s fault. They probably played eachother to a draw. It was that damned Ben Gordon motherfucker and his clutch heroics. I wish we had a late-game assassin on our team…

by Joel on Aug 19, 2009 4:04 PM EDT reply actions  

So, who do you guys think was a better PG? John Crotty, or Corey Benjamin?

Discuss.

by Big Z on Aug 19, 2009 4:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Good shit Joel. some here act like Rose is the second coming of Jordan. Stuck in my opinion clearly neutralizes him.

by scntfc on Aug 19, 2009 6:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Rose certainly plays as well as you’d hope a Rookie 1st. overall pick would. He’s dynamic. Gives CHI some shit to holler about.

Over here, I’m optimistic about Rodney.

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 7:38 PM EDT reply actions  

i like this pistons’ buzzer beater video… shows buzzer beaters each from our original core of big ben, tayshaun, rip, chauncey and sheed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA0Bxc6dFZc

by mannie32 on Aug 19, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions  

So, how about that universal health care?

lolz i kid, i kid.

by Garrett on Aug 19, 2009 7:52 PM EDT reply actions  

@ Skylar, not hating on the Chi. I hope they are right there with us fighting for dominance in the near future as opposed to Cleveland and Boston. Just hope they play second fiddle to us.

@mannie32, nice video. made me get goose bumps. all I could do is shake my head and long for the days of old. Wasn’t that Boston one during the playoffs? that was almost as painful as all of the overtimes we played against New Jersey in 03.

by scntfc on Aug 19, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Me too, man. Never been a Bulls fan, I’m from Detroit. Always will be.

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 9:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Veronica > Betty

by Quick Darshan on Aug 19, 2009 10:55 PM EDT reply actions  

To me it was never a question. I thought they stopped doing those comics years ago.

by Skylar on Aug 19, 2009 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Archie Shepp > Archie comics

by PS on Aug 20, 2009 1:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Ginger > Mary Ann

by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 20, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Gwen > Mary Jane

by Birdman on Aug 20, 2009 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Betty Rubble > Wilma Flintstone

by Skylar on Aug 20, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Hopefully Dumars finds out about that kid.

by Skylar on Aug 20, 2009 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

“Jason Maxiell embraces a summer of change”

“On Tuesday morning his bride, Brandi, was sitting in the stands watching her guy teach boys and girls shooting pointers.”

Jason Maxiell teaching kids how to shoot jumpers? The horror.

I hope they checked to make sure those children were old enough. They could have all been in grave danger.

“What happened to all the kids?”

“Oh, JASON! Not again! They WERE NOT BABIES!”

by Big Z on Aug 20, 2009 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090819/SPORTS03/908190399&plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey:588f9ec9-6c4a-4e6f-b09b-cdcd0a415403

Sorry. Link above.

by Big Z on Aug 20, 2009 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

@Big Z:
His bride, Brandi? I AM AN INTERNET NINJA!!!!! Small pic, but it does prove that Jason Maxiell actually has a heart.

by Mike Payne on Aug 20, 2009 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow, that’s a great article on Jarvis Varnado. I have him ranked number two on the next Ben Wallace list.

Behind Larry Sanders (great rebounder/shotblocker, goes to a small school in Virginia, attended Ben Wallace camps):

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Larry-Sanders-5148/

And ahead of overseas free agent Timofey Mozgov:

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Timofey-Mozgov-5161/

by Quick Darshan on Aug 20, 2009 4:16 PM EDT reply actions  

@QD:
re: Timofey Mozgov, via DraftExpress:

H: 7’ 1"
W: 0 lbs
Bday: 07/16/1986
(23 Years Old)

While his stats are impressive, I think he seriously needs to put on some weight before he’ll be NBA ready.

by Mike Payne on Aug 20, 2009 4:34 PM EDT reply actions  

@ Glenn, There are so many holes in that article that trying to debate them is like making preparation to write a thesis. No one is truly 100 % happy with all the moves Joe has made. But looking at the bright side of things… the only ugly contract we have is Rips. and that isn’t horrible. if the salary cap falls like expected next yr. Detroit is going to be one of a few teams with a lot of moveable assets. I hate that writers still write from the perspective of 2010 being a bonanza. Its becoming more and more obvious that Joe saw that it isn’t. 2 guys who put up the #s that BG & CV do is a bargain. in a yr teams are gonna be hard pressed to make a move while still being fiscal, Its a good time to stock pile talent. which is what Joe has done. none of the moves that he made are etched and stone. so any kinks can and should be easily corrected.

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 12:06 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with the mad scientist

by KRONIKjose on Aug 21, 2009 12:40 AM EDT reply actions  

@scntf:
the only ugly contract we have is Rips

I hate to be a broken record (no I don’t), but Rip’s contract is just fine. It is only ugly in the context of signing Ben Gordon. Inversely, Ben Gordon’s contract is just fine too. It’s only ugly in the context of the Rip Hamilton extension.

Also, CV’s contract is awesome. While I was an early fan of CV when he was in Toronto, I thought he was headed for a career as a flaky, injury-prone underachiever. Even then, he’s worth the contract Joe gave him.

As I’ve said before, I remain skeptical on Joe until we cut our SG investment in half— and by this coming trade deadline. Should that happen, my only beefs with Dumars in the last 8 years are MCIAFI and Darko.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 1:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I have a tough time disagreeing with many of that RealGM "writer"’s points. But a few of the laughable ones:

Joe Dumars had a largely blank slate to build a team with some solid assets, and he turned that into a squad with no #1 scorer, no point guard, no young defenders, and no low post scorers. Now that’s an accomplishment.

No #1 scorers, no point guard, no low post scorers. That’s what, according to people like this writer, we started the 2003-04 championship season with.

Gordon and Stuckey form the worst defensive backcourt in the entire league

By what metric?

problems with paying Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva an estimated $18 million per year

Villanueva came CHEAP. I don’t understand the complaint about that.

it moves Rodney Stuckey firmly to PG where he had a negative net PER this past season

Not difficult when your team is < 500 and your backcourt mate is 5’2".

…and hasn’t shown the ability to run an offense

You looking at assist numbers to make that call? Explain Tony Parker, please. If you’re watching tape, I counter MCIAFI.

The other mindblowing decision of this offseason was drafting Austin Daye, Jonas Jerebko, and DeJuan Summers, all of whom play small forward.

I’m with you there, 100%. Don’t forget about Chase Budinger.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 1:45 AM EDT reply actions  

While that RealGM article is the most negative review of the Pistons moves I’ve read so far, I do think it’s pretty telling that that there basically hasn’t been a single hugely positive review of our off-season by any source without a direct relationship to the Pistons (either by being a fan, or part of the Detroit media).

“If the salary cap falls like expected next yr. Detroit is going to be one of a few teams with a lot of moveable assets.”
-scntfc

? How do we have moveable assets? IMO, for the next couple years, we have one of the least flexible rosters in the league. We have $40mil already locked up through 2012-2013 just in the following players:

Rip/Gordon/CV/Max/Daye

When you add in Stuckey being due an extension in 2011 (and an extension for MFWB after this season), suddenly we’ll be right up against the cap through at least 2013. We’re three and a half years away from having moveable assets.

by Gabe on Aug 21, 2009 9:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Well, you’ve got Tay, on a soon to be expiring deal that just so happens to be very reasonable, backed up by 3 rookies, one of whom should be able to take his place at some point.

You’ve got Kwame, who’s expiring next year and signed to a reasonable contract. (Also Wilcox soon.)

You’ve got CV, signed to a price that may seem very reasonable when he reaches his prime.

You can debate the merits of the other contracts, but I don’t see any of the others as being unmovable, meaning the roster is at least “flexible”. You have enough money signed into the players above to make at least 2 different big moves. Looks pretty good to me, and I’m sure that that is why Joe is not too worried about the redundancy in the SG position (which is also a position of strength to deal from for trades).

by Drew on Aug 21, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions  

@ Gabe,

 there basically hasn’t been a single hugely positive review of our off-season by any source

I agree with you there. the best article outside of homerville that I have seen has been the slamonline article, titled “Better Than You Think” although it is not glowing it does put a more positive slant on things, which I believe in totally. Add to that, the fact that it has been the culture of the franchise for our moves to be questioned and or ridiculed preceding title runs. ‘03, Adrian Dantley, Mark Agguire
  and while the majority of the country “Laker fans” will tell you it was a fluke. we know that it wasn’t because we saw it from the ground up. Dumars clearly had a formula and a plan. And it seems that he has went out and duplicated that formula with whatever resources were availible to him.

? How do we have moveable assets?

virtually every contract that we have is moveable, because all of them are friendly. Like in my previous post rips is the only questionable one because of the overload of talent that we have at that position. otherwise pretty much everyone is being paid what they are worth or at a bargain. BG &CV respectively. Bynum, and Tay, Kwame, Wilcox, Ben and even Stuck can be easily moved this season due to length and or price of their contract.

@ Mike Payne

The other mindblowing decision of this offseason was drafting Austin Daye, Jonas Jerebko, and DeJuan Summers, all of whom play small forward.

I’m with you there, 100%. Don’t forget about Chase Budinger

Joe’s statements before the draft lets me know that this was by design. He clearly said that he was gonna draft for talent and not need. As I think we are all sure that Even if we had drafted and filled our hole. that would still be a longshot at making us any better than we already are.

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

thanks Drew, you beat me to the punch!

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s very much en vogue right now to bash Dumars. We’ve been so good for so long that I think the collective media got sick of us, so now that we’ve got a brand new roster that’s completely unproven as a unit, everyone’s taking potshots because they can. No biggie. We’re basically one “defensive stopper” big man away from being a contender— we’ve already got without a doubt the best 4-guard rotation in all of basketball (seriously, can you name a better guard 4some than Stuck/MFWB/Rip/BG?). Anyone with half a basketball brain should be able to see that. And if our guys buy into the defensive system (and Ben being back will aid this tremendously), we’ve got the offensive firepower to make some noise even this year.

I fully expect the Pistons to be the topic of quite a few “This Year’s Biggest Surprise” segments on PTI, NBA Fastbreak, etc. by the All-Star break. And it will be very gratifying given the heaps of unwarranted negativity— and I say “unwarranted” because Toronto has spent more money than us on much more questionable characters and everyone’s saying Colangelo’s some type of genius while throwing Joe and his extremely reasonably priced team under the bus.

by Joel on Aug 21, 2009 10:54 AM EDT reply actions  

@scntf:
Joe’s statements before the draft lets me know that this was by design. He clearly said that he was gonna draft for talent and not need. As I think we are all sure that Even if we had drafted and filled our hole. that would still be a longshot at making us any better than we already are.

I fundamentally disagree on two points:
He clearly said that he was gonna draft for talent and not need.

Just because he proclaimed his plan pre-draft doesn’t mean I agree with it, nor does it make the move smart.

As I think we are all sure that Even if we had drafted and filled our hole. that would still be a longshot at making us any better than we already are.

I remain committed to the opinion that if Joe drafted differently after Daye, it could have increased our W/L slightly. If the race for the 8th seed is anywhere near as tight as it was last year, another win or two, maybe three, could entirely change our outlook.

I’m no GM, I’m not in Joe’s seat, I don’t know what he does. That doesn’t mean I have to agree with his strategy. We’ve had the Summers vs. Blair discussion here ad nauseum, and I don’t want to spark that debate again. But we now have FOUR small forwards whose contracts expire in the same year— and only 48 minutes a game to go around. Unless Joe trades Tayshaun, we’ll never truly see what those 2nd rounders can do before their contracts expire and they go blow up on some other team.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

See, now I didn’t even read that article until right now, and AGAIN some choad is worshiping Toronto’s moves and blasting Detroit’s. Explain to me how giving a 30 year-old 6’10" SF who plays what is widely considered the worst defense in all the NBA 5 years and $50 million and giving a 7’ “center” who averages 5 rebounds a game and has no post game 5 years and $50 million are in any way, shape, or form “good moves.” Jarrett Jack and Reggie Evens are their toughest players and they’re both coming off the bench. Bosh is extravagantly overrated. Ditto with Calderon. I just don’t see how they had the second best offseason and Detroit had the worst.

It seems like every year the media really really wants Toronto to do well, so they suck Colangelo’s cock like he’s some type of genius— but really, what has he done? Steve Nash makes everyone look good, Toronto hasn’t done shit since Colangelo’s been there, and please don’t tell me that being the “architect” of the Redeem Team is something to be proud of— anybody can put together an NBA Live dream team. Every single one of us could’ve put together a squad that wins a gold medal. He’s overrated, the Raptors are overrated, and it’s going to be very satisfying when they finish with 35 wins again.

by Joel on Aug 21, 2009 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

@Joel:
Bravo. +1000.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

@MP
But we now have FOUR small forwards whose contracts expire in the same year– and only 48 minutes a game to go around. Unless Joe trades Tayshaun, we’ll never truly see what those 2nd rounders can do before their contracts expire and they go blow up on some other team.

I don’t see how this would really affect our W/L for this season. I’m totally with you about avoiding the Blair-Summers argument (thank you!), but in regards to this season would Blair be so much of an upgrade over Wilcox, Ben, or whoever is getting those big man minutes in the rotation that it would result in extra wins? If it turns out that during the season we are losing games because of rebounding, maybe, but that’s the only case that I think the overloading of SFs hurts us for this year.

…my only beefs with Dumars in the last 8 years are MCIAFI and Darko.

What was wrong with the Darko pick?

by Shinons on Aug 21, 2009 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

@Shinons:
For one, using that 2nd round pick differently could have meant that we wouldn’t have needed Wilcox and Ben (although I’d still want the latter). I think the case for rebounding alone is more important than might be realized. Having lost our best rebounder in Dyess and added a few mediocre ones, the ability to change or maintain possession of the ball could be our greatest failure. I think that adding a specialist to this role as the first big off the bench could very well have increased our W/L.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

The Darko pick was a draft of need.and based on potential alone,in drafting him Joe knew that he couldn’t contribute immediately. where asif he had taken Melo. we would have had the redundancy argument that we are having now.

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I have to disagree with the “redundancy” argument presented against drafting Melo. Tay and Melo are two completely different players, whereas Rip and Gordon bring virtually the same things to the table—the only difference being Rip has a stronger mid-range game and Gordon has a stronger 3-pointer. Even on potential alone back in 2003, Melo would’ve been a much better option as a starting SF, and Tay would’ve been perfect as a defensive stopper off the bench, which has been a better role for him all along. This would’ve addressed one of our primary needs for the past 5 years of not having a capable back-up 3.

by Kay Wan on Aug 21, 2009 12:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Fair enough. I’m hoping that Ben can fill that role as the specialist, and provide even more value with his shotblocking presence. I’m high on Blair and certainly agree that if he’s half the beast on the offensive glass that he was at Pitt, well, we have a team that could definitely do something with those extra possessions.

Hopefully the reason for the decision to pass is that Jod has his eye on someone to fill the role long-term in next year’s draft – preferably me and QD’s guys Larry Sanders and Jarvis Varnado.

by Shinons on Aug 21, 2009 12:30 PM EDT reply actions  

@ Kay Wan, I second that. but the consensus at the time was what I stated. Even then A true center was our biggest hole. and 5 years later we are still no closer to getting it (one). one can only dream about how many “belts” we would have had we taken Melo.

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

@Shinons:
Hopefully the reason for the decision to pass is that Jod has his eye on someone to fill the role long-term in next year’s draft – preferably me and QD’s guys Larry Sanders and Jarvis Varnado.

Man, I’m with you, I’ve been waiting for Joe to actually draft a big for years. Honestly, I cannot remember the last big Joe drafted aside from Samb.

@scntf:
if he had taken Melo. we would have had the redundancy argument that we are having now.

It is a very, very different thing to argue about redundancy and 2nd round picks than it is to argue about redundancy and a 2nd pick overall— especially in the greatest draft class since Jordan. If he had taken Melo, or Wade, or Bosh, any “redundancy” is a problem you certainly don’t complain about. This situation is entirely different.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Mike P. dont mind me. some of the things I type are me quoting things that were said from my recollection. I agree with you about it being a different situation. but Joe at the time said that his faith was in Tay, and that he was going to be our guy.all of this makes me realize how difficult his job is. because at the time everyone (GMs, media) said Darko was the smart choice. I remember some folks actually trying to pry him away after the season ended. so Joe can do two things, do what everyone projects is the best move and hence Darko. or think “act” outside of the box and be ridiculed like he is today.

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

wasn’t it bryan colangelo who traded jason kidd straight up for stephon marbury?

by Scott on Aug 21, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Man, I’m with you, I’ve been waiting for Joe to actually draft a big for years. Honestly, I cannot remember the last big Joe drafted aside from Samb.

There have been quite a few – there was also Amir, Maxiell, Okur, and, ahem, Darko.

Certainly seems like Jod usually goes the free agency route with bigs though.

by Shinons on Aug 21, 2009 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

The draft is where Dumars gets the most grief with picks like Mateen Cleaves, Rodney White and of course Darko Milicic. I actually give Dumars some slack on the Darko pick since David Aldridge reported prior to Detroit ever getting the No. 2 pick that whoever was to land in that spot would select Darko once LeBron James was off the board. Every general manager in the league would have taken Darko just as Dumars did, so to crucify him for that pick, which has become the norm, is a bit harsh.

here is a little piece that I got off of eXaminer.com, sorry I dont know how to embed.

by scntfc on Aug 21, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

The Pistons didn’t draft 3 small forwards. They drafted 3 combo forward. All three can credibly play both forward spots based on matchups. Throw in Villanueva and Washington and Maxiell and you have 6 young forwards. Law of averages says that enough of them will develop such that those two positions are locked up.

With BG, Stuckey and Bynum is seems like the Guard spots are pretty locked up too.

Some of you guys make it seem like it’s impossible to make a trade, draft pick or free agent signing for the next five years.

by Quick Darshan on Aug 21, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

picking nits, MP, but LA drafted samb, and we traded mo evans for him. So, i’m coming up short on the last big we drafted.

by Craig on Aug 21, 2009 1:51 PM EDT reply actions  

scott pollard??? I’m not counting memo, i guess, since he wasn’t a true 5.

by Craig on Aug 21, 2009 1:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Side note to the Darko/Melo conversation:

If we had drafted Melo, and assuming that with Melo in the mix, we don’t trade for Rasheed, but we keep Okur long-term… Could we have won more than 1 title with a core of Billups, Rip, Melo, Okur, Ben, and Prince? Maybe 2004 doesn’t end in a title, but maybe we are the best team in the east from 06 through 08? That would have been absolutely interesting considering the Melo/LeBron “rivalry” that never really developed.

by Jamison on Aug 21, 2009 2:41 PM EDT reply actions  

this is a crazy idea:

http://valleyofthesuns.com/2009/08/20/the-case-for-a-press-and-four-minutes-of-hell/

who would the “press lineup” be for this year’s pistons?

MFWB-Gordon-Washington-Daye-Wilcox?

by Scott on Aug 21, 2009 2:46 PM EDT reply actions  

@Scott:
Why the hell not? It’s worth trying, at least. And I agree with your lineup should we play with the Press.

by Mike Payne on Aug 21, 2009 3:00 PM EDT reply actions  

So many posts on this blog come down to this. Individually, Detroit has a bunch of good players, many of whom could realistically get better. CV has at least a good offensive game, Gordon is a closer, Rip and Tay probably still have a lot left, Ben can be a leader off the court, Kwame is a good value for the money, Maxy could realistically get back to where we want him to be consistently, and the draft picks all look pretty intriguing.

But as a team the pieces don’t match up so well. Rip and Ben are redundant and will create a temptation to play small ball. Physically, Ben is a significantly dimished version of his former self, and his former self was a liability on offense. Now instead of no decent backups for Tay, we have three? Who is going to rebound? Who is going to score in the post? Yeah, I know the 2004 team had no great post scorer, but they had a mess of other plusses (historically ferocious defense, five starters all at least second-team all-star quality, and a very deep bench, with the Pit Bulls, Corliss, and Memo).

So it does come down to trades and FA acquistions, if Detroit is going to be elite again. There is no, one, super-obvious, clearly plausible deal I can think of. The most obvious would be Rip or Gordon maybe + something for a legit stud center, but who specifically is going to do that?.

At least the team got a lot younger. . . .

by Toledo Joe on Aug 21, 2009 4:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I feel like MFWB should be “pressing” the ball handler every possession he’s in the game, regardless if we’re actually running a traditional press. Literally from the inbound pass onward I’d like to see Will hounding his guy, just like Lindsey Hunter used to. You saw in limited spurts at the end of last season how effective he can be disrupting the ball-handler.

by Joel on Aug 21, 2009 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

D’OH BY GAWD BENN IZ DA SEEZUN GUNNA STRT!!!???

I H8T ULL DISS TAWLKIN BRUM DOO GEIS!!!

smh

by Boney on Aug 21, 2009 4:49 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think we need a “stud” center. We just need somebody to pull down double-figure boards and play ferocious defense. Pryzbilla comes to mind. Gortat would’ve been perfect. I think Houston has a diamond-in-the-rough in Joey Dorsey. That type of guy. We have all the scoring we’ll need, inside and out. People talk about not having an interior scorer, but CV can get buckets inside and Wilcox is much more capable than a lot of people are giving him credit for— he has a nice little baby hook, a turnaround jumper out to like 8 feet or so, and if he’s anywhere near the rim he’ll just dunk over everyone. Don’t forget that most of MFWB’s and Stuckey’s baskets come in the painted area too— you don’t necessary have to score in the paint with your bigs (see: Wade, Lebron, Kobe, Paul, etc.). We never have and never will lead the league in points in the paint, but we’re not nearly as bad off as some people are making us out to be.

Come to think of it, who ever scored in the paint for us? Rasheed when he felt like it (2-3 shots a game)… Dyce had no inside game, Ben was obviously an offensive trainwreck… Corliss maybe? Even at our best, we were a very efficient jump-shooting team. We’re still that, but I think we have more explosive athletes and slashers who will spend a little more time in the lane than anyone on the ’04-08 teams did.

by Joel on Aug 21, 2009 4:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Joel:

FWIW, I would happily accept as a “stud” center somebody who can pull down double-figure boards and play ferocious defense.

I still would like to see some more interior scoring. I hope you’re right about CV and Wilcox. You’re right that we never had a consistent post scorer (although ‘Sheed played there more in ’04 than he did last year), and we proved you can win a ’ship without it, but I still think it’s a minus. You better have a lot of other things going for you. in ‘04-’07, Detroit got away with being a low scoring team on nights when the jumpers weren’t falling, but they could often rely on a ferocious defense and win 83-76 or whatever. I don’t see this current lineup winning by shutting down the other team.

by Toledo Joe on Aug 21, 2009 7:18 PM EDT reply actions  

If JOD is really using the same blueprint he used before then we probably need to give him at least 2 more yrs. too fill the holes. We had all kinds of holes in 2001 and 2002 it wasn’t til 2003 we started to look solid ,even tho we won alot of games, we weren’t going to the finals with those squads.I’m sure JOD’s gonna makes some trades even if he has to package some guys ,the bigger question is who the hell can he get for a solid center , the ones he might be able to trade for are either too old ,too injury prone or can’t score or rebound , any team that has a descent back up won’t give them up.Which leaves the draft or more likely european centers.In the days of the first bad boys there were alot of good centers out there now its the most barren position in the league, what the hell, have colledges stop mentoring centers or what.

by Defor on Aug 21, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

I’d rather have two decent PFs manning the 4 and 5 than a decent PF and some tall guy we found in the middle of no where as our centre. I think we’ll be okay with Wilcox/Kwame/Ben because opposing centres just aren’t that scary any more. If we can pick up some awesome 5 then I’m all for it, but who can we get? Amare (who isn’t really a centre)? Bosh (who also isn’t really a centre)? Kaman? Camby? Pretty slim pickin’s.

by Garrett on Aug 21, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Again, while I would be happy with someone in the Ben Wallace ‘04 mode of big time rebounder / great defense, there’s another reason to want a post presence in the paint - it makes it a lot easier for the jump shooters. Look at Orlando and Howard — toss it in, draw a double, toss it out, swish.

You don’t even need a monster in the middle who will consistently draw a double team. You just need a big who is a legit threat to score down low that will get the other teams guards (or sometimes forwards) to cheat a bit toward the big — giving our guards precious space.

This could be especially useful to the Pistons, because their jump shooters don’t have the range that, say, Orlando’s jumpshooters do, so Detroit can’t spread the floor quite as much, so they need other edges to get away from defenders. I mean, I love watching Rip run through three screens trying to get space as much as the next guy, but it would be nice to have another option.

by Toledo Joe on Aug 22, 2009 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

So Petey has found a home…

by Mike Payne on Aug 22, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

@Gabe:

“While that RealGM article is the most negative review of the Pistons moves I’ve read so far, I do think it’s pretty telling that that there basically hasn’t been a single hugely positive review of our off-season by any source without a direct relationship to the Pistons (either by being a fan, or part of the Detroit media).”

That is simply not so…

“One radio station in Ithaca, New York seems to believe the Detroit Pistons could be as high as the 4th seed in the NBA playoffs this season.”

http://blog.mlive.com/fullcourtpress/2009/08/saturday_morning_detroit_pisto.html

by Drew on Aug 22, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions  

There is an article on pistons.com about a few teams out west that will be vey thin this coming season. Denver, Utah, Portland, NO. which makes me appreciate what we have here a little more. we can add houston snd sacremento to that list of teams that will be searching for upgrades/fillers. Without a doubt it makes one wonder if the power has shifted back to the east. It also puts us in a postion where teams that are looking to fill some holes this season will have to At Least deal with us as a third party in trying to make something happen. As we are one of only a few teams that seems to have a surplus of moveable parts.

by scntfc on Aug 22, 2009 5:13 PM EDT reply actions  

So Petey has found a home…

And it’s home to John Edwards…how appropriate…

by Shinons on Aug 22, 2009 5:13 PM EDT reply actions  

@Shinons:
snare snare, crash!!

Salud, my friend :)

by Mike Payne on Aug 22, 2009 7:28 PM EDT reply actions  

it makes one wonder if the power has shifted back to the east

No doubt, we are Leastern no more. This season, three teams tied 11 games behind LA in the West, with Houston at 12. The elite teams are truly in the East now. There would be 4 if it weren’t for the Chauncey trade, at least for this past season. If Atlanta, Miami, Toronto and Washington can get themselves together this season, I think it’ll be clear cut where the power is.

In the East, the best are better than the best in the West. Additionally, the worst in the East are much better than the worst in the West. Represent!

by Mike Payne on Aug 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

TWEEET TWEEEEEEEEEET!!

by Charlie V on Aug 23, 2009 5:39 AM EDT reply actions  

lions suck

by scntfc on Aug 23, 2009 2:04 PM EDT reply actions  

They sure do. 17-0 after less than half of the first quarter?

by Toledo Joe on Aug 23, 2009 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

LIONS suck
BROWN BEAR balls
while getting humped by PATRIOTS raw
Getting pissed on by PANTHERS
and stomped out by COLTS
49ers and buccaneers
say their the butt of all jokes
so they got RAMmed hard by CHARGERS
and teabagged by TITANS
they surrendered to panty RAIDERS
without even fighting
they invited the team from WASHINGTON
to get their rocks off and
by halftime it was poppin
but by the 3rd quarter
They were soft and wetter than DOLPHINS
So along came a COWBOY
to talk piece with the CHIEF
he thought he saw a GIANT
he shook like a leaf
on the horizen he could SEAHAWKS
and FALCONS closing in for the kill
an EAGLE landed nearby
in his beak were some BILLS
he approached with caution
thats when he realized his CARDINAL sin

sorry guys cant come up with any more, help me finish this ode to the lions…

by scntfc on Aug 23, 2009 3:00 PM EDT reply actions  

SAINTS don’t approach PACKERS
on behalf of other men
so he mounted his BRONCO
and proceeded to break wind
out jumped a JAGUAR
and tore him limb from Limb
RAVENS flew in like JETS
they were particularly pleased
they feasted on carrion
like VIKINGS filled with glee.

by scntfc on Aug 23, 2009 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Sometimes its better NOT to hit the submit button.

by Mike Payne on Aug 23, 2009 6:11 PM EDT reply actions  

funny stuff. I have no sympathy for them losers either.

by 8milerd on Aug 23, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Getting back to the original topic of this blog entry … i.e. the trade of Delfino & Ukic for Amir Johnson & Sonny Weems:

Can someone with acute insight into the Pistons situation from last season please let me know their perspective on the reason[s]:

  • Amir Johnson failed to hold onto the Starting PF position which was bestowed on him by Michael Curry at the beginning of the year?
  • Joe Dumars was willing to give up Amir Johnson in a trade with Milwaukee this summer?

From a distance, at least, Amir Johnson was a still young player with a great deal of upside to his individual game, as a non-shot happy, athletic, role-playing PF for the Pistons at the start of last season. Then, a scant 9 months later … he is deemed to be a relatively insignificant piece to the puzzle in Detroit.

Thanks, in advance.

by khandor on Aug 24, 2009 9:43 AM EDT reply actions  

No one has any information to pass along in regards to the two questions I asked?

by khandor on Aug 25, 2009 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Detroit Pistons blog with completely fair and unbiased opinions of 29 of the Association's 30 teams. Read up and share what's on your mind.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Swedish_chef_small
Draft Day Dreams: Scott Machado
Largelogo_gurk_small
Off Topic Thread, Week of 1/30/12: Tech Geek Edition

Recent FanPosts

Tressel-nothing-fishy_thumb_small
Stop Winning Now...
Small
The Draft Dream of Anthony Davis fades
2ur2zk7_small
5-Game Win Streaks? BRING THEM TO ME
Small
Let's make a trade
Darko_milicic_small
ESPN Lottery Machine is Here!
Swedish_chef_small
The Pistons visit the City of Brotherly Love
Draft_100625_013_small
Blame Joe Dumars
Largelogo_gurk_small
Off Topic Thread, Week of 1/23/12: Your Pet Team Edition

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Been there!
I'm Totally Famous

Recent FanShots

if ur interested in drafting Blocks and Dunks, SATURDAY is a big day
All-Star Reserves Announced, Minus Greg Monroe
NBA Rookie Rankings V
Scott Machado: A Point Guard With Vision, Even if He Needs Glasses
Pistons' forward Jason Maxiell eats less, plays more
STEP AWAY FROM THE MOOSE
Brandon Knight gets acquainted with his new mask.
Where is Canada’s most romantic city?
Chauncey Billups likely tears achilles
Ben Wallace: Pistons Don't Have & Must Get Elite Defender

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-01-22_at_2 Packey

Mattw-h_small Matt Watson

Featured Contributor

Largelogo_gurk_small brgulker