FanPost

XstreamINsanity's 2013-14 Pistons Schedule Analysis (UPDATED 8/9/13)

Raj Mehta-USA TODAY Sports

I may expand on this idea in the coming week, but with as long as it's taken me to gather the data that I have (Central Division - 3:15), it's going to take me a while. The formulas are set in place, but typing up each team's schedule is time consuming (copying and pasting isn't an answer as the formats have to be adjusted and that's just as time consuming). I want to do this for the whole league just for fun, but for now I'll look at what we have in comparison to our Central Division opponents.

The Measurables

There are some things in the schedule that are a given. For instance, the Pistons have 20 back-to-back games, 3 sets of home-and-home matches, and 3 sets of 4 games in 5 nights. Here's how it compares to the teams in our Division.

Team Back-to-Back Home-and-Home 4 games, 5 nights
Detroit 20 3 3
Chicago 17 1 2
Indiana 21 1 3
Cleveland 20 2 2
Milwaukee 21 1 4

The Pistons also have one set of 5 games in 7 nights. As far as rest goes:

Days Detroit Chicago Indiana Cleveland Milwaukee
0 20 17 21 20 21
1 48 49 42 45 42
2 8 10 13 10 13
3 3 5 4 6 5
4 0 0 1 0 0
5 3 1 1 1 1

The Hypotheticals

No teams are the same as they were. Of Detroit's current 14 man roster, 7 players weren't on the team last year. In Milwaukee, their starting backcourt is no more. Cleveland had the No. 1 pick in Anthony Bennett and added Andrew Bynum to the mix. Indiana is pretty much the same, except for a stronger bench. And Chicago is going to have Derrick Rose back. So the following is very likely bunk, but for spits and wiggles ...

Taking the current schedule for each of the Central Division's teams and applying the opponent's win percentage from the previous year can likely show some form of strength of schedule. For instance, the combined winning percentage for Detroit's opponents this year is 0.503. For reference, Chicago's is 0.491, Indiana's is 0.489, Cleveland's is 0.497, and Milwaukee's is .488.

However, teams play better on their home court than they do on the road in most cases. Because of this, I decided to calculate the winning percentage of our opponents based on where they are playing. For instance, Detroit plays the Wizards to open the season, at home. Last year, the Wizards had a 0.537 winning percentage at home, but 0.171 on the road. So when calculating based on place of game for our home opener, I used 0.171 for the Wizards. In doing so, not much actually changed to the strength of schedule. Detroit's is 0.498, Chicago's is 0.488, Indiana's is 0.484, Cleveland's is 0.494, and Milwaukee's is 0.486. It would appear that Detroit has the toughest strength of schedule in our division by both of those measures.

Now, there were two ways that I counted possible wins. First, when a team we are playing has the odds (based on place of game) of winning below 0.500, I marked it as a win. Based on that, the division would shape up:

  1. Chicago: 43-39
  2. Indiana: 42-40
  3. Milwaukee: 42-40
  4. Cleveland: 39-43
  5. Detroit: 38-44

But then I decided to go back to using the win percentage based on where the game is being played, but for both teams. In this instance, if the home team had a higher home winning percentage than the road team's road winning percentage, then it was marked as a win. In that scenario, the division would shape up like:

  1. Indiana: 51-31
  2. Chicago: 47-35
  3. Milwaukee: 37-45
  4. Detroit: 23-59
  5. Cleveland: 18-64

Let's hope the immense roster changes allow us to have a much better record than that. However, I think I've heard some around here say that they think the Pistons will be right around 38 wins. Hopefully that's not good enough for last in the division.

Now, in the 38 win's scenario, it had us winning 9 of the second part of the back-to-backs. However, I actually think this number could potentially be higher. Reason being that 12 of the 20 back ends are against teams that also played the night before, so both teams will be tired. In most cases, the other team played a stronger opponent than we do, so they may be "more tired". Also, I believe youth will be on our side. Say for a minute that Kentavious Caldwell-Pope is the starting SG, our starting lineup's ages will be 23 (Brandon Jennings), 20 (KCP), 27 (Josh Smith), 23 (Greg Monroe) and 20 (Andre Drummond). On the chance that Rodney Stuckey is the starting SG, he's still only 27. Youth may make the back-to-backs not that hard to digest this year.

None of these "predictions" are based on solid data. It's based off of data from last year, when teams were different than they are now. This could be good, or it could be bad. I'd like to hope that the Pistons could easily get 38 wins with their new roster, which in itself would be a vast improvement over the year before (with a new coach, 7 new players, etc.). I dread thinking that the Pistons could only win 23 games, especially in a year when many teams aren't tanking. If I get around to gathering the other data for the rest of the league, I'll update this post.

UPDATE 8-9-2013

Thanks to Bluepost, I was able to do a league wide comparison a lot faster.

After looking at the league wide data, it shows that the West has a tougher schedule overall as compared to the East. Probably has something to do with the West's domination over the East. So just comparing with the East, Detroit has the fourth toughest adjusted strength of schedule: Toronto - 0.502, Charlotte - 0.500, Orlando - 0.499, Detroit - 0.498. League wide, Detroit is tied for the third most back to backs with 20 (fewest is 13 for Denver, most is 22 for Charlotte). League wide, Detroit is tied for the second most 4 games in 5 night stretches (fewest is 0 for Philadelphia, most is 4 for New York, Atlanta and Milwaukee). Also League wide, Detroit is tied for the most home and home sets at 3 (fewest is 0 for Oklahoma City, L.A. Clippers, and Brooklyn).

Now, using the adjusted winning percentages for both teams based on location of game, each conference would shape up as such:

Eastern Conference
Team Wins Losses Win%
Miami 70 12 0.854
New York 59 23 0.720
Brooklyn 57 25 0.695
Indiana 51 31 0.622
Chicago 47 35 0.573
Atlanta 47 35 0.573
Boston 42 40 0.512
Milwaukee 37 45 0.451
Washington 32 50 0.390
Philadelphia 31 51 0.378
Toronto 30 52 0.366
Detroit 23 59 0.280
Cleveland 18 64 0.220
Charlotte 18 64 0.220
Orlando 15 67 0.183
Western Conference
Team Wins Losses Win%
Oklahoma City 62 20 0.756
L.A. Clippers 59 23 0.720
Memphis 59 23 0.720
San Antonio 56 26 0.683
Denver 49 33 0.598
Golden State 48 34 0.585
L.A. Lakers 43 39 0.524
Houston 43 39 0.524
Utah 42 40 0.512
Dallas 40 42 0.488
Sacramento 30 52 0.366
Minnesota 30 52 0.366
Portland 30 52 0.366
Phoenix 20 62 0.244
New Orleans 17 65 0.207

Again, these numbers are VERY likely to change. Many teams made drastic changes...some better, some worse. However, IF this were to be the outcome...at least we get to keep our pick, right? Right?

FanPosts are user-created posts from the Detroit Bad Boys community and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of all fans or the staff at DBB. The DBB staff reserves the right at any time to edit the contents of FanPosts as they reasonably see fit.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Detroit Bad Boys

You must be a member of Detroit Bad Boys to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Detroit Bad Boys. You should read them.

Join Detroit Bad Boys

You must be a member of Detroit Bad Boys to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Detroit Bad Boys. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker