Brandon Knight cometh, Pistons plummet in home opener vs. Cavs, 105-89
Come one, come all to a beautiful show. It's going to be awesome, and some other stuff. Dee dee dee dee doo dee dee dee doo dee dee doo dee. Heh heh. Some other basketball stuff!
Fans paid the ticket toll for the home opener and the Cleveland Cavs got into the Detroit Pistons' soul. The Pistons were caught with their pants down and, if it weren't for a few pleasant performances from young players, this game would've been completely unwatchable.
Cleveland shot 57-percent from the field all night, outrebounded the Pistons 40-26, and ran away with the game in the second quarter when they outscored Detroit 26-15 (16-6 in the final five minutes). The Pistons started with a 9-2 run in the third, pulling within four points, but it was countered with a 10-2 Cavs run. Goodnight.
But there was another good Knight (oh, puns are fun), as the future of the Pistons provided the lone bright spot(s) in an otherwise embarrassing loss. Rookie Brandon Knight shot a career best 10-of-13 (3-of-5 from downtown) for 23 points, adding a team-high six assists (opposite just two turnovers), two steals, and a rebound in 28-plus minutes of his second professional regular season game. Ben Gordon was 9-of-19 (4-of-9 from beyond the arc) for a game-high 25 points while adding four assists (opposite two turnovers). Greg Monroe was 5-of-10 shooting for 10 points and grabbed a team-high seven rebounds (although he turned it over five times).
The Cavs were led by Samardo Samuels, who scored 17 points. Ramon Sessions added 16 (on 4-of-11 shooting), six assists, and seven rebounds in 28 minutes.
Join me after the jump for more.
- As MFMP pointed out in the comments of the Game Thread, Knight's 10-of-13 shooting was a career best, both collegiately and professionally. Keep in mind, though, that 77-percent shooting is ABSURDLY good, (especially for someone who attempts five threes), and probably a career game for many. To put this performance somewhat in perspective, here's a list of some of the NBA's best shooters, past and present, and when they reached a 77-percent or better shooting performance during their careers (when attempting a minimum of 10 shots):
-- Dirk Nowitzki (game 39 of rookie season)
-- Dwyane Wade (game 50 of rookie season, but he did not attempt any threes)
-- Larry Bird (game 65 of rookie season)
-- Kobe Bryant (game 65 of rookie season)
-- Reggie Miller (game 12 of second season)
-- Jeff Hornacek (game 81 of second season)
-- Michael Jordan (third season)
-- Steve Nash (fourth season)
-- Ray Allen (fourth season)
-- Chauncey Billups (eighth season)
-- Isiah Thomas (NEVER) - Best part about Knight in the early going appears to be his attitude. By most accounts, he works his ass off and is wicked sma't. Get this: after his career game, all he was worried about was improving upon his TWO measly turnovers.
- (Russel Westbrook was 0-for-13 for the Thunder tonight).
- Austin Daye was completely invisible for the second straight game after a strong preseason. He was 0-for-5 shooting with three turnovers.
- Monroe was credited with five turnovers, but a couple of those were not his fault. One was Tayshaun Prince's, who had three other turnovers to his name, not counting a few dreadful shots.
- Jerebko had a bad shooting line, but I thought he was great hustling for loose balls and being aggressive. He was second on the team in rebounds, and I'd say he earned his six rebounds more than Monroe earned his seven.
- I really wish Prince was not a Piston anymore. I'm fine with Stuckey and I think there are legitimate explanations for his re-signing, but I really can't fathom Prince still being apart of this team. It makes zero sense.
- Having said that, Stuckey was meh after having a fine first game. He scored 11 on 12 shots and, as PP notes, he only got to the line twice.
- Vernon Macklin saw some mop-up minutes and scored his first professional basket on a slam dunk shot (via a no-look pass from Knight)
- Pistons attempted 11 more field goals than the Cavs despite getting outrebounded, but the Cavs attempted 11 more free throws and made more field goals in less attempts.
- DBB alum Boney points out that Lawrence Frank is 0-19 in his last 19 games as a head coach.
- Box Score
- Gores seemed to enjoy the "entertainment" of the game despite the loss:
- Make no mistake: Gores wants to win. He's willing to be patient, though:
- Before the game, Stuckey got on the mic and thanked the fans for showing up to support the team (it was reported a sellout). Stuckey also promised a "new era" of Pistons basketball.
- Pistons, 0-2, travel to Boston to play the 0-3 Celtics on Friday.
"Tonight is about celebrating Detroit and its comeback," Gores vowed, shortly before tip-off. "That's what we're doing: We're coming back. And we all feel it in our hearts. I know I do."This has been on my mind for a long time. I feel I have been trained for this my whole life. I grew up in sports. I grew up in Michigan. I feel like I am so ready for this challenge to help Detroit come back.
"I'm going to be patient as long as there's progress being made," said Gores, who delivered a similar message when he spoke to the team at practice Tuesday. "Winning is an important part of this, but I need to win the right way. The right way is hard work, respect each other, do the right thing every day."Don't worry about the results. Do the right thing every day."
253 comments
|
Add comment
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Westbrook
I went to the Okc-Memphis game and the reason it was close was because of him. When he was on the bench the Zombies would go on a run. I really hope Knight keeps on getting minutes, it’s th only way he’ll get better.
by MeanGene on Dec 29, 2011 2:04 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The (K)Night Man Cometh
DAY MAN!
OH OH AWWW
FIGHTER OF THE (K)NIGHT MAN!
OH OH AWWW
CHAMPION OF THE SUN
OH OH AWWW
HE’S A MASTER OF KARATE AND FRIENDSHIP FOR EVERYONE!
I wish this song was more relevant to the actual players, it could totally be the theme for those two from now on.
Will have to see the replays though, I didn’t catch this one, was at the UNLV game.
President of the Tony Scheffler Fan Club
This is some team they have put together
How much did they just pay Prince again? 10 points, 3 boards. If he put any effort in he should have twenty a night. Lazy, lazy, lazy. What is his job as a starter? Isn’t he supposed to be a scorer? Why does he get away with doing so little all these years?
“What is his job as a starter? Isn’t he supposed to be a scorer? Why does he get away with doing so little all these years?”
Who said anything about him being a scorer? I’m absolutely positive he brought back soley because he averages a quadruple-double in “veteran leadership”.
I Heart Chris Paul & the LA Clippers.
I sure hope
Tay ends up worth the contract. Thus far, it hasnt looked like it. Its amazing what we went through to sign this guy…. On the other hand, nobody else has stepped up to the plate (Daye) to show any worth either. There are some MAJOR holes in this team, and its becoming pretty obvious. The best thing JoeD could have done is not re-sign prince or stucky. The ship needs to be blown up completely, and there is only two people on this team worth any money…do I even need to mention the names ? Well, I will… Knight and Jerebko. Other than that, whats the point in watching ? None.
by easterneagles79 on Dec 29, 2011 4:18 AM EST reply actions
O RLY?

I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
by heWizard on Dec 29, 2011 4:24 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Packey
I like the way you write my man!! You,Matt,MFMP,and the others have gifted writing abilites,and the very reason I enjoy visiting this blog thing. I can do without all the crying and whining from the others,but you guys make me want more,more MORE!!!
thanks, Roco
I don’t belong in the same paragraph as Matt, MFMP, and Kevin (or even most of our community members) in terms of writing abilities, but I appreciate the kind words and glad you’re wanting more of DBB — I can’t get enough of this place myself.
Oh you hold it right there, Packey. We each have our own voice and I wouldn’t put any above the other (okay, we are totally looking up at Matt Watson’s talent). I, for one, think merging with MTSM was one of the best things DBB ever did.
Because it brought us you… (tender music plays softly, single tear sheds, flowers start to blossom, he gets the girl)
by Mike Payne on Dec 29, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
C'mon son
and there is only two people on this team worth any money

“Open your fuckin’ eyes man” – Havoc, Mobb Deep, 1993
That goddamn Okra and beans got you Oprah in jeans. Seems to me a little lean cuisine, wouldn't hurt much- Agh don't touch! -Obie Trice
Gosh, if only we could understand why we suck so much
It’s so mysterious and so sudden. . . .
by Toledo Joe on Dec 29, 2011 8:11 AM EST reply actions 6 recs
I had a dream that we signed Keith Benson
The organization was clearly aware that we need another big and they were pumped about how he was going to get in there and stop all the points in the paint.
Now that I woke up, I don’t know what’s sadder. The fact that we didn’t sign him, or the fact that I’m dream about Keith Benson.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
Knight was fantastic, and Gordon played well. What I thought was great about Knight last night, though, wasn’t really his shooting (although it obviously was). It was the balance he found between his own shot and his teammates. I thought his shot selection for himself was very good, and he did a good job recognizing when a better shot could come from elsewhere.
But I’m super concerned about our big rotation (that’s an upgrade from very concerned). We are getting destroyed on the glass. Straight up worked.
I’m also a little concerned about Moose. He hasn’t quite looked like himself yet, but hopefully, this is just getting back in the swing of basketball.
"With logic he attacks. With statistics he defends."
I concur with you.
If Knight can prove himself as a consistent 3 point threat and a kickout option for Moose than my God do we have a couple of nice looking pieces. I know that maybe I’m a bit too high on Knight after only one really good NBA game, but I’ve been high on him for a while now and I’m getting a bit excited for the future.
But if JOD screws up this draft than I’m gonna punch a baby.
And it’s nice that Ben Gordon played like we pay him too. I don’t know how many minutes he played alongside Knight but if there is some sorta connection there then lets run with it.
on Monroe
He was unreal around the rim last year and was a useless 32-136 (24%) from everywhere else on the floor. Through two games this year: 45% around the rim and 50% from everywhere else including 2-4 from 16-23 feet where he was 7-38 (19%) last year.
It’s already clear he’s improved his shot, so if we can assume he’s just had a couple bad games around the rim for whatever reason, and we can expect that to improve, he could be a legit 20ppg threat. (20 and 8!)
yeah...and lets not forget that Monroe started off his rookie year slower than molasses
I really hope that that isn’t how he’ll start every year, but going into your 2nd year with now summer league, bla bla bla, lockout, doesn’t make it easy for a developing big to start off strong.
Cousins is putting up better stat lines, but I don’t know if you can really say he’s playing better. He’s shooting far worse, and if he’d played a full 36 minutes, would have fouled out of both games while also committing 3 turnovers a game.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 29, 2011 10:38 AM EST up reply actions
Re: Balance between shooting and passing
Good to hear. I find that much more encouraging than 23 points.
I’m with you. I’ve been banging on Knight so I need to show up and admit that this was a really promising performance. And really, its just that, one good game. I’m going to do my best to give it about 40-45 games before I start to form an opinion on Knight (and Frank for that matter). Hopefully people don’t get too down on him when the rookie games inevitably happen.
by Other Matt on Dec 29, 2011 10:08 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I wouldn't expect any differently,
but I really like, Gulks, that you’d rightly call Knight “fantastic”, despite being on record as being dubious about the pick. It’s so easy for all of us to want to be right all the time and I could see the temptation to dismiss it as a fluke or emphasize something he didn’t do right.
Obviously, this great game doesn’t mean anything more or less than an awful game. But props for calling what was.
My blogs: pakagankarachi.livejournal.com (dormant)
burmahunkalove.livejournal.com (occasional signs of life)
by MrHappyMushroom on Dec 30, 2011 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
Knight
Has proven to me that he IS the next corner-stone of the franchise. Him along with Monroe and Jerebko give us 3 pieces to the puzzle. Stuckey might be the fourth but otherwise, another draft or two and we are a contending team again
Datsyukian Deke, Detroit Red Wings Blog
Follow @cnsportsblogs
Yeah, but I think...
We’re a draft and a trade away from being a good team
by need4detroit on Dec 29, 2011 9:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Seriously?
Knight had the shooting night of his life and BG finally woke up from his coma and we still got waxed by 20 to the Cavs in our home opener. Contending is a very long ways and multiple legit bigs from where we’re at.
by DetroitDonovan on Dec 29, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
a good draft and a few smart trades could fix our big rotation
We’ll be fine if Joe can get us a franchise center out of the lottery (or at least a super athletic big not named Perry Jones to play alongside Greg) and trade Tay for another rotation quality big. I don’t know what Utah would want, but ideally we could trade for Milsap considering they are stocked with bigs.
Our backcourt rotation will inevitably have some defensive problems whenever BG is given big minutes, but I’m liking offensive capabilities. If Gordon was 6’6" I’d say Stuckey should just come off the bench right now.
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
Trade Tay?
For a quality big? You mean like a Big Mac? I’m confused.
by Other Matt on Dec 29, 2011 11:02 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Trade Tay?
For a quality big? You mean like a Big Mac? I’m confused.
by Other Matt on Dec 29, 2011 11:02 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
D'oh!
Still figuring out the android app.
by Other Matt on Dec 29, 2011 11:03 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
dont think milsap solves any of our big man problems. maybe rebounding but he’s undersized and not a shot blocker.
follow me on twitter: @danieldresden
right, reread what i said
I stated we need to get a super athletic big in the draft, and then trade for another rotation big (someone to come off the bench)
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
yeah i read it, i wish i had your optimism about how quickly this can be turned around but i just dont see it. This team sucks, super hard and the MGMT doesnt seem to want to even acknowledge until very recently that there might be a problem with this roster.
follow me on twitter: @danieldresden
Tay just shouldn't be here
That’s frankly the biggest problem we have. The money could have been really well spent on any number of bigs, not to mention he fucks up our entire starting lineup+takes the ball away from the younger guys. It also helped that CV has been suspended so I kinda just forgot about him lol
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
I think a lot of the speed at which the turnaround happens rests on the shoulders of Knight.
because the expected position out of him is a weak spot. If it isn’t adequately filled by someone than we take a step back.
if we could be so lucky...
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 29, 2011 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
It seems like
Every team in the league has promise but ours. I rather watch Ricky Rubio pass the ball to a Darko Fathead for 48 minutes than to watch this team play.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
did you watch the game last night?
Our big rotation has a lot of problems, and frankly Tay shouldn’t be here, but Knight and Gordon looked really fucking good. If Moose had someone help him box out then he would have had a really big night as well
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
I watches last night
I was entertained by a select few. But considering we played the Cavs who on paper should be as awful as us, that doesn’t leave me confident that the trend will continue.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
I don't agree with that
The Cavs have a quality starting wing in Casspi, a star point guard (or at least every indication says he will be a star) and a pretty solid big rotation. I hear Cavs fans constantly complaining about Jamison, but frankly he was pretty damn good in Washington. They need to figure out how to fit him into the offense better. At the very least they have rebounders, shotblockers and a guy can score in their frontline. I bet they’ll be at least .500
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:13 AM EST up reply actions
I understand your position
But Casspi wouldn’t start for another team in this league. And of course it seems like the Cavs have a decent big rotation when they are pounding on our 3’s and 4’s. I mean Samardo Samuels? Looks like a first ballot hall of famer going up against our undersized front line
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
Casspi looked really good in his rookie season; I think he’ll be a 3 point threat for all of his career. If anything I would say he’s a great starting wing to have because he’s relatively efficient but has a low usage rate and is on a cheap contract.
I agree about Samuels being a nobody, but as much as I hate the guy, Varejao is a really solid defensive big. Just take a look at the numbers. Combined with the addition of Thompson, they have a solid defensive rotation
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/v/varejan01.html
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
I don't want to seem like I am
disagreeing to disagree. But my theory on guys who play on bad teams is that they tend to put up inflated numbers. Varejao seems like a stud because there is no one around him that is any better.
Sort of how Stuckey is a 8.5m dollar player playing for the Pistons. Varejao is a glue on any other team, he is a solid piece on the Cavs. Thompson has to prove it. Casspi is a dime a dozen wing who doesn’t defend all to well. epinion.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
what about when the Cavs were contending though
Varejao was arguably their best big back when they were winning 60 games. Thompson still has to prove himself yes, but last night he showed some serious hops + solid timing on the ball. As for Casspi, to be honest I’ve haven’t really looked into his defense that much. For what it’s worth, he had the same d-rating as Tyreke, so he was middle of the pack relative to his teammates in Sacremento
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe I am just not a fan of Varejao
But saying he was the best big on that team still isn’t saying much. Like Mo Williams was the best point they had.
What other bigs did they have? When you are on the court at 6-10, 230 you should be able to get 8 and 7. I will give him credit for his D and peskiness.
And remember, when J.J. Hickson had his little run with the Cavs they were about to label him the future big of that program. He seems to leapfrog Varejao
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
to your original point, fully agreed that watching this team sucks and even the Wolves would be more entertaining. The Cavs have the pieces in place now to be very good in the future, but they suck like we do right now. Losing to them was MFing miserable.
I can agree with that
If Thompson and Irving can pan out you have two building blocks. You have a vet in Jamison, however long he is gonna be there and you have a lot of solid role players. But the two rookies have to prove it first.
To me though, I am not sold on Irving. Seems kind of small and unsure. Has talent, doesn’t seem like elite talent. But I was thinking the same about Knight until yesterday lol
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
Irving is the real deal
I was absolutely blown away when we played Duke. I’m pretty happy with Knight, but man it would have been awesome if we won the lottery instead of the Cavs
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
It was funny to me
When Dan Gilbert was complaining about the Lakers/Hornets trade. All I could think was Stern made up to you for that whole LeBron leaving thing with the 1st and 4th picks.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
for real
That seemed like too much of a coincidence for them to lose LeBron, but then walk out with the best possible draft combination
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe when Charlie V leaves
our decline in basketball productivity will be taken into consideration in the same fashion.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
best is relative
they have sessions. let’s say they took williams and valanciunas instead. looks better on my end.
not what i meant
best in terms of positioning, they couldn’t have done any better with the odds they had
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
Irving
is very young as well. I think he’ll be fine because he has some awareness and body control you can’t teach/learn, but he is a #1 pick so he’s probably going to be unfairly judged on a different scale.
I think we all knew there would be a gem or two in this draft somewhere, and when it’s all said and done this could end up being a good draft class. Loaded with starting caliber players, but maybe not superstars. Although I think Valanciunas will be one.
dude the cavs may be better than us
but they are still awful. losing to them by that much is pretty pathetic. People were talking about Indy like they were the Miami Heat saying that losing to them was expected which i thought was silly, but losing by this margin to the cavs means we suck super hard, not that the cavs are any good.
follow me on twitter: @danieldresden
yeah we lost be an embarrassing amount
But I still think people are underrating the Cavs. They got a massive upgrade at the point, have a few decent 3 point shooters, and most importantly they now have a shotblocker to go with Verajao to man the boards. IMO if used properly, Jamison can still put up some points.
At the very least their frontline is way better than ours. I think everyone here can acknowledge that
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
rec'd for be
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
Don't lose sight of how far we have fallen.
Finding much to be optimistic about in a 20 point home loss to a team that you think could be a .500 team. Man, that’s grasping at straws. Reminds me of last year’s excitement over McGrady. True, the team looked marginally less bad with him at the point, but he was probably not among the best two to three dozen PGs in the NBA last year.
Hey, maybe Knight will be really good and Monroe and Jerebko will be solid-plus. But JoFuckinD just wrapped up TayshaunFuckinP for four years. He’s as likely to be working on an extension for Charlie (Fuckin) V as he is to making a big and brilliant move for a quality big.
My blogs: pakagankarachi.livejournal.com (dormant)
burmahunkalove.livejournal.com (occasional signs of life)
by MrHappyMushroom on Dec 30, 2011 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
It'd be nice if Gordon actually showed us some of that old school Bulls-era type shit, throughout the season.
We need a smashmouth fuck ‘em up bad Center. I don’t know what it’ll take to motivate Joe Fubars to go get one.
That goddamn Okra and beans got you Oprah in jeans. Seems to me a little lean cuisine, wouldn't hurt much- Agh don't touch! -Obie Trice
Motivation

By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
by He-Man on Dec 29, 2011 11:12 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No, I meant like legit motivation, not a DBB Meme
Obviously a losing season won’t do the trick.
That goddamn Okra and beans got you Oprah in jeans. Seems to me a little lean cuisine, wouldn't hurt much- Agh don't touch! -Obie Trice
On paper we're competing for the top pick
You never know if another team could make moves to fully tank/rebuild, but as it stands we should end up with at least in the top 3. This year’s draft is loaded with big men; I still really want us to trade Daye+whatever’s necessary for a second first rounder to get Mason Plumlee. That would fix our entire frontline in one night actually
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
close
double-double machine = dunkin donut conoseur
<=> Guy Friday made the donuts from hay tires
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Mason-Plumlee-5231/
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 30, 2011 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
if that is the case
I don’t see it. Dumars has had the opportunity to release some of the pressures he has created with this team and he has continued to make the same mistakes. I was a JoD supporter, maybe even up until the lock out. But when this team came back virtually the same as last year I was done.
Either you are rebuilding or you are retooling. Dumars has been doing the latter ever since 2006.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
by He-Man on Dec 29, 2011 11:20 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
This is where I'm at too.
Although I’d say Dumars is retarding at this point, not rebuilding or retooling.
All the time relaxed.
by Supa Dupe on Dec 29, 2011 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
Knight was delivering the ball to him in stride
They have some chemistry already, just look at the chestbump after Knight hit the layup while getting the (flagrant) foul from Jamison.
As long as Knight gets big minutes, I think we’ll see the old Gordon
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
OLD gorden BETTER than NEW gorden. except THIS new gorden. HE share BETTER than RIP.
just epinion.
That goddamn Okra and beans got you Oprah in jeans. Seems to me a little lean cuisine, wouldn't hurt much- Agh don't touch! -Obie Trice
by Skylar on Dec 29, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I found that ball hog comment to be pretty great
Considering Rip and Tay were the primary reason why the offense would fall apart
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
I think you sugar coated that just a bit.
by Other Matt on Dec 29, 2011 1:29 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
I don't see why people love Westbrook
His jumper and shot selection are terrible. Going 0-13 when Durant seems to be heating up is just unacceptable, especially considering he’s done it time and time again.
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 11:10 AM EST reply actions
The chickens seem to be coming home to roost.
I remember all those years when we were good, going to Eastern Conference Finals every year. When JoD was tanking on our draft selections, there were no worries because we were good and contending. Now when I look at teams like Portland, OKC, Memphis, Chicago, ect., they are getting it done all with guys they drafted from their down years. Even SA always has a rookie and/or young talent in their fold.
Now we are bad and have two, maybe 3 rookies to show for it. I won’t even talk the Darko pick. With the Walter Sharpe’s, Terrico White’s, DaJuan Summers’, Deron Washington type picks, ect. we can expect trying to make up for those bad picks with future picks. But can we trust Dumars to finally start getting it right.
What is even more amazing is how you let a guy like Arron Afflalo walk. He was one of the few rookies you drafted that showed he could play. Young, up and coming teams accumulate talent. This tired, Goin’ to Work Pistons team is scattering youth around retreads. Stop Retooling, start rebuilding!
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
This is slightly unrelated...
but this is why I’m glad I’m a Steelers fan. They get the draft right every year and it’s amazing to have that kind of consistency as a franchise (which has obviously put them in contention the last two decades). Draft well and you don’t have to overspend on crappy free agents or keep declining, old players when you have younger guys ready to take over.
All the time relaxed.
Then there’s Amir Johnson, starting the season white hot doing precisely what Detroit needs so sorely. Blocking shots, rebounding, being a defensive force in the paint. Yeah, he’s still a foul machine and always will be, but dude did last season what Pistons fans were so excited about. He played high rotation minutes and was Toronto’s most effective player.
What’d we give him away for again? A handjob?
I think it was an HJ...
but not even the good kind, no lotion or saliva or anything.
All the time relaxed.
I still can’t figure out that one for the life of me
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
It makes perfect sense
as long as you combine with with the Alflalo giveaway.
Now, that’s some smart gee-emmin’!
My blogs: pakagankarachi.livejournal.com (dormant)
burmahunkalove.livejournal.com (occasional signs of life)
by MrHappyMushroom on Dec 30, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
too many depressing things to bother with
Rehashing the things Dumars has fucked up is getting old, so I’ll stick with Knight like the majority. Gotta say there may be some things I underestimated based on his college/draft analysis/scouting report, or that he’s improved upon.
I think he’s answered a few so far.
Underestimated on my part: his ability to drive past his opponent, his three-point shooting (better than advertised), and his ability to run point, which is eased by the fact he can get by his man at will to drive and dish. He doesn’t have explosiveness, but he does have quickness.
That floater will serve him well since he doesn’t have the body control at the rim of a guy like Irving. You’re not going to see Knight drawing a ton of contact and getting to the line because he pulls up with that floater, but it’s deadly effective, and again, he simply doesn’t have the body control, which I think will be more evident, because it is watching his college game tape.
Concerns yet answered: His ball handling is suspect. Rebounding, when the rest of your team can’t rebound a PG like Rondo or Kidd would be a gigantic asset, but I suppose I can’t ask too much, because those guys are rare. I still find it hard to believe he’ll ever garner much praise from the APBR community because he isn’t going to rebound a ton or get to the line much.
He’s a good player. Definitely and improvement to this lackluster roster. The gap between superstar and all-star is huge in the NBA, but I think he’s shown abilities to where if he reaches his potential there is an all-star future (all-star = valuable?), if things go right.
The floater
…is something I’ve hoped Stuckey would develop since his rookie season. That Knight already has this and a three-point shot bodes well for him.
"With logic he attacks. With statistics he defends."
by brgulker on Dec 29, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Indeed. More PGs need to watch tape of Mark Jackson and Tony Parker and really learn the teardrop.
by garrettelliott on Dec 29, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
The floater + Rec'd
I hoped Suckey would develop this as well. He is so strong he can get to the rack anytime he wants. If only he had that touch to finish,dude would be a beast. Is it safe to assume that he will never be able to close on a consistent basis?
If Stuckey developed a floater,
we’d all be flushed with pride.
My blogs: pakagankarachi.livejournal.com (dormant)
burmahunkalove.livejournal.com (occasional signs of life)
by MrHappyMushroom on Dec 30, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I think in time he'll cover a lot of those
Just look at his commentary after the games, he was still talking about turnovers being an issue when he really only had 1 of one his own. I think he’ll figure out how to help out with rebounding with due time.
I’d like his floater to get a little more ark on it like Gordon’s (same with his free throws), other than that I agree with Gulker that its a fabulous asset that just all point guards really should have.
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 29, 2011 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
I think your underrating his body control becasue he shoots floaters.
Draftexpress on Knight: strong first step, good quickness with the ball, and outstanding body control on his drives to the rim.
by need4detroit on Dec 29, 2011 11:46 PM EST up reply actions
I am still scratching my head over signing Prince.
Considering his contract do you think he may be valuable trade piece?
Whatever we are gonna trade him for
We could have signed with the money we gave him, smh.
By the power of Grayskull... I have the power!
by He-Man on Dec 29, 2011 1:03 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
No, I don’t think he’s going to be a “valuable” trade piece, in the sense that he’ll bring value in return. If we move Prince, it’ll either be for another ugly contract or we’ll need to include value to move him.
you think dumars is going to trade the Palace Prince?!
no way in hell. we’ll be watching his decrepit figure walking around the court in 4 years. we might as well just hang his skeleton up in the rafters after it’s all over.
by mcflies on Dec 29, 2011 1:11 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Prince was never
A huge part of the offense in our glory days. But I think his long arms and defensive IQ is what keeps him around. But if Knight finds him off of pick and rolls,he will knock down that 15 footer as long as he has time to wind up dreadful shooting form. Plus add in the fact that Dumars was obviously not sold that Daye could hold his own out there..And he be right.
Our Roster
While lots of folks don’t like the Prince and Stuckey resignings, and even supporters of it will quibble about the amounts and length of the deals, I don’t know how this team could function at all without them. Daye isn’t ready to start at SF, and we can’t afford to put JJ there with our lack of bigs. It’s still early to see how this team will peform over the long haul. Offensively, we’ve never gotten over losing Billups – Hamilton especially needed a good PG to set him up. I didn’t see the game, but didn’t we have Knight, Gordon and Stuckey on the court together at one point? I’m also hoping for a top lottery pick and a trade to bolster our frontline. At least the top pick is looking like a sure thing!
I don’t know how this team could function at all without them
Would you consider this team to be functioning with them? I’m not saying that to be cute, but it’s clear that this team is miserable and that it’s miserable with Tayshaun starting at the 3. It’s hard to argue that we’d be much worse without him.
we can’t afford to put JJ there with our lack of bigs.
We absolutely could— if we had spent the $55M we gave to Prince and Stuckey on available big men. Even if we went the budget route and issued a few minimum deals on low level bigs, we’d still have bodies in the rotation so that Jerebko could man the 3.
We probably could have had Dalambert and Humphries with the money we gave Prince and Stuckey. Per annums may have looked differently, but we could have offered several years.
"With logic he attacks. With statistics he defends."
by brgulker on Dec 29, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Honestly
Had we spent that money on Dalambert and Humphries, we probably would be 2-0 with a bright future ahead, not staring down the barrel of a 15-51 Season, with salvation only coming 3+ years from now. I mean how could you pas up on having a legit 3 big rotation, with Big Ben, Max, and Big Mack as the outliers; Knight and BG in the back, with MFWB and Daye as back ups (for now), JJ at the 3? (CV could play the 3 or 4 and not be as bad as he appears or waived- who cares). Damn JoD. You really eff’d up this time!
GULK FOR GM??
I'm not sure we're going to get as many as 15 wins
Which, depending on how you feel about tanking for a year to get a high pick, may or may not be a positive.
The worst part about tanking...
is that we just signed Stuckey and Tay to long term deals…
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
Whatever happened to "winning the fans" back
Different season, same sh!t.
by Rusty_Shackleford on Dec 29, 2011 1:45 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Don't really know what to say about this one
I would have jumped onto the game thread roll call (are we still doing that?), because it’s hard to watch the pistons with anyone who is a normal sports fan. Most people either act like Detroit doesn’t have a basketball team and avert their eyes like they are staring at the sun. It’s nice to have company as the team goes through what will certainly be a horror show of a season.
Concerns after the first two game:
Opposing teams get to shoot 51% from 3 point?
We average 12 fewer points in the paint?
We’re playing at the 5th slowest pace in the league?
Despite Jonas and Greg starting, the pistons gave up a huge number of rebounds, including 6 to Ramon Sessions.
As far as bigs go, Jonas and Greg aren’t a good starting lineup together right now. Both seem to be good against smaller lineups, or good as a power forward. But this lineup with those two starting doesn’t seem tenable. Ideally we could find someone who could guard a Center like Hibbert one on one and that person would form a three man big rotation with Jonas and Greg, and it could work sort of like the perkins-garnett-baby rotation for the celtics.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
gripes
the game thread roll call (are we still doing that?)
Completely forgot about it. I’ll start doing it again Friday
Agreed
I was at my in-laws last night and snuck into a different room to watch the game. My brother in law came in and sat down to watch, lasted about 7 possessions, then left muttering “I promised myself I wasn’t going to get sucked in to this shit show.” And really, who could blame him. It takes a truly obsessive fan to endure this mess.
by Other Matt on Dec 29, 2011 2:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
It takes a truly obsessive fan to endure this mess
Good thing we have none of those here in the DBB community.
This is DBB, and this is what we do.
by V. on Dec 30, 2011 9:43 PM EST up reply actions
Opposing teams get to shoot 51% from 3 point?
I don’t think that’s sustainable regardless, but having our big men at a disadvantage defensively makes other guys have to double down, so recovery is an issue, as is Gordon’s height.
We average 12 fewer points in the paint?
Big men
Despite Jonas and Greg starting, the pistons gave up a huge number of rebounds, including 6 to Ramon Sessions.
Again
We’re playing at the 5th slowest pace in the league?
Isn’t this a Frank staple? I know guys say things, but Frank has always run a slow prodding offense. And we do lack finishers. Who’s going to feed Prince alley-oops without Rip, and can Prince even run anymore? I still remember when he covered the court in like 5 steps to block Reggie Miller, but he’s never moved that fast again in his career.
If you think about it all our guys are kind of upright players, they aren’t finishers in the sense that they can contort there bodies after contact or do anything special.
If BG gets it going again..
He will show you a finisher lol. Not sure if it was lack of confidence,bad love life,crack binge,or the Iverson gambling syndrome,but he looked pretty damn good last night. If this is his coming back season…Watch out.
We have plenty of problems in our lineup, but lets not get crazy with giving Jonas and Greg shit for the stuff above.
It takes 5 guys to rebound, or at least that’s what my high school coach told me the perimeter players need to box their men out to keep them from crashing. If the whole Cleveland team is crashing the paint and getting past our guards then Jonas and Greg are doing good.
It can’t also be Jonas and Greg’s fault that guards are hitting open threes, that is just the guards not hedging correctly. I remember seeing a play where Brandon Knight was sucked way too far into the paint trying to disrupt Monroe’s man and Sessions hitting a wide open three afterwards and chalking it up to a bad defensive mistake on his part. I doubt that is the way that Frank designed the defense to run since we are undermanned up front. Our perimeter defense sucks because our perimeter defense sucks, not because our big men aren’t big enough.
As far as pace goes, I’d imagine Stuckey, Daye, Gordon, Jerebko, and even Prince would all be good recipients of passes from Knight, but they need to actually be aggressive and want to score points. I think our lack of running come less form lack of personnel and more from residual apathy from our current personnel.
Perhaps the biggest thing to blame is time. Larry Frank had to try to turn the whole organization around in less than a month thanks to the lockout, we shouldn’t be surprised that there are plenty of bad habits still around.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
I don't think anyone's putting the blame on Monroe or Jonas
But let’s also be realistic. These are two second year players. One came out of nowhere to have a pretty good first season, one had a very good first season. If this is the future of the Detroit front court, I think we’d likely rank in the middle of the pack. Maybe both will be better than expected. Or maybe each has a lower ceiling than we might hope.
My point is that it’s not like we have Dwight Howard and Blake Griffin down there. We have a couple of guys with good attitudes and potential, but who are very unproven.
My blogs: pakagankarachi.livejournal.com (dormant)
burmahunkalove.livejournal.com (occasional signs of life)
by MrHappyMushroom on Dec 30, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
I'm very disappointed...
instead of being stuck with Knight’s 23 point 6 assist and 2 turnover game…we could be having an AMAZING 2 rebounds per game and 1 block per game from Biyombo…WHY JOE?!?!?!?!?!
by CheerstoLilWayne on Dec 29, 2011 3:20 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
fo sho
But I do find myself checking in on our onetime sweetheart and looking hopefully for signs that he’ll turn out to be a flop. No hard feelings, dear Bizzy.
by excellent dinosaur on Dec 29, 2011 5:01 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
for all the good knights 23 did it might as well have been biyombo's statline.
follow me on twitter: @danieldresden
notice...
how i also put up the assists and turnovers…way to actually read.
by CheerstoLilWayne on Dec 30, 2011 12:36 AM EST up reply actions
And the worst part is
I never learned to read.

by C$ on Dec 30, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
You guys, I have so much work to do
But instead I just keep reading about basketball.
It’s awesome.
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
by heWizard on Dec 29, 2011 6:18 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
give it time...by about week 3, we'll be back within last year's numbers I'm sure.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 29, 2011 10:59 PM EST up reply actions
Pistons can do whatever they'd like
DBB will always be undefeated.
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
by heWizard on Dec 29, 2011 11:33 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
Yeah, it's not like our analysis has fallen off in the past several years
We’re a constant in this every-changing world in which we live in.
I thought about claiming her, too.
But she’s carrying a gun, unlike my boo Caroline McFly.
I like a woman who’s a pacifist. And one that can pass a fist, if you know what I mean.
I Call Phoebe Cates
This is DBB, and this is what we do.
by V. on Dec 30, 2011 9:46 PM EST up reply actions
I'll fight you with knives, spears, rusty razors, pikes, awls, crowbars, bats, spiked fuckin bats, cheater bars, dumbells, sticks, stones, poles, rocks, planks, branches, bricks, bottles, nunchucks, bos, swords, blades, hammers, daggers, chains, gats,
blackjacks, pipes, whips, guns, tanks, turrets, planes, jeeps, bombs, chainsaws, firecrackers, shovels er whatever other shit you got when it comes to a battle for Phoebe Cates
That goddamn Okra and beans got you Oprah in jeans. Seems to me a little lean cuisine, wouldn't hurt much- Agh don't touch! -Obie Trice
Discount Double Choke, 2011 Packers.
i wish they play like the spurs
Man I’ve been watching the spurs play since day one of this season and I like their fluidity and structure I wish the pistons can play the same type of basketball. I’m so sick of Tay’s pointless isolations.
Play like the Spurs?
Eh, I think the Spurs are a good team. However, I also think their style of play is kind of boring to watch from the standpoint of a person whose not a fan of that team.
I have to say that from what I’ve seen around the league so far, it’s the Blazers style of play that appeals to me the most. Seems that Portland runs at a pace I would call “controlled chaos” — meaning they’ll always look to push first to get some kind of secondary break going, but they’ll patiently run halfcourt offense if the opportunity for a quick score isn’t there. They commit a surprising low number of turnovers for a team that plays at an up-tempo pace as often as they do. They have a nice mix of shooters, a dependable low post presence, plus high-energy hustle wing players and bigs. And all those guys play unselfishly with one another. A helluva fun team to watch in my opinion.
It’s too bad they are turning the ball over a whole lot against the Nuggets tonight though. Heh, it’s sort of defeating the purpose of my last post.
"Entertaining to watch" does not always equal "most likely to win"
As the Phoenix Suns of a while back taught us.
i agree
after seeing them (Blazers) play today I reckon they have quite a nice style as well. I can’t believe the Jazz let Matthews walk.
That's true. But not this year.
The Trailblazers primary ballhandling guards Raymond Felton and Jamal Crawford both push the tempo and has the team running a lot more often. It’s a big reason why they traded away both Andre Miller and Steve Blake.
The only issue that may haunt them is lack of frontcourt depth. They really don’t have many quality bigs since Greg Oden is out. Starters LaMarcus Aldridge and Marcus Camby both log a lot of minutes, and undersized Craig Smith is first big called upon to give one of them a blow. The geriatric Kurt Thomas also comes in on occasion, and that’s it. This condensed regular season schedule may eventually catch up to this group.
I wonder if NY regrets the Melo deal now
They desperately need a guy to distribute the ball (more along the lines of make sure Amare and Melo don’t shoot the ball every time they touch it for fear of not getting enough shots) and the Felton+Stoudemire combo was pretty lethal with Gallinari spacing the floor
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 30, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
Amazing how fast things change in the west
Mavs 0-3 Thunder 3-0
Great game by both teams, and it sucks that Dallas couldn’t stop Durant. Those guys might be the new example of how NOT to “re-tool” your perennial playoff team.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
I mean, the Pistons at least got to the ECF six straight years. I kinda doubt the Mavs will be back in the WCF at this rate.
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
AND
Chandler is doing almost nothing for the Knicks. Gotta love when player movement is lose-lose for both teams.
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
I’d say Ben leaving and going to Chicago was pretty lose-lose.
The Mavs had their defensive Center leave in free agency after winning a championship… I think Dallas are haunted by the ghost of Detroit’s past or something.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
Honestly, I think the Mavs were pretty fucking smart this off-season
Its exceptionally difficult to repeat in this league if you’re not named the Lakers or Bulls and the rules of engagement for the entire league just shifted entirely. A lot has been made out of the Mavs seemingly lack of interest in retaining their core bench players and Tyson Chandler but in order to do so, look at how much they’d have had to pay them:
JJ Barea – 4 years, $19M
Tyson Chandler – 4 years, $56M
Caron Butler – 3 years, $24M
DeShawn Stevenson – 1 year, $2.5M
Of the 4 key players they lost, only Stevenson was intelligently signed and he was likely the most replaceable of the bunch. Mark Cuban seems like a pretty fucking smart dude…why spend all this money trying to chase a goal that in any year would be exceptionally difficult, let alone in the first year after a pretty significant shift in how NBA owners expect to do business with their talent and added to it the chaos that a shortened season with no pre-season, summer league, or extended free agency period creates.
If anything, I think the Mavs were one of the smartest teams in the off-season. All 3 of those guys with longer term deals were likely overpaid by their respective teams (JJ Barea on the T’Wolves for $20M when they already have Rubio and Ridnour and currently have no true SG?) If they’d paid them that kind of money, Cuban would have significantly less ability to make moves early on in the new CBA. He seems to be taking a wait and see approach before diving in.
On top of all this, Kidd and Terry are expiring contracts at the end of this season ($18.2M) and Lamar Odom is unguaranteed next year for another potential $8M in savings. At this point they’re in a pretty damn good position to either make a huge splash in free agency or absorb a major contract to re-tool before the end of this season.
They may be 0-3, but they weren’t expected to repeat anyways. Hell, most analysts don’t even have them getting past the Thunder in the Western Conference. At this point, I’d say Cuban played his cards better than any other GM/Owner out there right now.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 30, 2011 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
Well put.
What's a hundred million between friends? Make a deal and let's get on with it.
by BandWagonerPaysTheDues on Dec 30, 2011 6:56 AM EST up reply actions
Cuban has also said
that when dirk retires he’s tanking and tanking hard. so it looks like they’ve set themselves up to do it with contracts along that timeline.
by mcflies on Dec 30, 2011 8:05 AM EST via Android app up reply actions
Mavs are set
With some creative moves, according to former Piston T-Mac, Dallas could have Howard and D-will next year. Far fetched? Sure. But Cuban likes winning, and I could see him pulling that shit off.
by C$ on Dec 30, 2011 9:57 AM EST up reply actions
Actually, TMac is not the first person I've heard say that.
They did say that Dwight’s list included Dallas. If by mid-season they can somehow manage a package, somehow.
WWGMD?
Dallas has nothing but old dudes
and bad draft picks.
by mcflies on Dec 30, 2011 5:18 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
Also...I'd take Odom over CV, Marion over Tayshaun (even with the ugly ass shot)
Jason Terry over Ben Gordon
Jason Kidd over Stuckey
Mahimmi over Macklin
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 31, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
I hope for the Nets sake that doesn't happen
They mortgaged a lot of their future for Williams in hope that he would agree to an extension and bring in another star. They’ll be overshadowed in Brooklyn as well so its not like they have much to advertise if Deron leaves
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 30, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
any team that mortgages their future on the whims of a superstar gets a big fuck you from me. i hope the nets fail miserably.
follow me on twitter: @danieldresden
They’re a small market team. Much rather see them hit the jackpot than Miami or LA
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 30, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions
Brooklyn isn't the Bronx though
I read an article about how their stadium would be really inopportune for most NY fans because it would require a car to get to. Thus the Knicks would very likely keep most of the attention
Without a doubt, squats are a cure for everything.
by bearded thundar on Dec 30, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions
So far this season
Durant has scored 125 points on 75 shots. This doesn’t even need commentary.
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
I bought the 5-team pass version of League Pass Broadband for this season
After Detroit, I selected the Nuggets, Clippers and Bulls, leaving the fifth team open for me to choose later in the season. I’m watching the Nuggets play the Blazers right now. Holy fuck, is it fun to watch Arron Afflalo play basketball. He’s taking charges on one end of the floor, deterring on the other end when he should. Defending and making things happen off the ball. Man, that kid… I think his contract was high, but I’d love to have that kind of character in our back court…
I'd be happy having a SG over 6'5"...
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 30, 2011 12:43 AM EST up reply actions
as long as he shave his ridiculous beard.
James Harden that is.
I’m making my all awesome team
PG – Rondo / Paul
SG – Harden / Afflalo
SF – Wallace / Odom
PF – Smith / Ibaka
C – Perkins / Horford
(nobody asked, i know and i don’t give a shit)
WWGMD?
by Kriz on Dec 30, 2011 1:01 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I like your team
mine is quite similar:
Rondo / Lawson
Afflalo / Eric Gordon
Wallace / Jerebko (EAT THAT KRIZ!!)
Love / Randolph
Gortat / Monroe
I would take Ramon Sessions
over 20 starting point guards in the league. But if I had my pick of the litter, I’d choose Rondo. And if I had to pair him, I’d choose Lawson for his fucking unreal shot.
I go
Paul / Curry (with better proprioceptive training to avoid ankle injuries)
Afflalo / Martin ( I have a Southern Conference bias)
Durant / Wallace
Love / Smith
Okafor / Monroe
Why is Kevin Love not on everyone's team?
btw, too bad I can’t get priprioceptive training on my fantasy team.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
Not enough BLOCKS AND DUNKS for me. I need them brought to me.
by Shinons* on Dec 30, 2011 9:53 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
For some reason, nobody at DBB can obtain their own blocks or dunks.
by -PS- on Dec 30, 2011 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Why pick them up
When you can have them delivered?
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
Why have them delivered
when you can secure blocks and dunks through your own efforts—in the process learning valuable life lessons, gaining self-esteem, and getting some exercise?
That sounds…hard
I wrote a book about time travel. Buy it and/or die. http://www.thetimetravelguide.com
by heWizard on Dec 30, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm a fan
Except for Odom. He’s a slightly more famous, little better defensively Charlie V. Anyone who marries a Kardashian will not play for my video game team either.
by Packey on Dec 30, 2011 1:11 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Why would you start Rondo over Paul?
“Hey, Chris, I know you can do everything Rajon does, and that you’re also able to score from everywhere he can’t, but he’s got more rings than you, so we’re bringing you off the bench. No hard feelings, yeah?”
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 1:15 AM EST up reply actions
quite simple.
Rondo can defend any point guard in the league, night-in, night-out. Chris Paul cannot. Just ask a 32-year-old Chauncey Billups when the two met back in 2009.
And Chris Paul is a better passer and one of the most efficient scorers in the league
Rondo’s defensive advantage is outweighed by his offensive issues and complete inability to shoot free throws.
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 1:20 AM EST up reply actions
Arguing Rondo is better than Paul is like arguing that Perkins is better than Dwight Howard
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 1:21 AM EST up reply actions
holy shit
so the difference in talent between Rondo and Paul is equivalent to the difference between Perkins and Howard?
Wow. Wow times eleventy.
Chris Paul is a max contract player who is a terrific passer and excellent shooter that makes a great offensive team an excellent offensive team.
Rajon Rondo is a moderately-paid NBA point guard who can shut down any NBA point guard in the game and was also the most pure point guard in the game last season.
Statistically, Rajon Rondo is a better passer than Chris Paul. Rajon Rondo is also a more efficient scorer than Chris Paul. Rondo is also a far superior defender than Chris Paul.
So where were we at again?
oh its far greater
Rondo is essentially Judas to CP3’s Jesus. Abel to his Cain. Mel Farr to his Superstar.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 30, 2011 1:29 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
"Rajon Rondo is also a more efficient scorer than Chris Paul"
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 1:31 AM EST up reply actions
Rondo's career TS% is .520
Chris Paul’s is .571. Rajon Rondo’s career high assist % is 47.1. Chris Paul’s is 54.5.
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 1:33 AM EST up reply actions
here, have a cherry, Thom
for cherry picking your stats. How about we compare their most recent performance?
Rondo’s assist rate was higher than Paul’s last season, so were his season averages. You can’t compare career averages unless the two players you’re comparing have had similar pro careers. They haven’t.
Rondo sported a better assist rate than Paul did last season. He also shot better from the field. Oh, and he’s far above Paul in terms of defense.
What were you saying again?
but...and most important
Rondo is fugly…and Paul is baby fat pretty. don’t know if you all follow soccer but the same is true there. Lionel Messi is baby faced glory while his adversary is pretty boy assface Cristiano Ronaldo. People eat Messi up because he is likeable and hate Ronaldo because he is (as Ali would say) is too pretty. I still think Messi is a better player because i lived in Barcelona and I am team biased but you get my point yes?
You also can't compare last season's stats specifically Mike...
Rondo’s most common receivers of his assists are far more efficient than what Chris Paul was working with in New Orleans. I’m not saying this is makes up all the difference and Rondo could certainly be the more pure point guard or whatever we’re arguing here, but you can’t simply look at last season’s stats when CP3 was dishing to a 39% shooting Ariza and Belinelli shooting 43% when Rondo had Allen and Pierce each shooting at just over 49%.
As for shooting percentage, I think its fair to argue that Rondo could be purposefully more selective with his shots than CP3 could be with his given the options that CP3 had to distribute to were far less efficient than those in Boston.
As for defense, I’m not about to make an argument that CP3 is the better individual defender because I simply don’t think its the case. However, Boston’s team defense was 2nd in the league last year compared to New Orleans’ 10th. Rondo most definitely benefited from superior team defense as well.
To add to that, when you look at Rondo’s Offensive/Defensive ratings vs. CP3’s last year, there was no comparison. CP3 sported 122/102 vs. Rondo’s 104/100.
I get the feeling (and I say that so as not to put words in your mouth but only to convey my impression of your perspective) that you think there is a pretty noticeable gap between what Chris Paul has to offer vs. Rondo. I don’t think there is for the reasons above. Of course, when you add the salary considerations on top of all this, I do think the picture gets a little clearer. CP3 is getting paid $5M more per year to provide a far superior Offensive Rating. I think where it stays subjective is some would prefer to pay an extra $5M to see that scoring come from their PG vs. distributing that salary elsewhere and keeping your PG duties restricted to distributor, floor manager, and defensive leader.
If I had to choose, I’d go Rondo if only because he’s won a championship, has proven to lead on a team filled with superstars, and is a pass-first point guard.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 30, 2011 3:07 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Of course, when you add the salary considerations on top of all this
Absolutely, I’m a bargain shopper in this regard, and I put my dream team together with the salary cap in mind. As I hinted at below, my preference for Rondo is something I can’t really quantify— and thereby shouldn’t bring it here or I will get my ass handed to me.
We're definitely in agreement on this one Mike...
CP3 has had some solid players around him in past years and has come away with nothing more than a 2nd round exit in the playoffs. For the price and the performance, Rondo gets my vote everytime.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 31, 2011 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
Uh...
If anyone is cherry-picking stats, it’s you, Mike. Yes, Rondo DID have a higher FG% than Paul last year. He also posted a TS% below .500. Rondo’s field goal percentage doesn’t mean anything when he can’t convert from the line — exacerbated by the fact he rarely even GOT there in the first place — or shoot three pointers. I’d chalk some of that up to the plantar fascitis he suffered in the second half of the season, but even before then he was never terribly efficient scoring the ball. That still doesn’t change the fact that Rondo is a point guard who gets most of his points at the rim, but was more inept at the line than Dwight Howard last season. That’s a huge issue. Paul’s FG% is deflated, because he can actually shoot threes. I shouldn’t even have to say this, because I know you know this stuff.
Setting aside the fact that Rondo’s teammates were miles ahead of Paul’s, he BARELY edged out CP3 in assist rate last season in Paul’s first year back from major knee surgery. What an AMAZING fucking accomplishment.
I’m willing to concede that Rondo is the better defensive player, but his defense isn’t so superior that it makes him more valuable. Chris Paul isn’t Steph Curry. He’s an above-average defensive point guard. Likewise, Rondo isn’t some magic defensive god. He benefits a lot from a strong team defense.
Look, I think Rondo is a good point guard, but Chris Paul is legitimately one of the best point guards ever to play basketball. He’s on a whole different level. I don’t really like where the tone of this is going (and I’m certainly at fault for that, too) — fighting over other teams’ players isn’t really something to get heated about — I just can’t see a statistical argument for why Rondo is better.
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 4:23 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Well put.
I might like Rondo better as a Piston because he played a few games with his arm hanging limp at his side, but it’s just not fair to say he’s better than Paul. Is a pure point guard with hall of fame team mates better than one who makes shitty players look awesome? Pretty hard to tell, but I might just have to go with Coach K’s decision…
What's a hundred million between friends? Make a deal and let's get on with it.
by BandWagonerPaysTheDues on Dec 30, 2011 7:21 AM EST up reply actions
it's like we're comparing a McIntosh apple to a Granny Smith apple.
both are apples. Both are good apples. They have their differences but in the end you can have either one and be satisfied.
I was also considering walking to the store for an apple.
But by “walking,” I meant riding my Rascal. And by “apple,” I meant double-bacon double cheeseburgers, fried pickles and orthopedic socks.
by Joe Dumars on Dec 30, 2011 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
I go for Granny Smiths myself.
hence my comparison I guess. But really, the apple just has to have a nice crunch to it and I’ll be happy.
Gimme Gala or gimme death.
Also…comparing Rondo to Chris Paul is like comparing Google to Bing…
OH SNAP!
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 31, 2011 10:15 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Rondo and Paul can't be compared
Because Rondo hasn’t been asked to generate all the offense for a shitty New Orleans team. Rondo gets to pick and choose when he shoots, if he didn’t have 3 All-Stars who all need the ball he would have to take more shots, get to the line more and expose more of his offensive liabilities.
Welcome... to the Wallace-hood
I don’t really like where the tone of this is going
You’re right, and this is my bad. Looking back at it, I think my preference for Rondo is not objectively based. I don’t think there is a statistical argument that shows that Rondo is a better point guard. (and me being a dick about it doesn’t make it any less true)
I base my opinion of Paul on his defensive failures when handling bigger point guards. Chauncey dominated him in that playoff series back in 2009, and it wasn’t the first time Paul had been edged out of a series due to size issues. In turn, I also remember how Rondo man-handled Chauncey in Detroit.
But basing my opinion on a handful of playoff series is a lesser opinion than one based on the numbers. Because I’m a stubborn bastard, I’ll still take Rondo for what I feel is a greater defensive ability and potentially superior shot selection. But who’s the better point guard? I can’t argue with the numbers.
Argument conceded to the Thom that is not Tom Gores.
by Mike Payne on Dec 30, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Totally respect what you're saying...
But you can’t put someone down for cherry picking their stats, and then turn around and cherry pick some stats…
And I'm an idiot
As this point was already addressed and everything is solved. Should probably read everything before I post next time.
Stop doing the J Wurm and start reading Jwurm...
its all good though. I do this at least once or twice a game thread.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 31, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
I would go
PG — Paul / Rubio (Or Ty Lawson)
SG — Harden / Marcus Thornton
SF — Wallace / Iguodala
PF — Kevin Love / Ryan Anderson
C — Nene / Chuck Hayes
How's that for a slice of fried gold?
by Thom not Tom Gores on Dec 30, 2011 1:25 AM EST up reply actions
Ooh, fun. Mine:
PG: Lowry/Flynn/Nate Robinson (to go in for five minutes and pick fights with other teams’ best players)
SG: Iguodala/Spellcheck
SF: Wallace/Jerebko
PF: Tyrus Thomas/Moose
C: Ibaka/Biyombo
IR: Oden
Here's my team:
PG: Rodney Stuckey / Brandon Knight
SG: Ben Gordon / Platoon
SF: Tayshaun Prince (especially if he’s old) / Dominique Wilkin’s nephew (or something…)
PF: Jonas Jerebko / Jason Maxiell
C: Greg Monroe / Ben Wallace (following arrest)
Did I mention I aslo love DUBBLE WHOPPARZ?!
by TDP on Dec 30, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
I don't think you can go wrong
I’m partial to Paul, though.
Even if you go by last season alone, Rondo’s assist rate (47%) was only marginally better than Paul’s (46%). Rondo also turned it over a lot more — 24% to Paul’s 14%. I’m not sure what metric(s) you’re using to argue Rondo was “far above Paul in terms of defense,” but they had identical steal and block numbers and Paul only gave up 3 more points per 100 possessions.
If you have your magnifying glasses handy (or just open image in new tab), here’s how they compare using Synergy (Paul on top) — Defense:

DRtg and Synergy don’t line up, but what I gather from Synergy is that Rondo gave up about 50 less points than Paul (but Rondo also played in 12 less games)
Offense:

Finally, I think there’s something to be said for who Rondo plays with and who Paul had in NOLA. Rondo’s been playing with and distributing to three future HoFers.
I just like Rajon Rondo better
Is not about stats but style. Also perception, many feel his good play is a product of the big 3, I differ.
Plus he’s an stoic asshole. I like those.
WWGMD?
by Kriz on Dec 30, 2011 3:02 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
no sugarcoat, i just LIKE rajon rondo better. is not about stats but STYLE. also perception, many FEEL his good play is a product of the big 3, i DIFFER. plus he’s a stoic ASSHOLE. i like THOSE. just epinion
by -PS- on Dec 30, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I think they're a product of each other to be honest
In order for Ray, Pierce, and Garnett to hit their shots consistently, Rondo has to deliver the ball in the most preferable way for that player. Understanding where your players are most effective and how they like to receive the ball is hugely important to the success of a PG. Rondo obviously understands this. Hell, the difference in delivering a ball directly to a guys hands vs. delivering it 6 inches below can mean the difference between a mostly uncontested shot and a blocked shot in today’s NBA.
Jonas Jerebko once killed a charging female rhinoceros in heat protecting its young with nothing more than a hook shot.
Love Beer? Me too! http://jimbobsbeerblog.wordpress.com/
Follow me on twitter: #JimBobsBeerBlog
by The Boourns on Dec 31, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions
I'm onboard
As a Stones fan who moved to Boston shortly before the Big 3 arrived (and thus had to deal with most of the C’s fans I ball with suddenly becoming insufferable d-bags), I’ve found it pretty hard to like my new local team. Paul Pierce is whiny and dickish; KG is a terrible person; and of the two O’Neals they brought in, I prefer the one who punched a fan in the face. But despite my best efforts, I can’t help but like Rondo. Guy should’ve been a Piston.
by excellent dinosaur on Dec 31, 2011 9:55 AM EST reply actions
(still-waking-up-from-12-hour-Ohio-to-Massachusetts-drive reply fail)
by excellent dinosaur on Dec 31, 2011 9:56 AM EST up reply actions

by 























