FanPost

Greg Monroe vs. Everyone Else

***** IMPORTANT: To see the full stat tabs, this post needs to be viewed on the WIDE setting*****

Monroe seems to be Pistons fans most popular choice among players who will probably be available (he's definitely the choice of pistons.com editor/Jod spokesman, Keith Langlois).

I don't want Monroe.

I'm gonna try and illustrate why with stats (courtesy of draftexpress.com)

Monroe:

Basic Statistics Per 40 Pace Adjusted

Year League Team GP Min Pts FG FGA FG% 2Pt 2PtA 2P% 3Pt 3PtA 3P% FTM FTA FT% Off Def TOT Asts Stls Blks TOs PFs
2008/09 NCAA Georgetown 31 30.9 17.2 6.3 11.0 57.2 6.2 10.7 57.8 0.1 0.3 33.3 4.6 6.6 70.0 2.7 6.2 8.9 3.5 2.5 2.0 3.4 3.4
2009/10 NCAA Georgetown 34 34.2 19.0 7.0 13.3 52.5 6.7 12.4 54.5 0.2 0.9 25.9 4.8 7.2 66.0 2.6 8.8 11.3 4.4 1.5 1.8 3.9 3.0

Villanueva:

Basic Statistics Per 40 Pace Adjusted

Year League Team GP Min Pts FG FGA FG% 2Pt 2PtA 2P% 3Pt 3PtA 3P% FTM FTA FT% Off Def TOT Asts Stls Blks TOs PFs
2003/04 NCAA Connecticut 32 19.0 18.3 7.2 14.1 51.4 6.1 10.9 55.6 1.2 3.1 36.7 2.7 4.0 66.7 3.6 7.2 10.7 1.5 0.4 3.1 2.5 4.6
2004/05 NCAA Connecticut 31 25.8 19.9 7.5 14.4 52.1 7.2 13.8 52.2 0.3 0.6 50.0 4.6 6.7 68.8 3.9 8.3 12.1 1.9 0.9 2.7 3.3 3.2

Aldrich:

Basic Statistics Per 40 Pace Adjusted

Year League Team GP Min Pts FG FGA FG% 2Pt 2PtA 2P% 3Pt 3PtA 3P% FTM FTA FT% Off Def TOT Asts Stls Blks TOs PFs
2007/08 NCAA Kansas 40 8.3 13.3 5.1 9.8 51.8 5.1 9.8 51.8 0.0 0.0   3.1 4.5 68.4 4.0 10.1 14.1 0.6 1.3 4.0 2.5 5.7
2008/09 NCAA Kansas 35 29.6 19.9 7.6 12.7 59.8 7.6 12.7 59.8 0.0 0.0   4.7 5.9 79.2 4.0 10.7 14.8 1.4 0.8 3.6 2.1 3.4
2009/10 NCAA Kansas 36 26.8 16.2 5.9 10.6 56.2 5.9 10.6 56.2 0.0 0.0   4.3 6.3 67.9 4.4 9.7 14.1 1.2 1.1 5.0 2.2 3.7

Ed Davis:

Basic Statistics Per 40 Pace Adjusted

Year League Team GP Min Pts FG FGA FG% 2Pt 2PtA 2P% 3Pt 3PtA 3P% FTM FTA FT% Off Def TOT Asts Stls Blks TOs PFs
2008/09 NCAA North Carolina 38 18.8 12.8 5.0 9.7 51.8 5.0 9.7 51.8 0.0 0.0   2.8 4.9 57.3 4.2 8.5 12.7 1.1 0.7 3.3 2.0 3.7
2009/10 NCAA North Carolina 24 26.9 17.6 6.3 11.0 57.8 6.3 11.0 57.8 0.0 0.0   5.0 7.5 65.9 3.8 8.8 12.6 1.3 0.6 3.7 2.6 2.4

Whiteside:

Basic Statistics Per 40 Pace Adjusted

Year League Team GP Min Pts FG FGA FG% 2Pt 2PtA 2P% 3Pt 3PtA 3P% FTM FTA FT% Off Def TOT Asts Stls Blks TOs PFs
2009/10 NCAA Marshall 34 26.1 19.0 7.1 13.6 52.4 7.0 13.4 52.2 0.1 0.2 60.0 4.7 8.0 58.8 3.9 9.0 12.9 0.4 0.8 7.7 2.7 3.5

----------

Monroe:

Efficiency Statistics

Player Info Shooting Ratios Passing Ratios Defensive Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PTs/g FGA/g Pts/Play TS% eFG% FTA/FGA 3PA/FGA Ast/g Ast/FGA A/TO PPR BK/g STL/g PF/g
2008/09 NCAA Georgetown 31 30.9 12.7 8.1 0.99 0.61 0.58 0.60 0.02 2.5 0.32 1.03 -2.59 1.5 1.8 2.5
2009/10 NCAA Georgetown 34 34.2 16.1 11.3 0.92 0.57 0.53 0.54 0.07 3.8 0.33 1.14 -2.36 1.5 1.2 2.6

Villanueva:

Efficiency Statistics

Player Info Shooting Ratios Passing Ratios Defensive Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PTs/g FGA/g Pts/Play TS% eFG% FTA/FGA 3PA/FGA Ast/g Ast/FGA A/TO PPR BK/g STL/g PF/g
2003/04 NCAA Connecticut 32 19.0 8.9 6.9 0.99 0.57 0.55 0.29 0.22 0.7 0.10 0.59 -3.92 1.5 0.2 2.3
2004/05 NCAA Connecticut 31 25.8 13.6 9.8 0.95 0.57 0.53 0.46 0.04 1.3 0.13 0.57 -5.46 1.8 0.6 2.2

Aldrich:

Efficiency Statistics

Player Info Shooting Ratios Passing Ratios Defensive Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PTs/g FGA/g Pts/Play TS% eFG% FTA/FGA 3PA/FGA Ast/g Ast/FGA A/TO PPR BK/g STL/g PF/g
2007/08 NCAA Kansas 40 8.3 2.8 2.1 0.92 0.56 0.52 0.46 0.00 0.1 0.06 0.24 -5.36 0.9 0.3 1.2
2008/09 NCAA Kansas 35 29.6 14.9 9.5 1.13 0.64 0.60 0.46 0.00 1.0 0.11 0.64 -3.11 2.7 0.6 2.6
2009/10 NCAA Kansas 36 26.8 11.3 7.4 1.03 0.60 0.56 0.60 0.00 0.9 0.12 0.55 -3.69 3.5 0.8 2.6

Davis:

Efficiency Statistics

Player Info Shooting Ratios Passing Ratios Defensive Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PTs/g FGA/g Pts/Play TS% eFG% FTA/FGA 3PA/FGA Ast/g Ast/FGA A/TO PPR BK/g STL/g PF/g
2008/09 NCAA North Carolina 38 18.8 6.7 5.0 0.92 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.00 0.6 0.12 0.55 -3.56 1.7 0.4 1.9
2009/10 NCAA North Carolina 24 26.9 12.9 8.0 1.03 0.61 0.58 0.69 0.00 0.9 0.11 0.48 -4.88 2.7 0.4 1.8

Whiteside:

Efficiency Statistics

Player Info Shooting Ratios Passing Ratios Defensive Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PTs/g FGA/g Pts/Play TS% eFG% FTA/FGA 3PA/FGA Ast/g Ast/FGA A/TO PPR BK/g STL/g PF/g
2009/10 NCAA Marshall 34 26.1 13.1 9.4 0.95 0.55 0.53 0.59 0.02 0.3 0.03 0.16 -6.46 5.4 0.6 2.4

----------

Monroe:

Usage Statistics

Player Info Complete Metrics Possession Info Possession Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PER EFF EFF/40 WS/40 Pos/g Tm Pos/g % Tm Pos Pts/Pos FGA/Pos FTA/Pos Ast/Pos TO/Pos
2008/09 NCAA Georgetown 31 30.9 25.5 17.7 22.9 11.5 11.5 65.5 17.5 1.11 0.70 0.42 0.22 0.22
2009/10 NCAA Georgetown 34 34.2 25.9 21.6 25.2 12.5 15.4 66.8 23.1 1.05 0.73 0.40 0.24 0.21

Villanueva:

Usage Statistics

Player Info Complete Metrics Possession Info Possession Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PER EFF EFF/40 WS/40 Pos/g Tm Pos/g % Tm Pos Pts/Pos FGA/Pos FTA/Pos Ast/Pos TO/Pos
2003/04 NCAA Connecticut 32 19.0 23.4 11.4 24.0 11.1 7.8 70.2 11.1 1.15 0.88 0.25 0.09 0.16
2004/05 NCAA Connecticut 31 25.8 25.9 17.3 26.8 13.4 12.4 71.8 17.3 1.09 0.79 0.37 0.10 0.18

Aldrich:

Usage Statistics

Player Info Complete Metrics Possession Info Possession Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PER EFF EFF/40 WS/40 Pos/g Tm Pos/g % Tm Pos Pts/Pos FGA/Pos FTA/Pos Ast/Pos TO/Pos
2007/08 NCAA Kansas 40 8.3 22.2 5.2 25.2 13.9 2.7 69.0 3.9 1.05 0.78 0.36 0.05 0.20
2008/09 NCAA Kansas 35 29.6 31.6 23.9 32.2 18.6 11.8 69.5 16.9 1.26 0.81 0.37 0.09 0.14
2009/10 NCAA Kansas 36 26.8 28.7 20.0 29.9 17.4 9.7 70.1 13.9 1.16 0.76 0.45 0.09 0.16

Davis:

Usage Statistics

Player Info Complete Metrics Possession Info Possession Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PER EFF EFF/40 WS/40 Pos/g Tm Pos/g % Tm Pos Pts/Pos FGA/Pos FTA/Pos Ast/Pos TO/Pos
2008/09 NCAA North Carolina 38 18.8 20.5 11.3 24.1 13.7 6.3 76.0 8.3 1.06 0.80 0.40 0.09 0.17
2009/10 NCAA North Carolina 24 26.9 26.8 18.9 28.1 15.9 11.1 73.0 15.2 1.16 0.72 0.50 0.08 0.17

Whiteside:

Usage Statistics

Player Info Complete Metrics Possession Info Possession Ratios
Year League Team GP Min PER EFF EFF/40 WS/40 Pos/g Tm Pos/g % Tm Pos Pts/Pos FGA/Pos FTA/Pos Ast/Pos TO/Pos
2009/10 NCAA Marshall 34 26.1 29.8 19.6 30.1 15.6 12.0 71.0 16.9 1.09 0.78 0.46 0.02 0.16

 

Summary:

First I'll start out with the positives for Monroe; he played a larger role in Gtown's offense than any of the other big guys, and while he wasn't as efficient from the field as one would like, he did a good job of drawing fouls, which kept his TS% at an acceptable level. He had the most assists, and the best A/TO ratio. Also, he created more steals than the other big guys, which suggests good lateral fluidity.

Now the other side of the coin, and why I prefer the alternatives: The other guys blow Monroe out of the water when it comes to blocking shots, and they all rebounded at a higher rate, and at a much higher rate when it came to offensive rebounding. Shot-blocking and offensive rebounding are hugely important stats for projecting college PF/C prospects. Blocking shots is probably the most important "athletic indicator"-- because it tells a great deal about a PF/C prospects explosiveness and timing. Offensive rebounding is the best "hustle" stat-- telling about aggressiveness (and it shows an understanding of angles/positioning).

A PF/C prospects who is weak at both offensive rebounding and shot-blocking is troubling, because it suggests both a lack of aggressiveness and a lack of NBA caliber athleticism. Players with this combination of issues typically have limited ceilings (i.e. the very best case scenario is a guy roughly as productive as LaMarcus Aldridge).

On top of this is the fact that Monroe was the most turnover prone player (by possession). This is another issue where taken on its own, it might not be much of a concern, especially if the player is contributing in a number of areas (think Evan Turner). But if a player already has several holes in his game, adding a high turnover rate makes the prospect even riskier.

Finally, just take a look at the comparison between Monroe and Villanueva... They are remarkably similar players. CV actually has slightly better rebounding numbers(!), while Monroe has the edge with assists, but they are very close in most categories. Why draft an offensive-minded big when CV's contract runs another four years?

FanPosts are user-created posts from the Detroit Bad Boys community and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all fans or the staff at DBB. The DBB staff reserves the right at any time to edit the contents of FanPosts as they reasonably see fit.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Detroit Bad Boys

You must be a member of Detroit Bad Boys to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Detroit Bad Boys. You should read them.

Join Detroit Bad Boys

You must be a member of Detroit Bad Boys to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Detroit Bad Boys. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker