Archive for the '2008 Playoffs' Category Page 3 of 9



Appreciating Flip

This already made it’s rounds in the comments, but for those who missed it, check out Ian Thomsen’s “5 Reasons Detroit can be champions” on SI.com. There’s a lot of good stuff there from Joe Dumars and Flip Saunders, including this nugget explaining how Saunders keeps the Pistons motivated:

“At the beginning of the year,” Detroit coach Flip Saunders said, “we had our first meeting, and I had each guy tell me what they could do to help us win a championship. I got all those things typed up and I keep them in my coat pocket for every game. I keep it there as a reminder, in case I ever have to pull it out to them: ‘Hey, this is what you told me you were going to do.’ ”

Each player declared what he could do to help the Pistons win their first title since 2003-04. They spoke in front of each other, and it became a personal contract among the players and their coach.

“I’ll read it before games to see the mentality of where our players were at the beginning of the year, to see where they’re at [now],” Saunders said. “Chauncey [Billups] talked about not turning down shots — because I get on him sometimes that he turns down shots — and knowing our game plan as far as following through on that game plan. And ‘Sheed [Wallace] talked about the winner that he is, that he’s not going to let his team down, that they can follow him.

“It was good that we sat in there and talked about it. You could see where they were coming from and what they thought. Jason Maxiell said, ‘I’m going to bring energy, I’m going to make free throws’ — and there’s a guy that improved his free-throw shooting dramatically [to 63.3 percent] from a year ago [48 percent]. It was a contract that they gave not to me but to their teammates. It was about accountability.”

And?

“They have lived up to it,” Saunders said. “At times, everyone’s going to veer away a little bit. But because of that [meeting], our players have been more vocal with each other, about guys not doing things, and letting them know this is what you have to do.”

Flip’s been getting his due in recent game threads on this site, but I get the feeling we’re still the exception among fans as a whole. It’s too bad, because Flip’s been doing a hell of a job lately — that Chauncey Billups reverse in the final seconds of Game 2 looks even more brilliant when you understand the x’s and o’s behind it (via TrueHoop).

Some people will never be convinced until he leads the Pistons to another title. That’s fine, it comes with the territory of being a contender year in and year out — but realize that only four different coaches have won a title in the last 12 years, and six in the last 21. High expectations are fine, just don’t let it keep you from seeing what kind of job he’s been doing in the meantime.

The internet loves Rodney Stuckey

I have a history of latching on to certain players and overstating their worth before they really deserve it (OMG Delfino! Free Amir!), so I don’t want to do that with Rodney Stuckey. Instead, I’ll let the rest of the internet do it for me …

From Dr. Lawyer Indian Chief at Free Darko:

The clear consensus around the closed-door boardroom is that Stuckey is the most FreeDarko player in the league right now. Defying all conventional wisdom about how a player of his caliber should carry himself, bursting with potential and taking (but somehow making) the most ill-advised shots in tight situations. Guys like Stucky are not supposed to play on the road like he has. Guys like Stuckey are not supposed to play in the playoffs, period (see Allen, Tony). Although it could debunk my three-year thesis that KG’s problems in Minny were a result solely of bad coaching, I have to give Flip Saunders his props for trusting every single one of his guys, rolling out the ball, and seeing what the hell they can do.

From Austin Kent at Hoops Addict:

Again, Stuckey isn’t why the Pistons won Game 2, but his 5-8 from the field and confidence down the stretch are reasons to believe that Detroit does have other options outside their unquestionably dominant starting five.

The question, then, isn’t whether or not Stuckey channelled his inner Wade, or when he’ll develop to a point where performances like this become a nightly occurrence, but rather if you’ll remember or not, that he’s had it in him all along next time it happens.

From Jeff at CelticsBlog:

Pistons fans are quite taken with the young man. He stepped in for Billups when he was out at the end of the last series as well. The challenge for the Celtics will be to figure out ways to keep this latest weapon from doing too much damage. It is bad enough when any one of the starting 5 can get hot, but when they’ve got a 6th man stepping up, they become really difficult to beat.

From Big Al at The Wayne Fontes Experience:

The Pistons claimed they needed immediate help from their 1st pick in the NBA draft. Yet they pick a kid, Rodney Stuckey, who only spent all of 2 seasons at Eastern freaking Washington? Eastern Washington? This has Rodney White written all over it, and we know how well that turned out.

Whoops! That last one was from draft night, not Game 2! Here’s Big Al’s mea culpa posted yesterday:

Uh, Al….what in the HELL were you thinking?

I think I was blinded by a couple of things. I bought into the “small school player can’t compete right away” stereotype. I also had been quite unhappy with Joe Dumars’ recent history in draft picks. […] Good thing Joe D doesn’t listen to me, as Stuckey has been as impressive as all get out for the Pistons.

From Brian Spencer at Empty the Bench:

For the record, I’ve been a Rodney Stuckey advocate for awhile now. “Grown Man” Stuckey, as ESPN’s Mark Jackson referred to him at one point in Game 2, was super-mega massive for the Pistons, finishing with 13 points, 3 assists, and 2 steals in 17 minutes off the bench. Detroit doesn’t win this one without his contributions.

He scored in a variety of ways: spot-up jumpers with and without a hand in his face, driving to the basket, making free throws (Stuckey is now 33-36, good for 91.7%, from the line during these playoffs, good for 2nd overall). […] Stuckey hit some huge buckets to stem the tide and impressed once again. This kid has a very bright future.

It’s hard being a Pistons fan in Boston

I usually don’t link to comments made on other blogs, but this is worthy of an exception. From BW in response to Dr. LIC’s ode to Rodney Stuckey at Free Darko:

I watched the game from a bar in Boston last night… and as the 4th quarter wound down, I couldn’t keep in my Detroit loyalties any longer. No big deal, I thought.

After the game ended, the guy to my right turned to me.

“It’s not that I like the Celtics… I just moved here. I’ve lived in Pittsburgh, I grew up in Chicago. The Bulls are my team.”

I nodded.

“I hate the Pistons.”

He said it with an unexpected weight. I let the silence rest a beat too long and then tried to stammer out an uncomfortable “yeah” and whatever else would follow.

He shook his head.

“No, look. I hate my father.” He rolled up his sleeves and pointed. “See these - these tattoos - I got them because I hate my dad so much.”

We both looked up as Rip was giving the postgame interview.

He pointed at the screen.

“But I hate the Pistons more.”

We went back to our beers and I faked a phone call a few minutes later. I wish I had something glib to wrap this up with (!) but the moment was too intense. Worth sharing, though, I think.

So, in a crude segue, where do Pistons fans in Boston watch a game without angry Chicagoans by way of Pittsburgh ruining the atmosphere?

Previously:
Where do fans in [LA | Chicago | NY | DC | anywhere else] watch Pistons games?

Meet Detroit’s Big 3

Our Big 3

Thanks to DBB reader Monday for sending that in (long-time readers of the site may remember his previous handiwork), and Rob G for providing the inspiration. And of course, here’s a PDF version if you want to decorate your cubicle.

It’s all tied up

I say this without hyperbole: last night’s game was the most entertaining playoff game Detroit’s played in years. It was competitive throughout, the big names on both teams showed up and it came down to the very end. (And, of course, the Pistons won.)

But of all the things that went right for the Pistons — and there was a lot of things, including the real return of Chauncey Billups, the steady production of Antonio McDyess, the clutch scoring by Rasheed Wallace — what was most exciting was the emergence of Rodney Stuckey.

He was solid in the first half, but for a stretch late in the third and early in the fourth, he put the team on his shoulders and carried them. His line in the box score barely does justice for his impact on the game, but here it is: 13 points (5-8 FG, 3-3 FT) in 17 minutes, with three assists and two steals.

Even the Celtics were impressed. From the Boston Globe’s blog:

“I thought Stuckey really gave us problems tonight,” said Celtics forward Paul Pierce. “I think he was the X-factor tonight in this game.”

Chosen to sit at the interview podium with veteran Rip Hamilton, Stuckey relished the moment. Most of the questions were directed at his teammate, but the young point guard lit up when asked if he was nervous before tonight’s game.

“I’m never scared,” Stuckey said as more of a revelation than a boast. “I’m not nervous. I’ve got Rip, Chaunce, Sheed, Tay and all these guys behind me, and Lindsey Hunter, and they keep me poised and confident every day. Just being around them and them always being poised and confident gives me the extra energy and confidence that I need as a player and as an individual.”

A. Sherrod Blakely of Booth Newspapers has Lindsey Hunter’s post-game reaction:

“He’s so far ahead right now,” Hunter said. “He has that something that as a young guard in this league, you gotta have. I’m not talking about just to make it, but be one of the elite. I think that’s where he’s headed.”

Hunter is right when talking about that “something.” Stuckey does a lot of things well — getting to the rim, drawing contact, protecting the ball — but his biggest strength may be the one that’s most difficult to quantify: he’s extremely confident and unflappable.

A lot of rookies wilt under pressure, especially rookies from small schools who never came within spitting distance of the bright lights of March Madness. But Stuckey has always shown the poise of a veteran, the quiet confidence of someone who expects to do well and isn’t surprised by his success.

And that’s really why this game was so exciting — it wasn’t just about the tying the series, it was also peeking into the future. As DBB reader Rob G said in the comments after the game:

Boston has a big three. So do we. Stuckey wears #3. He’s the man.

The key will be reproducing that performance over the rest of the playoffs, but if you look at what he’s done the last few games, consistency is becoming less and less of an issue for him.

From here the series heads to Detroit. As I’m sure you’ve heard 10,000 times before, the Celtics have yet to win on the road in the playoffs, but to be fair, they’ve yet to fall behind in a series, either. I’m sure it’s weighing on their confidence at least a little, but probably not as much as most people think considering they had the best road record in the regular season.

That said, Detroit took Boston’s best shot and didn’t flinch. As LawyerBoy said in the comments:

Ray Allen 9-16 (5-5 from FT) for 25
Paul Pierce 9-16 (6-6 from FT) for 26
KG 11-19 (2-2 from FT) for 24.

That’s the Big 3 combining for 75 on 20-34 (58.8%) shooting … and we still beat them.

If you’re a Celtics fan, you can’t expect the Big Three to play any better, at least not all at the same time. Maybe one of them goes off like Pierce did in Game 7 against the Cavaliers, but it’d come at the expense of someone else. The rest of the Celtics combined to score just 22 points.

We knew Detroit’s depth was an advantage on paper, and on Thursday we saw it in action. The way I see it, it’s only going to get worse for the Celtics, especially with fatigue setting in:

Q. Paul and Kevin said it was kind of a step slow on defense. Was it simply that, or was it something else, as well?

COACH DOC RIVERS: No, there’s nothing wrong. I told you yesterday, the games I was fearful with the fatigue factor was today. I thought the adrenaline of Game 7 would take us through Game 1. Our coaches felt the same way. They made shots off of single doubles that usually we’re able to lock and trail and stay behind, and we were a step or two behind. Not a lot you can do with it. You know, we’re going to rest tomorrow and we’ll be ready for Game 3.

Technically we have a tie series, but it sure feels like Detroit took a commanding lead.

Pistons 103, Celtics 97 box score / ESPN.com

No suspension for Rip Hamilton, but cross your fingers for Rasheed Wallace

This is old news, but just to be thorough, the NBA fined Rip Hamilton for throwing an elbow at Kevin Garnett in Game 1. This is actually good news, since there was a small (okay, tiny) chance that Rip might have been suspended. That said, it doesn’t sound like there’s any hard feelings on Boston’s side. From Chris Silva of the Detroit Free Press:

Added Boston coach Doc Rivers: “It was flagrant, I can tell you that. We thought that at the time. But again, Rip is a good guy, great guy, and it’s an emotional game and that kind of stuff happens. I’ve done it before, too, and thank God at that time we didn’t have flagrant 1s or 2s. It’s just part of the game at times, and it’s not a big deal.”

Speaking of suspensions, Rasheed Wallace is flirting with one of his own: he picked up his fifth tech of the postseason in the first quarter last night, just two away from a mandatory one-game vacation. Once a player accumulates seven techs in the postseason, another suspension follows after every other tech the rest of the playoffs.

In all honesty, this may be the stupidest rule in the game, especially considering by design it creates controversy. The only teams it could possibly affect are the ones who advance deep into the playoffs, which means the first time a player is actually punished under this rule, it’ll happen under a huge spotlight.

Besides, techs are so subjective in the first place — some refs give players a long leash while others actually egg them on (cough, Joey Crawford, cough). Punish players by hitting them in the pocket book, not ruining a series that millions of fans would like to see decided by the best players playing.

Pistons @ Celtics, Game 2

This isn’t a must-win, but it’s still damn important. I put together a preview of sorts at FanHouse, and I’ll also be live-blogging the game. Do your thing in the comments — I’ll see you when this gets tied up.

Chauncey Billups: I have to be more aggressive

Chauncey Billups expects to be more aggressive in Game 2. From Keith Langlois’ blog:

Billups said he came out of Game 1 feeling pretty good physically and expects not only he, but backcourt partner Rip Hamilton, will attack more often in Game 2.

“I’m going to – I probably will,” he said. “I know with Rip and I not being aggressive and trying to score the ball, our chances, they go down a little bit. So I think that he and I both have to be a little more aggressive, and that’s not necessarily taking shots but just getting into the teeth of the defense. You know they load up, you know they’re going to be coming off on penetration, and (it’s important) to get guys easier shots and not fight the shot clock so much.

“The rhythm was a little bit off, but even when they don’t let you reverse the ball, then that’s when you’re going to take action, take seams. That’s just something that once you see how teams are playing certain things, that’s when you make certain adjustments. I think we’ll do a better job of that tomorrow.”

Like I said before, Game 1 was all testing the hamstring and regaining rhythm; tonight’s game is when we should expect the real Chauncey Billups to step forward. Rip Hamilton plans on giving his backcourt mate a hand. From Chris McCosky:

“If you watch our offense, 80 percent of the time it starts with the ball in Chauncey’s hands,” Hamilton said. “We have to put him in a situation where he can come out and catch the ball and not have to spend a whole lot of energy bringing it up the court.”

Hamilton suggested that he or Prince could bring the ball up.

“[Boston] is so aggressive on the strong side of the ball,” said Hamilton. “Chauncey has to spend so much energy bringing it up, then when he comes off he’s facing a loaded-up defense. Once he gets out of that, there’s seven or eight seconds on the shot clock.

From the sounds of things, Billups is hoping he’ll be able to get Rasheed Wallace more involved, as well. From Chris Silva in the Free Press:

The Pistons want to get their versatile big man more involved tonight, but defensive player of the year Kevin Garnett isn’t the only Celtic standing in the way. Because Boston loads up on the strong side, Wallace is seeing defenders from every angle.

“They’ve got a guy at the elbow, they’ve got a guy coming behind if (Wallace) is to get by KG, so you’ve got to be able to create ways to shoot the ball,” Chauncey Billups said. “You can’t just (isolate) him down there. (Garnett is) too good defensively.”

Neither Billups nor Wallace looked anything like the players they were for most of the year up until this point; if they revert to form, this series should head back to Detroit all tied up.

Glen Davis has soft hands

Seriously? You’re a rookie in the Conference Finals and you agree to an article in which you explain your manicure?

Nowadays, Big Baby, who got his name for his size and sensitivity during his elementary years in Louisiana, has a daily regimen of moisturizing, brushing and buffing himself into top form.

[…] Those habits include liberal use of Lubriderm lotion to keep his hands soft. He gets manicures twice a month, and favors - without apology - a clear top coat.

The stereotypical “guys-as-grimy-and-rough” image is outdated, he said.

“My generation is changing. Guys are doing the same things women are doing,” he said.

Davis, dressed in a Gino T-shirt, Nike shorts and sandals, grabbed some of Ace’s new manicure tools - fingernail clippers and a nail brush - and began buffing.

“This is optimum playing nail,” he said, pointing to the middle finger of his left hand to reveal the slightest slice of white extending from the finger. He clipped the others around it, talking about them as if he were shooting baskets.

“When you knock down a nail,” he said. “Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.”

If I didn’t read that myself on the Boston Herald’s website I would have sworn it’s a J.E. Skeets parody. I highly encourage you to check out the article and look at the pictures — you couldn’t Photoshop something that ridiculous.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not against personal hygiene or breaking down stereotypes, but the timing of this article is like he’s begging to get made fun of by Detroit fans. (via TrueHoop)

Update: This article is actually from May 14 — my bad. To be clear, I really have don’t have a problem with guys who get manicures or pedicures — I’m guessing at least half the players in the league do it. It just cracked me up that a rookie would agree to an entire interview about it complete with a video demonstration and pictures, just because I assumed the veterans would never let him live it down. But as CelticsBlog points out, this guy has funnier skeletons in his closet.

Pistons lose Game 1, and that’s OK

Game 1 didn’t go off as well as I’d hoped … but it did play out just as I expected.

As far as I’m concerned, the first game was always about regaining rhythm, not taking control of the series. Boston was flying high off an emotional win, and in front of a frenzied crowd, expecting them to open the game at anything less than full throttle would have been foolish.

The Pistons, meanwhile, hadn’t played in a week, and they hadn’t played with their floor general in nearly two. That the Pistons opened the game allowing the Celtics to jump out to an 8-0 lead neither surprised nor greatly worried me, especially considering the tide soon turned and the game remained competitive for most of the remaining three and a half quarters.

Chauncey Billups played like a guy who missed a couple of weeks … but still, he played. Now that the rust is off and he’s tested the hammy in game situations and finally knows for sure that his leg will not in fact explode every time he makes a move, he can finally get back to being his regular self in Game 2, hand out more than two assists, attempt more than six shots and crack double-digits in scoring. From the Detroit News:

“It was good to be out there,” Billups said. “My explosiveness, obviously, wasn’t there. But I know I’ll get better as I go along.”

Rasheed Wallace was lost for much of the game. The Pistons eventually force-fed him the ball on the block for several possessions late in the game, and while it paid off with a couple of jumpers, it also resulted in a couple of forced shots and a swipe by Rajon Rondo, who picked up on Detroit’s extremely transparent strategy.

It was too little, too late and too forced. I don’t mean to single Rasheed out here — Rip Hamilton had a couple of uncharacteristic drives with mixed results, as well. I’m just saying that the Pistons are at their best when their offense flows and they’re feeding the hot hand, not when they’re desperate and trying to heat a cold hand.

As disappointing as the final score may be, there were plenty of positives, as well. How can you not be happy with Rodney Stuckey right now? He played like a guy who’s learned something each and every time he’s taken the court. He’s aggressive on his drives, and he’s getting calls he didn’t get earlier in the year. In the past, the Pistons have lacked a guy who could get into the paint, draw contact and convert, but he’s become that guy.

So, please, don’t overreact. No one, absolutely no one, was predicting a sweep. The chic pick both in the comments of this site and elsewhere on the internet was Pistons in six, which means there were always supposed to be a couple of losses. It was a disappointing game, but there was no giving up, there was no sleepwalking, and there was certainly no complacency.

Instead, there were stretches of sloppy play on both sides of the ball, some unexpected missed free throws late and not enough rhythm throughout. And yet, if you take away one disastrous third quarter, the Pistons would have won this game 62-60. All things considered, I’ll take that. As Rasheed said after the game:

“We’ll be right,” Rasheed Wallace assured afterward. “It’s just one game. They got it. Good for them. But there’s a Game 2 Thursday.”