<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Rodney Stuckey be allowed to wear No. 3?</title>
	<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/</link>
	<description>A Detroit Pistons blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Landry</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-136894</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Landry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-136894</guid>
		<description>Everyone of you that said "yes" are not very smart. He is not near as good as any of those other people in the rafters. Maybe you should think about what you said earlier in the year. Look how good Stuckey is doing in the playoffs. Think about it one more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone of you that said &#8220;yes&#8221; are not very smart. He is not near as good as any of those other people in the rafters. Maybe you should think about what you said earlier in the year. Look how good Stuckey is doing in the playoffs. Think about it one more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medatboi</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-126216</link>
		<dc:creator>Medatboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-126216</guid>
		<description>Stuckey deserves it. Although i'm not a huge detriot fan i do love the players on the team. but my favorite boy now is another washington kid that went to school 15 min from where i live. stuckey will do big things for you and if you haven't noticed before he got injured his name was listed in the top 5 players to win ROY. so if your looking for a future savior in a gaurd i think you don't have to look no further. number 3 will be hung in the rafters some day but the name on the back will not say wallace (he did skip out on you guys by the way don't kid yourselfs) it will say stuckey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuckey deserves it. Although i&#8217;m not a huge detriot fan i do love the players on the team. but my favorite boy now is another washington kid that went to school 15 min from where i live. stuckey will do big things for you and if you haven&#8217;t noticed before he got injured his name was listed in the top 5 players to win ROY. so if your looking for a future savior in a gaurd i think you don&#8217;t have to look no further. number 3 will be hung in the rafters some day but the name on the back will not say wallace (he did skip out on you guys by the way don&#8217;t kid yourselfs) it will say stuckey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PistonsNationBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Afflalo &#38; Stuckey, by the numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-84751</link>
		<dc:creator>PistonsNationBlog.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Afflalo &#38; Stuckey, by the numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-84751</guid>
		<description>[...] YOU SUCK WADE!  Sorry &#8217;bout that.  Anyhow he&#8217;ll wear number 3 as a Pistons which makes some fans uneasy because of who wore &#8220;the big red three&#8221; as Mason would call it.  Myself I&#8217;m on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] YOU SUCK WADE!  Sorry &#8217;bout that.  Anyhow he&#8217;ll wear number 3 as a Pistons which makes some fans uneasy because of who wore &#8220;the big red three&#8221; as Mason would call it.  Myself I&#8217;m on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On media day and Rodney Stuckey&#8217;s plans &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-82539</link>
		<dc:creator>On media day and Rodney Stuckey&#8217;s plans &#124; Detroit Bad Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-82539</guid>
		<description>[...] room to get this into my HOOPSWORLD article, but I asked Stuckey about whether he felt any pressure wearing No. 3. I thought he handled the question well:  I really don’t see it as pressure. I mean, No. 3 has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] room to get this into my HOOPSWORLD article, but I asked Stuckey about whether he felt any pressure wearing No. 3. I thought he handled the question well:  I really don’t see it as pressure. I mean, No. 3 has [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81998</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81998</guid>
		<description>Ben was great to the end. He gave it his all. With Flip being more offensive minded, Ben saw the defensive-minded Pistons trademark changing. He didn't fit in totally anymore. He was "bad" to the end and should be honored. Nobody will ever fit his shoes again. He was one of the greatest, most hard-working of all the Pistons. We let him down, not him. We love you, Ben. If your number is retired, it would be a credit to the great years you gave the Pistons. If the Pistons don't retire it, it would just be another sign to show that Basketball has become just another business more than a sport. Better to go out with your head high than become another Barry Bonds, wait til they send you off with your tail between your legs. Stuckey will never fill the shoes of Ben Wallace. Ben'll get a least one or more defensive honors. There's no comparison. If you don't retire his #3, then hang Stuckey up there with it...maybe he'll grab a rebound or block a shot for our Chaplin face, grave Mr Ben Wallace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben was great to the end. He gave it his all. With Flip being more offensive minded, Ben saw the defensive-minded Pistons trademark changing. He didn&#8217;t fit in totally anymore. He was &#8220;bad&#8221; to the end and should be honored. Nobody will ever fit his shoes again. He was one of the greatest, most hard-working of all the Pistons. We let him down, not him. We love you, Ben. If your number is retired, it would be a credit to the great years you gave the Pistons. If the Pistons don&#8217;t retire it, it would just be another sign to show that Basketball has become just another business more than a sport. Better to go out with your head high than become another Barry Bonds, wait til they send you off with your tail between your legs. Stuckey will never fill the shoes of Ben Wallace. Ben&#8217;ll get a least one or more defensive honors. There&#8217;s no comparison. If you don&#8217;t retire his #3, then hang Stuckey up there with it&#8230;maybe he&#8217;ll grab a rebound or block a shot for our Chaplin face, grave Mr Ben Wallace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81787</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81787</guid>
		<description>All you people saying Ben should have been "loyal", you do realize the NBA is a business right? The league isn't just about "entertaining the fans", these players have lives they have to live after they retire. Theres about a 10-12 year window for good players to play in the NBA, and thats providing they don't sustain a career damaging/threatening injury in the process--why shouldn't these guys try to get as much money as possible before they retire? 

Ben was a core piece, as well as the most recognizable face, of the Pistons championship team in 2004. Ofcourse his number should be retired. 

Until the number is actually retired, I don't see why Stuckey shouldn't be able to wear it. If he has a great career in the D and Wallace's number is retired, just retire his too--big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All you people saying Ben should have been &#8220;loyal&#8221;, you do realize the NBA is a business right? The league isn&#8217;t just about &#8220;entertaining the fans&#8221;, these players have lives they have to live after they retire. Theres about a 10-12 year window for good players to play in the NBA, and thats providing they don&#8217;t sustain a career damaging/threatening injury in the process&#8211;why shouldn&#8217;t these guys try to get as much money as possible before they retire? </p>
<p>Ben was a core piece, as well as the most recognizable face, of the Pistons championship team in 2004. Ofcourse his number should be retired. </p>
<p>Until the number is actually retired, I don&#8217;t see why Stuckey shouldn&#8217;t be able to wear it. If he has a great career in the D and Wallace&#8217;s number is retired, just retire his too&#8211;big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Migs</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81770</link>
		<dc:creator>Migs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81770</guid>
		<description>I think A) if Stucks wants the number he should be able to wear it...and in 15 years or when the number is no longer being warn and Ben has retired then hang the number from the rafters.  As sour as his exit was, I think most of the D is over it and a time to honor him will come in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think A) if Stucks wants the number he should be able to wear it&#8230;and in 15 years or when the number is no longer being warn and Ben has retired then hang the number from the rafters.  As sour as his exit was, I think most of the D is over it and a time to honor him will come in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81750</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81750</guid>
		<description>Stuckey  is the our #3 now. To retire a number the player has to Retire too. So Ben Wallace play for Division Rival. 

Stuckey can use number #3, if the organization pretend honor Ben in future, That`s OK (I don`t agree), but I know what Big Ben means to the Pistons. 

For now, Stuckey has the right to use Number 3, just because Big Ben not retired yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuckey  is the our #3 now. To retire a number the player has to Retire too. So Ben Wallace play for Division Rival. </p>
<p>Stuckey can use number #3, if the organization pretend honor Ben in future, That`s OK (I don`t agree), but I know what Big Ben means to the Pistons. </p>
<p>For now, Stuckey has the right to use Number 3, just because Big Ben not retired yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefro</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81553</guid>
		<description>I say let Stuckey have the #3.  

Ben Wallace did enough to have his # retired for the Pistons... unfortunately, then he did enough to not have it retired.  

The Pistons didn't low-ball BW when chose to take Chicago's offer.  It was a good offer and they had to leave room under the cap to re-sign Billups this year.  If he had just walked, then we'd all forget that at the end of his tenure BW pulled some lame moves like refusing to re-enter games and calling out his coach + team mates. 

Now he continues to bad-mouth Flip while he is a member of the rival Bulls.  He makes it a point to let the world know that he thinks Flip is a worse coach than LB or Skiles.  Turn those comments around for a second - what if Flip publicly stated that BW was less of a player than others he has coached?  Pistons fans, players and others would never forgive him for taking shots like that at one of our favorite players.

For someone who demands a lot of respect, BW doesn't always give it back.  He never seemed to forgive Flip for pulling him in 4th period of playoff games when Pistons were trailing and needed offense.  Ben was a great player, but it was his lack of offensive skills and his horrid free throw shooting that got him pulled when the Pistons needed to score a lot of points quick late in a games.  Pretty lame to blame the coach when it was his free throws clanking off the rim. 

If Ben Wallace wanted to be retired a Piston, then he could have stuck around, or at least stopped taking shots at the organization after he left.  I'll always appreciate what he did, but why should the organization treat him well now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say let Stuckey have the #3.  </p>
<p>Ben Wallace did enough to have his # retired for the Pistons&#8230; unfortunately, then he did enough to not have it retired.  </p>
<p>The Pistons didn&#8217;t low-ball BW when chose to take Chicago&#8217;s offer.  It was a good offer and they had to leave room under the cap to re-sign Billups this year.  If he had just walked, then we&#8217;d all forget that at the end of his tenure BW pulled some lame moves like refusing to re-enter games and calling out his coach + team mates. </p>
<p>Now he continues to bad-mouth Flip while he is a member of the rival Bulls.  He makes it a point to let the world know that he thinks Flip is a worse coach than LB or Skiles.  Turn those comments around for a second - what if Flip publicly stated that BW was less of a player than others he has coached?  Pistons fans, players and others would never forgive him for taking shots like that at one of our favorite players.</p>
<p>For someone who demands a lot of respect, BW doesn&#8217;t always give it back.  He never seemed to forgive Flip for pulling him in 4th period of playoff games when Pistons were trailing and needed offense.  Ben was a great player, but it was his lack of offensive skills and his horrid free throw shooting that got him pulled when the Pistons needed to score a lot of points quick late in a games.  Pretty lame to blame the coach when it was his free throws clanking off the rim. </p>
<p>If Ben Wallace wanted to be retired a Piston, then he could have stuck around, or at least stopped taking shots at the organization after he left.  I&#8217;ll always appreciate what he did, but why should the organization treat him well now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81547</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81547</guid>
		<description>No reason to deny Rodney Stuckey the opportunity to wear the #3 right now. The comments on this blog alone show a substantial division amongst fans, and retiring the number will remain a significant debate for at least a few years. When the time to seriously consider retiring the number comes up - minimum 8-10 years seems safe - we will know a lot more about the player wearing it to determine whether that player should change uniform numbers. While Stuckey may be the real deal, it was not so long ago that another Rodney, coming from a lesser-known college and with high expectations, did not fare so well with the Pistons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No reason to deny Rodney Stuckey the opportunity to wear the #3 right now. The comments on this blog alone show a substantial division amongst fans, and retiring the number will remain a significant debate for at least a few years. When the time to seriously consider retiring the number comes up - minimum 8-10 years seems safe - we will know a lot more about the player wearing it to determine whether that player should change uniform numbers. While Stuckey may be the real deal, it was not so long ago that another Rodney, coming from a lesser-known college and with high expectations, did not fare so well with the Pistons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blanke</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81544</link>
		<dc:creator>blanke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81544</guid>
		<description>...and as for hanging Ben's jersey up in the rafters: no.  It should have been, but it won't be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and as for hanging Ben&#8217;s jersey up in the rafters: no.  It should have been, but it won&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blanke</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81543</link>
		<dc:creator>blanke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81543</guid>
		<description>As the years pass two things are going to become clearer and clearer:

1. Both LB and BW's departures had a lot more to do with Bill Davis, Joe Dumars, and later, Flip Saunders -- than ANYTHING ELSE.  

2. If the management had decided to keep them here -- which it had the option to -- we'd be looking at a true championship dynasty right now, with at least 3 titles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the years pass two things are going to become clearer and clearer:</p>
<p>1. Both LB and BW&#8217;s departures had a lot more to do with Bill Davis, Joe Dumars, and later, Flip Saunders &#8212; than ANYTHING ELSE.  </p>
<p>2. If the management had decided to keep them here &#8212; which it had the option to &#8212; we&#8217;d be looking at a true championship dynasty right now, with at least 3 titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diablo</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81534</link>
		<dc:creator>Diablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81534</guid>
		<description>No one thinks that Pistons will retire the number 3, as tribute to Ben Wallace and Rodney Stuckey's career(if Stuckey turns out to be a spectacular player)? 

If anything i think that would be the only way it would be retired</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one thinks that Pistons will retire the number 3, as tribute to Ben Wallace and Rodney Stuckey&#8217;s career(if Stuckey turns out to be a spectacular player)? </p>
<p>If anything i think that would be the only way it would be retired</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PistonsGirl4Life</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81417</link>
		<dc:creator>PistonsGirl4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81417</guid>
		<description>Actually my bad, apparently it was POST Bowman and pre Shanny... and apparently it wasn't the first time:

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/sportsblog/2007/01/paying_tribute_to_steve_yzerma.html

"Twice during Yzerman’s tenure, there were rumours that he was going to be traded. It’s well-known by now that Red Wings owner Mike Ilitch wanted Pat LaFontaine in 1983, visibly slumping in his seat when the Islanders took him one pick before Detroit would draft. Legendary New York general manager Bill Torrey admitted that one of the reasons he made that choice was for a potential trade years later.

That opportunity came in 1991. LaFontaine demanded a trade and Torrey’s first call was to then-Red Wings GM (now Ottawa coach) Bryan Murray. There were some discussions, but Murray asked Torrey if the trade could get done without Yzerman going in return. When Torrey said no, Murray ended the conversations.

In 1994, with Bowman now making the hockey decisions, the Red Wings were coming off the seven-game stunner to San Jose. The Senators wanted Yzerman and were willing to give up Alexei Yashin to do it. (Really, can you imagine Bowman and Yashin? What a sitcom.) Bowman kind of confirmed this the other night, but the team learned there was no way Yzerman could be traded during Detroit’s home opener after that season’s lockout.

Fans – realizing their captain might be dealt – provided such a show of love and support that Bowman and everyone else realized they couldn’t trade him. He was simply the most popular person in the organization, and no one else was close. That’s when any discussions died. "

Wow, just reading that article made mee feel good.  Thanks for the millionth time Steve.  (Also I'm starting to wonder if the reason I don't watch the Red Wings very much anymore has ALOT more to do with no Stevie Y than it does with my fury over the lockout, which had been my stated reason until now... interesting)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually my bad, apparently it was POST Bowman and pre Shanny&#8230; and apparently it wasn&#8217;t the first time:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/sports/sportsblog/2007/01/paying_tribute_to_steve_yzerma.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/sports/sportsblog/2007/01/paying_tribute_to_steve_yzerma.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Twice during Yzerman’s tenure, there were rumours that he was going to be traded. It’s well-known by now that Red Wings owner Mike Ilitch wanted Pat LaFontaine in 1983, visibly slumping in his seat when the Islanders took him one pick before Detroit would draft. Legendary New York general manager Bill Torrey admitted that one of the reasons he made that choice was for a potential trade years later.</p>
<p>That opportunity came in 1991. LaFontaine demanded a trade and Torrey’s first call was to then-Red Wings GM (now Ottawa coach) Bryan Murray. There were some discussions, but Murray asked Torrey if the trade could get done without Yzerman going in return. When Torrey said no, Murray ended the conversations.</p>
<p>In 1994, with Bowman now making the hockey decisions, the Red Wings were coming off the seven-game stunner to San Jose. The Senators wanted Yzerman and were willing to give up Alexei Yashin to do it. (Really, can you imagine Bowman and Yashin? What a sitcom.) Bowman kind of confirmed this the other night, but the team learned there was no way Yzerman could be traded during Detroit’s home opener after that season’s lockout.</p>
<p>Fans – realizing their captain might be dealt – provided such a show of love and support that Bowman and everyone else realized they couldn’t trade him. He was simply the most popular person in the organization, and no one else was close. That’s when any discussions died. &#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, just reading that article made mee feel good.  Thanks for the millionth time Steve.  (Also I&#8217;m starting to wonder if the reason I don&#8217;t watch the Red Wings very much anymore has ALOT more to do with no Stevie Y than it does with my fury over the lockout, which had been my stated reason until now&#8230; interesting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PistonsGirl4Life</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81412</link>
		<dc:creator>PistonsGirl4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.detroitbadboys.com/archives/2007-09-25/should-rodney-stuckey-be-allowed-to-wear-no-3/#comment-81412</guid>
		<description>At one point there was a running rumor that Yzerman was on the blocks for Alexei Yashin (no I am not kidding), that's about the only time I remember "Yzerman" and "trade" or "leaving Detroit" coming up at all.  It was right after we flamed out vs NJ and just before Scotty came (and Keith "I swear he's a hockey player even though he can't skate" Primeau was traded for Shanny).  Something about "The obvious answer is more Russians".

The Wing's wisely declined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At one point there was a running rumor that Yzerman was on the blocks for Alexei Yashin (no I am not kidding), that&#8217;s about the only time I remember &#8220;Yzerman&#8221; and &#8220;trade&#8221; or &#8220;leaving Detroit&#8221; coming up at all.  It was right after we flamed out vs NJ and just before Scotty came (and Keith &#8220;I swear he&#8217;s a hockey player even though he can&#8217;t skate&#8221; Primeau was traded for Shanny).  Something about &#8220;The obvious answer is more Russians&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Wing&#8217;s wisely declined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.656 seconds -->
