Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Poll: Bynum vs. Stuckey

I was curious how DBB readers felt about the place of Bynum vs. Stuckey on the Pistons.

There are a lot of variables at play here, is Stuckey a combo guard, who has more value as a trade asset, what does the rest of the roster look like, how much value does each provide in the short and long term with their contracts. I tried to make a poll question that would avoid all of the above questions and simply asked who is the better basketball player.

I think it's easier to build a team that wins with Bynum as your PG than with Stuckey as a combo guard so I'm voting for Bynum in the poll. I think Stuckey has been given a ton of opportunity in Detroit and shown only less development than the faith shown in him. I don't  think you win championships with players like that. If your players aren't surprising you with their growth, I'm not sure you want them on the team.

Compare the amount of faith shown Stuckey vs. Arron Afflalo or Amir and Delfino and then look at the returns. Maybe Stuckey is better than I think but his tenure with the team has been one big downslide. If he doesn't have one good game in Orlando a million years ago after CB had his leg hooked by Jameer Nelson I'm not sure the last few years of Detroit Basketball are the pit of suck we've all come to know and loathe.

Vote and leave an explanation for your vote in the comments if you so desire.

Poll
Who is a better basketball player?
Rodney Stuckey
110 votes
Will Bynum
78 votes

188 votes | Poll has closed

FanPosts are user-created posts from the Detroit Bad Boys community and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all fans or the staff at DBB. The DBB staff reserves the right at any time to edit the contents of FanPosts as they reasonably see fit.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

MFWB. Easy.

We give up a slight bonus in defense to receive a massive improvement in distribution. While Bynum has always been an excellent isolation defender, he took a step back this season from injuries. If he really is healed, the rest of his defensive game will improve as well.

Stuckey is a 6th man of the year candidate, and should come off the bench with the ball in his hands and given the reigns. But as a starting point guard, he leaves our team empty on the plays it should run with our roster. When he starts and tries to lead our team, it’s no surprise that our bigs are stuck and the ball just doesn’t move in the way it should.

Bynum to start, Stuckey to 6th.

witty signature

by Mike Payne on Sep 14, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Stuckey

I’m just not that thrilled about the logjam at SG and the way the roster is constructed. I’d rather deal Stuckey for assets and live with BG as 6th man and Rip at SG. Rip can play some SF. BG can play some PG if you have McGrady and Tay handling the ball. I see the quickest way out of the roster mess as dealing Stuckey. That’s not saying anything bad about Stuckey, he’s the most desirable asset among the 3 SGs from last year. I don’t have anything against Stuckey and liked him a lot up until the Pistons gave away Afflalo for nothing and then Afflalo ended up being the valuable player on a very good team. Meanwhile we’re trying to figure out Stuckey’s role on a lottery team and always having to give his potential the benefit of the doubt. I say deal him, maybe as a sweetener for a deal with Tay to a contender.

by joejoejoe on Sep 14, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh

We’re like a yard sale that has some stuff that might have been nice at one time, buyers thinking about talking themselves making an offer, then drive off glad they didn’t…

by Shinons on Sep 14, 2010 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m with you J-trip. I love him as a trade asset, but I also love him as a sixth. Should either of those options happen, they’re better than him starting at the point IMO. (and he should never start at the 2)

witty signature

by Mike Payne on Sep 14, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trade idea

Rip, Stuckey, and Maxiell for Gil Arenas, JaVale Magee, and the Wizards #1 pick in 2011

It would give you
Bynum/Gil
BG/T-mac
Tay/Daye
Jonas/CV/Monroe
Ben/Monroe/McGee

Not awful.

by joejoejoe on Sep 15, 2010 3:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

problem is Gil has tons of money left

And his reputation is likely too tarnished for Joe to go after him. Sheed may have been a nuisance, but he was a damn good player and never had any national headlines

"Don’t really know shit about White other than he is a colon of Stuckey" - das SmittyJ

And here I thought I knew White like the palm of my hand

by bearded thundar on Sep 15, 2010 7:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think it's $22m total

It’s one year of Rip and two years of Max’s contract that the Wizards save, the Pistons would get a #1 pick and the swap the rights to resign Stuckey for McGee. It’s not a great trade in hindsight but Arenas is a much better passer than Rip and a true PG, it fixes a lot of the rotation issues, it gets you a legit big prospect. I don’t think Arenas is a bad guy, he just was immature. He’s been hurt but maybe he transform himself. Maybe the Pistons can squeeze 2 #1s out. This trade was more about me being exhausted by the logjam at SG on the Pistons and not wanting to see that again.

If Stuckey does well for Detroit, he devalues your 2 largest assets as trade bait. It’s a no win situation.

by joejoejoe on Sep 15, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

funny enough

I don’t see the Wizards letting go of McGee, nor their first rounder.

witty signature

by Mike Payne on Sep 15, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I voted Stuckey

The way I see it, if you’re starting in our backcourt you ought to do one of the two main things that creates an efficient offense: get to the free throw line, or hit three pointers (discounting turnovers, as our slow-paced offense only allows a guy to turn the ball over more than three times a game if your initials are AI). Neither one of them are going to be making threes – but Stuckey has a chance to really be great at drawing fouls if he stops attempting acrobatic layups, instead attempting to draw the foul. IMO, that’s what would make the greatest impact for us.

by Shinons on Sep 14, 2010 10:48 PM EDT reply actions  

The way I see it, if you’re starting in our backcourt you ought to do one of the two main things that creates an efficient offense: get to the free throw line, or hit three pointers

Sheeyit, Nons, love a brother to the max, but I stand apart in thinking Stuck is going to do either.

witty signature

by Mike Payne on Sep 14, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's gonna Alienize the mojo from Lebron and D Wade like in Space Jam

GUARANTEED!

Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.

by The Boourns on Sep 15, 2010 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's also in the Top 30 for usage

Stuckey produced one of the lowest win share totals of players with a usage rate over 26% (along with Rip). You have to shoot the basketball better at guard in the NBA. There is no way to shoot 41% from the field and 23% from three and be a winning guard in the NBA.

by joejoejoe on Sep 15, 2010 3:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Billups

That is what made Billups so good, getting to the line, hitting threes and never turning the ball over. He was pretty good. The team had gotten stale and CB was as much to blame as anyone but Dumars and a lot of people screwed up by thinking Rip’s game would age better than CB. And it’s a lot easier to get a good SG in the NBA than a good PG.

Oh well. To the future. And beyond!

/signsdampier

by joejoejoe on Sep 15, 2010 3:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Or maybe...

We could trade Tay’s expiring and Stuckey for Billups…

by Shinons on Sep 15, 2010 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bynum.

He’s a better scorer and much better distributor. On offense, he complements virtually every 2 or 3 on the Pistons: Hamilton, Gordon, McGrady, Daye (I’m assuming Prince is gone). On defense, Stuckey might be better, but not by much. Bynum all the way.

by -PS- on Sep 14, 2010 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

actually last year he was considerably better

Will had a pathetic d-rating of 113, and also I’m of the group that Will’s style makes him appear better on offense than he actually is.

The entire offense tends to slow down when Will tries to penetrate, fails and then kicks it out to someone with <10 on the shot clock. His o-rating of only 105 shows that. IMO, he was much more effective last year when he focused on distributing, rather than this year when he tried to be a primary scorer.

However, the question was “who is the better basketball player” and not “who would you rather play”, so my vote goes towards Will (for obvious reasons).

"Don’t really know shit about White other than he is a colon of Stuckey" - das SmittyJ

And here I thought I knew White like the palm of my hand

by bearded thundar on Sep 15, 2010 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s funny that some people are saying Bynum is a better passer. Stuckey ain’t no Stockton, but Bynum is kind of a black hole, isn’t he? Yeah, he’ll pass sometimes, but his real strength is one-on-one basketball where he can score 26 points in a 4th quarter.

Actually, come to think of it, they’re both kind of black holes. Stuckey puts his head down and forces it, too.

by garrettelliott on Sep 15, 2010 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also, I’m going with Stuckey as the better basketball player.

by garrettelliott on Sep 15, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

One way of measuring that is to look at assist rates, which show an estimated share of the assists that a player made while on court

Stuckey: 24.7%
Bynum: 28.2%

Not a huge margin, which serves your point pretty well :)

witty signature

by Mike Payne on Sep 15, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

part of the problem was that Stuckey was forced into scoring mode the entire season

So I do think it does balance out the assist rates a bit when you take in context.

With that being said, Will is a much better passer in terms of quality of his passes. Stuckey has shown good court vision at times, but he tends to force the issue instead of sneak the ball around the defense for an open shot.

"Don’t really know shit about White other than he is a colon of Stuckey" - das SmittyJ

And here I thought I knew White like the palm of my hand

by bearded thundar on Sep 15, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

part of the problem was that Stuckey was forced into scoring mode the entire season

When Bynum was on the court, so was he. The season prior, Bynum recorded 35.3%.

witty signature

by Mike Payne on Sep 15, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly my point

He has better passing ability than Stuckey, but many times he chooses not to.

However in terms of basketball skill, I think Will has more ability/talent – but once again semantics comes in. If we’re discussing purely ability, you know my stance, but if we’re talking the more useful player, then I think slightly goes to Stuckey.

"Don’t really know shit about White other than he is a colon of Stuckey" - das SmittyJ

And here I thought I knew White like the palm of my hand

by bearded thundar on Sep 15, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted Bynum.

Just because I think he can get to the rim and draw fouls just fine, but is a better distributer than Stuckey. So that whole pass to the open man thing is a bit more of an option. Something stuckey doesn’t do as he make some errant throw towards the hoop.

by madpoopz on Sep 15, 2010 12:52 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Bynum’s a better PG. I think Stuckey is probably slightly better as a basketball player overall because of his ability to defend both guard positions and to rebound the ball. But only slightly.

by brgulker on Sep 15, 2010 9:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Well said. I had to vote Stuckey, because the question was, “who is the better basketball player”.

by waulie on Sep 15, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Very similar styles

Both of these guys really have very similar styles. They are both shoot-first slashing scorers with no outside shot to speak. The difference in my mind is twofold:

1. Size
2. Age/Ceiling

I think I’ve said this before, but as hard as MFWB works, he’s never going to get any bigger. He’s a scrappy defender, but when a bigger guard decides to use his weight advantage, there’s not much he can do about it. At least Stuckey has a chance to guard bigger 1’s, and is quick enough to stay in front of most quick guards as well (doesn’t ALWAYS, but CAN).

MFWB is also as good as he’s going to get. Anyone expecting a significant improvement in any aspect of his game is betting against the odds. He’s at his peak right now. He’s not likely getting any better.

Say what you will about Stuckey, but in theory he still has the potential to improve his game. I realize most that voted for Bynum probably don’t agree that he will improve, by my argument still stands that he could.

And after all of that Stuckey defending type sounding talk, I actually voted for Bynum. I think Bynum is the better basketball player this minute, but I think for the long term Stuckey is the better option.

by Big Z in Orlando on Sep 15, 2010 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

“I was curious how DBB readers felt about the place of Bynum vs. Stuckey on the Pistons.”

I think the argument is kinda moot. I love both the guys coming off the bench, but I don’t like either starting. They both have some large flaws. Better pg in my mind is Bynum, simply because he has made up his mind on how he is going to approach things while Stuckey still hasn’t shown me that. I’ll go with Stuckey as the better all around player by a slim margin barring offseason improvements by the two. I just wish I felt confident in Stuckey finishing layups, I still don’t get his akwardness at the rim.

To experience the consequences of my own choices. This is why I live

by JumpingBlob on Sep 16, 2010 1:49 AM EDT reply actions  

I voted Stuck

He has shown improvement every year and under a different scheme each year. It’s difficult to shoot a moving target with accuracy. He’s being forced to be a leader on a team that doesn’t really accept him as the leader yet. That cannot be easy. I think he has been forced into a position that reflects poorly on his strengths and yet he’s been busting his tail doing what he can for this team. He might not be a 100% pure point guard, but he is the better player overall than Bynum IMO and I’d rather have him lead the team.

by FunkyDonut on Sep 16, 2010 8:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Bynum was too AI-esque for my taste last season.

But I chalk up at him trying to earn a contract. So I hope this year he comes and focus more on running the offense rather than getting his numbers.

As a PG, Bynum probably has the most ability but like I said I didn’t like his approach to it.

Right now I like Stuckey better, if for nothing else, for his height and how that helped him fill multiple roles for us last season.

Where in the world is Trent Plaisted?

by Kriz on Sep 16, 2010 11:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Voted fro Stuck, but allszitis is “Paper or plastic”

by alaskanpistonsfan on Sep 16, 2010 3:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Note about the poll

Stuckey had give or take a 5% edge on Bynum up until about 60 votes, then the late votes went hard for Stuckey. My wild arsed guess is that daily readers of DBB are more evenly split than more casual followers of the NBA like say ESPN’s Chad Ford.

by joejoejoe on Sep 17, 2010 2:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Bynum

I go for Will Bynum, he is a pure point guard that can get all our wings involved in the offense. While Stuckey has all the talent in the world he’s never taken the next step I expected him to, he could be a pretty good sixth man but I don’t think he would want that role at all.

by Detroitsportsfan3 on Sep 17, 2010 12:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Stuckey

I like Bynum’s game but I feel like Stuckey has not had the right backcourt mate to help his game. Gordon’s 3pt ability is the perfect compliment to Stuckey’s driving game. I think at some point JoD needs to trade Rip for a big.

"These are my new shoes. They're good shoes. They won't make you rich like me, they won't make you rebound like me, they definitely won't make you handsome like me. They'll only make you have shoes like me. That's it." - Charles Barkley

by DarkKnight18 on Sep 17, 2010 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

This is what I think of Stuckey he reminds me of Ramon Sessions hes a guy who could do really well as a sixth man but does not have the ability to be a big time player in 30 mins of playing time consistantly he is a better shooter than Bynum but remember hes a point guard. Point guards need to know how to drive and kick the ball up otherwise we are getting another Mo Williams.
 
If we were to make a trade I would say we trade
Charlie V and Stuckey
to The Sixers
for Marreese Speights and a 2nd round pick
 Think about it we finally get a scoring threat down low and a tandom of speights, Monroe and Jonas talk about terrible three. you could even have prince in at shooting guard with Bynum or gordon at point, talk about instant offense.

Walter James Culver. or you can call me FLOCKA

by Walter Flocka Culver on Sep 23, 2010 9:45 AM EDT reply actions  

sessions is a great option off the bench but look what he did for minnesota last year didly squat he had some good years in milwaukee but all i see in him is an eddie house type character

Walter James Culver. or you can call me FLOCKA

by Walter Flocka Culver on Sep 23, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

WTF is the kitten shit?

yeah i am new to all this…but not new to the stuckey v bynum shit. honestly neither of them blows my mind enough to start arguments. they are both combo guards. deal with it. in my mind i would start terrico white who seems to be the dumars combo guard wet dream. stuckey is good right, but if he is supposed to be the next wade how many nasty dunks have we seen? lots of “Yo!”s after bad drives and bad decision making, which, as much as i love bynums intensity he is not much better. White at least could be the next Evans…

by Frankdog on Sep 24, 2010 4:40 PM EDT reply actions  

That would blow my mind if Terrico White started.

by garrettelliott on Sep 25, 2010 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am going out on a limb here no doubt

but dude is a similar size, crazy athletic, combo guard like Tyreke. I am just saying if he were drafted now with the expectations Stuck had i think he would play tons of minutes and maybe be more of a threat. Now he is stuck behind Stuck and Will and maybe never sees minutes. Quite possibly i am kool aided up but daymn that vid of him dunking and destroying everyone gave me the chills

I smell a troll

by Frankdog on Sep 25, 2010 4:09 PM EDT reply actions  

funny shit

i guess i asked for that

I smell a troll

by Frankdog on Sep 26, 2010 10:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A Detroit Pistons blog with completely fair and unbiased opinions of 29 of the Association's 30 teams. Read up and share what's on your mind.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
OT Thread - More Diablo than Heat?
Small
Pistons' Kyle Singler helping out Real Madrid overseas
Small
Well it is draft time!
Onions_fom_chile_stocks_small
Pistons-Pacers Recap: Where no one really gave a crap
Img_0538_small
Fantasy Basketball Conundrum
Small
Wolves at Pistons: The Vernon Macklin experiment continues
Small
Draft Day Nightmares
Small
What If....Dumars Had Not Fired Carlisle?
Small
Maybe the Pistons Should Try To Sign Oden...
Small
LeBron > Jordan...at least in this way...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-01-22_at_2 Packey

Mattw-h_small Matt Watson

Featured Contributors

Largelogo_gurk_small brgulker

Darko_milicic_small Sean_Corp