Pistons.com’s Keith Langlois on the evolution of “Ben Wallace, a player built from hard work, to Ben Wallace, corporate brand.”
Archive for November, 2006
The schedulers should be hung for that. Five back-to-back sets and then a four day layoff? How’s that make any sense? Regardless, we are finally back to talking about Piston basketball, and tonight’s tilt with the Heat offers an opportunity to examine a couple of nagging questions, as well as what they mean to the matchup.
I’ve debated vehemently with Matt recently the following question: With only two wins thus far against teams over .500, what do we really know about the Pistons?
Well, we know that they can still bully the short, fat kids of the NBA playground (e.g., Philly, Charlotte, Atlanta, etc.). But can they take it to their peers, the good teams (or, the supposed-to-be-good, as is the case with Miami)? Can they still march into another team’s arena and step on their neck?
With those questions in mind, I contend that tonight’s game against the Heat should be as telling a barometer for Piston fans as any game this season. (And, yes, that includes the last-second road loss to the world-beating Utah Jazz.)
Don’t let the Heat’s 6-8 record or the Pistons’ downplaying of the rivalry
It won’t be easy; the Heat are pumped for this.
”Winning these past couple of games was a pretty good confidence booster because of the way we started out,” forward Udonis Haslem said. ‘People probably say, `Hey, they beat Charlotte, they beat Philly, so what?’ When you get a chance to beat a team like Detroit, you feel a little more confident than just beating Charlotte and Philly.”
And for his part, Pat Riley is getting his guys motivated:
And in the wake of a 20-point loss last week — Miami’s fourth by that margin or more — Riley threatened to cut players despite their guaranteed contracts.
“You show a team like this a lot of respect, and you give them a lot of rope, and sometimes it backfires,” Riley said. “You think that because they’re veterans, they understand certain privileges. Then you’re getting beat by 20 and 30 and 40, and you say, ‘Hey, maybe this isn’t the way to go with it.’
“It has its benefits — don’t wear them out in practice, and save it for the games. But I wasn’t wearing them out in practice, and we weren’t saving anything for the games.”
Finally, since moving to point guard three games ago, Dwyane Wade has averaged over 33 points and 13 assists per (while the team has been over 100 points in each game).
The Pistons’ perimeter defense will be tested; the help defense will be tested; and the defensive rebounding will be tested. This Miami team is not Atlanta.
Hell, even Miami’s verrry casual fan base
So, after a long layoff and amidst a six game win streak, how does Blue respond tonight? Has the recent string of victories simply been a byproduct of a dip in competition? Or have you noticed something in the recent play that portends good things for the future of this team?
Or are you of the opinion that Miami is no more a measuring stick than the Hawks, Bobcats, or Hornets?
Bring your pre-, in-, and postgame comments here.
Pistons-Heat a blossoming rivalry [MLive]
Heat-Pistons still a ‘healthy rivalry’ [Miami Herald]
Champs to chumps? Heat seeking answers [AP, MSNBC]
There’s being confident, and there’s being cocky. Even I’m willing to admit that Chauncey Billups toes the line between the two. From the Detroit Free Press, talking about tonight’s meeting with the NBA champion Miami Heat:
“We want what they’ve got,” point guard Chauncey Billups said. “As everybody does. We’ve been an elite team for a long time, and they’re starting to become that. It’s a good rivalry.”
Starting to become that? Starting to become that? Don’t mean to wake you up, Chauncey, but they’ve been that ever since June 2, 2006 when they knocked off the Pistons in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals. Cripes.
(In any event, the YAYsports! post making fun of Chauncey’s ego will appear in 5… 4… 3… 2… )
Pistons fired up to take the Heat [Detroit Free Press]
With a nice assist from Isiah Thomas (whose Knicks defeated the Cavs), the Pistons have first place in the Central all to themselves. If you haven’t see the highlights, they’re worth checking out for the Nate Robertson gaffe alone.
Bill Simmons, ESPN’s Sports Guy, mailed in his predictable “Wow, the Eastern Conference sucks” column. He ranks Detroit second behind Cleveland, even though I thought he did a good job skewering the Cavs. If his bit on the Pistons rubs you the wrong way, The Blog That Yost Built has already put together a nice rebuttal.
I have my own thoughts, but this is downright harsh. Sam Smith of the Chicago Tribune: “But now it’s clear the Bulls have been given the bad news about Wallace: He has 18 months to live, maybe 12 (as a productive NBA player). He’s not the defensive rock and intimidator the Bulls hoped they’d get.”
The Pistons and Heat play Thursday night, but excuse Dale Davis if he’s not able to make the morning shootaround — his trial for his arrest (and Tasering) last August begins that morning.
No reason, just great footage. In case you’re wondering, I tracked it down: it’s a meaningless regular season game from February 2, 1992. Have I ever mentioned how much I love the internet?
Pop quiz: Can you name the Piston that talks after Jordan near the end?
Pistons 108, Bulls 106 video [YouTube]
Game Box Score [Basketball-Reference]
I feel a little silly talking about headbands two days in a row,
And with any luck, this will be the last time we talk about what Ben puts on his noggin, unless he gets a hell of a lot more creative than just a headband.
Why does Scott Skiles hate headbands so much in the first place?
Apparently Skiles is merely enforcing a rule laid down by general manager John Paxson. KC Johnson of the Chicago Tribune explains:
[The] reason was to stop the practice of former Bulls such as Eddie Robinson from wearing a headband around his neck or Eddy Curry, in town Tuesday, from wearing one crookedly.
“That rule was borne out of some things I saw when I first got the job that didn’t look good,” Paxson said. “It was more out of uniformity than anything else. It’s not meant in any way to stifle anybody’s individuality or creativity. It was just simply part of a structure we were trying to create.”
Fair enough. The Bulls were in really bad shape when Paxson took control of the front office, and instilling a sense of professionalism sounds pretty reasonable.
But why can’t they make an exception for Wallace?
Maybe they would have if he simply asked first.
“I told [Wallace] the only thing that’s a problem is the way he made his feelings known,” Paxson said. “That obviously comes across poorly. That’s what we have to address. We have rules. We don’t have too many. Every team does.
“We have to be a little careful in terms of changing something for one player at this time. If I knew this was going to be an issue a month or two ago and Ben had expressed that to us, that might’ve been a way to handle it. Right now, we’re in a tough position. We have the rule for the right reasons.”
But why do they make him tape his ankles if it’s uncomfortable?
That was overblown.
The Tribune also reported Wallace had difficulty running during the first practice of training camp because he was unaccustomed to having his ankles taped, a Bulls team rule. Paxson and Skiles responded Monday by saying Wallace and Adrian Griffin haven’t had to have their ankles taped since that day because they expressed their dissatisfaction privately.
Aren’t the Bulls being a little hypocritical here?
Yeah, I think so, at least when you consider the Bulls use pictures of Ben wearing a headband in their promotional materials.
But this whole incident has never been about the validity of the rule, has it? The way I see it, it’s about the fact that Ben knew what the rule was but went ahead and broke it anyway — twice. He purposefully put Skiles in a position where Skiles would either a) cave in and lose some degree of his authority, or b) put a less talented lineup on the court and risk losing the game. Either way, the integrity of the team was put at risk.
So what now?
I’m guessing everything is water under the bridge, especially the way Skiles is trying to spin this as some kind of team-building experience. Maybe Ben gets fined, maybe he doesn’t, but anything like a suspension — which columnist Sam Smith called for yesterday — seems unlikely.
What still rubs me the wrong way, though, is that Ben is still too stubborn to admit he’s wrong, let alone show any remorse.
“I knew that we weren’t allowed to wear the headbands,” Wallace said. “If you know the rules and break them, you expect to be punished. I can’t try to put myself above the team or anybody else and wear a headband like I did. I’m man enough to take the punishment. But I’m not sorry.”
Wallace was blunt when asked why he wore the headband on Saturday night in New York.
“I just felt like wearing it,” Wallace said.
I know Ben is a proud guy, but what the hell is wrong with manning up and admitting when you’re wrong? I’m not surprised — he never apologized for refusing to re-enter the Orlando game last year, and that was by far a more serious offense than this. But it’s still disappointing. I know some of you are extremely sensitive about any criticism lobbed Ben’s way, but this is simply about being a decent human being.
Sadly, I don’t think Ben senses the irony is his rationale for wearing the headband in the first place:
Wallace said ex-Pistons teammate Clifford Robinson helped him start his practice of wearing a headband.
“He told me I should try it and that’s a reminder not to let my head get too big in this league,” Wallace said.
Too late, guy.
Jason Whitlock dislikes Scoop Jackson…a lot. And I can’t imagine Scoop is endearing himself to many others with statements like the following:
“See, what Wallace should do, since he’s on this defiant trip, is tell Paxson, ‘OK, I’ll abide by the headband rule if you stop letting (or giving away, as the Bulls did during the home opener to welcome him) fans wear those back-to-slavery Buckwheat wigs during games.’” Ugh.


Latest Comments