Not surprisingly, the Pistons led the NBA in attendance for the fourth time in five years as the Palace’s sell-out streak has reached 226 games and counting. If attendance were measured strictly by the turnstiles and not tickets sold, I’m curious if the Pistons would still be at the top. I’m not saying they wouldn’t be, but it’d also be disingenuous to say that 22,076 people actually attended every single game.
Latest Comments
- Forty on the post Presenting the Big Men of 2010
- Forty on the post PN roundtable
- Other Matt on the post PN roundtable
- Other Matt on the post Presenting the Big Men of 2010
- Mike Payne on the post PN roundtable
- Forty on the post PN roundtable
- Glenn on the post Presenting the Big Men of 2010
NBA FanHouse
- Monta Ellis Has Somethin' Up His Sleeve
- NBA Essentials: Contours of Blatche's Waist
- Latest All-Star Voting Results: Carmelo Passes Amare for West Starting Spot
- Is Darius Miles Even a Big Deal?
- Von Wafer Met the Rim and The Rim Won
- Under The Microscope: Michael Beasley Part II, Under the Lights
- Doing Lines: Gasol Enjoys the Single Coverage
- Danny Granger's Three at the Buzzer: 'You've Got to Be Kidding Me'
- Memphis Drops Darius Miles for Shaun Livingston, Clippers Lend Helping Hand
- Davis Helping Keep Kids Away From Gangs

I think Chicago would be at the top. Their arena is always packed everytime. I rarely see empty seats there, even if the Bulls sucked this year. Also Cleveland could be up there imo. The Q. is really packed all the time. But no matter what, selling 22,076 tickets for every game is no joke, so it’s still huge for the Pistons. If some ticket holders don’t come to the games everytime, then it’s their problem.
Funny how sports teams stress attendance while most other forms of entertainment talk ticket sales or gate receipts. The image of fans eagerly shoehorning their fannies into overcrowded sections is an important part of the image, but a ticket sold is the same either way and requires less BS.