<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On rebounding and Ben&#8217;s role in the offense</title>
	<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/</link>
	<description>A Detroit Pistons blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Headband-gate: Ben Wallace and Scott Skiles feud &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/#comment-8330</link>
		<dc:creator>Headband-gate: Ben Wallace and Scott Skiles feud &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/#comment-8330</guid>
		<description>[...] I don't think Ben Wallace will be a problem-child for the Bulls all season, but I do expect Wallace's four-year decline to continue, and I won't be surprised if he both falls out of Defensive Player of the Year consideration and is left off the All-Star roster this year. As far as I'm concerned, all that talk about Chicago being a legitimate title contender this year falls in the same category as the Pacers being a preseason favorite last year &#8212; sports writers trying to outsmart themselves simply because they're bored picking the usual teams.  Remember his pouting in the midst of Detroit's incredible start last year? [back]"Ben Wallace's headband doesn't matter. Wallace's heist of Bulls funds does." [back]"Before this season started, Wallace in an ESPN interview blasted Saunders and commended all his former coaches, bringing giggles to all as Wallace had previously blasted them. He's an oversensitive, easily embarrassed, remote soul. I noticed him seeming to limp during the Friday game when he was benched and he was off for some MRI Sunday. His history, despite the supposed "warrior" mentality, is to come up with some small injury when things aren't going well to explain the issue, usually poor free-throw shooting." [back] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I don&#8217;t think Ben Wallace will be a problem-child for the Bulls all season, but I do expect Wallace&#8217;s four-year decline to continue, and I won&#8217;t be surprised if he both falls out of Defensive Player of the Year consideration and is left off the All-Star roster this year. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, all that talk about Chicago being a legitimate title contender this year falls in the same category as the Pacers being a preseason favorite last year &#8212; sports writers trying to outsmart themselves simply because they&#8217;re bored picking the usual teams.  Remember his pouting in the midst of Detroit&#8217;s incredible start last year? [back]&#8221;Ben Wallace&#8217;s headband doesn&#8217;t matter. Wallace&#8217;s heist of Bulls funds does.&#8221; [back]&#8221;Before this season started, Wallace in an ESPN interview blasted Saunders and commended all his former coaches, bringing giggles to all as Wallace had previously blasted them. He&#8217;s an oversensitive, easily embarrassed, remote soul. I noticed him seeming to limp during the Friday game when he was benched and he was off for some MRI Sunday. His history, despite the supposed &#8220;warrior&#8221; mentality, is to come up with some small injury when things aren&#8217;t going well to explain the issue, usually poor free-throw shooting.&#8221; [back] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handband-gate: Ben Wallace and Scott Skiles feud &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/#comment-8327</link>
		<dc:creator>Handband-gate: Ben Wallace and Scott Skiles feud &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/#comment-8327</guid>
		<description>[...] There's the rub, Ben. You proved this summer that everyone has a price, and you're learning this season that ever choice has a consequence. Have fun counting all of your money, and here's to hoping your new team isn't completely gutted when they're forced to trade some of your promising young teammates to acquire that legitimate offensive threat down low they should have went after last summer.  I mentioned this briefly in an Alley-Oop, but it deserves a full post. [back]Remember his pouting in the midst of Detroit's incredible start last year? [back]"Ben Wallace's headband doesn't matter. Wallace's heist of Bulls funds does." [back]"Before this season started, Wallace in an ESPN interview blasted Saunders and commended all his former coaches, bringing giggles to all as Wallace had previously blasted them. He's an oversensitive, easily embarrassed, remote soul. I noticed him seeming to limp during the Friday game when he was benched and he was off for some MRI Sunday. His history, despite the supposed "warrior" mentality, is to come up with some small injury when things aren't going well to explain the issue, usually poor free-throw shooting." [back] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There&#8217;s the rub, Ben. You proved this summer that everyone has a price, and you&#8217;re learning this season that ever choice has a consequence. Have fun counting all of your money, and here&#8217;s to hoping your new team isn&#8217;t completely gutted when they&#8217;re forced to trade some of your promising young teammates to acquire that legitimate offensive threat down low they should have went after last summer.  I mentioned this briefly in an Alley-Oop, but it deserves a full post. [back]Remember his pouting in the midst of Detroit&#8217;s incredible start last year? [back]&#8221;Ben Wallace&#8217;s headband doesn&#8217;t matter. Wallace&#8217;s heist of Bulls funds does.&#8221; [back]&#8221;Before this season started, Wallace in an ESPN interview blasted Saunders and commended all his former coaches, bringing giggles to all as Wallace had previously blasted them. He&#8217;s an oversensitive, easily embarrassed, remote soul. I noticed him seeming to limp during the Friday game when he was benched and he was off for some MRI Sunday. His history, despite the supposed &#8220;warrior&#8221; mentality, is to come up with some small injury when things aren&#8217;t going well to explain the issue, usually poor free-throw shooting.&#8221; [back] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pistons topple World Chumps at Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Pistons topple World Chumps at Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2005-12-14/on-rebounding-and-bens-role-in-the-offense/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] Ben Wallace exploded for nine boards in the first quarter and finished with 21 for the game. He also scored 10 points to post his fourth double-double in his last five games, averaging 12 points and 15.2 rebounds per game in that span. He made some waves in the papers after complaining about his production earlier this month, but he's been a rock ever since. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ben Wallace exploded for nine boards in the first quarter and finished with 21 for the game. He also scored 10 points to post his fourth double-double in his last five games, averaging 12 points and 15.2 rebounds per game in that span. He made some waves in the papers after complaining about his production earlier this month, but he&#8217;s been a rock ever since. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.842 seconds -->
