Was JoD Right?
After watching Lebron's show last night, it got me thinking...did Joe Dumars actually do the right thing by signing Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon?
Out of all the marquee free agents, who would've come to a Pistons team that featured Rodney Stuckey as its best player, and Rip Hamilton as its second best? You can forget LeBron, Wade and Bosh for sure, and both Boozer and Ama're Stoudimaire were paid max contracts by their new teams. I highly doubt either of them would choose the Pistons over the Bulls or the Knicks. Heck, could we even get David Lee in a sign trade...would we have anything to offer them?
Now that I look at it, I think JoD actually made the right move. Sure, Charlie V and Ben Gordon are not superstars, or even all stars for that matter, but I would take Villanueva over almost every other power forward available in the market right now (the only other guy being Tyrus Thomas). Ben Gordon? He's a solid scorer, okayish defender, and would've been the second best shooting guard behind Dwayne Wade in terms of price vs. production in this Free Agent class.
I know a lot of us are angry at what Dumars has done, but I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that we are finally having to witness a rebuilding process after a long long time. Personally, I actually don't think our team is all that bad. If Monroe can be a decent center (6-8 points, 8-10 boards), then I actually the Pistons have a decent shot at making the playoffs this season. They're not going to be the Pistons of old, where defense was the primary focus, and just scored enough to win, but the exact opposite of that. They could very well be a team that simply outscores the opposing team, and they have enough firepower to match up with any team in the league...well, other than maybe the Heat now.
FanPosts are user-created posts from the Detroit Bad Boys community and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all fans or the staff at DBB. The DBB staff reserves the right at any time to edit the contents of FanPosts as they reasonably see fit.
66 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Joe D
is a mastermind look at the NETS and the rest of the teams that just knew they were gonna get lebron, And we didnt stand a chance on none of the top teir free agents either
Of Course He Was Right
The question is , can you win with the play you want to sign. CV I think is a little roll of the dice, but I’m high on BG. All I can say is they look like bargains today,
No way am I paying that kind of money to Boozer, Amare, etc…only one is maybe DLee, and GSW overpaid for him. Which reminds me, you’d rather have Amare than DLee as your 4, you could have done 5 years/$45M or so last year for him, and instead, you take on a guy with one good eye and one good knee for 2.5x the money. So…when is Donnie Walsh going to announce his retirement?
See where I’m going with this?
duh
it always bothers me that people, especially on this site, bash joe d for signing ben and charlie. When he built one of the strongest teams in the east from 03 to the end of 08 with ragtag players, people hopped on the “joe d is a genius” bandwagon. People are too used to seeing this team win.
Once we ’re on the right track again its all aboard the pistons bandwagon. Pathetic.
by Habbidabs on Jul 9, 2010 6:33 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed.
I at least only had issue with the amounts that he signed them for and how quickly he pulled the trigger in what was expected to be a quiet free agency.
He’s stated he’s not going to just re-sign Bynum and end up “bidding against himself”. He wants the market to decide Bynum’s worth and then offer something slightly better. This is exactly what he didn’t do with Ben Gordon and CV. He just set the value on both of them without waiting to see what other team’s would be willing to offer.
And yeah there is a risk with waiting…BG or CV could have gotten an offer that they still liked and went with it at which point we’d be in a tough pickle. But I would have much rather ended up with CV for 5 and 32 as opposed to 5 and 38 and Gordon for 5 and 50 instead of 5 and 55…
Still glad they’re both Pistons though.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
I think he just saw fair market value, and decided not to risk it, and pulled the trigger…can’t say either one is overpaid, especially after this offseason
The beginning of the end of the misery
Well right...my sentiments exactly.
Through out the regular season though, there was obvious concern that we just established market value of those players and ultimately may have over-valued them.
Given this free agency, I now disagree with that statement.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
CV couldn't have been had for 5 and 32 (the Cavs wanted him for the MLE).
I’d have to think Portland would have gone after Ben Gordon because he would have been a perfect fit next to Brandon Roy.
by Quick Darshan on Jul 9, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair points on both players.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
I think the mere fact that we’re here, now, proves that most at DBB aren’t bandwagon ass cats.
One love!
/conscientiousobjector’d
I like my coffee how I like my coffee... recursive.
by TDP on Jul 9, 2010 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions
55mil for Ben Gordon > 120mil for Joe Johnson
Without Rip on the roster, Ben Gordon is a good value. Hopefully, Jod can turn Rip into another young piece.
I think he was almost right
Gordon and CV are not ideal players, but when you consider the money being thrown away this year I can’t help but believe Jod made a decent move.
The absolute truth is the Pistons were not going to win another championship with the roster they had at the start of 08/09. While it definately screwed us for a couple years, Jod got Gordon and CV in their prime for Billups while apparently paying less than the current market value for those types of players.
Whether those two players are an ideal fit for the current roster or if he could have gotten them for a couple of million less over five years is not really as important as some would have you believe. We now have two players that many GM’s will, rightly or wrongly, covet on contracts that look like gold compared to what’s being signed this year.
I can’t say he has gotten it right yet, since the roster is a total mess and we have no cap flexibility for at least a couple years. But, I will give him one more year to get things headed in the right direction. I really don’t think things are as bad as some profess.
I still think rebuilding was the right move
But the more I think about it, the more I think we could’ve at least had a decent shot at making the finals that year. I mean, maybe we wouldn’t if we got matched up against Cleveland, but Boston didn’t have KG or Posey, and we would still have the personnel to own Orlando (Rasheed and Chauncey, basically). Plus, Stuckey could’ve developed into a slightly more useful role player than he was in the ‘08 playoffs, and we would’ve used Amir/Max a bit more, I think. I don’t think it’s inconceivable — especially with the way Tay guarded Kobe in the ‘04 finals — that we could’ve beaten LA in the finals, either. Well, unless MCIAFI spoiled it all…
Regardless, that’s all in the rear-view mirror now. Not much point in speculating over that stuff.
"Detroit Bad Boys is full of HOMOS ,JACKASSES and NON-sports fans."
-ralphgoblue/thunder_god08
by Thom_not_Tom on Jul 11, 2010 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm still wondering
Why Joe never gave the Chauncey-Rip-Stuck 3 guard rotation a legitimate chance, especially after the BG signing making it clear that he wants to replicate the Bad Boys’ system.
I would have been perfectly fine with trading Tay for cap space (so that he and Sheed would come off the books together) and letting our guards try to lead us to the Finals again. I still feel that Stuckey seems best for a 6th man role, and he would have thrived with one more year under Chauncey.
by bearded thundar on Jul 11, 2010 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah...
My biggest issue with the Billups trade was how it would impact Stuckey’s development…while giving Stuck starter minutes could help, having the tutelage of a floor general like Billups even if it meant he got significantly less minutes at PG would have been way better for his development as a potential franchise PG.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
exactly
And regardless of Stuckey’s development, wouldn’t you agree that a Chauncey, Rip, Stuck 3 guard lineup would be much better than our current Stuck, Rip, BG rotation?
by bearded thundar on Jul 11, 2010 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
agreed.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
absolutely
and you can let Rip expire if you want and sign BG to an equivalent contract, in case you prefer a Chauncey, BG, Stuck 3-guard lineup.
witty signature
Which would also be better than what we currently have
I think that the playoffs skewed his line of thought, as Rip was unstoppable against Orlando and Stuckey really stepped up when Chauncey faltered. However it’s now evident that a lot of Chauncey’s problems were due to the injury
by bearded thundar on Jul 11, 2010 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions
especially after the BG signing making it clear that he wants to replicate the Bad Boys’ system.
In what sense? My sense is that he’s moving in precisely the opposite direction (presumably as quickly as he can).
he said so
In an interview Gordon confirmed that Joe wanted a Bad Boyseqsue 3 guard rotation where any 3 were capable of starting and handling the ball
by bearded thundar on Jul 12, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions
My issue has never been about the signings of CV and Gordon
it’s about spending $11M/yr. on Gordon months after giving Hamilton an $11M/yr. extension. Completely fubar’d.
witty signature
How Am I the First to Rec This?
Our boy Latif has made a statement that would have been scorned by most of us six months ago, but that is now looking like conventional wisdom, and getting all of us to agree that it is conventional wisdom. Bully for him!
My blogs: pakagankarachi.livejournal.com (dormant)
burmahunkalove.livejournal.com (occasional signs of life)
by MrHappyMushroom on Jul 9, 2010 11:23 PM EDT reply actions
lol
I was surprised someone rec’d the post
The beginning of the end of the misery
by Latif Masud on Jul 10, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
No. Jod was not right.
$22-24mil per year on Gordon/Rip is an awful, crippling use of resources. Paying over a third of the salary cap to a pair of definitively sub-star level SG’s is the worst kind of dumb— it locks the team into long-term mediocrity, which is the absolute worst place for an NBA team to be.
On top of that, last off-season was a buyer’s market (I made a fanpost on this very topic), with plenty of cheaper alternatives, players who could have provided a reasonably similar chunk of production as Gordon/CV at a fraction of the long-term cost.
Also, by blowing every penny of cap space so quickly, Jod completely neglected to take advantage of all the teams that were desperately trying to shed contracts in anticipation of this off-season. OKC and Houston made a killing in long-term assets by taking on other teams short term salary, and they were able to do it because of flexible cap situations… an option Jod completely pissed away within minutes of the start of free agency.
So the answer is no, Jod was not right. Jod got it very, very wrong.
by Gabe F-B on Jul 9, 2010 11:59 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
none of those guys are close to the same level of production
Channing Frye is basically just a 3 point shooter, who in the right system can score…thats it
Drew Gooden: old, solid rebounder, but no upside
David Lee: I would agree…this is one guy I would’ve taken over CV, but it would’ve cost us more $$…something we didn’t have
CV: Yes, he is inconsistent, but he has a high ceiling. He’s young, not fully developed, but very talented. He is basically ’Sheed without the defense.These are the type of player JoD in the past has turned into gold. Guys like Tay, Chauncey, and ’Sheed.
As far as the guards:
Really? Von Wafer? Rodney Carney?
They are no where near the talent level of Ben Gordon. They have upside, but they are not starting SGs or even role players on most teams.
The only move that doesn’t make sense is of course the Rip Hamilton extension, but I’m gonna give JoD the benefit of the doubt for a few more years b/c I think he’ll trade Rip. He’s traded fading stars for future all stars before. (Grant Hill for Ben Wallace, Jerry Stackhouse for Rip Hamilton).
The beginning of the end of the misery
by Latif Masud on Jul 10, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
David Lee: I would agree…this is one guy I would’ve taken over CV, but it would’ve cost us more $$…something we didn’t have
We spent a collective $18 million between Gordon and CV. We could have absolutely given David Lee a contract— one that would likely have been cheaper than the $13M/yr. he earned this year. That $13M is a pretty damn fair number given that he’s a 20/12/4 player. We just re-signed Rip Hamilton, so we didn’t need to sign Ben Gordon. Pick one or the other, not both, then add David Lee and you’ll still have $10M + to play with. Then, don’t trade Afflalo, not for anything.
Sign Ben Wallace + Frye, you’re good to go.
Rodney Stuckey | Will Bynum
Ben Gordon | Arron Afflalo
Jonas Jerebko | Tayshaun Prince
David Lee | Jason Maxiell
Ben Wallace | Channing Frye
That is a playoff team.
witty signature
by Mike Payne on Jul 10, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Roster Balance, FTW!
I’d replace Lee with boozer there though. I think the reason Boozer didn’t opt out was because we were his only shot at a max contract, and we didn’t want to spend most our cap on one player. If we don’t extend Rip, we’d have had enough to sign Boozer and Gordon.
by Roll The Dyess on Jul 10, 2010 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions
After watching Lebron’s show last night, it got me thinking…did Joe Dumars actually do the right thing by signing Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon?
Absolutely not, especially after seeing what David Lee’s contract looks like right now. Our team blows, we’re going to blow for the immediate future, and we’re basically relying on one or more lucky trades to even get us back to being relevant in the EC. Every move Joe has made since the CB trade (with the exceptions of Ben and Jonas) have been the wrong ones.
Maybe JoD KNEW the East was going to be extra-extra-extra weak after this summer, and it’s all a part of his master plan? Maybe…? Ehhhh…..? http://www.cricketchirp.com
by garrettelliott on Jul 10, 2010 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions
in agreement, but to put it another way:
Every move Joe has made since the CB trade (with the exceptions of Ben and Jonas) have been the wrong ones.
Every move Joe has made since the CB trade (with the exceptions of Ben and Jonas) have shown a clear departure from Detroit’s blue collar, defense-minded identity. Every move he has made by trade, free agent signing or the draft (with the possible exception of Monroe) has left clearly superior players on the table.
witty signature
I partially agree with that
I don’t think JoD is building a defensive team anymore…anyone that still believes that needs to watch Pistons games. Like I said above, this is going to be a Pistons that will simply try to outscore their opponents, and they have the firepower to do so. Maybe giving Rip and BG a combined $22 mil looks stupid, but thats one of the best ways to get scoring. We’re not gonna get a superstar here anytime soon, so the best way to get scoring would be from efficient SGs like the guys we have. Plus, having guys like CV and BG at least gives us trading chips in the near future, so if we can;t sign a superstar, maybe…just maybe we can trade for one.
‘Melo might not be around in Denver. Chris Paul might be available. We couldn’t pursue those guys with our ‘08 roster. We couldn’t pursue them with just David Lee + ’08 roster. But with the young talents in Jerebko, Stuckey, great contracts in CV and BG, and expiring deal in Tayshuan…I would say the pistons have some of the best trading pieces in all of the NBA right now. Not to mention, the best GM in terms of trading guys in the buisness…
The beginning of the end of the misery
by Latif Masud on Jul 10, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
this is going to be a Pistons that will simply try to outscore their opponents
To do that, you need to play at the fastest pace possible. Detroit played the second slowest pace in the league last season— with all that firepower you mentioned.
Maybe giving Rip and BG a combined $22 mil looks stupid, but thats one of the best ways to get scoring.
Absolutely not when they play the same position.
Plus, having guys like CV and BG at least gives us trading chips in the near future
facepalm
Not to mention, the best GM in terms of trading guys in the buisness…

witty signature
Lots of injuries last year dicated pace and play.
This years team will be better once everyone is healthy. Prince and Rip both missed over 30 games. Ben and CV missed games with nagging injuries for 3 months. Bynum had a nagging injury all year. We will be better this year and I cant wait!!!
by BennieBladesFan on Jul 10, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Better, yes.
But it’s hard to be content with a non-contender. Sure it’s cool to see young guys develop and MFBYNUMITE, but we have a long way to go to feel like 04 and even more to feel like 05.
by Roll The Dyess on Jul 10, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions
You don’t think CV or BG are good trade baits? Sure their play was less than stellar last year, but I would bet thats the last season Gordon averages less than 17 pts. Charlie: like i said b4, he can do a lot of things, hes versatile, and teams love versatile PFs, and 7 mil is a bargain for players like that, especially young ones.
And JoD and trades: did one losing season somehow make you forget about the teams hes put together from 2003 to 2008. Did one “bad” trade (not even bad really, just traded away an aging point guard to clear up cap space) make you forget about all the good ones? I don’t wanna call you a fair weather fan b/c you’re a regular on this site, which more than shows your fandom, but you have to agree with the fact that JoD has earned the benefit of the doubt for at least a few years…
The beginning of the end of the misery
You don’t think CV or BG are good trade baits?
I think justifying less-than-optimal signings by saying “well, they’ll be trade bait” is ridiculous.
did one losing season somehow make you forget about the teams hes put together from 2003 to 2008
I have covered that in very exhaustive detail.
witty signature
Every move Joe has made since the CB trade (with the exceptions of Ben and Jonas) have shown a clear departure from Detroit’s blue collar, defense-minded identity
That would basically be how I would define wrong in my post above. So yeah, same thing, different words.
I will never be able to defend Jod’s moves last summer. It seems as if some are arguing something like Jod was looking into his crystal ball and realized that he couldn’t compete this summer, and he was justified in spending his money. He’s ahead of the curve, in other words. But what I fail to understand is how signing middling players to multi-year, multi-million dollar contracts a year in advance of everyone else doing soii s a good thing.
What would have been amazing is if he had anticipated that from other GMs and avoided it a year ahead of time, not duplicated it.
There are 10-15 bargain guys we couldve had
Last year if we dont sign these 2 (BENCH) guys for a quarter of our pay roll (something like that) then the Pistons couldve lost 3-5 more games had a higher lotto pick (i like G Monroe ) but maybe we couldve gotten a top 3 ‘cant miss guy’
Then have a lot of cap room for 2-3 mid level guys this year..
Fire Joe Dumars
Lions Super Bowl 2012
wow
I find it really SAD how people forget what JoD has done for the Pistons. He is Mr Piston. He has won us two championships as a player, stayed with us (as a player) through the good times and the bad. He built a championship team that should’ve won more than one title from ashes, and after one bad season, and a questionable trade and a questionable contract extension, people want his job. I almost want him to go somewhere else. I almost want him to go somewhere like New Jersey, where there is stable ownership that is willing to spend money and a team that will be in the big-time New York market, where he could really show people that given the right tools, he can build a championship team
The beginning of the end of the misery
Detroit Pistons
I think we finish 2nd or 3rd in the Div. w a chance at the playoffs. Ben Gordon will have a better year and i’d like to see a faster paced team w the player’s we have, Stuckey, Gordon, Prince, Jerebko and Monroe running the floor and then slow it down w/ Bynum, Rip, Prince, Monroe and Wallace/Wilcox. Nice write up Latif only thing i think is wrong is Monroe playing Center, at best a PF. He only ways 10 or 20 lbs more than me and he’s got me by 5 or 6" to lite in the ass. I’d like to see Detroit make a move for Spencer Hawes he right around the league avg. in scoring and reb.
I say 3rd
Milwaukee and Chicago are going to be fighting it out for the division title, and we’re nowhere near as good as either of them. Indiana is going to sucks, and so is Cleveland. At worst, we finish 4th.
"Detroit Bad Boys is full of HOMOS ,JACKASSES and NON-sports fans."
-ralphgoblue/thunder_god08
by Thom_not_Tom on Jul 12, 2010 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I bet you Cleveland is at least .500
I really don’t get why people undervalue their team so much, is it just because LeBron never won in the playoffs? They have a great array of shooters, some nice defensive bigs and an allstar PF in Jamison. Not a great team, but there’s a chance they finish better than us. They weren’t one of the best defensive teams in the league because of LeBron – he preferred to guard the opponents worst players to not get into foul trouble.
by bearded thundar on Jul 12, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think you can categorize Jamison as an "all-star PF"
Formerly an all-star PF sure, but whatever that was that he displayed playing for the Cavs after the trade deadline is not all-star PF material.
I think its a fair assumption that when you take a player like Lebron off any team, the win totals will drop significantly. Since Lebron has never been injured for long periods of time with the current roster, there is no telling how the Cavs will play without him over extended periods of time.
They had what no draft picks this draft so they don’t have much in the way of rising talent outside of the people already on their team.
I think the thing they have going for them the most is byron scott stepping in to coach. He could very well take that team and implement an offense well-suited to them…but their current roster is listed here (http://www.shamsports.com/content/pages/data/salaries/cavaliers.jsp). Outside of Williams, Jamison, and Varejao/West, their team is really not that strong. They could be, but I think they have a lot of question marks like whether Powe can return to his former level of play…how any of these players play when they don’t have the best player in basketball drawing double teams on a regular basis, etc…
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
i think that had more to do with the team
than Jamison himself.
Jamison was playing some of his best ball in Washington, especially on the rebounding side (I believe he had a 20 board game). He just was poorly integrated into their team, that falls a lot on both Mike Brown and LeBron (guy who writes up plays and guy who dominates ball)
by bearded thundar on Jul 12, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
agreed...
but do you think Jamison can do what he did in Washington even if he’s properly integrated? I’d argue, Haywood, Butler, Arenas were all better players to play alongside than anyone in a similar position currently on the Cavs roster…
I do think their starting 5 is reasonable:
- Williams
- ??? (West?)
- Moon
- Jamison
- Varejao
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
The key will be if they give Moon the majority of the minutes at SF. He’s always been a really productive player who doesn’t get played enough. Moon/Varejao are a good dirty work tandem, and Williams/Jamison can do the scoring, if they can pick up a solid/efficient SG they probably still make the playoffs.

by 














