Ben Gordon on Detroit’s new style
Ben Gordon talking to WSCR in Chicago:
"I know we’re gonna be a very high power offensive team, so we’re gonna definitely get out, and run, and play uptempo, and try and score a lot of points. Just talking to coach Kuester, we’re really gonna have to focus on rebounding the ball well and playing team defense, ’cause right now we’re not a big team on our front line particularly. So, we’re gonna have to focus on really playing team defense and trying to create offense through our defense, but still playing that uptempo style, and kinda getting out on the break and having a good time."
153 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Methinks Ben Gordon’s going to light it up on December 2nd.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 5, 2009 1:42 AM EDT reply actions
BG will outscore Rip this year. As will CV31. Rip will be mad that he has a more limited role, or mad that he will have to play SF, and will get traded before mid-season.
by Cody on Aug 5, 2009 1:57 AM EDT reply actions
The fact that Ben Gordon and John Kuester, as evidenced in this quote, are working on facing the problems we’re concerned about on DBB at least makes me feel better about the current roster.
“This is where we need HELP” coming from a player is a thousand times better than “We’re gonna start 5 combo guards and WIN” from Langlois.
by Mike Payne on Aug 5, 2009 2:42 AM EDT reply actions
Ugh. Stomach churns … yearns for the days of 88-76 outcomes.
by Sauce1977 on Aug 5, 2009 3:43 AM EDT reply actions
Of course Ben is going to out-score Rip, just like the opponents are going to out-score the Pistons. It’s all connected.
by Wolverine on Aug 5, 2009 8:34 AM EDT reply actions
@ MP:
The fact that Ben Gordon and John Kuester, as evidenced in this quote, are working on facing the problems we’re concerned about on DBB at least makes me feel better about the current roster.
Yeah, it’s encouraging. But OTOH, those deficiencies should be obvious to anyone with half a basketball brain.
Here’s hoping awareness translates into urgency in the practice facility and on the court.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions
Having half a basketball brain is one half more than Detroit’s last coach had.
by Birdman on Aug 5, 2009 10:22 AM EDT reply actions
@Sauce
Ugh. Stomach churns … yearns for the days of 88-76 outcomes.
For real. Sounds to me like Gordon is saying “I’m taking 25 shots a game!!!!…obligatory hat tip to rebounding and defense…Seriously, I can’t wait to take 25 shots a game!!!!!”
@Cody
BG will outscore Rip this year. As will CV31. Rip will be mad that he has a more limited role, or mad that he will have to play SF, and will get traded before mid-season.
You’re probably right, which sucks. He’s gotten a very raw deal for the past year. That extension has turned out to be nothing but a slap in the face to Rip. A slap in the face when he’s not wearing the mask, I mean. So that it’s effective and all…
by Shinons on Aug 5, 2009 10:23 AM EDT reply actions
@ Shinons:
You’re probably right, which sucks. He’s gotten a very raw deal for the past year. That extension has turned out to be nothing but a slap in the face to Rip.
Please. An 11-million-dollar-per-year slap in the face is one I would take any second of any minute of any hour of any day of any week of any year.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions
Sauce I agree. I loved those slow days where we wouldt barely put up 80 and still win. Real hardnosed defense with shot clock stalling offense.
by Ronnie D. on Aug 5, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions
I yearn for the days of 213-206 games. Rock ’n Jock, baby.
by TDP on Aug 5, 2009 10:49 AM EDT reply actions
Guy says everything right and people still find reasons to bitch.
by Joel on Aug 5, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions
Please. An 11-million-dollar-per-year slap in the face is one I would take any second of any minute of any hour of any day of any week of any year.
Actually it’s a $12.5 million slap in the face if money’s the only thing that matters to you. But if, you know, winning, consistency in your role, not continually bringing in guys to start over you, just being used as trade bait, if those things are important to you…
I’m not saying Rip’s a victim, just that he’s gotten a pretty raw deal. I don’t think that’s too extreme of a statement.
by Shinons on Aug 5, 2009 11:15 AM EDT reply actions
@brgulker: hell, I’d take a 5M dollar bitch slap to the face. lol
@ Joel: Agreed.
I think if you look at the NBA, the 80-76 games are no longer possible. If for no other reason than rule changes and defensive hand checks out on the perimeter. I think there was a story long ago about how John Havilcheck when he hand checked you actually grabbed your hip/shorts. And those shorty shorts made it quite easy.
Take the final four from this year and all had offensive weapons for the most part. Sure, Orlando I believe was the top rated D team and Clev gets props for it’s defense. But it didn’t help much when Clev played Orl and tried to match up D wise and the fact that not many people could put the ball in the hoop. Ditto for Orl. Once LA got geared up defensively against Den in games 5 & 6 and against Orl, those teams couldn’t adapt.
I’m not saying D isn’t important. It still wins chips IMHO. But what good is it if you’ve got 5 Bruce Bowens out there and shut the other team down but can’t make a bucket? Given how Kuester has studied under several D coaches and he was in Clev for O, Det history of D and I gotta believe Jod explained to Gordon what type of ball Det is know for, I don’t have any problem with what BG said.
by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 5, 2009 11:16 AM EDT reply actions
Guy says everything right and people still find reasons to bitch.
Is your memory really that short?
Ben Gordon is no Ai, to be sure, but just because an NBA players says all the right things doesn’t mean he’ll actually follow through. There are reasons for skepticism (and bitching).
I think Gordon’s got a great attitude, mind you, but I can understand why people are concerned about the team, especially because Rip and BG will be forced to co-exist (for at least a little while), and that didn’t work so hot last season.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 11:17 AM EDT reply actions
I hated seeing brick after brick during those games when we couldn’t score for the life of us. Sometimes, I’d rather have more offense than D. Here’s hoping this will be a more balanced team. It’s easier to score than it is to defend nowadays in the league and the old pistons would still stink it up on O.
Our D shouldn’t fall off too much with Rip and Tay in there teaching team defense. It’s all in the scheme. I’ll give BG and CV a chance to prove themselves before crucifying them about their previous “lack of playing defense”. Let’s see how they do as Pistons. Same was said about Chaunce and Rip. It’ll def be more exciting basketball and I can’t wait for it. It’ll be a nice change and if they start winning, everyone will pretend they loved it from the start.
I still remember game 7 of the finals against the Spurs. We had the lead till 4 minutes left in the game and couldn’t score worth a poop.
by Rami @ work on Aug 5, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions
I still remember game 7 of the finals against the Spurs. We had the lead till 4 minutes left in the game and couldn’t score worth a poop.
If memory serves, we were one of the best teams in the league in terms of scoring efficiency and differential that season. As were the Spurs. We were generally very good on offense that season, even though we lacked a “shot creator” in crunch time, and SA was very good on defense. We just got unlucky.
Scoring totals are overrated. If I score 110 per game but give up 111 points per game, I’m going to lose more than I win. That’s why teams with the best offensive/defensive differentials win year after year after year.
On paper, it looks like we’ll be able to score more points next year than we did in previous years. But, it also looks like we’ll give up more points than we did in previous years.
I agree, though, we have to give the guys a chance. But I disagree with you about offenses, because I don’t think it’s about how many points we score; rather, it’s about how efficiently we score them and how inefficiently we can cause our opponents to score. I’ll take an 80-75 win over a 105-108 loss every game of the season.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions
@ Shinons: Partially agree. But you can’t give a guy a role based on salary. Did he get a raw deal? His buddy is traded and 2 guys didn’t resign. Typical NBA transactions that’s repeated throughout the NBA numerous times.
And let’s face it, he wouldn’t have gotten a 33M/3yr extension this year or next year when his contract was up. And it’s not like Jod didn’t say something last summer about trading players. He may be pissed off, but he’s been in the leauge long enough to know what this league is.
by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 5, 2009 11:53 AM EDT reply actions
I’m excited to see all these guys play together. There are so many young guys on the team, I want to see which ones really step up and show us something like Bynum last year. I think Stuckey and CV will both put up career best numbers while improving their efficiency and that Daye will flash a lot of potential.
Can’t believe the regular season is stil almost 3 months away. Ugh.
by Jim on Aug 5, 2009 12:05 PM EDT reply actions
+10000000000 @ brgulker for the iverson video. I never saw that one. lmao…one of the reporters at the end “Even practice?” lmfao. Everything he said was a complete lie- he didn’t care about the ’chip, his teammates, or his coach (no one really cared about the coach tho lol).
by Cody on Aug 5, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions
MBinSC, how many times do you think Rip has asked himself “Why the %$#* did they extend me???” Chauncey got traded to his hometown, Tay’s still in the team’s plans, Sheed and Dyess walked to a contender, Ben got paid, and Rip’s in limbo with a team that doesn’t really seem to want him and doesn’t seem to be anything more than a trade piece. He’s probably going to be gone by the trade deadline. Whether he understands how the league works or not, that’s got to suck. What’s his motivation right now, except to look good for his next team?
by Shinons on Aug 5, 2009 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
The NBA is the NBA. Yeah, I get that all those guys were together for years, but they have to realize they were EXTREMELY lucky, bordering on spoiled. When you don’t win, you can’t expect to stay together for very long. Heck, I’d go so far as to say it was a year too late, but that’s debatable.
Also, I see people say this time and time again, that Rip signed an extension before Chauncey was traded. NOT TRUE. He had agreed to the terms of an extension, but it wasn’t actually signed until after the trade. Also, Shinons, I think its a little misleading to say “Why did they extend me?” Its not like he didn’t sign the paper too.
http://www.pistonsforum.com/detroit-pistons-general-discussion/10351-rip-ripped-no-way.html
Unfortunately, the Free Press article is gone, but there is an excerpt from it on this forum. Also, it has been mentioned several times on pistons.com.
by Drew on Aug 5, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
Drew, I never even mentioned those points you are talking about (time together or timing of extension).
Also, Shinons, I think its a little misleading to say "Why did they extend me?" Its not like he didn’t sign the paper too.
I say this is entirely relevant because Rip was making a long-term commitment to the team whereas the team wasn’t particularly interested in Rip for their short-term OR long-term plans. I’m not a particularly sentimental guy, but I think that sucks for Rip.
I don’t really care enough to debate the “Was Rip screwed” argument – I think it’s been thoroughly played out over the past year. The bottom line is the sooner we trade Rip, the better for everyone involved.
by Shinons on Aug 5, 2009 12:57 PM EDT reply actions
brgulker:
I actually agree with you on scoring efficiency. My comments are more about people bitching about how bad defensively we’ll be before anyone has taken the court. We won with our defense, but we lost because of our offense. You still have to score to win. At this point with how the NBA is, I’d rather have a more potent offense with guys who drive the lane and are better 3 and free throw shooters. The new makeup of the team is refreshing but I still want us to get a bit bigger.
by Rami @ work on Aug 5, 2009 1:13 PM EDT reply actions
Shinons: Oh, I know you didn’t say that they signed the extension before the trade, I just meant that one phrase. But I think the team is obviously committed to Rip at least somewhat. They did give him round about 11 million per year.
And, on another point, I wouldn’t be surprised if they keep Rip and let Bynum walk. I think that Tay is far more likely to be traded, with his cap friendly contract and the caliber of rookies behind him.
Bring in another frontcourt player for Tay/the MLE, and suddenly the backcourt logjam corrects itself (with Bynum leaving), the SF position is solid, and there are lots of pieces to use to rebuild the frontcourt— Tay, MLE, and a solid big man draft. Also, with the SF staffed by players on their rookie contract and the possibility of using the draft for frontcourt players, the SG money doesn’t look so scary.
by Drew on Aug 5, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions
@ Shinons:
MBinSC, how many times do you think Rip has asked himself "Why the %$#* did they extend me???"
Give me a fricking break. Let’s all cry for Rip for a second.
Now that that’s over, let’s think rationally and put away the silly emotions.
First, Rip could have declined the extension, right? Right. He knew along with everyone else what Jod had said and how old the roster was getting. It wasn’t a secret.
Second, Rip is making 33 fracking million dollars over three years because of the extension, which is more than he could have made had he not signed it. I don’t know how in the world you can call a 3/33 contract a “raw deal,” no matter how you slice it.
Third, when you sign a contract in the NBA, you know exactly what you are doing. You know that you could be traded at virtually every moment, and yeah, it would suck to have that happen or to have that happen to one of your best friends. But the risks are clear and well-known. And they are compensated accordingly.
Fourth, it’s 33 fracking million dollars!
Fifth, if he misses Chauncey so much, he can afford to buy a private jet and go visit him in his spare time.
Finally, rip was extended for the same reason that Orlando matched for Gortat: Good players are assets. As a fan, we know that. As players, they know that. As GM’s, they know that.
Let’s stop the boo hoo, woe is Rip train. He ‘lost’ a friend. That sucks. I’ve lost several, too, you know why? Because they had to move because of their jobs — and none of us are making 33 mil over 3 years for what we do. Suggesting that we should feel sorry for Rip is absurd.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions
I almost would rather see stuck leave than mfwb. but thats just my opinion. I’m sick of people saying the rip got screwed thing. If we translated this into blue collar terms there should be no misunderstandings. If you work at Ford and guys with tons of seniority are being forced to take buyouts. maybe your good buddy got canned due to his attendance. their eliminating positions and move you from off the hi-lo to the line where its hot as shit and you stand in one spot all day. what you gonna do? quit? hell naw you gonna keep showing up like you been doing. and whistle while you work. why. cause aint nobody putting $ in your pocket. and yeah you loved the days of old. but it is what it is. you sure as hell aint going up the street and making what ford pays you.
by scntfc on Aug 5, 2009 1:48 PM EDT reply actions
Shinons: Rip knew last year that Sheed’s contract ended this past season. I think Dyess had a two year deal prior to the trade. Ben took the money and ran. . . a few years ago.
His best bud gets traded to a team, hometown or not. If Jod could’ve swapped D-wade for CB, Rip’s less pissed off?
“Why did they extend me?” Who cares. Having listened to what Jod said after the 08 loss to the Celtics, Flip getting fired and Max signing just before camp, Rip is unsure what the future holds? who cares.
Rip could have been in the last year of his contract this season and then tested the waters. He knew that before he signed his contract. Anyone of the guys, CB, Dyess, Sheed go down with a torn ACL last season, does he sit there and say “why did they extend me or why did I sign?” Who cares.
Now, does Rip’s game fit better with the 04-08 Pistons as constructed as opposed to the team being put together now? Yes.
“What’s his motivation right now, except to look good for his next team?” Yep. Because he’s got a contract based on what the Pistons were willing to sign him at that point. Does he decline that extension based on what he knows now? Only he knows. Of course, he also knows nobody is going to sign him to a 33M/3 yr deal. Does he take an MLE and play behind Allen, VC, Kobe ? Denver? Probably not since the MLE is going to cost Den 2X that because of the lux tax.
I guess my point is that Rip had to of had some kind of ingling of what was going to be done. Be it CB, Tay, Dyess or Sheed based on the transactions done in the summer of 08 and Jod’s words. If I see half by sales team blown up and nothing in return, sure I gotta question why management wants me here since I fit into the “team.” But if they go out and get me some talent and I’m still here, then I ‘m still here to make this work. It’s not like we sold off talent for the sole purpose of being under the lux tax without replacing anyone. Say Rip comes off the bench and get 12-15 per nite. In 4 years when the contract is up, he’ll be sought after and have alot less miles on his legs. If he starts and get ~20/nite, he will be sought after in 4 years.
In short: If he makes it work, it’ll work. If he doesn’t, then it won’t. And something tells me Jod isn’t the type to say "so he won’t be pissed off, let’s sign him to an extension and overpay him.
by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 5, 2009 1:49 PM EDT reply actions
"What’s his motivation right now, except to look good for his next team?"
How about personal fracking integrity?
This team is signing my paycheck (and it’s a huge paycheck). As a person of integrity, I work my hardest. Period.
I expect Rip will do the same. He might not be happy, and he might complain, but he’ll work hard. That’s a quality I respected about him personally last season.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 1:56 PM EDT reply actions
Yeah, I think Rip has proven that he shows up to play every night. He’s an iron man, and has been EXTREMELY consistent for us (except at the start of last season when he was still recovering from Chauncey’s trade or whatever). He’s a professional, and that’s all the motivation he probably needs.
by Garrett on Aug 5, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions
“scntfc
Aug 5th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
I almost would rather see stuck leave than mfwb. but thats just my opinion."
Man, I’d never do that. I think stuck got a raw deal with MCIAFI coaching him, more so than RIP or anyone else on the team. He took a couple steps back because of the chaos we had last year. Folks say he’s not a true point, but what opportunity has he had to learn to run a stable offense? This will be his 3rd coach in 3 years with his 3rd different offensive schemes. I think this will be his year. I wouldn’t hesitate to trade him if we get an already proven pure PG, but that’s unlikely. Good PG’s are rare and he’s the closest we have right now. Plus, MFWB is like 5’4" (joking) and Stuck is ~6’5". Would you rather have BG and MFWB as your 1 and 2?
by Rami @ work on Aug 5, 2009 2:34 PM EDT reply actions
I’m sick of all the Rip and BG pissing contest. Them guys probably don’t even care who score more points a nite. I think they will coexist just fine.
As for the AI and Rip problem last year, it wasn’t even about Rip or AI. The problem was about Curry not being able to coach a team. That why the Pistons look like they were playing street ball last year.
by joe on Aug 5, 2009 2:39 PM EDT reply actions
Looks like we just signed Austin Day to a contract:
http://www.mlive.com/pistons/index.ssf/2009/08/detroit_pistons_sign_firstroun.html
by Rami @ work on Aug 5, 2009 3:15 PM EDT reply actions
Rip Hamilton was the Piston’s best player last year.
Think about that for a second. The guy was fighting a groin injury for probably half the season. The new coach was AFI. He setup man/best friend was gone. He was the new Captain of the Team, but got benched for johnny-come-lately Allen Iverson. The team was disintegrating around him.
But, Rip was the best player last year. Most consistent, at least. You may make a case for McDyess as well, but his one month absence tips the scales for Rip, in my book.
Having said that… trading him is also going to be the easiest way to help “fix” this team. He’s redundant. The Pistons have already hired his replacement.
How would that feel, working alongside the guy you know is going to take your job? You just don’t know when…
I’m not feeling sorry for Rip. No one should. But the cold facts are what they are. If Rip isn’t shipped out soon, this team will be worse because of it (a very strange thing to realize).
by Big Z on Aug 5, 2009 3:31 PM EDT reply actions
Give me a fricking break. Let’s all cry for Rip for a second.
Now that that’s over, let’s think rationally and put away the silly emotions.
Did you miss the part where I said I don’t really care?
First, Rip could have declined the extension, right? Right. He knew along with everyone else what Jod had said and how old the roster was getting. It wasn’t a secret.
Again, I don’t really care.
Second, Rip is making 33 fracking million dollars over three years because of the extension, which is more than he could have made had he not signed it. I don’t know how in the world you can call a 3/33 contract a "raw deal," no matter how you slice it.
Like I said before, money is only one part of the equation. Still, I don’t care.
Third, when you sign a contract in the NBA, you know exactly what you are doing. You know that you could be traded at virtually every moment, and yeah, it would suck to have that happen or to have that happen to one of your best friends. But the risks are clear and well-known. And they are compensated accordingly.
Like I said before, him being traded would be the best for everyone involved. Malcontents in the clubhouse never lead to many wins. Like I said also said before, I don’t really care.
Fourth, it’s 33 fracking million dollars!
Still don’t really care.
Fifth, if he misses Chauncey so much, he can afford to buy a private jet and go visit him in his spare time.
I never said jack shit about him missing Chauncey. I don’t really care about that just like I don’t really care about this argument.
Finally, rip was extended for the same reason that Orlando matched for Gortat: Good players are assets. As a fan, we know that. As players, they know that. As GM’s, they know that.
Cap space is also an asset, and that seemed to be what Jod most coveted this summer. And if Rip would have exercised his option, his expiring deal for the summer of ‘10 would have been an asset. But you’re pulling this argument out of your ass – no one’s even talked about this. And I don’t really care.
Let’s stop the boo hoo, woe is Rip train. He ‘lost’ a friend. That sucks. I’ve lost several, too, you know why? Because they had to move because of their jobs — and none of us are making 33 mil over 3 years for what we do. Suggesting that we should feel sorry for Rip is absurd.
Very douchey, but I don’t really care. You are a shit-ton more worked up about this topic than I am.
by Shinons on Aug 5, 2009 3:35 PM EDT reply actions
BigZ: Guys take jobs because the guy that was suppose to do the job didn’t get it done. Whether it’s football, basketball, the bank CEO or the local sheriff.
I think they will co-exist fine. Rip was willing to come off the bench last year and if training camp says he needs to start or come off the bench this year, he will. It’s not like he’s out there playing for a contract knowing the firt bad pass he’s going to sit the rest of the game, if for no other reason than MCIAFI isn’t here.
Some nites BG will go off and some nites it will be Rip. Some nites it will be both and other nites neither.
by MarkButter in SoCal on Aug 5, 2009 4:09 PM EDT reply actions
@ Big Z:
Rip Hamilton was the Piston’s best player last year.
I disagree completely. I would say Dice and Tay (excluding the playoffs) were significantly better. What does Rip excel at other than scoring?
@ joe:
I’m sick of all the Rip and BG pissing contest
I don’t think it’s a pissing contest between those two guys; they’ll handle it like pro’s. I think the discussion about here has been that there are only 48 minutes to be had at SG per night … who’s gonna get the bulk of them? And which of the two will get played out of position the most?
@ Shinons:
Did you miss the part where I said I don’t really care?
Okay, so you bring up an issue, respond to the issue several times, and then claim to not care. Evade much? I mean, if you’re gonna raise an issue, that’s great; that’s how it works. But it’s more than a little silly to raise an issue, respond, and then just start dodging.
But you’re pulling this argument out of your ass – no one’s even talked about this.
So should I get your approval before making a comment? We extended Rip because Jod valued Rip as a player, i.e., as a good player, Rip is an asset to the team. I’m not sure why that’s such a novel concept; I thought I was just stating the obvious …
Very douchey, but I don’t really care. You are a shit-ton more worked up about this topic than I am.
Douchey. Right. You want me to sing kumbayah with Rip and I’m douchey.
Look, it sucked for Rip to lose his best friend like that, I’m sure. I’ve been through the same thing. But that’s just life for all of us; work gets in the way of friendships. So yeah, when someone gets all whiny about a multi-millionaire whose friend had to move because of his job and then suggests that we should somehow sympathize with that, yeah, it works me up a bit. Poor Rip and his 33 million dollar contract. Awww, what a raw deal. How sad.
by brgulker on Aug 5, 2009 4:12 PM EDT reply actions
I actually read that headline as Ben Wallace…
Then when he started saying “we” I thought, that’s awfully optimistic given that you’re not signed yet.
by TimR on Aug 5, 2009 4:15 PM EDT reply actions
“How would that feel, working alongside the guy you know is going to take your job? You just don’t know when…”
Really, you could say that about Tayshaun too. The Pistons did just bring in 4 small forwards. But, I’m sure he will teach and mentor them just the same. Because he wants to win.
Rip wants to win too. I think he’ll be a good egg this year.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 5, 2009 4:22 PM EDT reply actions
I want to see how well Rip shoots this year without DICE and Sheed setting screens for him. BG can score on his own and make things happen. Rip needs to run around a slew of screens and then catch and shoot. CV cannot set screens like DICE and Sheed. Maybe Kwame can
Personally I really like Rip and my son went to his camp – but without CB and bigs to set screens he is not very effective
by IsraeliPiston on Aug 5, 2009 4:27 PM EDT reply actions
Okay, so you bring up an issue, respond to the issue several times, and then claim to not care. Evade much? I mean, if you’re gonna raise an issue, that’s great; that’s how it works. But it’s more than a little silly to raise an issue, respond, and then just start dodging.
See here:
“I don’t really care enough to debate the "Was Rip screwed" argument – I think it’s been thoroughly played out over the past year. The bottom line is the sooner we trade Rip, the better for everyone involved.”
Right before you got on your little emotional hissy fit. Give it up. I don’t give a shit.
Douchey. Right. You want me to sing kumbayah with Rip and I’m douchey.
I could care less what you sing. But yeah, you’re acting like a douche.
Look, it sucked for Rip to lose his best friend like that, I’m sure. I’ve been through the same thing. But that’s just life for all of us; work gets in the way of friendships. So yeah, when someone gets all whiny about a multi-millionaire whose friend had to move because of his job and then suggests that we should somehow sympathize with that, yeah, it works me up a bit. Poor Rip and his 33 million dollar contract. Awww, what a raw deal. How sad.
I still don’t give a shit about a thing you just said.
by Shinons on Aug 5, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions
@brgulker:
I disagree completely. I would say Dice and Tay (excluding the playoffs) were significantly better. What does Rip excel at other than scoring?
First, I agree with Big Z, and I disagree that Dyess and especially Tay were “significantly better”. In my opinion, Rip and MFWB were our best players this season, Dyess as well. (however, Rip and MFWB produced a net positive result when on the court, Dyess did not)
Second, “what does Rip excel at other than scoring?” Plenty. Even if he didn’t, what the hell is the job description of a “shooting guard” anyway? Beyond his scoring, Rip is a great defender and a great passer:
- vs. opponent performance in 48 by position
- 4.4 apg makes him 8th best SG passer in the league.
by Mike Payne on Aug 5, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions
I agree with MP…Rip is an excellant passer. I remember a stretch of like a couple weeks last year where he averaged damn near a double double and had like 14 assist nights, then 9, then 12; really good statlines. That was when they were winning, too.
by Cody on Aug 5, 2009 4:49 PM EDT reply actions
first off everyone needs to stop bitchin about how rip and ben are like rip and u kno who
by jason on Aug 5, 2009 8:08 PM EDT reply actions
Unless they notice the illegal defense rules prior to this century were actually working to help the offense, then I don’t think defense is going away. The refs are crooked and terrible, in that order … if they used hand-check rules sparingly, the league would be in a far better balance for offense and defense. Right now, there seems to be an inefficient league mandate to call tight games, instead of just doing away with zone defense and calling every touch-foul there is to call.
There’s just absolutely nothing appealing about a 140-122 loss. None.
by Sauce1977 on Aug 5, 2009 8:23 PM EDT reply actions
Then we’re agreed: Rip Hamilton has nice cheekbones.
by Jonathan on Aug 5, 2009 8:49 PM EDT reply actions
Every time I think of hand checking, I think of Derek Harper. I remember an interview back when the league stopped allowing it and I think it was Joe Dumars who said Derek Harper was the KING. He could stop an offensive player dead in his tracks just by putting his hand in the right spot in a guy’s lower back or hip, and apparently it was a huge pain in the ass for everyone.
by Garrett on Aug 5, 2009 8:51 PM EDT reply actions
I am sure most would disagree with me but I really feel like Bynum is a consistant jumpshot away from being a great player. I think we are lucky to have him and totally see a diamond in the rough. And if there is one thing that can improve in this league through hard work its your shot. Alot of other game intangibles cannot be taught. Some of the greatest players in the last couple decades have come into the league without a jumper and really busted their ass to improve it. Look at Lebron most recently. Every year his jumpshot has improved. It was WORTHLESS when he first got into the NBA. WB’s size will keep him from being a dominant player but with a jumpshot hes got a shot at being a star. I really believe that and am totally drinking the koolaide. I really hope we keep him and he keeps improving. Then again maybe hes reached his ceiling and is one of those players who really never learn to shoot. But from what I have seen I really hope that hes around a long time and I don’t see why anybody on this board would be down on him.
by EZ MIKE P on Aug 5, 2009 10:56 PM EDT reply actions
@MP
you’re right…I disagree. Bynum actually has a decent jump shot…better than stuckey at least. I think he is an energy guy that would not translate very well into a 36 mpg player. He is a great role player, and i would love to see him get 20 minutes a night this year, but not much more than that.
by Cody on Aug 5, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions
@ EZ MIKE P
You seem to love MFWB as much as Mike Payne does. Alter ego?
by PS on Aug 5, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions
@cody:
if you refer to EZ MIKE P as “MP”, that means he and I shall fight with knifes. And I will gladly do so. I’ve been repping MFWB since “EZ” was writing his name in all caps. Word! buffalo stance
by Mike Payne on Aug 6, 2009 12:45 AM EDT reply actions
Apparently LenDale White has been less drunk and surly lately… and has slimmed down about 30 pounds or so. Perhaps Mr Big Shot had a chat with his cousin about how being fat makes you less proficient at athletic-related activities.
by Yahtzee on Aug 6, 2009 1:56 AM EDT reply actions
“…with a jumpshot hes got a shot at being a star…”
I’d switch that to:
“With a jumpshot hes got a shot at being Nate Robinson.”
I don’t mean that as an insult either, just that players under 6’ tall, whose strength is scoring (unless they get hyped like AI) usually aren’t stars. Still, Bynum’s a bargain at his current price, and with an improved jumper (even if he could just hit around 33-35% on threes) he’d be a very, very potent offensive player.
by Gabe on Aug 6, 2009 2:28 AM EDT reply actions
a lil something to ease allovda tension around here.
by scntfc on Aug 6, 2009 2:52 AM EDT reply actions
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5ivbp_nba-pistons-103-celtics-97-f-recaps_sport
the last time I held my head high while speaking of the pistons
by scntfc on Aug 6, 2009 2:57 AM EDT reply actions
I thought one of Bynum’s strengths was being a pesky perimeter defender?
by Colin on Aug 6, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions
Shocker
someone besides just me finally steps up and calls a spade a spade. Br you are a douche. You don’t think in realistic terms (oh well if I were making 33 million I’d do whatever you wanted me to do).
If you’re making 55k at your nubs job and the 2nd shift guy comes in and is instantly everyones favorite and they can’t wait to dump your tiredass, you’d feel resentful too.
This isn’t about singing bible study songs with a professional athlete.
by Boney on Aug 6, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions
I’m more interested in what Q-star thinks about Rip than idle speculators…and the Q-star thought it was more important to go to Rip’s wedding than see his summer league team get off to a start.
Rip has a role on the team and Q-star is doing everything he can, from day one, to make him happy.
by Illinois Pistons Fan on Aug 6, 2009 1:43 PM EDT reply actions
I would have to disagree on the Nate Robinson thing. His offensive game is already more dangerous than Nate’s. Hes just to fast to stay in front of. You can’t say that about Nate Robinson. And NR is in a different position for playing time and exposure. I think hes overated honestly. If it wasn’t for the fact hes short and athletic in NY we wouldn’t talk about him except he won some dunk contests that he didn’t even deserve. Made a mockery of the already joke of a dunk contest in both wins. And I am new to the board as far as reading everyones comments so if Mike Payne has been giving big ups to WB for a long time then I didn’t see it so kudos to that. And when I say star I don’t mean Lebron, Kobe etc. But a guy the whole league knows about and wants to watch. Brings attention to the Pistons like are other good players do to the average fan who doesn’t semi-obsess like we do on this board.
by EZ MIKE P on Aug 6, 2009 1:51 PM EDT reply actions
@ MP:
Second, "what does Rip excel at other than scoring?" Plenty. Even if he didn’t, what the hell is the job description of a "shooting guard" anyway? Beyond his scoring, Rip is a great defender and a great passer:
- vs. opponent performance in 48 by position
- 4.4 apg makes him 8th best SG passer in the league.
I could quote stats to make my case, but it’s not worth the hassle. Rip has been our leading scorer, so it’s natural to conclude that he’s our best player.
If you look beyond scoring totals, you might see something else. If you’re interested in the stats, I’ll share them, but last time I did … well, it just ain’t worth the trouble.
by brgulker on Aug 6, 2009 2:34 PM EDT reply actions
@brgulker:
Rip has been our leading scorer, so it’s natural to conclude that he’s our best player.
I totally disagree, and think the regulars here would too. I think a casual fan might equate the “top scorer” thing with “best player”, but we’re all way too smart for that here. If that were so, we wouldn’t have loved Big Ben the way we did when he was here.
If you look beyond scoring totals, you might see something else.
That’s exactly what I did. Exactly. I didn’t say anything about scoring, I showed what Rip brings to the table BEYOND scoring. Namely, a top 10 passer for his position (which is “great”, not “above average”) and a great defender (again, not just “above average”).
If you’re interested in the stats, I’ll share them, but last time I did … well, it just ain’t worth the trouble.
I honestly don’t know why people dog you for this. I love your comments, I love your stat analysis and don’t think any of the whiners should discourage you from posting stat-related points of discussion.
I do not understand why people get all worked up about the statistical analysis of sports. Sure, there are people like QuickDarshan who states that basketball stats don’t represent the whole of a players performance— and he’s totally right. Defense is impossible to quantify accurately, although some stats do help show a bit of the picture— like opponent performance, stls/blks.
But then there are others who illogically hate stats. It’s dumb, ignorant, silly. Then again, so is relying on stats entirely to make an analysis. Amongst the stat lovers here, I don’t think any of us are foolish enough to suggest stats alone can 100% represent a player’s value. I know you know this too, brgulker. I dig your stat comments, and I want to see more of them. I don’t think, however, people above are complaining about your stat posts here— just the way you went after Shinons, which was a bit douchey (no disrespect).
by Mike Payne on Aug 6, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t mind when people post stats, either. I’m definitely not a stats guy, but thanks to you guys I’ve become more of one. And if I don’t want to read a bunch of numbers, I’ll just keep scrolling down. Ain’t no thang.
by Garrett on Aug 6, 2009 3:09 PM EDT reply actions
Are you kidding me? Q-Star went to the wedding for the free booze and hot bitches. He knows he’s big dog and knew he’d get some sweet poonanny at the wedding.
by James B. on Aug 6, 2009 3:10 PM EDT reply actions
@James B.:
Q-Star went to the wedding for the free booze and hot bitches.
I too like free booze, bitches.
by Mike Payne on Aug 6, 2009 3:19 PM EDT reply actions
http://www.nba.com/magic/news/Lewis_Suspended-321190-2348.html
rashad lewis banned for 10 games due to use of banned drug
that means we’ll play an orlando team without lewis twice in the opening weeks if i remember our shedule correctly
by mannie32 on Aug 6, 2009 4:17 PM EDT reply actions
Richard Hamilton was the best player on the team last year.
br,
you didn’t use stats to come up with McDyess or Tay, you used who you saw had big games or were the most consistent on nights where you personally watched the game. How do I know that? Because I once thought McDyess was the best Piston last year, and I was waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay fckin wrong.
I dont believe Rip is great at defending his position, I think he’s perhaps top 15. The stats don’t show his true defensive presence, but then again they don’t show Tay’s either.
Rip has been the most consistent player on the team for several years. He signed a going rate contract for a shooting guard who does what he does for the team.
by Boney on Aug 6, 2009 4:52 PM EDT reply actions
RE: Stats. I love numbers but my pet peeve is the improper use of stats to prove a point which I think TV broadcasts do all the time. “He scoring average went up from 20.7 to 21.3” Umm, ever heard of standard deviation?
I think the posters on here are more intelligent about stats. Especially since they tend to use “per possession.”
The stats I trust the most are team stats (per possession). I think that “Points Per 100 Possessions” is the best tool for evaluating team defense and offense.
As for individual stats, I like “rebounding percentage” too, but even that has limitations.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 6, 2009 4:58 PM EDT reply actions
“Richard Hamilton was the best player on the team last year.”
/Boney’d??
by Quick Darshan on Aug 6, 2009 4:59 PM EDT reply actions
Stats can definitely lie. All absolutes are junk. Except for one, and that is, Allen Iverson absolutely fucking sucks.
by Sauce1977 on Aug 6, 2009 5:57 PM EDT reply actions
On that note, what exactly is the big picture of this new Pistons style, other than bending over and taking it in the can, repeatedly?
There’s gonna be a lot of daggers, only, now, it seems like Detroit’s the one that’s going to be the victim of a lot more of them.
Oh, and John Hughes died. That suburb of Illinois he repeatedly used goes right with him. Rock on forever, Hughes, Breakfast Club and Bueller fucking rule.
by Sauce1977 on Aug 6, 2009 6:07 PM EDT reply actions
Apparently, DaJuan Summers is in a CV31/Bosh-like twitter race with a friend and porn star.
I think I may to need to make some revisions to my “The Wrong DaJuan” screenplay. Bow-Chica-Bow-Bow.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 6, 2009 10:19 PM EDT reply actions
Its easy to look at this teams lineup and make an assumption that were gonna suck on defense , but until I see them play at least til the half way point i’m gonna reserve my judgement this team is head and shoulders above what we had last yr. especially the coach and I’ve seen too many guys who supposedly couldn’t play defense all of a sudden become a defensive force with the right team defensive scheme.As for the log jam at shooting guard I don’t think Rip’s gonna be with us past the trade deadline, I just hope JOD gets a front court player with close to equal value and that He can send RIP somewhere he want to be ,he’s busted his ass for us and deserves that much ,but in all honesty getting both those objectives in a Rip trade may not be possible.
by Defor on Aug 6, 2009 10:34 PM EDT reply actions
With so many new faces, the defense will most definitely suck at the beginning of the season. And DBB will be a horrible place to be for a while.
I just want to see significant improvement from the beginning of the season to the end. And, of course, I want to see effort.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 12:27 AM EDT reply actions
Co-sign, QD. I want to see effort, and some sort of semblance of professional basketball.
by Garrett on Aug 7, 2009 12:56 AM EDT reply actions
I’m trying to get Detroit Metro renamed “The Will Bynum Airport”
by Skylar on Aug 7, 2009 1:01 AM EDT reply actions
Can’t wait to use the Mother F#$%in’ People Mover
by Yahtzee on Aug 7, 2009 2:07 AM EDT reply actions
As inspired by MFSkylar, we need a “rename various detroit area landmarks as if they were sponsored by Pistons players” thread.
(OT: i’m driving to the D now actually, 7.5 hours…)
by Mike Payne on Aug 7, 2009 9:40 AM EDT reply actions
JOD is constructing a team to rival the Bad Boys. The interior is not there yet (and he knows it). BG is not a starter. Rip’s defense, as a two, is top 5 in the entire NBA. He will more than likely remain a Piston throughout this contract.
We do not need a “true Point Guard” JOD has stated numerous times, his preference is to have two combo guards on the floor. Stuckey, Rip, MFWB are all combo guards. BG is a “true” shooting guard.
I don’t think BG has been involved in a system where defense was pressed on him, all he was needed for in Chicago was to score, when you have a team (Chicago) that has NO low post scoring threat, there must be a dude who doesn’t miss, that was BG. Chicago’s defensive plan the last couple years appears to have been something like just-force-them-to-drive-the-lane-we-got-guys-who-will-contest-then-get-the-rebound.
Rip, Tay, Stuckey and MFWB are above average perimeter defenders, if CV and Kwame can provide even average help defense, we are going to score more than we give up to most teams. As constructed now, the 2009-2010 Pisons should easily win 42 games (barring significant injuries), anymore than that is iffy.
The rookies are (obviously) the biggest question mark, if each one has an “impact game” (similar to what they showed in the Summer league), we probabaly get another 4 to 6 wins this year.
With an undersized front court, our playoff performance will be as successful as the production the rookies provide, imho.
by DJ on Aug 7, 2009 12:05 PM EDT reply actions
2 things:
1)
Boney
Aug 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Richard Hamilton was the best player on the team last year.
Holy crap. Boney, the resident and long-time Rip hater saying that says a lot to me. Brgulker, you’ve wandered into a community where we’ve all obsessively watched every Pistons game for years and then come here to discuss it. This brings me to my other point…
2)
I could quote stats to make my case, but it’s not worth the hassle. Rip has been our leading scorer, so it’s natural to conclude that he’s our best player.
I appreciate your incredibly stupid and condescending comment. Stats are not the end all be all. After all, there are lies, damn lies, and statistics. I think that stats are useful when paired with your own observations. You come in here and quote Dave Berri like his word is gospel and talk all kinds of shit and totally disregard the opinions of people who’ve watched every effing game for the better part of the last 5 seasons. You tell us the stats tell the whole story. It’s bullshit. When we unearthed Rip from the bench and he responded with that string of double-doubles (pts-ast), in my opinion it was the best stretch of basketball he’d played since the 2004 playoffs. I don’t give a shit whatever statistical measure you care to quote says, my eyes and the team’s overall play during that stretch told me that he was lights out.
Chill out with the “you’re all morons and here are the cherry picked stats to prove my point” attitude you’ve got.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 12:18 PM EDT reply actions
@DJ
Rip is a combo guard that is one of the best defenders (at his position) in the league?
Gordon hasn’t been in a system where defense is a priority? A lot of Gordon’s Bulls teams were great defensively, because Scott Skiles emphasized defense.
Stuckey is an above average defender?
42 wins is the floor for this team?
The rookies can be responsible for an additional 4 to 6 wins? They’re barely going to make it off the bench. Detroit’s playoff performance (if they make it) will have very little to do with the rookies. Very few players make an impact their first year, much less a mid-first and two second round picks that all play the same position, from a mediocre draft.
by Birdman on Aug 7, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
Upon further review, my comment might be unnecessarily hostile. I blame the 90 minute conference call I was on during my day off. The point remains the same, though.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
@Other Matt
That was not unnecessarily hostile at all.
@Birdman
You’re right in questioning Rip as a “combo guard,” but he is one of the better defender at his position in the League. You watch the Pistons. This is not a crazy statement. And like Mike Payne so intelligently pointed out, Rip was #8 in assists/game for SG’s last year, so calling him a “combo guard” is not that far off base.
Also, the fact that those Bulls teams with Skiles were top 5 defenses— with Gordon playing 30 mpg— should tell us that no matter what we think his personal defensive deficiencies are, in the right system his mistakes don’t hurt his team as much as some people here might want to claim.
Stuckey defended LeBron better than anybody else in the playoffs last year and has shown spurts of great defensive ability. Clearly he has the physical tools to be a fantastic perimeter defender. Is he there yet? That’s what the season’s for.
For the floor for this team is probably closer to 35 wins. The ceiling probably around 50.
As for the rooks, well that’s all just conjecture at this point. I for one think Daye is potentially unstoppable against most second-unit 3’s and 4’s, so he has game-changing potential. Summers? I dunno. Ditto with the Swede.
I think it’s more accurate to say that our bench, as a unit, will probably account for an additional 4-6 wins if they play well, not necessarily the rooks.
by Joel on Aug 7, 2009 1:07 PM EDT reply actions
MF Mike Peezy: I went to Oregon, I would’ve relished a snobby beer or 7 with you.
Cobo Hall gets renamed Kwame Brown Hall, in honor of the other Kwame, who ain’t get a damn thing done on the renovation tip.
by Skylar on Aug 7, 2009 1:25 PM EDT reply actions
97.1 Just reported we just signed Ben Wallace to a one year deal!
by Mark B. on Aug 7, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions
If I could wish for 1 thing, just one….
I wish Petey and davidstern would come back and tell us all how it feels to be a fanboi of a guy who can’t even sniff a job in the NBA?
The Heat say they’re interested in AI, but he won’t start over Chalmers. The Grizzlies want him, but everyone knows that’s strictly for the sideshow act as he’s not going to start over OJ Mayo and he sure as hell won’t start at PG. The Clippers only are interested because of ticket sales…
how does that make the fanbois feel now, now that they’re fucking lameass hero has become nothing more than a circus act that travels from town to town looking for a job that isn’t there for a guy of “his skillset”.
Enjoy Greece you headband wearing douchebag. Good riddance.
by Boney on Aug 7, 2009 1:46 PM EDT reply actions
97.1 Just reported we just signed Ben Wallace to a one year deal!
Oddly enough, this honestly makes me feel better about our chances at being competitive this year.
by Shinons on Aug 7, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions
braking NEWS- big ben back on TEAM and also back in entire CITY of detroit.
by coachDP on Aug 7, 2009 1:59 PM EDT reply actions
@coachDP
Yes, but what’s your epinion?
@Boney
I wonder why Jod didn’t give McDyess an $8 million dollar contract this year.
by Birdman on Aug 7, 2009 2:01 PM EDT reply actions
@Joel
Those Bulls teams had guys who protected the rim, whether it was Big Ben, Thomas, Noah. Honestly, I think that is the key to a good defense (along with the necessary mentality, of course). Regardless of Stuckey, Gordon, or Villa’s individual shortcomings as defenders, if we have a guy who will protect the rim they will all look better.
For the floor for this team is probably closer to 35 wins. The ceiling probably around 50.
I agree with this. I was holding off a w/l prediction until we made this last move and I’m going to predict 44 wins now that we’ve signed Ben.
@Boney
I wish Petey and davidstern would come back and tell us all how it feels to be a fanboi of a guy who can’t even sniff a job in the NBA?
+1,000,000
The basketball gods sure have been great to AI haven’t they?
by Shinons on Aug 7, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions
ESPN reporting LeBron will not sign an extension with Cleveland and will explore Free Agency in 2010. I’m delightfully wrong in saying that I thought he’d extend with Cleveland.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 2:18 PM EDT reply actions
Other Matt,
Please tell me there’s a fucking link on that… I had to pick myself off the floor I was laughing so hard
by Boney on Aug 7, 2009 2:21 PM EDT reply actions
Boney,
It’s coming up on Sportscenter on the half hour.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 2:26 PM EDT reply actions
I checked ESPN and can’t find it. In other news, I’m very pleased with having Big Ben back. I think his knowledge/experience/work ethic/leadership/stereotypical veteran crap/etc. will be worth a couple wins by themselves. Plus maybe he can teach Kwame and Wilcox how to block shots and not be pussies.
by Joel on Aug 7, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions
Eh…Can’t get excited about Ben’s return. We don’t have the same core surronding him to make him look good. The dude is done.
wow@ going from a franchise player to backing up Kwame Brown
by prophecy_projectz on Aug 7, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions
http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=8278082
I assume this is the quote they’re referring to:
“I signed a contract in 2006 with an option,” he said. “It would make no sense for me to sign that contract if I didn’t keep my options open. I’ll let you fill in the blanks.”
Classy guy, that Lebron.
by Shinons on Aug 7, 2009 2:30 PM EDT reply actions
Yeah, the AP article (and the subsequent blurb on Sportscenter) is a little less breathless than the first ESPN report. Still, I would be really unhappy if I were a Cavs fan.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 2:32 PM EDT reply actions
It wouldn’t shock me to see Ben start some games this year. If Arnie can keep him healthy, it’s not like Kwame and Wilcox are known for their consistency.
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 2:33 PM EDT reply actions
hey I knew that negative nancy (prophecy) was lying in the weeds somewhere…
welcome back. Take some haterade… brgulker just made it
by Boney on Aug 7, 2009 2:33 PM EDT reply actions
Why do I get the sense that LeBron’s decision is a surprise to some folks? Isn’t this what Cavs fans (and everyone else) were expecting all along? The Cavs should still be considered the heavy favorites to keep him.
Kobe and Duncan both opted out of their contracts at one point, too. LeBron is a historic player along the lines of those 2 guys. Unless things drastically fall apart in Cleveland this year, he’s staying. Going to the Nets or Knicks would be a huge step backwards, competitively.
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 2:41 PM EDT reply actions
SHAMELESS PLUG:
A film I wrote is opening in Detroit this weekend (www.oceanofpearls.com). You don’t have to go see it. Just buy a ticket and then go see GI Joe or something else instead. That’s what I’m going to do.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions
I think the Brooklyn Nets would be a good option for LeBron. There’s the cache of being the centerpiece of the move. Plus, they got young, cheap talent (Devin Harris, Courtney Lee and Brook Lopez) so he’ll have a core to grow with him.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 2:46 PM EDT reply actions
the Nets do have a better core than the Cleveland Cavs do… and 1 offseason isn’t going to help Cleveland either…
problem is, will LeBron sign for the max he can get from New Jersey? New Jersey doesn’t have enough beefy salaries to send back in a sign and trade
god damnit could you imagine how EMPTY the Q would be the season after LeBron leaves
by Boney on Aug 7, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions
holy crap. i just got an awesome trade idea. Trade Jason Maxiell to Boston for Rasheed Wallace, Ben Gordon to Denver for some guy named Chauncey Billups, then trade Kwame Brown and Rodney Stuckey for Mehmet Okur! omg we could be a championship team!!
by Cody on Aug 7, 2009 3:02 PM EDT reply actions
I just don’t see how “a young core to grow with” is more attractive than the contender he’s on right now. Lopez and Harris are nice building blocks, but are they collectively better than the depth that Ferry has built around LeBron? And once LeBron signs with a big market team, they probably can’t afford to make any more impactful moves.
I get the impression that LeBron has a sense of legacy and loyalty that will make him comfortable staying in Cleveland. He will make everyone nervous when he takes a road trip to New York and New Jersey early next July, but he will be perfectly content when he returns to Ohio and Danny Ferry throws that Max contract at him.
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 3:04 PM EDT reply actions
I’m not concerned with Wallace getting too many minutes. I just want him to kick some ass in practice. Too bad he wasn’t around last year to beat up on A.I.
by Roll The Dyess on Aug 7, 2009 3:05 PM EDT reply actions
@ Jamison- Big Z and Shaq both are really old and their contracts expire after this season. Varejo or w.e. is not a starting caliber PF. After this year, they would have no Center and a bench PF starting. You can’t win without a frontcourt. Although Shaq and Z would free up a lot of cap space lol
by Cody on Aug 7, 2009 3:07 PM EDT reply actions
lmao @ Roll the Dyess…picture that:
“Stop it Ben! It’s just practice! We talkin’ ’bout practice, man!”
lol
by Cody on Aug 7, 2009 3:09 PM EDT reply actions
@Boney:
I’m not sure I agree with the “better core” comment. Harris and Lopez are solid building blocks, but there is a huge dropoff after that. Cleveland probably has 4-5 guys that are better than Jersey’s 3rd best player.
I just don’t think it’s realistic to think he’ll join a rebuilding team with so little depth. And really, most teams with cap space are in that situation.
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 3:10 PM EDT reply actions
I have a question about Cleveland. They have something on the order of $46 million coming off the books next off-season (LeBron, Shaq, Z). Assuming they re-up LeBron for the max (something like $18 million to start), how much money will they have under the cap? The estimates say the cap will be at $51, that gives them $3 million to spend. Is there any way they can get a second premier piece to go with LeBron by obliterating the cap like they have with this team?
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 3:12 PM EDT reply actions
Couple things:
First, along with what seems like a majority of people, IMO it’s a good thing we signed Ben. At the very least it means Kwame won’t be getting 30-35 mpg, and Ben was actually pretty good last year, so maybe with some Arnie Kander magic he can stay serviceable for another year or two. Plus the theoretical/potential/hopeful benefit of having him tutor the young guys on how to play defense like your life depends on it.
Second, IMO a common misconception about Gordon is that he’s a bad defender. His defensive numbers have pretty much always been decent (and he’s been a key player on several terrific defensive teams), the holes in his game are all in relation to possessions- both regarding their creation and usage.
Basically, he is below average in rebounds and steals, and is relatively turnover prone. So while he has been a very good scorer, his overrall value has stayed rougly average because of the possession-related holes in his game. Hopefully this is something he can improve on.
Third, why all the hate towards brgulker? Disagreeing passionately is part of what real basketball fandom is all about, so if someone’s tone comes off poorly, then IMO it seems like it’s coming from a genuine passion for the team. Agreeing to disagree seems like a better solution than calling someone stupid or a d-bag when an argument occurs.
@ Other Matt: I’ve always been leery of the suggestion (which you seem to be making) that people who use stats aren’t “watching the games.” Personally, I’m a huge “stats guy” but I watch every single game just like everyone else.
by Gabe on Aug 7, 2009 3:13 PM EDT reply actions
@ Cody:
Yeah, Shaq and Z will need to be replaced next summer. My point is that I think the scales are tipped more heavily in the Cavs favor than people are letting on. The Cavs are the most realistic final destination for him.
It’s obviously not a sure thing, but I expect him to stay.
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 3:17 PM EDT reply actions
For some gallows humor today, check Keith Langlois’s newest post:
“Rip Hamilton is certain to log minutes at small forward this season in addition to shooting guard. Kuester has said the Pistons will play small at times, meaning Tayshaun Prince will spend time at power forward to exploit mismatches. Dumars has said he’d like to see Rodney Stuckey play off of the ball some – not because he doesn’t see him as the team’s point guard, the way his comments were misinterpreted, but to allow his natural aggression to be fully utilized. Stuckey could even be used some at small forward in the right matchups.”
N.B.: Stuckey is 6’5", generously. Langlois goes on to suggest that Deron Washington, the thin, 6’7" guard, “can even match up against some power forwards.”
Keith appears to be serious in writing these things, but the joke’s on all of us.
by Bill Higgins on Aug 7, 2009 3:19 PM EDT reply actions
“Lopez and Harris are nice building blocks, but are they collectively better than the depth that Ferry has built around LeBron?”
Yes, by far. I take Lopez, Harris and Lee over Ilgauskas/Shaq, Mo Williams and Delonte West anyday. Plus, since two of them have rookie contracts you have tons of salary flexibility. Also, they have Terence Williams and Chris Douglas Roberts.
I don’t think it’s even a question that the Nets are a better option in terms of competing.
Who else does Cleveland have? Varejao is pretty good. But, Jamario Moon? Tits Gibson? Anthony Parker? You can get guys just as good for minimum contracts. Once you have LeBron, it’ll be easy to get players to come on the cheap.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 3:21 PM EDT reply actions
“I just don’t think it’s realistic to think he’ll join a rebuilding team with so little depth.”
Once you have LeBron, you are no longer a rebuilding team.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions
“god damnit could you imagine how EMPTY the Q would be the season after LeBron leaves?”
I just went from six to midnight.
by Joel on Aug 7, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions
@ Cody,
I’m not suggesting that all people who use stats aren’t “using their eyes”. What I am suggesting is that anybody who watched most of last season and has Tayshaun ahead of Rip on the list of Best Pistons Players Of 08-09 because of some stat was not actually watching the games.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions
I’ve never found brgulker’s posts to be douchey or condescending. The only negative thing I’ve heard about brgulker was written by Rob G:
“brgulker is a knave”
/Knights of Kwame
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 3:27 PM EDT reply actions
Also, I’m so glad Ben is back! Stuckey really ought to give Ben his number 3 back. 2 reasons.
1. Ben is one of the top ten Pistons of all time.
2. Stuckey took #3 in homage to Dwyane Wade. In Detroit? Are you kidding?
Stuckey needs a fresh start, and a new number can’t hurt.
by Bill Higgins on Aug 7, 2009 3:30 PM EDT reply actions
Bill Higgins:
Holy. Shit.
Keith Langlois is the worst. By his logic, “depending on the matchups,” anyone can play any position.
Hey, with the right “matchups” Bynum can play PF, Kwame can play SG, Rip is a combo guard/center, and Stuck is a combo guard/forward/center. We have the most versatile team ever!!1
Back in reality, if Stuckey gets minutes at SF this season… ummm… let’s just hope that doesn’t actually happen.
by Gabe on Aug 7, 2009 3:37 PM EDT reply actions
@QD:
Comparing Lopez to Shaq/Z, I agree Lopez is a difference maker, especially going into 2010-11. But I think the backcourts are kind of a wash. Beyond that, I would be more comfortable with the rest of the Cavs roster. The young guys that you mentioned (even Lee) aren’t likely to factor in as selling points when he’s out looking.
When you add in the fact that the Nets may never even move to Brooklyn, I just don’t see the appeal.
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 3:40 PM EDT reply actions
hahahah yea i was scratching kmy head when he said stuckey at SF… what an idiot… can’t take that guy seriously
by mannie32 on Aug 7, 2009 3:43 PM EDT reply actions
I just don’t see how "a young core to grow with" is more attractive than the contender he’s on right now. Lopez and Harris are nice building blocks, but are they collectively better than the depth that Ferry has built around LeBron? And once LeBron signs with a big market team, they probably can’t afford to make any more impactful moves.
I get the impression that LeBron has a sense of legacy and loyalty that will make him comfortable staying in Cleveland. He will make everyone nervous when he takes a road trip to New York and New Jersey early next July, but he will be perfectly content when he returns to Ohio and Danny Ferry throws that Max contract at him.
Cleveland obviously has put together a very strong team, one that can contend for the title every year that Lebron is a part of it. They can offer more money, so “testing free agency” isn’t about who makes the best offer. It’s about one of two things:
1. Lebron is a vain douche who doesn’t think Cleveland is good enough for him (since they’re a championship contender, unlike NJ or NY).
2. Lebron is a vain douche who was planning on signing with Cleveland the whole time, but loves the attention of “OMG, WILL LBJ COME BACK!!??? OMG, HE CAME BACK!!!! YAY LEBRON, EH’S SOOOOO BETTER THAN MJ!!!”
by Shinons on Aug 7, 2009 3:44 PM EDT reply actions
I like a 3-guard lineup with this team, but Prince at the 4 obviously doesn’t work. I would hope that Kuester sees that, too.
On the subject of the guards, I am also a little nervous about the Bynum/Gordon backcourt that we’ll probably see in most 2nd quarters this year. Offensively, very explosive… Defensively, yikes!
by Jamison on Aug 7, 2009 3:49 PM EDT reply actions
SHAMELESS PLUG:
A film I wrote is opening in Detroit this weekend (www.oceanofpearls.com). You don’t have to go see it. Just buy a ticket and then go see GI Joe or something else instead. That’s what I’m going to do.
That’s awesome. I haven’t seen it playing in Albuquerque, but I went and rated it a 10/10 on IMDB, just because MFQDDBBSB.
by Shinons on Aug 7, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions
People mentioning that the Cavs aren’t in a good position to re-sign Lebron AND someone else are higher than I’ve been in a long while.
Having Ilgauskas and Shaq off the books at season end allows them to re-sign Lebron to a 6 year max contract vs. a 5 year max contract anywhere else. Quite literally, the Cavs can offer more money and offer more money over a longer period of time than any other team.
Additionally, they’ll still have enough money left over to make a move at a player like Bosh.
If you have a player like Bosh in your frontcourt then Varejao immediately becomes a very solid starting PF. His numbers last year in near starter minutes was 8 ppg/7 rpg with almost a steal and block to go along with it. His points average has improved every year and his rebounds while tapering off this year will continue to be the focal point of his game so if he’s averaging 10/8 by 2010, then he’s starting material, especially if Bosh is taking the majority of the scoring load inside.
All of a sudden you have Mo Williams, Delonte West, Lebron, Varejao, and Bosh…thats a much better starting squad than what New Jersey could offer up.
Realistically, Cleveland’s biggest problem will be bench role players…they have Hickson and Gibson right now and Hickson didn’t get much burn last year. They’ll need a couple of solid scorers off the bench from the SG position.
The other thing that Cleveland could do is look at Dirk Nowitzki who will likely come at a cheaper price than Bosh and offers a wider range of scoring from the PF position. You move Varejao to Center and you still have a highly potent offensive game combined with solid defense.
What will make Cleveland in 2010 though is it’s draft class from this year or the small free agent signings they make…not Lebron and not a secondary big signing.
by James B. on Aug 7, 2009 3:56 PM EDT reply actions
And its not surprising that Lebron is a vain douche…he’s already stated he wants to be the first billionaire athlete…gotta be vain to make a statement like that. And honestly, if any of us were in his shoes, we’d be the same way.
I mean I know I’m the best there ever was at masturbation, but I can’t ever imagine getting paid millions upon millions of dollars to do it, let alone be sponsored by various companies urging me to use their product line like motion lotion or his/her pleasure cream from trojan…and don’t even get me started about the ass ticklers.
by James B. on Aug 7, 2009 3:59 PM EDT reply actions
Masturbation is a lot like being a point guard. You’re only as good as your off-hand.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 4:11 PM EDT reply actions
“Cleveland obviously has put together a very strong team, one that can contend for the title every year that Lebron is a part of it.”
I fail to see how the cast of jokers in Cleveland is a “very strong team,” especially for years (plural being important there). They’re a a 25-win team without Lebron— Shaq/Big Z or no Shaq/Big Z. Delonte West and Verejao wouldn’t start on 28 teams in the league. Shaq and Big Z are both gone after this year (with literally no bigs in the organization to replace them— we should all know how hard it is to acquire/keep quality big men). They have no real promising young guys in the pipeline. Anthony Parker is 34. Jamario Moon is an effective bench defender at best. Mo Williams = Cuttino Mobley.
I don’t think they’re as good this coming year as they were last year, and they’ve got literally all their eggs in one basket. If they don’t win it all— and they won’t— Lebron’s gone. If they DO win it all— and they won’t— Lebron’s probably STILL gone, since it’s been established that he is clearly a vain douche and he’ll probably be thinking, “Well, I won it all in CLEVELAND of all horrible godforsaken places, so now I’m going to go live it up in the big city.”
Cleveland is neither set up to win it this year OR in the future. They are— what’s the scientific term? Oh yeah— fucked.
by Joel on Aug 7, 2009 4:12 PM EDT reply actions
James, I’m not sure that Cleveland will have enough money to pull off the scenario you outlined. They’re about $20 million over the cap this year. Let’s assume the cap goes halfway between where it is for the upcoming season and where the league has projected it will go for 2010-11, so call it $54 million. Taking Shaq and Z off the books, giving LeBron a raise, and the scheduled raises kicking in for their players already signed, they should have somewhere between $3-6 million to work with. Since they go into the off-season under the cap, they won’t have the mid-level to use. My question is, “is there any way Cleveland can go way over the cap like they have with this season’s team?” I don’t claim to know enough about the CBA to even guess at an answer.
by Other Matt on Aug 7, 2009 4:18 PM EDT reply actions
I fail to see how the cast of jokers in Cleveland is a "very strong team," especially for years (plural being important there). They’re a a 25-win team without Lebron– Shaq/Big Z or no Shaq/Big Z. Delonte West and Verejao wouldn’t start on 28 teams in the league. Shaq and Big Z are both gone after this year (with literally no bigs in the organization to replace them– we should all know how hard it is to acquire/keep quality big men). They have no real promising young guys in the pipeline. Anthony Parker is 34. Jamario Moon is an effective bench defender at best. Mo Williams = Cuttino Mobley.
A very good team in the sense that they won 66 games last season that nearly went undefeated at home. The point was that the only reason that Lebron would have a reason to leave would be that his vain douchery says that the city of Cleveland isn’t good enough for him.
by Shinons on Aug 7, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions
@James B.
Cleveland is so far over the cap that they’re barely going to have MLE-type money after they sign Lebron, much less “second superstar money”. Their payroll is currently ~$80mil. For convenience sake, we’ll say the the cap is $60mil. After luxury taxes, they’re paying $100 million dollars payroll this year (for a team that has no shot of winning it all, IMO). Shaq and Big Z come off the books— that’s $31.5mil. That puts them right around $50. Then you have to figure Lebron’s going to make a couple mil extra a year— what’s the max? like $17mil-ish?— so then you’ve got them somewhere between $53-55mil.
Don’t forget the cap is going to go down, so that leaves them with somewhere between $2-5mil to somehow retool a completely devastated front line.
They are— say it with me— FUCKED.
by Joel on Aug 7, 2009 4:24 PM EDT reply actions
Joel, you say that the cavs have “a team that has no shot of winning it all, IMO”. Allow me to respectfully disagree with your opinion. I don’t follow that the celtics/magic are any further ahead of the team that was (cept for the last gimme) undefeated at home last season and didn’t lose a playoff game until the conference finals. And return the same team sans ben/serb and added shaq/moon/parker. And have some dude named LeBron. No Chance??? I’d give them even odds with la/spurs/celts/magic. Easy.
by Craig on Aug 7, 2009 5:40 PM EDT reply actions
Cavs have a chance of winning, but they won’t close the deal. Get Shaq, sheeitt go get Alonzo’s old ass. Still ain’t hoisting shit but the MVP trophy. Sweet!
by Skylar on Aug 7, 2009 6:44 PM EDT reply actions
Cavs have a chance of winning, but put LeBron on New Jersey and they are a better team. Why? Because the have great young players and every veteran will want to come play for them once you add LeBron to that list of young stars.
Lebron, Devin Harris, Brook Lopez, Courtney Lee, Terence Williams, Chris Douglas Roberts, Josh Boone, Sean Williams, Keyon Dooling, Yi Jianlian
is better than
Lebron, Choke Williams, Anderson Varejao, Delonte West, Tits Gibson, Jamario Moon, Anthony Parker, JJ Hickson, Jawad Williams, Darnell Jackson
Especially considering NJ doesn’t have any bad contracts on their books.
by Quick Darshan on Aug 7, 2009 7:00 PM EDT reply actions
@Joel
“…our bench, as a unit, will probably account for an additional 4-6 wins if they play well, not necessarily the rooks.”
That is what I was trying to imply…poorly worded..my bad.
Thank-you.
by DJ on Aug 8, 2009 3:06 AM EDT reply actions
HERE WE GO AGAIN DOGGIN MY TEAM-PLEASE STOP TALKIN BOUT TRADING RIP, I GUESS THE NBA HAS IT IN FOR THE CHAMPS OF O4, BECAUSE THEY BEAT THE TEAM WHO TRIED TO BUY A CHAMPIONSHIP, SO NOW EVERYONE WON’T BE STILL UNTIL EVERYBODY ON THE TEAM IS GONE, DIVIDE AND CONQUER THAT’S ALWAYS BEEN TRUE, DON’T LET THAT HAPPEN JOE KEEP RIP AND TAY AND BEN THE ONLY THREE WE HAVE LEFT THAT GAVE US SO MUCH PRIDE. YES, I KNOW RIP WAS HURT WHEN CHAUNCY LEFT BUT HE IS A PROFESSIONAL AND GREAT AT WHAT HE DOES, JUST BECAUSE HE COULD NOT JELL WITH IVERSON DOES NOT MEAN HE’S NOT GOOD. NOBODY DOES THAT CURL LIKE RIP. ALSO IF RIP STAYS HE SHOULD BE CAPTAIN NOT STUCKEY.
by A WATSON on Sep 9, 2009 4:42 PM EDT reply actions

by 











