Archive for the 'DBB talks with...' Category

Talking with Detroit Free Press beat reporter Krista Jahnke

I spend a lot of time opining about the Pistons, but for the most part I’m just digesting the same info as all of you. That’s why today I’m excited to present a conversation with someone who actually has access, someone who attends practice, sits in the best seats in the house, asks questions in the locker room and follows the team on the road. Today, I’m talking with Krista Jahnke, beat reporter for the Detroit Free Press.

I’d like to start by thanking Krista for her time — she has a hectic schedule but fortunately was able to steal some time away last week to exchange emails with me. I think you’ll agree that the results are very interesting: we talked about her daily routine covering the team, her dynamic with other members of the Detroit media as well as what players around the league she thinks the Pistons should go after on the trade market.

______

Matt Watson: Last season was your first covering the Pistons for the Detroit Free Press. The Pistons were coming off of two consecutive NBA Finals appearances, but as someone who graduated from MSU in 2002, you already had some experience covering some pretty good college teams. Did that help prepare you for your first year covering one of the NBA’s best?

Michigan StateKrista Jahnke: I was in school at Michigan State during the championship years, and at times, I helped out on the men’s basketball beat, covering a practice or a press conference or a game here or there. But I never covered the tournament, and I was never the full-time beat writer. The only beat work I did at The State News was as the women’s basketball beat writer during Joanne P. McCallie’s first season. The team went 10-18. I got my first taste of traveling to road games, trying to build relationships with coaches and players and learning the ins and outs of being around one team nearly every day.

The men’s NCAA championship win came during my first semester at The State News. I was a sophomore intern. I spent that night combing the streets of East Lansing for quotes and tidbits from the celebration that overtook Grand River and the surrounding streets. If anything, what I learned through that experience was the enormity of it, the way it drew people together in such a passionate, intense way. You could say that was when I had the first inkling that I wanted to try sports writing. The next fall when we applied for beats, I applied only to the sports desk.

But the real answer is, I don’t think much can prepare you for covering a professional team as a beat writer. You just have to do it. The college beats are much different, in terms of access especially, but also in many other ways. The business, the fans, the money, the professionalism of the players, the relationships with the media and the amount of media are all vastly different than those in the college game. Two different beasts, I’d say.

MW: Can you walk us through your daily routine when the team is at home? How much time do you end up spending in Auburn Hills (either at the Palace or the practice facility) compared to the Free Press office? After the game ends, how long do you have to file your story?

KJ: Practice days and game days are different, so I’ll cover both briefly.

On a practice day, I spend the morning reading the Web to update myself on NBA news, Pistons and otherwise. I try to get a sense of what the news of the day will be. I arrive at the practice facility around 11 a.m. and go through the provided clip packets as well as stats and box scores from the previous night. I might also spend some time transcribing quotes. Sometime between 12 and 1 p.m., Flip lets the assembled media in. We usually stand around for a bit watching the end of practice — mostly free throws and fooling around — and then interviews begin with Flip and one or two players. Once that’s done, I head home to write the next day’s story or whatever it is I’m working on (and eventually, this will be the time I blog as well. Stay tuned for that). If there’s news brewing, this is the main time I’d make calls or check in with agents or front office guys. My stories are due around 7.

Palace of Auburn HillsOn game days, I arrive at the Palace about three hours before the game (depending on traffic on 75, of course). My routine is similar to what I do before practice, and I also eat dinner. The locker room opens an hour and a half before the game, and a few minutes before that I’ll wander out to the court to see what’s up and chat with the assistant coaches. Flip speaks with the media right on the court, and then we hit the locker room. The pre-game locker room situation is not great for us beat writers. Four of the starters - Chauncey, Tay, ‘Sheed and C-Webb - do not talk before games. We often chat with Chauncey off-the-record, but he superstitiously avoids pre-game interviews. Rasheed usually wanders around singing aloud to the music pumping through his headphones. That leaves Rip, a great guy, but one who is as crafty at shaking us as he is at shaking defenders. And with bumping rap music drowning out conversation, it’s just not what you’d call a landmine of great interviews. On the plus side, Lindsey Hunter and Dale Davis are always around and are always fun to talk with, whether for an interview or just to BS a little. Then I have about 45 minutes to write my pre-game notes to hit my first deadline at 7:30.

Most games start at 7:30, and in that case, I have to write a little of my game story during the game. If it’s an 8 o’clock game, I have to write it ALL during the game. My first deadline is 10:40, so an 8 o’clock game ends with me filing my first story about 10 minutes after the buzzer. I write during time outs and at halftime, and if it’s a close game, most of the fourth quarter, trying to follow the action at the same time. It can be tough, especially in games that go down to the wire. In that case, I often have two stories going at once, a “winning” story and a “losing” story. We in the media hate overtime games for that reason; we often selfishly root for blowouts just to ease our stress.

The post-game media session begins about 10 minutes after the game. We interview Flip first and then hit the locker room, where we wait for the guys to emerge - slowly - from the shower. Chauncey is our go-to guy because he typically appears first and takes care of us. If someone else has a great game, like Rasheed or Chris, some nights, we’re just out of luck. We don’t have time to wait them out.

I get whatever I can in time, and then haul back to the media room to finish my game story for the 10:40 deadline. After that, I update my notes if they need it and on rushed nights, redo the game story as well. I’m usually done by 11 or 11:15 p.m.

MW: What’s your routine like when the team is on the road? Do you have any favorite cities or arenas?

KJ: The game-day routine is the same once you get to the arena. But I also attend shoot-around on the roads. Shootarounds are a great chance to talk with hard-to-pin-down guys - they have nowhere to go. The four beat writers also get to stay and watch, our only real chance to see some behind-closed-doors happenings.

The biggest difference is the travel, obviously. People often ask me about the travel; it seems exciting, I suppose. In reality, it gets old quickly. We fly commecial and book our own travel. That gets tedious. I try to travel the night before games rather than early on game-day. That’s just hectic and can lead to problems if your plane is delayed. With the early-morning wake-up calls and the late nights at the arena and the hassle of the airport, travel is just a grind. It’s often hard to sleep knowing your alarm will start buzzing at 5:15 a.m. Every now and then, the schedule allows for some time to go out to dinner or walk around a bit, and that’s great. But I usually just want to sleep! I waste all my time in all these great cities working and napping.

Madison Square GardenBut my favorite cities: New York is No. 1. I’ve loved New York forever. I love big cities, places where I can walk right out of my hotel and find things to do. So New York will always top my list. Madison Square Garden, too, is special to me. There’s a buzz there that can’t be replicated in a sparkling-new arena. I like that. I also like Chicago - for similar reasons to New York, and one of my best friends lives there. I enjoyed Seattle last season, although the arena must rank in the bottom five. It’s old and dim and dank. Other than that, I like convenient cities, places where I can walk to the arena from my Marriott and where the airport is just a short cab ride away. That list includes Charlotte, Washington D.C., Minnesota, Oklahoma City (surprisingly), Indianapolis, Milwaukee and Orlando.

MW: I know there’s not supposed to be any cheering on press row, but are you really able to avoid a rooting interest? I know you want to stay objective, but at the very least your job has to be a lot easier (especially in the locker room) when they win, right?

KJ: I don’t root for the Pistons to win. But you’re right that it’s much nicer to spend time in a happy environment than a sad or angry one. That said, any “rooting” boils down to me muttering under my breath if they play like crap and silently applauding if things go well. I also genuinely like nearly everyone in the organization, and with that comes a sense that you’d rather see good things happen to them. But I don’t feel that stands in the way of being professional and writing what needs to be written. I know where to draw the line. I’m not hanging out with these guys. But liking people and wanting them to succeed — that just makes me human, I think. And this organization is stocked with great people.

MW: What’s the dynamic like with the other beat reporters? I imagine you end up seeing a lot of them more so than some of your own co-workers at the Free Press, especially during road trips. Is it always competitive?

KJ: I think, compared to some relationships I’ve heard of, that we have an ideal situation. We are certainly competitive. No one wants to get beat on a story. Sometimes you get a sense that a writer is up to something, and you get a little worried and start making calls. We rarely discuss what we’re working on - I mean what angles we’re exploring, what we’re leading with in our notes. If someone thinks they have something alone, they’re not going to go sharing it. And there’s no holding onto material, a luxury beat writers who work alone have. If we hear a good quote or nugget of information, you better get it in the paper somewhere because if you save it for another day, there’s a good chance it will have already shown up somewhere else.

But we help each other out with little things, like say if someone’s recorder didn’t get a quote that everyone else had. Things like that. We share rides on the road. Sometimes we go out to dinner together or grab a post-game drink. We talk about the team, what we’re seeing when things go wrong. We do see each other all the time, from the practices and games to the airports and hotels. It makes it much more enjoyable if you can get along with those people. And I’d say the four of us get along very well.

MW: What about the dynamic with the guys writing for Pistons.com? I’d think, simply because of their employer, they get a lot more access than the rest of the media. How can you compete with that? Or is that something you even see a need to compete with?

Keith LangloisKJ: Well, Keith [Langlois], who by the way is a writer I really admire, used to get more access, but he no longer gets to watch practices. And since we’re on the road with the team and he’s not, I’d say at this point our access is somewhat better. Except for the front office guys; he gets much more face time with Joe Dumars, that’s for sure.

As far as competing with that, we’re doing different things. Not to say sometimes he doesn’t write stories I would have loved to have. But he is pretty much limited to accentuating the positive and while not out-and-out ignoring the negative, certainly not exploring it too far. I think the traditional media competes because if something bad is going on, we’d be obligated to report it. As a reader, I would trust that source a little bit more.

MW: Chris Sheridan recently stirred up controversy with his comments regarding Rasheed Wallace and Flip Saunders. As a national reporter who’s in town one day and out the next, he can get away with that (being accosted with bottles of orange soda, notwithstanding) a little more easily than someone who has to face these guys every day. How do you toe the line between deciding what might be newsworthy and interesting to fans and what’s simply gossip that will make your job more difficult if you run it?

KJ: I think you gain much more perspective from being around the team day in and day out, so the things that are actually newsworthy and should be reported become obvious. I can’t wait until I have a few more years under my belt, because my perspective will be that much better. It’s hard to compete with people who have been around for years and just “get it” a little more. But I’m getting there. I understand what locker room chatter is off limits and what little things could go in the paper because they’re harmless (and usually funny). Like after the Indiana Pacers game, the locker room TV was turned to some program about American Idol, and they were interviewing the “She Bangs!” guy. Rasheed Wallace sees it and immediately starts singing, “She bangs, she bangs,” while doing his best impersonation of that guy’s flailing arms dance. Hilarious. I feel free to use little, harmless things like that.

But the bigger point is that it pays to have perspective. We know how Rasheed acts under normal circumstances, and everything that report criticized was completely normal for ‘Sheed. So we don’t overreact to it. But we also know when Rasheed’s body language is off and his demeanor in the locker room seems sour. Then we ask him about it and report what he says, as we did a few times this season when he admitted he was having issues. That’s the line to me.

MW: I know some reporters (Chris McCosky and A. Sherrod Blakely, for instance) now have their own blogs, and it’s not rare for them to break stories there instead of waiting to run an article the next morning. How do you see newspapers continuing to respond to the push for real-time information? How do you think this will change the way your job is done, say, five years in the future?

KJ: If there’s major news, we post stories on our Web site, too, even if I don’t have a blog. Just pointing that out. But I do see newspapers moving more and more toward Web-first coverage. I want a blog, and it sounds like I’ll have one soon enough. These days, you’re at a disadvantage if you don’t have one. For one thing, you have unlimited room to write online, something we writers crave and the major downfall of newspapers. Editors think readers want less, less, less - shorter stories, more little items, that kind of thing. So our holes for news shrink every year. It’s frustrating to not get news into the paper and then see everyone else just post in a blog what they can’t get to fit.

But blogs have also changed the tone of our relationship with readers. In the paper, we write in what I’d call an authoritative yet distant voice. In a blog, you write as yourself and you’re free to speculate, analyze and opinionize without many limits. That changes the kind of information people begin to expect. Not only do they want more - more updates, more little nuggets - put they want it with personality and insight that you don’t see in a traditional piece in the paper.

In five years — and this is a lame cop-out of an answer — I’d say we’ll move further down that road. That maybe we do nearly 50-50 work between the Web and the print format. Maybe that includes things like pod-casts and streaming video of interviews and more chats, all those different components that are already out there. And of course, blogs.

MW: Everyone is pretty much assuming the Pistons are going to make another trade this year. If you could move into Joe Dumars’ office for a day, who would be the top three players around the league you’d make some calls about?

KJ: I still think it’s probable, but don’t be shocked if nothing happens. They’ve pretty much got one big man to work with now in Nazr Mohammed, and with four years left, he’s a little tougher to move. Plus, I’d think there’s some concern that if Chris Webber decides to move on as an unrestricted free agent (although I expect he’ll want to stay) then they’re left with no center if they let Mohammed go. It’s a tricky matter, and I for one don’t believe the Pistons NEED to make a trade to contend this year. I’m just glad I don’t make these decisions, because as you’ll see, this is not my strong suit, dreaming up trades.

Juan DixonThat said, I have heard Juan Dixon is on the market in Portland. He’s a bit small for a shooting guard and he couldn’t help backup Chauncey much, but he certainly can score off the bench and that’s one thing the Pistons need. The Pistons could have him for Will Blalock and Ronald “Flip” Murray. They’d get to hang onto Mohammed that way. Would the Blazers want to do that? I’m not sure. They’d get a young prospect in Will and a player who seems like he has just not found his fit yet in Flip. That might not be enough.

I still like the idea of Morris Peterson, probably because I’m a Sparty but also because he’s a classy guy who is fine playing off the bench. But it sounds like the Raptors want Antonio McDyess, so that’s not going to happen. I’d still explore that, if I were Joe. Maybe as it gets closer to the trade deadline, Toronto’s demands will change, although Bryan Colangelo is no slouch and the Raptors will be extra careful because they’re a division leader at the moment.

As for a third, it’s hard to find something that works for all parties. From what I’ve heard, the Marko Jaric/Nazr Mohammed deal is dead, and Jaric is happily playing under new head coach Randy Wittman. Bonzi Wells is now healthy and playing in the eight-man rotation in Houston. That pushed SG Kirk Snyder to the bench, as well as backup point guard John Lucas. I think both of those guys have some upside but maybe not enough to pull off a trade. Snyder has good size, and he’s athletic. Lucas is undersized at 5-foot-11, but he’s a good shooter. Both are young. The numbers work if the Pistons got both guys for Flip and Will. But we’re not talking guys who dramtically change what the Pistons can do in any way.

MW: I have to ask about Amir Johnson. For a guy who never gets on the court and entered the league without any amount of hype, he’s been gaining a lot of new fans lately, especially following comments from the front office saying he’s basically untouchable. We just read Chris Silva’s piece on him, but I’m interested in your take: When will he crack the rotation? And from what you see on the practice floor, can you think of any comparable players around the league that are actually playing?

KJ: I think Amir has a chance to start seeing playing time next year. He is still a project, and by that I mean, he’s not going to crack the starting lineup anytime soon. His jumper needs work, and he gets pushed around inside on defense. Adding some bulk would help. But he does have a great sense for blocking shots, he loves to play, he’s explosive, he’s got nice touch around the rim, he can get up and he’s quick. That’s a lot to like, not to mention that he’s 6-foot-11 and maybe still growing. I’d compare him to… a poor man’s Amare Stoudemire.

________

Again, I’d really like to thank Krista for her time and candor. Also, I’d like to tip my hat to Dave from BlazersEdge, who’s recent interview with Oregonian beat reporter Jason Quick inspired some of my questions.

Detroit Bad Boys talks to Elie Seckbach

Elie SeckbachElie Seckbach, “the embedded NBA correspondent,” has been covering the NBA since 1997, but in the past couple of months his popularity has exploded among NBA fans — as he once told Tim Thomas, it took him 10 years to become an overnight sensation.

Why did it happen now? The Internet. Through YouTube, thousands of fans are now able to watch his quirky and candid interviews, where he catches NBA players off guard with his off-the-wall questions. (My favorite? The Hanukkah one at the bottom of this post.)

I began exchanging emails with Elie a couple of weeks ago, and since then he’s been the subject of discussion everywhere from Sports Illustrated (Andy Gray called him “about the most entertaining NBA reporter out there) to Free Darko (Bethlehem Shoals: “Is Elie bad for Jews who like the NBA?”) to the Washington Post (Post title on the Sports Bog: Wiseacre Kid Takes Video Camera Into NBA Locker Rooms, Asks Silly Questions).

On Monday, Elie was a guest on The Basketball Jones podcast, discussing his newfound fame, how players and other reporters perceive him and how covering the NBA differs from some of his more serious assignments. If you’re a fan of his videos, I strongly suggest you give it a listen.

For more from Elie perspective, here is the results of our email conversation — I’d like to thank Elie for taking the time. Continue reading ‘Detroit Bad Boys talks to Elie Seckbach’

Detroit Bad Boys talks with David Wieme

Dave Wieme has seen every Pistons and Shock title up close

I had very few specific goals when I launched this site last October. At first, I spent most of my time scouring the internet to find the latest info on the Pistons, attempting to serve as a clearinghouse of information on the team for whatever readers came my way. I liked to inject a bit of personal commentary here and there, but I was awfully self-conscious in the early going. Even though I am a writer and used to the idea of putting my opinions “out there,” it took awhile for me to get over the mental construct of having an actual “blog.”

Why? Blogs just seemed a bit… pretentious, as if I thought my opinions about sports were so important that they couldn’t fit into a regular message board. I eventually got over that, though, because truth be told, one of the biggest kicks I get out of this site is reading the comments people leave behind. I like starting conversations, not giving lectures. At the end of the day, I know I’m just a fan. I may watch a lot of games and read a lot of articles, but in the end my opinion holds as much water as those of my readers, many of whom follow the team just as closely as I do.

But while I can’t lay claim to any special insight or intuition, I am lucky enough today to present the thoughts of someone who can: Dave Wieme. For a lot of fans, Dave needs no introduction — he’s the author of a funny and insightful blog over at Pistons.com. As the Palace Sports & Entertainment Director of Strategic Communications, and someone who’s been with the team for all three of their NBA titles, he can offer a unique perspective on what it’s like to work for one of the best professional sports organizations in the world.

Dave was nice enough to answer a few questions for us — as he describes below, his days can be extremely busy, so we definitely appreciate the considerable time and candor he put into his responses. I believe everyone out there will enjoy his insight, including his descriptions of the various jobs and roles he’s filled for the team over the years, his observations about how the NBA has evolved in that time, his opinion on who would win a showdown between the original Bad Boys and the current squad, which Pistons (past and present) he feels should have their jerseys retired, and some refreshingly candid remarks about the Larry Brown era.

Again, we thank Dave for taking the time to do this. The following is the results of our email conversation.

Matt Watson: According to your description over at Pistons.com, it sounds like you’ve been affiliated with the Pistons for the better part of 25 years, starting back in 1982 when the team was still at the Silverdome. What exactly were you doing for the team back then?

Dave Wieme: You know, when you put it that way, I start feeling pretty old. Hell, I start feeling REALLY old! But I guess I have been around the Pistons for a very long time. I don’t think 25 years is a true indication because I left the organization for a while from ‘93 to ‘01, but it certainly has been more than 17 years and that’s a long time.

You and your readers will note that I WAS NOT around for the teal years AND the years the team wasn’t very good…coincidence, I think not…now if I could only get my salary to reflect my “good luck charm” status, I’d be golden.

The Pontiac SilverdomeI’ve certainly seen a lot and I’m very fortunate to be in the position that I’m in today. When I started, I was 15 years old and we were playing at the Silverdome. I wasn’t a big fan of the Pistons or basketball at the time; I played in middle school and played a year of freshman ball, but I was too short and didn’t have much skill, so I doubt I would have made the JV team. The job, however, opened my eyes to a great number of things, not only with business, but with basketball as well.

Being only 15, I had to rely on my parents to drive me to the Silverdome after school and I would go in around 3:00 p.m. every game day. I worked directly for the public relations department as a pseudo intern and then would work on the scoring crew as a runner during the games.

Before games, I would work with college interns and the PR director to put the official Game Notes together - copy them, staple them into packets and pass them out before the game. I would also do newspaper clippings. No, we didn’t have Google to search, but instead we would get newspapers from around the country delivered to the offices and we had to go through them twice a week to pull articles that concerned the Pistons. I would help set up the press room and the courtside seating for the media, including setting up phones, typewriter, foul paddles and assignment cards.

Now here is where I’m going to sound really old…in those days (I can’t believe I am using that phrase), we didn’t have computers, so all the statistics were kept by hand. There was one official book that was kept by our official scorer (since 1957, Morrie Moorawnick, who, by the way, still comes around games at The Palace). Stats were transcribed onto official sheets after every quarter, at halftime and for the final box scores. We also had a running sheet that was done on an electric typewriter. These running stats recorded every event that happened during every quarter…from points, to rebounds, to shots, to fouls, to timeouts…and the time of each occurrence was recorded on these sheets as well.

The running and box scores were done on pre-printed, carbon paper, with the columns and boxes. Moorie, along with others on the scoring crew, had to fill in the boxes for the end of the quarter stats…by hand!

My job was to take the sheets back into our copy room, run them off on a mimeograph machine and then run the copies back out to the media sitting at the table courtside. It’s funny, because of computers today, the media gets their stats immediately. If there is any delay, they start to get ornery and if they don’t get them before the next quarter starts, they usually go ballistic. Back in the day, if I got the stats back out the media by the nine minute mark of the next quarter, I was flying…and they were appreciative.

During the game I had to run what were called “running stats” - updates on individual and team performances; points, steal, FG%, FT% and rebounds - to the media. These running stats were done on carbon paper that was five sheets thick and Morrie rattled the numbers off as someone else wrote it down. I then had to take the sheets to, and I will always remember this order, home radio, home reporters, visiting radio, visiting reporters and then home television, which was always on the opposite side of the court from the scorer’s table where I picked up the sheets.

I got to be pretty well known, not only with the media, both home and away, but also with a number of the season ticket holders who had seats down low enough to see me do my thing.

After games, I helped get quotes from players and coaches on each team, passed out stats, typed up the quotes and then picked up the phones, foul paddles and anything else that was used at the scorer’s table that night. I usually got home about midnight on game nights.

The greatest job ever, from high school on.

MW: What other roles have you held in the organization over the years?

Besides my current position and as a runner for the scoring crew, I have held the position of public relations assistant, basically an assistant PR director in the Pistons PR offices. I worked for Matt Dobek, the current vice president of public relations for the Pistons, from 1989 to 1993. Great years to be employed full time. Matt, by the way, has been here, consistently, since 1983.

During that tenure in the PR offices, I also got close with the assistant coaches - the Brendans, Suhr and Malone - and they asked me to break down tape for the team. Basically, I charted tendencies of opponents and also put together tapes of plays for our opponents. It was a great chance to learn the game from the best. I loved knowing tendencies of players in the league and helping players like Isiah, Joe, Dennis and the rest of the Bad Boys prepare.

The experience with the coaches, along with the PR job was extremely valuable and really helped me in my current role. I feel I have a pretty good understanding of the game and decent understanding (as much as they can be) of the media.

MW: You left the organization in 1993 but returned in 2001, ironically the exact same time that the five-year Teal Uniform Era mercifully ended. Coincidence, or not? And what differences do you see in the NBA as a whole from your first stint with the team to your second?

The Teal Era was bad for everyone involvedThere is a definite coincidence between my leaving and the Pistons going in the tank and my coming back and the Pistons being successful. Also, it’s no coincidence that we dumped the teal right around the time I came back. It’s amazing how bad the team is when I’m not around and how really good they are when I’m around. I think Joe Dumars really needs me.

Of course, I also believe that I can change the weather just by thinking about it and if I wear the right underwear, we will eventually have world peace.

I honestly believe there is NO connection…if I DID believe it, I would have also figured out, like I mentioned above, how to make my salary commiserate with my “luck charm” status.

As far as part two of the question, I think the biggest difference I see in today’s NBA versus back in the day is the fact that there aren’t any real rivalries. Back in the day, the Pistons hated the Celtics. We came to hate the Bulls as well. They were in the East and we played them often. Boston was the team we had to beat to get to the promised land. Chicago was the team that was like us and we were their Celtics. They had to get past us to get to Nirvana.

Joe Dumars on Dennis JohnsonWhen we played these teams we hated them. We hated the players, we hated the coaches, we hated the city, we hated their fans. And the players showed it.

Today, the NBA doesn’t have great rivalries…and the players all seem to like each other. I don’t know if it’s from the collective bargaining agreement or if the players stand united against ownership or what, but there isn’t any real animosity in today’s NBA. I know that’s probably not the PC thing to say, but I believe it’s true. I’d like to see some guys knocked on their butts once in a while. Would like to see a couple hard plays, just to get their attention and show who is boss.

Back in the day, there were friendships amongst players, but when they got on the court, all bets were off. Think about Magic and Isiah, Mahorn and Jeff Ruland, Laimbeer and…well, bad example because he hated everyone and everyone hated him. I liked those old days when you felt it was us against everybody.

MW: Your official title is Director of Strategic Communications, and you’ve described it as “a hybrid of public relations, communications, promotions, marketing, advertising and brand management.” It sounds like you wear a lot of different hats each week, and as such, I’m guessing you don’t have very many “typical” days. (One of my favorite posts of yours was the one from January 12 when you talked about how you woke up expecting a quiet day at the office only to learn about the whole Automotion “controversy”.) But, when everything is going smoothly, what does a routine day at the office entail for you?

First of all, thanks for reading my entries on www.pistons.com. I have really enjoyed writing them and hope to do it on a more regular basis during the playoffs.

To your question, my days are anything but typical, but I’ll give some idea of what I do. First off, I have regularly scheduled meetings every day of the week.

Mondays are with Operations/Communications and we review every event and the week past. Tuesdays it’s a Pistons executive meeting, a Web meeting and Corporate Sponsorship meeting. Wednesdays it’s a Promotions meeting. Every other Thursday, I meet with Tom Wilson and Alan Ostfield to discuss strategy and any corporate communications issues. Fridays, it’s a Detroit Shock meeting. Being at these meetings allows me to have a greater understanding of all that is going on in the organization and thus, pick and choose those issues that might be of interest to the media and help us perpetuate the message of Palace Sports & Entertainment.

Every day, I read all three local papers to start my day. I also scan CNN online every morning to get an understanding of what is making national news. Every week, I review Crain’s Detroit Business, Sports Business Journal and the Oakland Business Review. Once per month, I am involved in a NBA Communications conference call with every team in the league.

I receive about 75-100 emails per day and anywhere between 25-40 phone calls. Thank goodness for my Blackberry…it has been a real time-saver as I can be totally portable with it and stay in touch with the office.

I have an assistant and typically three college interns working for me. We do a great deal of writing, including press releases (usually two per week), stories for the Web site, media advisories and internal communications. We also do a great deal of pitching story ideas to the media. This can include phone calls or emails to every media source - local newspapers, radio and television - and then national sources, if applicable. Finally, we also do a great deal of research, staying on top of things and gathering information.

Nothing typical on a day-to-day basis, but I wouldn’t have it any other way.

MW: How, if at all, does your job change as we get closer to the playoffs?

In a nutshell, things get busier. There is heightened interest in the team and the organization and the media is searching for stories. What I try to do to prepare for this time of the year is sit down in mid-April and review what we might have done last year and come up with ideas for this year. I make a list of story ideas that the media might be interested in and then I make some calls to members of the media to get a feel for when and what they might need. Really, it’s about preparation and then about availability. The further we go, the bigger it gets and the busier it gets. I love playoff time.

MW: Since you’ve witnessed all three of the team’s NBA titles up close, I have to ask: who do you think would win a seven-game series between the old school Bad Boys and today’s current crew? What similarities do you see between the two teams, and what differences do you see?

At the beginning of the season, when Isiah had his number placed on the floor of The Palace, the media was asking this question. At that time, I wrote a blog on the question and picked the Bad Boys to win. My answer was based on the fact that the Bad Boys were a physical team with a very deep bench. I thought the Bad Boys would beat up, intimidate and pound this current team into submission. I thought the Bad Boys could throw too many weapons at the current team and would take a seven game series in five or six games.

Today, as I write this, I have changed my opinion. I believe today’s version of the Detroit Pistons would have a very good chance to win a seven-game series against the Bad Boys. The match-ups are fairly even, but I see today’s Pistons with a bit of an advantage, talent-wise. The bench was a weakness, however, in these past few months, the bench has proved to be very good. McDyess, Lindsey, Tony Delk and Delfino are playing well and now extend leads that the starters get instead of trying to hold on while the starting five rests.

The main advantage I still see the Bad Boys having is the five inches or so between everyone’s ears. I have never seen anyone with a will to win like Isiah. And I have not seen a team with a collective will, particularly in big games, like the Bad Boys.

Today, I think this series would go seven games, but I still think the Bad Boys would prevail in game seven by a score of 92-90. So close, so close, so close and a very exciting time to be a Pistons fan these days.

MW: A lot of the guys I used to cheer for in the late 80’s and early 90’s now have their numbers hanging from the Palace rafters. Personally, I think it’s already set in stone that 20 years from now we’ll also see No. 3 up there, and if things go right, maybe even a No. 1 and No. 32. In your opinion, what do you think?

Isiah ThomasRetired numbers are kind of a touchy subject with me…I think the only time you retire a number is if the person has been with the organization for a very long time and has made significant contributions to the organization and is recognized by his peers as one of the best in the industry.

I’m going to say something that is probably going to surprise some of your readers, but before this season started, I felt there should only be three numbers up in the rafters — #11, #16 and #21. I think Isiah, Bob Lanier and Dave Bing were the only three guys that truly deserved to have their numbers retired for all that they did for the criteria I mentioned above. Today, one number should be added to that list — #4 Joe Dumars. His recent induction into the Basketball Hall of Fame solidified it for me.

As far as #1 and #32…I think there still needs to be some time with the organization, and some success with the organization and maybe a Hall of Fame consideration, before we consider retiring their numbers. As it stands today, I would have to agree with your assessment that #3 will most likely be up there.

MW: I’m still feeling the sting from [the March 17th] loss to the Knicks, not just because it was a game everyone thought the Pistons were going to win, but also because it was a loss at the hands of Larry Brown, one of the biggest turncoats in Detroit sports history. But as frustrating as it was for me as a fan to hear all of those “Larry to Cleveland” rumors during last year’s playoffs, I’m guessing it was even worse for you to deal with from a public relations standpoint. Was there any animosity toward Brown (and if so, is there any left over) amongst those responsible for dealing with what had to be a public relations nightmare?

Personally, the thing with Coach Brown was a feeling of disappointment more than animosity.

I respected Coach Brown. I respected his credentials and his pedigree and I respected the position he was taking on.

He comes to the organization as a Hall of Fame guy and immediately makes an impact on your team. He has been entrusted with our very precious commodity and is expected to do everything in his power to take care of it. He preaches doing things “the right way” and pounds the philosophy into everything he talks about. I felt safe with him at the helm and he furthered this feeling when we won the championship in 2004.

I liked Coach Brown from the moment I met him at his address to our staff. He had been here about two days and he was to address our staff of about 300 people in the arena. He walked in, in his long sleeve workout shirt, sweat pants and basketball shoes. He is about my height, but for a man of his age, he is in great shape; lean and muscular. I remember I walked up before his address and introduced myself. I said, “Coach Brown, it’s a pleasure to have you here and I’m looking forward to working with you. Anything I can do to brief before you address the staff?”

He said to me, “Yes, Dave, you can call me Larry.” And then he laughed and briefly told me what HE was going to discuss with our staff. I liked him immediately.

Larry BrownI didn’t deal with him very much, that is more the job of our public relations guys Matt Dobek and Kevin Grigg, but from afar, I got to know Coach Brown as a professional who understood the business and understood basketball. He was accommodating, most times, and he really knew what being a head coach was all about. I saw him as good for our team and our organization.

But then I began to read things in the newspaper and see things on television. I didn’t know he was sick and when he went for surgery, I think we are all stunned. But I thought we hung by him and did everything we could to support him.

And then he comes back, and maybe it was too soon, but he comes back and gives us a lift. We go on a tear and go into the playoffs feeling pretty good and playing even better. And then, out of the blue the news comes that he has talked with Cleveland and then the talks with New York.

What? Are you kidding? Why now? Why this? What possibly can be gained?

He has betrayed the team. He has betrayed the organization and he has betrayed the people who have supported him throughout. In this organization, disloyalty is not looked upon very highly. And when it’s disloyalty in public, it falls even further down the hole.

For those of you who think Coach Brown wasn’t disloyal, let me put it to you this way. What would you do with an employee who came to you and said they were going to speak to your direct competitor about the potential for a very high-ranking job in their organization? AND they were going to do it when your annual earnings reports were coming out AND they were going to tell everyone and anyone that they were having these discussions?

What would you do? Exactly…you would fire the person. I think Mr. Davidson put it best when he spoke to Bernie Smilovitz right after Coach Brown was let go. Mr. Davidson basically said it just got to be too much Larry and not enough Pistons. It was all about Larry and we can’t have that. This is a team and as a team, it can’t be all about one person. And so he did the deal.

I know there is some animosity towards Coach Brown, from people in the organization and from the media. Me personally, I still respect the man and what he did for this organization, but I’m also very disappointed in his actions and the way he handled the situation. I think he could have done a much better job and avoided the drama.

MW: Last, but definitely not least, please tell us that there are no plans in the works to replace Europe’s “The Final Countdown” as the unofficial team theme song.

I can unequivocally say that there are no plans to replace The Final Countdown. It has worked for us for nearly 20 years…if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!