<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sacramento settles for cheap laughs, loses home opener</title>
	<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/</link>
	<description>A Detroit Pistons blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Wars: In response to the Wizznutzz &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-21896</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Wars: In response to the Wizznutzz &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-21896</guid>
		<description>[...] Back to the point: I’m inclined to think that the Wizznutzz’ comments on Detroit were in jest… an emotionally charged reflex to our audacity at attacking their beloved Agent Zero (a name they dubbed him that has subsequently caught on). If that’s the case, then their slams on our city should be forgiven. In the absence of better material (more than regular-season wins over the Pistons can provide), the usually creative nutzz went by way of the Sacramento Kings or Rick Telander. Disappointing, but what else were they going to talk about? Let's see&#8230; Championship(s)? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Back to the point: I’m inclined to think that the Wizznutzz’ comments on Detroit were in jest… an emotionally charged reflex to our audacity at attacking their beloved Agent Zero (a name they dubbed him that has subsequently caught on). If that’s the case, then their slams on our city should be forgiven. In the absence of better material (more than regular-season wins over the Pistons can provide), the usually creative nutzz went by way of the Sacramento Kings or Rick Telander. Disappointing, but what else were they going to talk about? Let&#8217;s see&#8230; Championship(s)? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pistons roll into Sactown &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Pistons roll into Sactown &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>[...] For me, this is Pistons-Patton II. Who? Surely you remember: Leland Patton, the Kings director of event presentation, thought it would be funny to put together an extremely negative video montage of Detroit for the pre-game show featuring, among other things, abandoned buildings and burned out cars. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For me, this is Pistons-Patton II. Who? Surely you remember: Leland Patton, the Kings director of event presentation, thought it would be funny to put together an extremely negative video montage of Detroit for the pre-game show featuring, among other things, abandoned buildings and burned out cars. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote on your most hated rival! at Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote on your most hated rival! at Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] 5) Sacramento Kings. Is this the perfect storm&#8211;the most hated player in Detroit sports hooks up with one of the most hated franchises? The Kings were barely a blip on the radar before they trashed tha D in a bush-league pre-game video montage of burnt cars and abandoned buildings. Now every Detroit fan revels in toppling the Kings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 5) Sacramento Kings. Is this the perfect storm&#8211;the most hated player in Detroit sports hooks up with one of the most hated franchises? The Kings were barely a blip on the radar before they trashed tha D in a bush-league pre-game video montage of burnt cars and abandoned buildings. Now every Detroit fan revels in toppling the Kings. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s happening with Leland Patton? at Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s happening with Leland Patton? at Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 04:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-11-09/sacramento-settles-for-cheap-laughs-loses-home-opener/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember that whole mess in Sacramento early in the season? And how the Kings fingered Leland Patton, their director of event presentations, as being responsible? Well, I still get referrals from Google about it, because somehow I'm now the No. 4 result that shows up when you do a search on his name. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Remember that whole mess in Sacramento early in the season? And how the Kings fingered Leland Patton, their director of event presentations, as being responsible? Well, I still get referrals from Google about it, because somehow I&#8217;m now the No. 4 result that shows up when you do a search on his name. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.954 seconds -->
